Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 5/2022

27.03.2022 | Correction

Correction to: How to strengthen the management of acute diverticulitis: the utility of the WSES classification—a prospective single-center observational study

verfasst von: Juan Carlos Sebastián-Tomás, Segundo Angel Gómez-Abril, Tomás Ripollés, Andrea Manrique, Teresa Torres-Sanchez, María Jesús Martínez-Pérez

Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

In this article, Table 3 unfortunately contained some mistakes in the data regarding outpatient treatment. The correct version of the Table 3 is given below:
Table 3
Clinical and analytical parameters, treatment modalities, and outcomes comparison between different WSES stages for ALCD
 
Total (n = 230)
0 (n = 70)
1A (n = 122)
1B (n = 16)
2A (n = 12)
2B (n = 6)
3 (n = 3)
4 (n = 1)
Abdominal pain, n (%)
230 (100%)
70 (100%)
122 (100%)
16 (100%)
12 (100%)
6 (100%)
3 (100%)
Yes
Days of abdominal pain, median (P25–P75)
2 (1–3)
2 (1–3)#
2 (1–3)§
4 (1–6.25)§
3 (2–7)*
1 (1–1.50)†,‡
2 (1–11.50)
3
Abdominal guarding, (%)
128 (55.65%)
35 (50%)§
65 (53.28%)
12 (75%)
6 (50%)§
6 (100%)*,#
3 (100%)
Yes
Fever > 38 °C, n (%)
49 (21.30%)
12 (17.14%)
27 (22.13%)
3 (18.75%)
5 (41.67%)
1 (16.67%)
2 (66.67%)
Yes
HR > 90 bpm, n (%)
39 (16.96%)
10 (14.29%)
21 (17.21%)
4 (25%)
1 (8.33%)
1 (16.67%)
1 (33.33%)*
Yes
WBC, median (P25–P75)
11.9 (9.55–14.5)
10.4 (8.3–13.7)†,‡,#,¶
12.2 (9.7–14.2)*,#,¶
13.9 (10.5–17.6)*
14.3 (12.9–17.8)*,†
13.1 (11.4–15.5)
17.9 (17.8–)*,†,§
12.6
Neutrophils (%), median (P25–P75)
75 (68.15–79.70)
72.25 (68.78–76.05)†,‡,#,§,¶
78.30 (74.83–80.80)*,§,¶
75.70 (63.73–87.28)*
79.40 (76.35–81.55)*,§,¶
86.95 (81.10–91.30)*,†,#
84.75 (82.6–)*,†,#
93.7
Lymphocytes (%), median (P25–P75)
15 (11.40–20.43)
17.35 (15.35–22.15)†,‡,#,§,¶
11.85 (9.33–15.25)*,§,¶
14.20 (11.90–21.35)*,§,¶
11.70 (8.05–14.60)*
8.30 (3.98–12.55)*,†,‡
8 (7.90–)*,†,‡
5.4
NLR, median (P25–P75)
5 (3.31–7.02)
4.16 (3.15–4.89)†,‡,#,§,¶
6.60 (5.06–8.36)*,§,¶
5.33 (2.63–6.39)*
6.63 (5.23–10.25)*
10.86 (6.65–23.44)*,†,‡
10.54 (10–)*,†
17
CRP, median (P25–P75)
68 (29–126)
45.50 (14–95.25)†,#,¶
70 (35.25–124.75)*,#,¶
72.50 (30.75–108.25)
149 (105–201)*,†,¶
93 (5–253.25)
252 (208–)*,†,‡,#
151
Fibrinogen, median (P25–P75)
632 (538.50–690.75)
551 (517.25–704.05)†,¶
673 (599–715.75)*
635 (513–677)
659 (531.50–740.50)
631 (355.75–869.75)
867 (668–)*,†,‡
736
INR, median (P25–P75)
1.12 (1.07–1.21)
1.13 (1.09–1.18)#,¶
1.16 (1.08–1.28)#,¶
1.14 (1.05–1.22)#,¶
1.21 (1.15–1.29)*,†,‡
1.15 (1.04–1.24)
1.27 (1.26–)*,†,‡
1.32
Serum Albumin, median (P25–P75)
4.4 (4.1.–4.6)
4.2 (4–4.68)#
4.35 (4.10–4.50)#
4.35 (4.20–4.60)
3.9 (3.25–4.45)*,†
4 (3.78–4.65)
4.15 (4–)
3.7
Serum Creatinine, median (P25–P75)
0.84 (0.73–0.94)
0.80 (0.75–0.87)
0.87 (0.75–0.95)
0.78 (0.68–0.89)
0.70 (0.62–0.98)
0.90 (0.69–0.99)
1.28 (0.86–)*,†
0.88
Admission to hospital, n (%)
103 (44.78%)
17 (24.29%)†,‡,#,§,¶
50 (40.98%)*,‡,#,§
14 (87.50%)*,†
12 (100%)*,†
6 (100%)*,†
3 (100%)*
Yes
Length of stay (days), median (P25–P75)
5 (4–7.50)
5 (4–6.75)#,¶
5 (4–6)#,§,¶
5 (5–6)#
12 (6.50–22)*,†,‡
6.5 (5.75–15)
9 (8–)*,†
9
Outpatient treatment, n (%)
127 (55.22%)
53 (75.71%)†,‡,#,§,¶
72 (59.02%)*,‡,#,§
2 (12.50%)*,†
0 (0%)*
0 (0%)*,†
0 (0%)*
No
Readmission, n (%)
19 (8.26%)
3 (4.29%)
14 (11.48%)
2 (12.50%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
No
 Previously admitted/outpatient
7/12
1/2
4/10
2/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
–/–
Percutaneous drainage, n (%)
8 (3.47%)
0 (0%)#
3 (2.46%)#
0 (0%)#
5 (41.67%)*,†,‡
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
No
Emergency surgery, n (%)
5 (2.17%)
0 (0%)
1 (0.82%)#,¶
0 (0%)
2 (16.67%)*,†
0 (0%)
1 (33.33%)*,†
Yes
Asymptomatic 1-month, n (%)
189 (82.17%)
57 (81.42%)
104 (85.25%)#
13 (81.25%)
5 (41.66%)
4 (66.66%)
3 (100%)
Yes
Recurrence 1-year, n (%)
57 (27.78%)
18 (25.71%)
28 (22.95%)
4 (25%)
5 (41.66%)
2 (33.33%)
0 (0%)
No
Lower GI endoscopy, n (%)
29 (12.61%)
26 (37.14)
43 (35.25%)
7 (43.75%)
2 (16.67%)
4 (66.67%)
1 (33.33%)
No
Neoplasm during follow-up, n (%)
1 (0.43%)
1 (1.43%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
No
Elective surgery, n (%)
12 (5.22%)
2 (2.86%)#
3 (2.70%)#
2 (12.50%)
5 (41.67%)*,†
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
No
Chi-square test (categorical variables) and Mann–Whitney U test (continuous variables) results: *p value < 0.05 compared with 0, p value < 0.05 compared with 1A, p value < 0.05 compared with 1B, #p value < 0.05 compared with 2A, §p value < 0.05 compared with 2B, p value < 0.05 compared with 3. Stage 4 (n = 1) was not included in the analysis
HR heart rate, SBP systolic blood pressure, WBC white blood cells, NLR neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, CRP C reactive protein, INR international normalized ratio, GI for gastrointestinal
Metadaten
Titel
Correction to: How to strengthen the management of acute diverticulitis: the utility of the WSES classification—a prospective single-center observational study
verfasst von
Juan Carlos Sebastián-Tomás
Segundo Angel Gómez-Abril
Tomás Ripollés
Andrea Manrique
Teresa Torres-Sanchez
María Jesús Martínez-Pérez
Publikationsdatum
27.03.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01946-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 5/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.