Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2009

01.09.2009 | Original Article

Correlation of maximum urethral closure pressure with Valsalva leak point pressure using air-charged urodynamic catheters

verfasst von: Terry White, Amie Kawasaki, Reneita V. Ross, Rony A. Adam, Thinh H. Duong

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 9/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective of this study was to measure the correlation of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) with Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) in women with urodynamic stress incontinence using air-charged urodynamic catheters.

Methods

Records of all women who underwent urodynamic testing for urinary incontinence using air-charged catheters over a 3-year period were reviewed. Data included scores on the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7).

Results

One hundred ninety-three women met the criteria for urodynamic stress incontinence. There was a modest correlation of MUCP with VLPP at 200 mL (r = 0.46, p < 0.001) and a low correlation of MUCP with VLPP at maximum capacity (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). There was no correlation of UDI-6 or IIQ-7 scores with MUCP or VLPP.

Conclusions

The low to modest correlation of VLPP with MUCP with air-charged catheters is similar to what has been reported with water-filled and microtransducer catheters.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn A, Nager CW, Hawkins E, Schulz J, Stanton SL (2007) A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:931–935PubMedCrossRef Kuhn A, Nager CW, Hawkins E, Schulz J, Stanton SL (2007) A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:931–935PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollak JT, Nimark M, Connor JT, Davila GW (2004) Air-charged and microtransducer urodynamic catheters in the evaluation of urethral function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:124–128PubMedCrossRef Pollak JT, Nimark M, Connor JT, Davila GW (2004) Air-charged and microtransducer urodynamic catheters in the evaluation of urethral function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:124–128PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zehnder P, Roth B, Burkhard FC, Kessler TM (2008) Air charged and microtip catheters cannot be used interchangeably for urethral pressure measurement: a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial. J Urol 180:1013–1017PubMedCrossRef Zehnder P, Roth B, Burkhard FC, Kessler TM (2008) Air charged and microtip catheters cannot be used interchangeably for urethral pressure measurement: a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial. J Urol 180:1013–1017PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sultana CJ (1995) Urethral closure pressure and leak-point pressure in incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol 86:839–842PubMedCrossRef Sultana CJ (1995) Urethral closure pressure and leak-point pressure in incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol 86:839–842PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McLennan MT, Melick CF, Bent AE (2000) Leak-point pressure: clinical application of values at two different volumes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11:136–141PubMedCrossRef McLennan MT, Melick CF, Bent AE (2000) Leak-point pressure: clinical application of values at two different volumes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11:136–141PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Swift SE, Ostergard DR (1995) A comparison of stress leak-point pressure and maximal urethral closure pressure in patients with genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 85:704–708PubMedCrossRef Swift SE, Ostergard DR (1995) A comparison of stress leak-point pressure and maximal urethral closure pressure in patients with genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 85:704–708PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldner PC Jr, Bezerra LRPS, de Castro RA, Sartori MGF, Baracat EC, de Lima GR et al (2004) Correlation between Valsalva leak point pressure and maximal urethral closure pressure in women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:194–197PubMedCrossRef Feldner PC Jr, Bezerra LRPS, de Castro RA, Sartori MGF, Baracat EC, de Lima GR et al (2004) Correlation between Valsalva leak point pressure and maximal urethral closure pressure in women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:194–197PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nager CW, Schulz JA, Stanton SL, Monga A (2001) Correlation of urethral closure pressure, leak-point pressure and incontinence severity measures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:395–400PubMedCrossRef Nager CW, Schulz JA, Stanton SL, Monga A (2001) Correlation of urethral closure pressure, leak-point pressure and incontinence severity measures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:395–400PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wall LL, Hewitt JK, Helms MJ (1995) Are vaginal and rectal pressures equivalent approximations of one another for the purpose of performing subtracted cystometry? Obstet Gynecol 85:488–493PubMedCrossRef Wall LL, Hewitt JK, Helms MJ (1995) Are vaginal and rectal pressures equivalent approximations of one another for the purpose of performing subtracted cystometry? Obstet Gynecol 85:488–493PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson DA (1985) Use of vaginal pressure measurements in urodynamic testing. Obstet Gynecol 66:581–584PubMed Richardson DA (1985) Use of vaginal pressure measurements in urodynamic testing. Obstet Gynecol 66:581–584PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 3:291–306PubMedCrossRef Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 3:291–306PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA (1995) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 14:131–139PubMedCrossRef Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA (1995) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 14:131–139PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen L, Holliday M (1982) Statistics for social scientists. Harper & Row, London Cohen L, Holliday M (1982) Statistics for social scientists. Harper & Row, London
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Theofrastous JP, Bump RC, Elser DM, Wyman JF, McClish DK (1995) Correlation of urodynamic measures of urethral resistance with clinical measures of incontinence severity in women with pure genuine stress incontinence. The Continence Program for Women Research Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:407–412, discussion 412-414PubMedCrossRef Theofrastous JP, Bump RC, Elser DM, Wyman JF, McClish DK (1995) Correlation of urodynamic measures of urethral resistance with clinical measures of incontinence severity in women with pure genuine stress incontinence. The Continence Program for Women Research Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:407–412, discussion 412-414PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemack GE, Zimmern PE (1999) Predictability of urodynamic findings based on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire. Urology 54:461–466PubMedCrossRef Lemack GE, Zimmern PE (1999) Predictability of urodynamic findings based on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire. Urology 54:461–466PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Albo M, Wruck L, Baker J, Brubaker L, Chai T, Dandreo KJ, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network et al (2007) The relationships among measures of incontinence severity in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 177:1810–1814PubMedCrossRef Albo M, Wruck L, Baker J, Brubaker L, Chai T, Dandreo KJ, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network et al (2007) The relationships among measures of incontinence severity in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 177:1810–1814PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Correlation of maximum urethral closure pressure with Valsalva leak point pressure using air-charged urodynamic catheters
verfasst von
Terry White
Amie Kawasaki
Reneita V. Ross
Rony A. Adam
Thinh H. Duong
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0910-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2009

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.