Correction to: multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level
verfasst von:
Ines Rombach, Alastair M Gray, Crispin Jenkinson, David W Murray, Oliver Rivero-Arias
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that the following notation wasn’t used consistently. The original article has been corrected.
The correct notation is as follows:
Unit-nonresponse
Item-nonresponse
Anzeige
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Correction to: multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level
verfasst von
Ines Rombach Alastair M Gray Crispin Jenkinson David W Murray Oliver Rivero-Arias