nach oben

European Spine Journal

Erschienen in:

05.03.2018 | Review

Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and objective measurements of walking capacity and performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review

verfasst von: Annette Bennedsgaard Jespersen, Malin Eleonora av Kák Gustafsson

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) plays a significant role in lumbar spinal stenosis research and is used to assess patient’s walking limitations. The World Health Organisation describes the constructs of walking capacity and performance and recommend measuring both to fully describe patient’s walking ability. Objective methods to assess walking capacity and performance is being investigated and used alongside the traditional use of PROs. This review of the literature was made to provide an overview of relations between the ODI and outcome measures of walking capacity and performance in spinal stenosis research, and to provide a strategy for improving such measures in future research.

Methods

The review was conducted according to the Prisma Statement. In February 2017, a search was performed in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane database. Authors independently screened articles by title, abstract, and full text, and studies were included if both authors agreed. Articles with correlation analysis between the ODI, walking capacity and performance measures by accelerometer or GPS were included.

Results

The results support a correlation between the ODI and walking capacity measures. The available studies using ODI and accelerometers were too few to reach a conclusion regarding correlation between ODI and walking performance. No articles with GPS measure were identified.

Conclusions

The ODI should not stand alone when evaluating walking limitations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. To enable a comprehensive assessment of walking ability, a walking test should be used to assess walking capacity and accelerometers should be investigated and standardized in measuring walking performance.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Verbiest H (1980) Stenosis of the lumbar vertebral canal and sciatica. Neurosurg Rev 3:75–89CrossRefPubMed

Ammendolia C, Stuber K, Tomkins-Lane C, Schneider M, Rampersaud YR, Furlan AD, Kennedy CA (2014) What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23:1282–1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3262-6 CrossRef

de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DJ (2011) Measurement in medicine. A practical guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996214 CrossRef

Lassere MN (2006) A users guide to measurement in medicine. Osteoarthr Cartil 14(Suppl A):A10–A13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2006.02.021 CrossRefPubMed

Organisation WH (2003) ICF Checklist. In: Version 21a, Clinician Form

Organisation WH (2002) Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health ICF

Tomkins CC, Battie MC, Rogers T, Jiang H, Petersen S (2009) A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol. Spine 34:2444–2449. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fc8 CrossRefPubMed

Pratt RK, Fairbank JC, Virr A (2002) The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 27:84–91CrossRefPubMed

Deen HG Jr, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, McPhee MC, Verheijde JL, Lemens SM (2000) Test–retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc 75:1002–1007CrossRefPubMed

10.

Rossier P, Wade DT (2001) Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.9396 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Singh A, Crockard HA (1999) Quantitative assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a simple walking test. Lancet (London, England) 354:370–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(98)10199-x CrossRef

12.

Gibbons WJ, Fruchter N, Sloan S, Levy RD (2001) Reference values for a multiple repetition 6-min walk test in healthy adults older than 20 years. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 21:87–93CrossRefPubMed

13.

Tomkins-Lane CC, Haig AJ (2012) A review of activity monitors as a new technology for objectifying function in lumbar spinal stenosis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 25:177–185. https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-2012-0325 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Welk GJ (2002) Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaign

15.

Davis MG, Fox KR (2007) Physical activity patterns assessed by accelerometry in older people. Eur J Appl Physiol 100:581–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-006-0320-8 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Cavanaugh JT, Coleman KL, Gaines JM, Laing L, Morey MC (2007) Using step activity monitoring to characterize ambulatory activity in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:120–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00997.x CrossRefPubMed

17.

Winter CC, Brandes M, Müller C, Schubert T, Ringling M, Hillmann A et al. (2010) Walking ability during daily life in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or the hip and lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Gilmore S, McClelland JA, Davidson M (2016) Does walking after lumbar spinal surgery predict recovery of function at 6 months? Protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:472. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1296-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Skotte J, Korshoj M, Kristiansen J, Hanisch C, Holtermann A (2014) Detection of physical activity types using triaxial accelerometers. J Phys Act Health 11:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2011-0347 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Stemland I, Ingebrigtsen J, Christiansen CS, Jensen BR, Hanisch C, Skotte J, Holtermann A (2015) Validity of the Acti4 method for detection of physical activity types in free-living settings: comparison with video analysis. Ergonomics 58:953–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.998724 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Allet L, Knols RH, Shirato K, de Bruin ED (2010) Wearable systems for monitoring mobility-related activities in chronic disease: a systematic review. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 10:9026–9052. https://doi.org/10.3390/s101009026 CrossRef

22.

Granat M, Clarke C, Holdsworth R, Stansfield B, Dall P (2015) Quantifying the cadence of free-living walking using event-based analysis. Gait Posture 42:85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.04.012 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Barzilay Y, Noam S, Meir L, Gail A, Amit B, Michal I, Vaccaro AR, Leon K (2011) Assessing the outcomes of spine surgery using global positioning systems. Spine 36:E263–E267. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181da3737 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Maddison R, Jiang Y, Vander Hoorn S, Exeter D, Mhurchu CN, Dorey E (2010) Describing patterns of physical activity in adolescents using global positioning systems and accelerometry. Pediatr Exerc Sci 22:392–407CrossRefPubMed

25.

Maddison R, Ni Mhurchu C (2009) Global positioning system: a new opportunity in physical activity measurement. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 6:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-73 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124CrossRefPubMed

27.

Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN (1996) Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:796–803CrossRefPubMed

28.

Tomkins CC, Battie MC, Hu R (2007) Construct validity of the physical function scale of the Swiss spinal stenosis questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity. Spine 32:1896–1901. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811328eb CrossRefPubMed

29.

Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144CrossRefPubMed

30.

Heinemann A, Raad J, Akuthota V, Segal N, Nitsch KP, Rho M, Chan L, Casey E, Press J, Sowa G, Moore J (2017) Scoping review to develop common data elements for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.005 CrossRef

31.

Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, Lee MJ (2011) Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine 36:S54–S68. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d CrossRefPubMed

32.

Fairbank JCCJDJ et al (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed

33.

Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25:2940–2952 (discussion 2952) CrossRefPubMed

34.

Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008) Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, medical outcomes study questionnaire short form 36, and pain scales. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 8:968–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006 CrossRef

35.

Fairbank JC (2014) Why are there different versions of the Oswestry Disability Index? J Neurosurg Spine 20:83–86. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.9.spine13344 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, Herno A, Kroger H, Savolainen S, Turunen V, Viinamaki H (2007) Lumbar spinal stenosis patients are satisfied with short-term results of surgery—younger age, symptom severity, disability and depression decrease satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil 29:537–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600902646 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Okoro T, Qureshi A, Sell B, Sell P (2010) The accuracy of assessment of walking distance in the elective spinal outpatients setting. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 19:279–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1152-0 CrossRef

38.

Werneke M (2016) A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthop 87:88. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1120127 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg (London, England) 8:336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 CrossRef

40.

Kellar SP, Kelvin EA, Munro BH (2012) Munro’s statistical methods for health care research. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

41.

Domholdt E (1993) Physical therapy research: principles and applications. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia

42.

Gross DP, Battie MC (2003) Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil 13:287–295CrossRefPubMed

43.

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil 19:539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 CrossRef

44.

Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (2017) Diagnostic study appraisal worksheet. https://www.cebm.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CEBM_Diagnostic-study-appraisal-worksheet.doc. Accessed 14 Aug 2017

45.

Tomkins-Lane CC, Battie MC, Macedo LG (2014) Longitudinal construct validity and responsiveness of measures of walking capacity in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 14:1936–1943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.030 CrossRef

46.

Tomkins-Lane CC, Battie MC (2013) Predictors of objectively measured walking capacity in people with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 26:345–352. https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-130390 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Rainville J, Childs LA, Pena EB, Suri P, Limke JC, Jouve C, Hunter DJ (2012) Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis—a comparative study. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 12:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.006 CrossRef

48.

Barz T, Melloh M, Staub L, Roeder C, Lange J, Smiszek FG, Theis JC, Merk HR (2008) The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 17:686–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0593-1 CrossRef

49.

Tomkins-Lane CC, Battie MC (2010) Validity and reproducibility of self-report measures of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 35:2097–2102. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f5e13b CrossRefPubMed

50.

Prasad BC, Ramesh Chandra VV, Devi BV, Chivukula SS, Pundarikakshaiah K (2016) Clinical, radiological, and functional evaluation of surgical treatment in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. BioMed Res Int 64:677–683. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9074257. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.185378

51.

Pryce R, Johnson M, Goytan M, Passmore S, Berrington N, Kriellaars D (2012) Relationship between ambulatory performance and self-rated disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 37:1316–1323. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824a8314 CrossRefPubMed

52.

Schulte TL, Schubert T, Winter C, Brandes M, Hackenberg L, Wassmann H, Liem D, Rosenbaum D, Bullmann V (2010) Step activity monitoring in lumbar stenosis patients undergoing decompressive surgery. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 19:1855–1864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1324-y CrossRef

53.

Tomkins-Lane CC, Conway J, Hepler C, Haig AJ (2012) Changes in objectively measured physical activity (performance) after epidural steroid injection for lumbar spinal stenosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:2008–2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.014 CrossRefPubMed

54.

Conway J, Tomkins CC, Haig AJ (2011) Walking assessment in people with lumbar spinal stenosis: capacity, performance, and self-report measures. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 11:816–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.10.019 CrossRef

55.

Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L, Kroger H, Andrade J, Jimenez R, Tapaninaho A, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine 31:E648–E663. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000231727.88477.da CrossRefPubMed

56.

Papadakis NC, Christakis DG, Tzagarakis GN, Chlouverakis GI, Kampanis NA, Stergiopoulos KN, Katonis PG (2009) Gait variability measurements in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: part A. Comparison with healthy subjects. Physiol Meas 30:1171–1186. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/30/11/003 CrossRefPubMed

57.

Lee GY, Lee JW, Choi HS, Oh KJ, Kang HS (2011) A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skelet Radiol 40:1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1102-x CrossRef

58.

Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C (2016) Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 352:h6234. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6234 CrossRef

59.

de Schepper EIT, Overdevest GM, Suri P, Peul WC, Oei EHG, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Luijsterburg PAJ (2013) Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine 38:E469–E481. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828935ac CrossRefPubMed

60.

Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, Kim KJ, Kim HJ, Chung SK, Kang HS (2010) A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1095–1098. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.09.2772 CrossRefPubMed

61.

Normahani P, Kwasnicki R, Bicknell C, Allen L, Jenkins MP, Gibbs R, Cheshire N, Darzi A, Riga C (2017) Wearable sensor technology efficacy in peripheral vascular disease (wSTEP): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002300 PubMedCrossRef

62.

Del Din S, Godfrey A, Rochester L (2016) Validation of an accelerometer to quantify a comprehensive battery of gait characteristics in healthy older adults and Parkinson’s disease: toward clinical and at home use. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 20:838–847. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2015.2419317 CrossRefPubMed

63.

Gernigon M, Le Faucheur A, Fradin D, Noury-Desvaux B, Landron C, Mahe G, Abraham P (2015) Global positioning system use in the community to evaluate improvements in walking after revascularization: a prospective multicenter study with 6-month follow-up in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Medicine 94:e838. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000000838 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Krenn PJ, Titze S, Oja P, Jones A, Ogilvie D (2011) Use of global positioning systems to study physical activity and the environment: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 41:508–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.046 CrossRefPubMed

65.

Schneller MB, Bentsen P, Nielsen G, Brond JC, Ried-Larsen M, Mygind E, Schipperijn J (2017) Measuring children’s physical activity: compliance using skin-taped accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 49:1261–1269. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001222 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and objective measurements of walking capacity and performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review
verfasst von: Annette Bennedsgaard Jespersen
Malin Eleonora av Kák Gustafsson
Publikationsdatum: 05.03.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5520-5

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and objective measurements of walking capacity and performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Graphical abstract

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Chiropractic care and risk for acute lumbar disc herniation: a population-based self-controlled case series study

Letter to the Editor concerning “Osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: long-term retrospective comparison between vertebroplasty and conservative treatment” by K. Martikos et al. [Eur Spine J (2018) doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5605-1]

Management of a high thoracic chance fracture

Giant thoracic discs: treatment, outcome, and follow-up of 33 patients in a single centre

Letter to the Editor concerning “Percutaneous cement discoplasty for the treatment of advanced degenerative disk disease in elderly patients” by Sola C, Camino Willhuber G, Kido G et al. Eur Spine J (2018): Doi 10.1007/s00586-018-5547-7

The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part II: interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath—today’s perspective

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie