Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nutrition 6/2020

Open Access 09.07.2020 | Correction

Correction to: Low-phytate wholegrain bread instead of high-phytate wholegrain bread in a total diet context did not improve iron status of healthy Swedish females: a 12 week, randomized, parallel-design intervention study

verfasst von: Michael Hoppe, Alastair B. Ross, Cecilia Svelander, Ann‑Sofie Sandberg, Lena Hulthén

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nutrition | Ausgabe 6/2020

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
The original article can be found online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00394-018-1722-1.

Correction to: European Journal of Nutrition (2019) 58:853–864 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00394-018-1722-1

Due to author error the paper was published with a statistical fault.
The “Results” section in the abstract should read: “Fifty-five females completed the study. There was a significant difference in change over time in total body iron stores between the two groups (p < 0.035). In the low-phytate bread group (n = 24) there were significant within-group decreases in both ferritin (mean 12%; from 32 ± 7 to 27 ± 6 μg/L, geometric mean ± SEM, p < 0.018) and total body iron (mean 12%; from 6.9 ± 1.4 to 5.4 ± 1.1 mg/kg, p < 0.035). Plasma alkylresorcinols indicated that most subjects complied with the intervention”.
The first sentence in the “Conclusions” section in the abstract should read: “In Swedish females of reproductive age, no statistically significant difference in iron status was detected after 12 weeks of high-phytate wholegrain bread consumption”.
The “Post-intervention iron status” Result section should read: “Following 12 weeks of intervention there was a significant difference in change over time in total body iron stores between the two groups (p < 0.035, Table 1). Within the low-phytate bread group there were a decrease in S-ferritin (p < 0.018) and amount of body iron reserves (p < 0.035).”
Table 1
Data at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention
 
High-phytate bread group (n = 31)
Low-phytate bread group (n = 24)
p value (between groups)
Baseline
Post-intervention
p value (within group)
Baseline
Post-intervention
p value (within group)
BMI (kg/m2)
22.6 ± 0.6
22.8 ± 0.6
0.326
21.7 ± 0.5
21.8 ± 0.5
0.145
0.774
Hb (g/L)
134 ± 1
136 ± 1
0.155
132 ± 1
134 ± 1
0.178
0.682
Hepcidin (ng/mL)
11.8 ± 2.4
11.8 ± 2.0
0.704
13.6 ± 2.7
9.5 ± 2.8
0.433
0.343
Ferritin (µg/L)
31 ± 4
32 ± 4
0.859
33 ± 3
27 ± 6
0.018
0.251
TfR (mg/L)
2.7 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.1
0.409
2.9 ± 0.1
2.9 ± 0.6
0.489
0.491
Body Fea (mg/kg)
7.0 ± 0.4
7.0 ± 0.5
0.738
6.9 ± 0.4
5.4 ± 0.5
0.035
0.035
Alkyl-resorcinols (mmol/L)
351 ± 52
467 ± 77
0.120
266 ± 68
522 ± 127
0.002
0.139
C17:C21 ratio
0.16 ± 0.02
0.23 ± 0.02
0.018
0.15 ± 0.02
0.29 ± 0.03
0.001
0.051
Subjects were allocated into two groups that either received (on a daily basis) 200 g wholegrain rye flour-based bread natural high in phytates or 200 g dephytinized wholegrain rye flour-based bread. Evaluation was done at baseline and after 12 weeks
Values represent geometric mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM, as italicized values)
Bold values indicate the level of significance p ≤ 0.05
aCalculation of body iron reserves was based on the ratio between soluble transferrin receptor and serum ferritin [27]
Also, Table 1 and 2 should state the actual p values, and not just NS (not significant). Thus, revised tables are provided. Accordingly, the p value for change over time in dietary phytate-P intake for the high-phytate bread group in Fig. 2 should state “p = 0.106”.
Table 2
Whole grain intake at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention
 
High-phytate bread group (n = 31)
Low-phytate bread group (n = 24)
p value (between groups)
Baseline
During intervention
p value3 (within group)
Baseline
During intervention
p value (within group)
Total WG intake (g/day)
75 ± 47
111 ± 27
0.010
81 ± 51
112 ± 35
0.076
0.696
WG intake in connection with main meals (g/day)
69 ± 43
90 ± 34
0.046
76 ± 49
93 ± 41
0.263
0.622
WG intake when excluding WG from bread (g/day)
42 ± 28
31 ± 28
0.014
43 ± 39
34 ± 34
0.003
0.350
WG intake from total dietary bread (g/day)
27 ± 25
76 ± 6
0.001
30 ± 23
76 ± 6
0.001
0.760
WG intake from bread alone in connection with main meals (g/day)
23 ± 21
55 ± 19
0.001
24 ± 23
55 ± 18
0.001
0.629
Data are presented as geometric mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM, as italicized values)
Bold values indicate the level of significance p ≤ 0.05
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Neuer Inhalt

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Metadaten
Titel
Correction to: Low-phytate wholegrain bread instead of high-phytate wholegrain bread in a total diet context did not improve iron status of healthy Swedish females: a 12 week, randomized, parallel-design intervention study
verfasst von
Michael Hoppe
Alastair B. Ross
Cecilia Svelander
Ann‑Sofie Sandberg
Lena Hulthén
Publikationsdatum
09.07.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nutrition / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1436-6207
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-020-02286-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

European Journal of Nutrition 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.