nach oben

Erschienen in:

16.01.2022

Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version

verfasst von: Nemanja Aleksic, Svetozar Putnik, Sara Schroter, Vedrana Pavlovic, Uros Bumbasirevic, Mina Zlatkovic, Ilija Bilbija, Milos Matkovic, Aleksa Jovanovic, Tatjana Pekmezovic, Gorica Maric

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To translate, culturally adapt and validate the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ), a disease-specific tool for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD), into Serbian language (CROQ-S).

Methods

Validation study was performed at the Clinic for Cardiac Surgery and Clinic for Cardiology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia. We included a convenience sample of 600 patients with IHD divided into four groups. Acceptability, reliability and validity of the CROQ-S were assessed.

Results

CROQ-S was acceptable to patients as demonstrated by less than 1% of missing data for each single item. Cronbach's Alpha was higher than the criterion of 0.70 for all scales in each version except the Cognitive Functioning scale which only met this criterion in the CABG pre-revascularisation version. Mean values of item-total correlations were greater than 0.30 for all scales except the Cognitive Functioning scale in both the pre-revascularisation groups. Compared to the original version, exploratory factor analysis in our study showed more factors; however, the majority of items had a factor loading greater than 0.3 on the right scale. Correlations of CROQ-S scales with the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and Seattle Angina Questionnaire showed the expected pattern whereby scales measuring similar constructs were most highly correlated.

Conclusion

CROQ-S is an acceptable, reliable and valid disease-specific instrument for measuring HRQoL in this sample of Serbian speaking patients with IHD both before and after coronary revascularisation. However, the Cognitive Functioning scale did not meet all the psychometric criteria and further validation of its responsiveness is required.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Global Health Estimates: Life expectancy and leading causes of death and disability. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates.

Moran, A. E., Forouzanfar, M. H., Roth, G., Mensah, G. A., Ezzati, M., Flaxman, A., Murray, C. J. L., & Naghavi, M. (2014). The global burden of ischemic heart disease in 1990 and 2010: The global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation, 129, 1493–1501. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004046CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ilic, M., & Ilic, I. (2017). Ischaemic heart disease mortality in Serbia, 1991–2013; a joinpoint analysis. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 146(6), 746–753. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1935_15CrossRefPubMedCentral

Khan, M. A., Hashim, M. J., Mustafa, H., Baniyas, M. Y., Al Suwaidi, S. K. B. M., Al Katheeri, R., Alblooshi, F. M. K., Almatrooshi, M. E. A. H., Alzaabi, M. E. H., Al Darmaki, R. S., & Lootah, S. N. A. H. (2020). Global epidemiology of ischemic heart disease: Results from the global burden of disease study. Cureus, 12(7), e9349. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Institute of Public Health of Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanović Batut”. (2019). Incidence and mortality of acute coronary syndrome in Serbia. Serbian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry.

Windecker, S., Kolh, P., Alfonso, F., Collet, J. P., Cremer, J., Falk, V., Filippatos, G., Hamm, C., Head, S. J., Jüni, P., Kappetein, A. P., Kastrati, A., Knuuti, J., Landmesser, U., Laufer, G., Neumann, F. J., Richter, D. J., Schauerte, P., Uva, M. S., Task Force members, et al. (2014). 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularisation: The task force on myocardial revascularisation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). European Heart Journal, 35, 2541–2619. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278CrossRefPubMed

Thuijs, D. J. F. M., Kappetein, A. P., Serruys, P. W., Mohr, F. W., Morice, M. C., Mack, M. J., Holmes, D. R., Jr., Curzen, N., Davierwala, P., Noack, T., Milojevic, M., Dawkins, K. D., da Costa, B. R., Jüni, P., Head, S. J., SYNTAX Extended Survival Investigators, et al. (2019). Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet, 394(10206), 1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-XCrossRefPubMed

Ben-Yehuda, O., Chen, S., Redfors, B., McAndrew, T., Crowley, A., Kosmidou, I., Kandzari, D. E., Puskas, J. D., Morice, M. C., Taggart, D. P., Leon, M. B., Lembo, N. J., Brown, W. M., Simonton, C. A., Dressler, O., Kappetein, A. P., Sabik, J. F., Serruys, P. W., & Stone, G. W. (2019). Impact of large periprocedural myocardial infarction on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting for left main disease: An analysis from the EXCEL trial. European Heart Journal, 40(24), 1930–1941. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz113CrossRefPubMed

Holm, N. R., Mäkikallio, T., Lindsay, M. M., Spence, M. S., Erglis, A., Menown, I. B. A., Trovik, T., Kellerth, T., Kalinauskas, G., Mogensen, L. J. H., Nielsen, P. H., Niemelä, M., Lassen, J. F., Oldroyd, K., Berg, G., Stradins, P., Walsh, S. J., Graham, A. N. J., Endresen, P. C., … NOBLE investigators. (2020). Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: Updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet, 395(10219), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1CrossRefPubMed

10.

Thompson, D. R., & Yu, C. M. (2003). Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease-I: Assessment tools. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Fatima, K., Yousuf-Ul-Islam, M., Ansari, M., Bawany, F. I., Khan, M. S., Khetpal, A., Khetpal, N., Lashari, M. N., Arshad, M. H., Amir, R. B., Kakalia, H. R., Zaidi, Q. H., Mian, S. K., & Kazani, B. (2016). Comparison of the postprocedural quality of life between coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review. Cardiology Research and Practice, 2016, 7842514. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7842514CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Währborg, P. (1999). Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 1-year follow-up in the coronary angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularization investigation (CABRI) trial. European Heart Journal, 20(9), 653–658. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7842514CrossRefPubMed

13.

Lavoie, L., Khoury, H., Welner, S., & Briere, J. B. (2016). Burden and prevention of adverse cardiac events in patients with concomitant chronic heart failure and coronary artery disease: A literature review. Cardiovascular Therapeutics, 34, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12180CrossRefPubMed

14.

Peric, V. M., Borzanovic, M. D., Stolic, R. V., Jovanovic, A. N., & Sovtic, S. R. (2006). Severity of angina as a predictor of quality of life changes six months after coronary artery bypass surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 81, 2115–2120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.033CrossRef

15.

Spertus, J. A., Nerella, R., Kettlekamp, R., House, J., Marso, S., Borkon, A. M., & Rumsfeld, J. S. (2005). Risk of restenosis and health status outcomes for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation, 111, 768–773. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000155242.70417.60CrossRefPubMed

16.

Huber, A., Oldridge, N., & Hofer, S. (2016). International SF-36 reference values in patients with ischemic heart disease. Quality of Life Research, 25(11), 2787–2798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1316-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208.CrossRef

18.

Schroter, S., & Lamping, D. L. (2006). Responsiveness of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire compared with the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 15(6), 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-5993-7CrossRefPubMed

19.

Spertus, J. A., Winder, J. A., Dewhurst, T. A., Deyo, R. A., Prodzinski, J., McDonell, M., & Fihn, S. D. (1995). Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(2), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9CrossRefPubMed

20.

Schroter, S., & Lamping, D. L. (2004). Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): Development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty. Heart, 90, 1460–1466. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.021899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Schroter, S., Miles, R., Green, S., & Jackson, M. (2017). Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot. British Medical Journal Open, 7(2), e015915. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915CrossRef

22.

Seki, S., Kato, N., Ito, N., Kinugawa, K., Ono, M., Motomura, N., Yao, A., Watanabe, M., Imai, Y., Takeda, N., Inoue, M., Hatano, M., & Kazuma, K. (2011). Translation and validation study of the Japanese versions of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ-J). European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 10, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.03.005CrossRefPubMed

23.

Shahali, S. H., Shaterzadeh, Y. M. J., Goharpey, S. H., & Rahim, F. (2008). Reliability of the Persian version of Coronary Revascularization Qutcome Questionnaire (CROQ) in cardiac patients undergoing CABG and PTCA procedures. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2, 919–924.

24.

Takousi, M. G., Schmeer, S., Manaras, I., Olympios, C. D., Fakiolas, C. N., & Makos, G. (2016). Translation, adaptation and validation of the Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire into Greek. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 15(2), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515115592250CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kim, M., Seo, J., Hwang, J. Y., & Park, K. S. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0615-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-nCrossRefPubMed

27.

Acquadro, C., Conway, K., Hareendran, A., Aaronson, N., European Regulatory Issues and Quality of Life Assessment (ERIQA). (2008). Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value Health, 11, 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00292.xCrossRefPubMed

28.

Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple Imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800102CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

30.

Aaronson, N., Alonso, J., Burnam, A., Lohr, K. N., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E., & Stein, R. E. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015291021312CrossRefPubMed

31.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed., p. 2013). SAGE.

32.

Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (1998). Factor analysis. In M. J. Staquet, R. D. Hays, & P. M. Fayers (Eds.), Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methods and practice (pp. 191–223). Oxford University Press.

33.

Li, L., Wang, H. M., & Shen, Y. (2003). Chinese SF-36 health survey: Translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(4), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.4.259CrossRef

34.

Lillevik, S. A., Schroter, S., & Hanssen, T. A. (2018). Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 17(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117715841CrossRefPubMed

35.

Pintor Pinna, P., Schroter, S., Colangelo, S., Dilaghi, B., Arpinelli, F., Fonzo, D., Torta, R., Sheiban, I., & Bobbio, M. (2002). Assessment of acceptability and comprehension of the Italian version of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ. Hippokratia, 6(Suppl. 1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/147451511559225CrossRef

Titel: Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version
verfasst von: Nemanja Aleksic
Svetozar Putnik
Sara Schroter
Vedrana Pavlovic
Uros Bumbasirevic
Mina Zlatkovic
Ilija Bilbija
Milos Matkovic
Aleksa Jovanovic
Tatjana Pekmezovic
Gorica Maric
Publikationsdatum: 16.01.2022
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03064-0

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Patient-reported outcomes associated with transition to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

A philosophical perspective on the development and application of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs)

A comparison between measurement properties of four shoulder-related outcome measures in Nepalese patients with shoulder pain

Patient-level barriers and facilitators to completion of patient-reported outcomes measures

Single item self-rated general health: SF-36 based observations from 16,910 spine surgery procedures

Correction to: Resilience to health challenges is related to different ways of thinking: mediators of physical and emotional quality of life in a heterogeneous rare-disease cohort