Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2015

01.04.2015 | CORR Insights

CORR Insights®: Metal-on-conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surfaces Have a Higher Risk of Revision Than Metal-on-highly Crosslinked Polyethylene: Results From a US Registry

verfasst von: Richard W. McCalden, MD, MPhil, FRCSC

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) has essentially supplanted conventional polyethylene for use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) during the past decade. There now exists good evidence to demonstrate a clear reduction in femoral head penetration (and presumably polyethylene wear) and periprosthetic osteolysis associated with the use XLPE compared to conventional polyethylene in THA [2, 3]. While the annual reports of Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry continue to show the clinical benefits of XLPE (demonstrating a reduction in revision rates) [1], other investigators have not demonstrated a clear reduction in revision rates with the use of XLPE at mid-term followup [4]. …
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2262–2277.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2262–2277.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuzyk PR, Saccone M, Sprague S, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene for total hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:593–600.CrossRefPubMed Kuzyk PR, Saccone M, Sprague S, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene for total hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:593–600.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Paxton E, Cafri G, Havelin L, Stea S, Pallisó F, Graves S, Hoeffel D, Sedrakyan A. Risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty: Metal-on-conventional polyethylene compared with metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces: International results from six registries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96 Suppl 1:19–24.CrossRefPubMed Paxton E, Cafri G, Havelin L, Stea S, Pallisó F, Graves S, Hoeffel D, Sedrakyan A. Risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty: Metal-on-conventional polyethylene compared with metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces: International results from six registries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96 Suppl 1:19–24.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
CORR Insights®: Metal-on-conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surfaces Have a Higher Risk of Revision Than Metal-on-highly Crosslinked Polyethylene: Results From a US Registry
verfasst von
Richard W. McCalden, MD, MPhil, FRCSC
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4168-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.