Correction to: Semi-automatic segmentation from intrinsically-registered 18F-FDG–PET/MRI for treatment response assessment in a breast cancer cohort: comparison to manual DCE–MRI
verfasst von:
Maren Marie Sjaastad Andreassen, Pål Erik Goa, Torill Eidhammer Sjøbakk, Roja Hedayati, Hans Petter Eikesdal, Callie Deng, Agnes Østlie, Steinar Lundgren, Tone Frost Bathen, Neil Peter Jerome
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in Fig. 6.
The corrected Fig. 6 is placed in the following page.
Fig. 6
Relationship between the resulting metrics from manual DCE and GMM–PET for a ADC mean for untreated lesions (r = 0.866, p < 0.001) and b treated lesions (r = 0.895, p < 0.001) and m tumor area from c untreated (r = 0.870, p < 0.0001) and d treated (r = 0.928, p < 0.001) lesions. Red identity lines included show that area from GMM–PET is slightly smaller than from manual DCE
×
Anzeige
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mit e.Med Radiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Radiologie, den Premium-Inhalten der radiologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Radiologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Correction to: Semi-automatic segmentation from intrinsically-registered 18F-FDG–PET/MRI for treatment response assessment in a breast cancer cohort: comparison to manual DCE–MRI
verfasst von
Maren Marie Sjaastad Andreassen Pål Erik Goa Torill Eidhammer Sjøbakk Roja Hedayati Hans Petter Eikesdal Callie Deng Agnes Østlie Steinar Lundgren Tone Frost Bathen Neil Peter Jerome
