30.07.2022 | Correction
Correction to: Effectiveness of second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients taking antithrombotic agents: a multicenter propensity score matching analysis
Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer | Ausgabe 5/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenExcerpt
In the original publication of the article, the Table 4 has been set incorrectly. The correct Table 4 is given in this correction. In addition, the ORCID iD of the first author, Taro Iwatsubo (0000-0001-7721-8292) is given in this correction.
BEST-J score
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predicted bleeding rate
|
> Intermediate (6.1%)
|
> High (11.4%)
|
> Very high (29.7%)
|
||||||
Delayed bleeding, n (%)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p value
|
Delayed bleeding, n (%)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p value
|
Delayed bleeding, n (%)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p value
|
|
Non-SLE group
|
16/158 (10.1)
|
Reference
|
13/107 (12.1)
|
Reference
|
6/31 (19.3)
|
Reference
|
|||
SLE group
|
10/175 (5.7)
|
0.538 (0.211–1.309)
|
0.154
|
7/126 (5.6)
|
0.426 (0.138–1.205)
|
0.100
|
4/30 (13.3)
|
0.645 (0.119–3.103)
|
0.731
|
SAMURAI model
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predicted bleeding rate
|
> 5%
|
> 10%
|
> 25%
|
||||||
Delayed bleeding, n (%)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p value
|
Delayed bleeding, n (%)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p value
|
Delayed bleeding, n (%)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p value
|
|
Non-SLE group
|
15/117 (12.8)
|
Reference
|
12/76 (15.8)
|
Reference
|
4/21 (19.0)
|
Reference
|
|||
SLE group
|
7/122 (5.7)
|
0.415 (0.137–1.134)
|
0.073
|
6/76 (7.9)
|
0.459 (0.133–1.416)
|
0.209
|
5/20 (25.0)
|
1.404 (0.249–8.494)
|
0.719
|