Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2019

07.03.2019 | Urogenital

Correlation between MRI phenotypes and a genomic classifier of prostate cancer: preliminary findings

verfasst von: Andrei S. Purysko, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Omar Y. Mian, Sarah Sittenfeld, Elai Davicioni, Marguerite du Plessis, Christine Buerki, Jennifer Bullen, Lin Li, Anant Madabhushi, Andrew Stephenson, Eric A. Klein

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

We sought to evaluate the correlation between MRI phenotypes of prostate cancer as defined by PI-RADS v2 and the Decipher Genomic Classifier (used to estimate the risk of early metastases).

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study included 72 nonconsecutive men with prostate cancer who underwent MRI before radical prostatectomy performed between April 2014 and August 2017 and whose MRI registered lesions were microdissected from radical prostatectomy specimens and then profiled using Decipher (89 lesions; 23 MRI invisible [PI-RADS v2 scores ≤ 2] and 66 MRI visible [PI-RADS v2 scores ≥ 3]). Linear regression analysis was used to assess clinicopathologic and MRI predictors of Decipher results; correlation coefficients (r) were used to quantify these associations. AUC was used to determine whether PI-RADS v2 could accurately distinguish between low-risk (Decipher score < 0.45) and intermediate-/high-risk (Decipher score ≥ 0.45) lesions.

Results

MRI-visible lesions had higher Decipher scores than MRI-invisible lesions (mean difference 0.22; 95% CI 0.13, 0.32; p < 0.0001); most MRI-invisible lesions (82.6%) were low risk. PI-RADS v2 had moderate correlation with Decipher (r = 0.54) and had higher accuracy (AUC 0.863) than prostate cancer grade groups (AUC 0.780) in peripheral zone lesions (95% CI for difference 0.01, 0.15; p = 0.018).

Conclusions

MRI phenotypes of prostate cancer are positively correlated with Decipher risk groups. Although PI-RADS v2 can accurately distinguish between lesions classified by Decipher as low or intermediate/high risk, some lesions classified as intermediate/high risk by Decipher are invisible on MRI.

Key Points

• MRI phenotypes of prostate cancer as defined by PI-RADS v2 positively correlated with a genomic classifier that estimates the risk of early metastases.
• Most but not all MRI-invisible lesions had a low risk for early metastases according to the genomic classifier.
• MRI could be used in conjunction with genomic assays to identify lesions that may carry biological potential for early metastases.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll PH, Mohler JL (2018) NCCN guidelines updates: prostate cancer and prostate cancer early detection. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16:620–623CrossRefPubMed Carroll PH, Mohler JL (2018) NCCN guidelines updates: prostate cancer and prostate cancer early detection. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16:620–623CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moschini M, Spahn M, Mattei A, Cheville J, Karnes RJ (2016) Incorporation of tissue-based genomic biomarkers into localized prostate cancer clinics. BMC Med 14:67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moschini M, Spahn M, Mattei A, Cheville J, Karnes RJ (2016) Incorporation of tissue-based genomic biomarkers into localized prostate cancer clinics. BMC Med 14:67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Erho N, Crisan A, Vergara IA et al (2013) Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy. PLoS One 8:e66855CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Erho N, Crisan A, Vergara IA et al (2013) Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy. PLoS One 8:e66855CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Karnes RJ, Bergstralh EJ, Davicioni E (2013) Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population. J Urol 190:2047–2053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karnes RJ, Bergstralh EJ, Davicioni E (2013) Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population. J Urol 190:2047–2053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein EA, Yousefi K, Haddad Z et al (2015) A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol 67:778–786CrossRefPubMed Klein EA, Yousefi K, Haddad Z et al (2015) A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol 67:778–786CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B et al (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313:390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B et al (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313:390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 378:1767–1777CrossRefPubMed Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 378:1767–1777CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Borofsky S, George AK, Gaur S et al (2018) What are we missing? False-negative cancers at multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate. Radiology 286:186–195CrossRefPubMed Borofsky S, George AK, Gaur S et al (2018) What are we missing? False-negative cancers at multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate. Radiology 286:186–195CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Mendrinos S, Babb JS, Taneja SS (2012) Prostate cancer foci detected on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging are histologically distinct from those not detected. J Urol 187:2032–2038CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Mendrinos S, Babb JS, Taneja SS (2012) Prostate cancer foci detected on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging are histologically distinct from those not detected. J Urol 187:2032–2038CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dianat SS, Carter HB, Pienta KJ et al (2015) Magnetic resonance-invisible versus magnetic resonance-visible prostate cancer in active surveillance: a preliminary report on disease outcomes. Urology 85:147–153CrossRefPubMed Dianat SS, Carter HB, Pienta KJ et al (2015) Magnetic resonance-invisible versus magnetic resonance-visible prostate cancer in active surveillance: a preliminary report on disease outcomes. Urology 85:147–153CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho R, Siddiqui MM, George AK et al (2016) Preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predicts biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. PLoS One 11:e0157313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ho R, Siddiqui MM, George AK et al (2016) Preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predicts biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. PLoS One 11:e0157313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SY, Oh YT, Jung DC et al (2016) Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results. Eur Radiol 26:2502–2509CrossRefPubMed Park SY, Oh YT, Jung DC et al (2016) Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results. Eur Radiol 26:2502–2509CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiradkar R, Ghose S, Jambor I et al (2018) Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: preliminary findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 48:1626–1636CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shiradkar R, Ghose S, Jambor I et al (2018) Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: preliminary findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 48:1626–1636CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRefPubMed Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Penzias G, Janowczyk A, Singanamalli A et al (2016) AutoStitcher: an automated program for efficient and robust reconstruction of digitized whole histological sections from tissue fragments. Sci Rep 6:29906CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Penzias G, Janowczyk A, Singanamalli A et al (2016) AutoStitcher: an automated program for efficient and robust reconstruction of digitized whole histological sections from tissue fragments. Sci Rep 6:29906CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Li L, Pahwa S, Penzias G et al (2017) Co-registration of ex vivo surgical histopathology and in vivo T2 weighted MRI of the prostate via multi-scale spectral embedding representation. Sci Rep 7:8717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li L, Pahwa S, Penzias G et al (2017) Co-registration of ex vivo surgical histopathology and in vivo T2 weighted MRI of the prostate via multi-scale spectral embedding representation. Sci Rep 7:8717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedland SJ, Choeurng V, Howard L et al (2016) Utilization of a genomic classifier for prediction of metastasis following salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 70:588–596CrossRefPubMed Freedland SJ, Choeurng V, Howard L et al (2016) Utilization of a genomic classifier for prediction of metastasis following salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 70:588–596CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Obuchowski NA (1997) Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 53:567–578CrossRefPubMed Obuchowski NA (1997) Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 53:567–578CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Karnes RJ, Choeurng V, Ross AE et al (2018) Validation of a genomic risk classifier to predict prostate cancer-specific mortality in men with adverse pathologic features. Eur Urol 73:168–175CrossRefPubMed Karnes RJ, Choeurng V, Ross AE et al (2018) Validation of a genomic risk classifier to predict prostate cancer-specific mortality in men with adverse pathologic features. Eur Urol 73:168–175CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Spratt DE, Dai DLY, Den RB et al (2018) Performance of a prostate cancer genomic classifier in predicting metastasis in men with prostate-specific antigen persistence postprostatectomy. Eur Urol 74:107–114CrossRefPubMed Spratt DE, Dai DLY, Den RB et al (2018) Performance of a prostate cancer genomic classifier in predicting metastasis in men with prostate-specific antigen persistence postprostatectomy. Eur Urol 74:107–114CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S et al (2017) Individual patient-level meta-analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high-risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol 35:1991–1998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S et al (2017) Individual patient-level meta-analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high-risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol 35:1991–1998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein EA, Santiago-Jiménez M, Yousefi K et al (2017) Molecular analysis of low grade prostate cancer using a genomic classifier of metastatic potential. J Urol 197:122–128CrossRefPubMed Klein EA, Santiago-Jiménez M, Yousefi K et al (2017) Molecular analysis of low grade prostate cancer using a genomic classifier of metastatic potential. J Urol 197:122–128CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Den RB, Yousefi K, Trabulsi EJ et al (2015) Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 33:944–951CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Den RB, Yousefi K, Trabulsi EJ et al (2015) Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 33:944–951CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Beksac AT, Cumarasamy S, Falagario U et al (2018) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging features identify aggressive prostate cancer at the phenotypic and transcriptomic level. J Urol 200:1241–1249CrossRefPubMed Beksac AT, Cumarasamy S, Falagario U et al (2018) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging features identify aggressive prostate cancer at the phenotypic and transcriptomic level. J Urol 200:1241–1249CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Radtke JP, Takhar M, Bonekamp D et al (2018) Transcriptome wide analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and matching surgical specimens from high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: the target must be hit. Eur Urol Focus 4:540–546CrossRefPubMed Radtke JP, Takhar M, Bonekamp D et al (2018) Transcriptome wide analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and matching surgical specimens from high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: the target must be hit. Eur Urol Focus 4:540–546CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Boutros PC, Fraser M, Harding NJ et al (2015) Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer. Nat Genet 47:736–745CrossRefPubMed Boutros PC, Fraser M, Harding NJ et al (2015) Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer. Nat Genet 47:736–745CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D et al (2016) Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology 280:793–804CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D et al (2016) Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology 280:793–804CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoyanova R, Pollack A, Takhar M et al (2016) Association of multiparametric MRI quantitative imaging features with prostate cancer gene expression in MRI-targeted prostate biopsies. Oncotarget 7:53362–53376CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stoyanova R, Pollack A, Takhar M et al (2016) Association of multiparametric MRI quantitative imaging features with prostate cancer gene expression in MRI-targeted prostate biopsies. Oncotarget 7:53362–53376CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Correlation between MRI phenotypes and a genomic classifier of prostate cancer: preliminary findings
verfasst von
Andrei S. Purysko
Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
Omar Y. Mian
Sarah Sittenfeld
Elai Davicioni
Marguerite du Plessis
Christine Buerki
Jennifer Bullen
Lin Li
Anant Madabhushi
Andrew Stephenson
Eric A. Klein
Publikationsdatum
07.03.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06114-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

European Radiology 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.