Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2010

01.07.2010

Correlation Between Preoperative Endoscopic and Intraoperative Findings in Localizing Colorectal Lesions

verfasst von: Martine Adam Louis, Kalyana Nandipati, Rakel Astorga, Anupa Mandava, Carl-P. Rousseau, Neil Mandava

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Colonoscopy findings compared with findings at time of surgery have a discrepancy rate of 3–21%. The objective of our study was to investigate this discrepancy and provide potential resolutions.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we identified 400 patients who underwent colonoscopy followed by colon resection at our community hospitals in 1999–2006. Discrepancies between colonoscopy and intraoperative findings were noted. Each discrepancy was classified as major if the surgical procedure had to be altered, the lesion was missed, an unnecessary segment was removed, or the incision was extended. A discrepancy was classified as minor if there was no alteration in planned surgery.

Results

Of the 400 cases, 160 (40%) were located in the right colon, 13 (3%) were in the transverse colon, 185 (46%) were in the left colon, and 42 (11%) were in the rectum. A total of 48 (12%) discrepancies between colonoscopy and intraoperative findings were identified: 26 (54%) were major and 22 (46%) were minor. Thirteen (27%) were in the proximal colon (3 major and 10 minor discrepancies), 3 (6.3%) were in the transverse colon (all major), 22 (46%) were in the distal colon (17 major and 5 minor), and 10 (21%) were in the rectum (3 major, 7 minor). Major discrepancies were significantly higher in the left colon (17 of the 185 left-sided lesions; 9.1%) than in the right colon (3/160; 1.9%; P = 0.045).

Conclusions

In our study, colonoscopy has an error rate of 12% when used to localize tumors; more than half of these patients require significant unanticipated changes in their surgery. The discrepancies are significantly higher in left side of colon.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T (2005) Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140:932–935CrossRefPubMed Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T (2005) Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140:932–935CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A et al (2003) Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53:5–26CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A et al (2003) Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53:5–26CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta AK, Melton LJ 3rd, Petersen GM et al (2005) Changing trends in the incidence, stage, survival, and screen-detection of colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:150–158CrossRefPubMed Gupta AK, Melton LJ 3rd, Petersen GM et al (2005) Changing trends in the incidence, stage, survival, and screen-detection of colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:150–158CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkin W (2003) Options for screening for colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 237(Suppl):13–16CrossRef Atkin W (2003) Options for screening for colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 237(Suppl):13–16CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Santoro GA, D’Elia A, Battistella G et al (2007) The use of a dedicated rectosigmoidoscope for ultrasound staging of tumours of the upper and middle third of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 9:61–66CrossRefPubMed Santoro GA, D’Elia A, Battistella G et al (2007) The use of a dedicated rectosigmoidoscope for ultrasound staging of tumours of the upper and middle third of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 9:61–66CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathew J, Shankar P, Aldean IM (2004) Audit on flexible sigmoidoscopy for rectal bleeding in a district general hospital: are we over-loading the resources? Postgrad Med J 80:38–40CrossRefPubMed Mathew J, Shankar P, Aldean IM (2004) Audit on flexible sigmoidoscopy for rectal bleeding in a district general hospital: are we over-loading the resources? Postgrad Med J 80:38–40CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311PubMed Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Ulrich A et al (1995) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery—are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum 38:723–727CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Ulrich A et al (1995) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery—are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum 38:723–727CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hancock JH, Talbot RW (1995) Accuracy of colonoscopy in localisation of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:140–141CrossRefPubMed Hancock JH, Talbot RW (1995) Accuracy of colonoscopy in localisation of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:140–141CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leaper M, Johnston MJ, Barclay M et al (2004) Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy. Endoscopy 36:499–503CrossRefPubMed Leaper M, Johnston MJ, Barclay M et al (2004) Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy. Endoscopy 36:499–503CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK (2006) Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2866–2877CrossRefPubMed Rex DK (2006) Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2866–2877CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Karl RC (2007) Staying safe: simple tools for safe surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg 92:16–22PubMed Karl RC (2007) Staying safe: simple tools for safe surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg 92:16–22PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Feingold DL, Addona T, Forde KA et al (2004) Safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 8:543–546CrossRefPubMed Feingold DL, Addona T, Forde KA et al (2004) Safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 8:543–546CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Askin MP, Waye JD, Fiedler L et al (2002) Tattoo of colonic neoplasms in 113 patients with a new sterile carbon compound. Gastrointest Endosc 56:339–342CrossRefPubMed Askin MP, Waye JD, Fiedler L et al (2002) Tattoo of colonic neoplasms in 113 patients with a new sterile carbon compound. Gastrointest Endosc 56:339–342CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Correlation Between Preoperative Endoscopic and Intraoperative Findings in Localizing Colorectal Lesions
verfasst von
Martine Adam Louis
Kalyana Nandipati
Rakel Astorga
Anupa Mandava
Carl-P. Rousseau
Neil Mandava
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0358-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2010

World Journal of Surgery 7/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.