Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2017

11.10.2016 | Original Paper

Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment

verfasst von: Zhi-geng Jin, Zhuo-qi Zhang, Li-min Jing, Yu-jie Wei, Jiao Zhang, Jian-ping Luo, Sheng-li Yang, Dong-xing Ma, Ying Liu, Wei Han, Yong Yang, Hui-liang Liu

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) for coronary lesion assessment by directly comparing with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). From October 2014 to December 2015, 40 patients (58 lesions) who had undergone both DARCA and IVUS were included in the image analysis. The minimum lumen diameter (MLD), lesion length, reference vessel diameter (RVD) and percent diameter stenosis at the same lesion, were identified and assessed. Significant correlation with IVUS was found for DARCA in either lesion length (r = 0.90, P < 0.001) or RVD (r = 0.81, P < 0.001) comparison. DARCA had fair correlation with IVUS for both MLD (r = 0.65, P < 0.001) and diameter stenosis (r = 0.48, P < 0.001). From the Bland–Altman plots, there was a good agreement between DARCA and IVUS regarding MLD (mean difference: −0.23 mm, 95 % limits of agreement: −0.96 to 0.50 mm) and RVD (mean difference: −0.15 mm, 95 % limits of agreement: −0.85 to 0.55 mm), while lesser agreement was found on lesion length (mean difference: −3.39 mm, 95 % limits of agreement: −12.63 to 5.85 mm) and diameter stenosis (mean difference: 4.82 %, 95 % limits of agreement: −17.05 to 26.68 %). There is an adequate correlation and agreement between DARCA and IVUS in coronary lesion assessment.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, Bittl JA, Byrne JG, Fletcher BJ, Fonarow GC, Lange RA, Levine GN, Maddox TM, Naidu SS, Ohman EM, Smith PK (2014) 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1929–1949. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.017 CrossRefPubMed Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, Bittl JA, Byrne JG, Fletcher BJ, Fonarow GC, Lange RA, Levine GN, Maddox TM, Naidu SS, Ohman EM, Smith PK (2014) 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1929–1949. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2014.​07.​017 CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Vlodaver Z, Frech R, Van Tassel RA, Edwards JE (1973) Correlation of the antemortem coronary arteriogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 47:162–169CrossRefPubMed Vlodaver Z, Frech R, Van Tassel RA, Edwards JE (1973) Correlation of the antemortem coronary arteriogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 47:162–169CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz JN, Kong Y, Hackel DB, Bartel AG (1975) Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 36:174–178CrossRefPubMed Schwartz JN, Kong Y, Hackel DB, Bartel AG (1975) Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 36:174–178CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat De Scheerder I, De Man F, Herregods MC, Wilczek K, Barrios L, Raymenants E, Desmet W, De Geest H, Piessens J (1994) Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. Am Heart J 127:243–251CrossRefPubMed De Scheerder I, De Man F, Herregods MC, Wilczek K, Barrios L, Raymenants E, Desmet W, De Geest H, Piessens J (1994) Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. Am Heart J 127:243–251CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mintz GS, Painter JA, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Chuang YC, Bucher TA, Sokolowicz LE, Leon MB (1995) Atherosclerosis in angiographically “normal” coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:1479–1485CrossRefPubMed Mintz GS, Painter JA, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Chuang YC, Bucher TA, Sokolowicz LE, Leon MB (1995) Atherosclerosis in angiographically “normal” coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:1479–1485CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD (2004) Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:167–174. doi:10.1002/ccd.20036 CrossRefPubMed Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD (2004) Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:167–174. doi:10.​1002/​ccd.​20036 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia JA, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Klein AJ, Carroll JD (2007) Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70:190–196. doi:10.1002/ccd.21054 CrossRefPubMed Garcia JA, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Klein AJ, Carroll JD (2007) Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70:190–196. doi:10.​1002/​ccd.​21054 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, Van Den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD (2009) Rotational versus standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73:753–761. doi:10.1002/ccd.21918 CrossRefPubMed Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, Van Den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD (2009) Rotational versus standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73:753–761. doi:10.​1002/​ccd.​21918 CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudson PA, Klein AJ, Kim MS, Wink O, Hansgen A, Casserly IP, Messenger JC, James Chen SY, Carroll JD, Garcia JA (2010) A novel dual-axis rotational coronary angiography evaluation of coronary artery disease–case presentation and review. Clin Cardiol 33:E16–E19. doi:10.1002/clc.20651 CrossRefPubMed Hudson PA, Klein AJ, Kim MS, Wink O, Hansgen A, Casserly IP, Messenger JC, James Chen SY, Carroll JD, Garcia JA (2010) A novel dual-axis rotational coronary angiography evaluation of coronary artery disease–case presentation and review. Clin Cardiol 33:E16–E19. doi:10.​1002/​clc.​20651 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SY, Hansgen A, Carroll JD (2011) Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography versus standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:820–827. doi:10.1002/ccd.22804 CrossRefPubMed Klein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SY, Hansgen A, Carroll JD (2011) Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography versus standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:820–827. doi:10.​1002/​ccd.​22804 CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez-Menchero AE, Diaz JF, Sanchez-Gonzalez C, Cardenal R, Sanghvi AB, Roa-Garrido J, Rodriguez-Lopez JL (2012) Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 65:434–439. doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2011.12.014 CrossRef Gomez-Menchero AE, Diaz JF, Sanchez-Gonzalez C, Cardenal R, Sanghvi AB, Roa-Garrido J, Rodriguez-Lopez JL (2012) Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 65:434–439. doi:10.​1016/​j.​recesp.​2011.​12.​014 CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Grech M, Debono J, Xuereb RG, Fenech A, Grech V (2012) A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:576–580. doi:10.1002/ccd.23415 CrossRefPubMed Grech M, Debono J, Xuereb RG, Fenech A, Grech V (2012) A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:576–580. doi:10.​1002/​ccd.​23415 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Giuberti RS, Caixeta A, Carvalho AC, Soares MM, Abreu-Silva EO, Pestana JO, Silva Junior HT, Vaz ML, Genereux P, Fernandes RW (2014) A randomized trial comparing dual axis rotational versus conventional coronary angiography in a population with a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. J Interv Cardiol 27:456–464. doi:10.1111/joic.12148 CrossRefPubMed Giuberti RS, Caixeta A, Carvalho AC, Soares MM, Abreu-Silva EO, Pestana JO, Silva Junior HT, Vaz ML, Genereux P, Fernandes RW (2014) A randomized trial comparing dual axis rotational versus conventional coronary angiography in a population with a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. J Interv Cardiol 27:456–464. doi:10.​1111/​joic.​12148 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, Pinto FJ, Rosenfield K, Siegel RJ, Tuzcu EM, Yock PG (2001) American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1478–1492. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01175-5 CrossRefPubMed Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, Pinto FJ, Rosenfield K, Siegel RJ, Tuzcu EM, Yock PG (2001) American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1478–1492. doi:10.​1016/​S0735-1097(01)01175-5 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2–correlation between subjects. BMJ 310(6980):633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2–correlation between subjects. BMJ 310(6980):633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Unzue Vallejo L, Delcan Dominguez JL, Alegria Barrero A, Medina Peralta J, Rodriguez Rodrigo FJ, Rodriguez-Lopez JL (2013) Coronary lesions quantification with dual-axis rotational coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 14:37–40. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2012.11.001 CrossRefPubMed Unzue Vallejo L, Delcan Dominguez JL, Alegria Barrero A, Medina Peralta J, Rodriguez Rodrigo FJ, Rodriguez-Lopez JL (2013) Coronary lesions quantification with dual-axis rotational coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 14:37–40. doi:10.​1016/​j.​carrev.​2012.​11.​001 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chae JS, Brisken AF, Maurer G, Siegel RJ (1992) Geometric accuracy of intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 5:577–587CrossRefPubMed Chae JS, Brisken AF, Maurer G, Siegel RJ (1992) Geometric accuracy of intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 5:577–587CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat von Birgelen C, Kutryk MJ, Gil R, Ozaki Y, Di Mario C, Roelandt JR, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW (1996) Quantification of the minimal luminal cross-sectional area after coronary stenting by two- and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound versus edge detection and videodensitometry. Am J Cardiol 78:520–525CrossRef von Birgelen C, Kutryk MJ, Gil R, Ozaki Y, Di Mario C, Roelandt JR, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW (1996) Quantification of the minimal luminal cross-sectional area after coronary stenting by two- and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound versus edge detection and videodensitometry. Am J Cardiol 78:520–525CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubo T, Akasaka T, Shite J, Suzuki T, Uemura S, Yu B, Kozuma K, Kitabata H, Shinke T, Habara M, Saito Y, Hou J, Suzuki N, Zhang S (2013) OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:1095–1104. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.04.014 CrossRefPubMed Kubo T, Akasaka T, Shite J, Suzuki T, Uemura S, Yu B, Kozuma K, Kitabata H, Shinke T, Habara M, Saito Y, Hou J, Suzuki N, Zhang S (2013) OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:1095–1104. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcmg.​2013.​04.​014 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris PD, Taylor J, Boutong S, Brett S, Louis A, Heppenstall J, Morton AC, Gunn JP (2016) When is rotational angiography superior to conventional single-plane angiography for planning coronary angioplasty? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87:E104–E112. doi:10.1002/ccd.26032 CrossRefPubMed Morris PD, Taylor J, Boutong S, Brett S, Louis A, Heppenstall J, Morton AC, Gunn JP (2016) When is rotational angiography superior to conventional single-plane angiography for planning coronary angioplasty? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87:E104–E112. doi:10.​1002/​ccd.​26032 CrossRefPubMed
27.
Metadaten
Titel
Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment
verfasst von
Zhi-geng Jin
Zhuo-qi Zhang
Li-min Jing
Yu-jie Wei
Jiao Zhang
Jian-ping Luo
Sheng-li Yang
Dong-xing Ma
Ying Liu
Wei Han
Yong Yang
Hui-liang Liu
Publikationsdatum
11.10.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0999-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.