Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4/2014

01.12.2014 | Original Article

Cost comparison of genioplasty: when indicated, wire osteosynthesis is more cost effective than plate and screw fixation

verfasst von: David S. Precious, Alvaro B. Cardoso, Mônica Christine A. C. Cardoso, Jean-Charles Doucet

Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This retrospective study was conducted to determine the difference in the cost of genioplasty according to the osseous fixation technique used.

Patients and methods

A retrospective study among orthognathic surgery patients treated over a 54-month period ending in June 30, 2011 was conducted. Immediately post surgery, panoramic and cephalometric radiographs of these patients were assessed to determine the presence of genioplasty procedure and the type of fixation used. The cost of the actual fixation used by the surgeons was compared with that which the cost would have been had the surgeons used the criteria described in the hypotheses, for plate and screws fixation when genioplasty is performed.

Results

A review of 1,498 orthognathic surgery patients revealed that 473 of these patients underwent genioplasty. Out of 473 patients, 425 had genioplasty to either advance and-or superiorly reposition the chin. Of these, 230 had wire osteosynthesis and 243 had some form of rigid fixation. The unit cost of fixation for genioplasty when wire osteosynthesis is used is less than C$5.00. The mean unit cost estimate in our patient group when pre-bent plates are used was C$542.00. All 230 patients in whom wire osteosynthesis was used demonstrated stable fixation of the bony parts and no immediate postsurgical adjustment was required in any patient.

Conclusions

For patients requiring genioplasty to advance and-or superiorly reposition the chin, it is possible to use wire osteosynthesis to achieve accurate and stable fixation while reducing the fixation cost by more than C$500.00 per case. The surgeon should include cost considerations in the selection of treatment methods.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Precious DS, Delaire J (1985) Correction of anterior mandibular vertical excess: the functional genioplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 59:229–235PubMedCrossRef Precious DS, Delaire J (1985) Correction of anterior mandibular vertical excess: the functional genioplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 59:229–235PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Precious DS, Armstrong JE, Morais D (1992) Anatomic placement of fixation devices in genioplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 73:2–8PubMedCrossRef Precious DS, Armstrong JE, Morais D (1992) Anatomic placement of fixation devices in genioplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 73:2–8PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Precious DS (2009) Genioplasty. In: Turvey TA (ed) Oral and maxillofacial surgery, vol 3, 2nd edn. Saunders Elsevier, New York, pp 137–154 Precious DS (2009) Genioplasty. In: Turvey TA (ed) Oral and maxillofacial surgery, vol 3, 2nd edn. Saunders Elsevier, New York, pp 137–154
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards RC, Kiely KD, Eppley BL (2000) Resorbable fixation techniques for genioplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:269–272PubMedCrossRef Edwards RC, Kiely KD, Eppley BL (2000) Resorbable fixation techniques for genioplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:269–272PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat DeFreitas CE, Ellis E III, Sinn DP (1992) A retrospective study of advancement genioplasty using a special bone plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:340–346PubMedCrossRef DeFreitas CE, Ellis E III, Sinn DP (1992) A retrospective study of advancement genioplasty using a special bone plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:340–346PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fariña R, Valladares S, Aguilar L, Pastrian J, Rojas F (2012) M-shaped genioplasty: a new surgical technique for sagittal and vertical chin augmentation: three case reports. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1177–1182PubMedCrossRef Fariña R, Valladares S, Aguilar L, Pastrian J, Rojas F (2012) M-shaped genioplasty: a new surgical technique for sagittal and vertical chin augmentation: three case reports. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1177–1182PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Reyneke JP, Johnston T, Van der Linden WJ (1997) Screw ostheosynthesis compared with wire osteosynthesis in advancement genioplasty: a retrospective study of skeletal stability. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:352–356PubMedCrossRef Reyneke JP, Johnston T, Van der Linden WJ (1997) Screw ostheosynthesis compared with wire osteosynthesis in advancement genioplasty: a retrospective study of skeletal stability. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:352–356PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolce C, Johnson PD, Van Sickels JE, Bays RA, Rugh JD (2001) Maintenance of soft tissue changes after rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement, with and without genioplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:142–149PubMedCrossRef Dolce C, Johnson PD, Van Sickels JE, Bays RA, Rugh JD (2001) Maintenance of soft tissue changes after rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement, with and without genioplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:142–149PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones BM, Vesely MJJ (2006) Osseous genioplasty in facial aesthetic surgery: a personal perspective reviewing 54 patients. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 56:1177–1187CrossRef Jones BM, Vesely MJJ (2006) Osseous genioplasty in facial aesthetic surgery: a personal perspective reviewing 54 patients. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 56:1177–1187CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Serna EM, Pliego ES, Ulldemolins NM, Morán AM (2008) Treatment of chin deformities. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 59(7):349–358CrossRef Serna EM, Pliego ES, Ulldemolins NM, Morán AM (2008) Treatment of chin deformities. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 59(7):349–358CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Troulis MJ, Kearns GJ, Perrott DH, Kaban LB (2000) Extended genioplasty: long-term cephalometric, morphometric and sensory results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:167–175PubMedCrossRef Troulis MJ, Kearns GJ, Perrott DH, Kaban LB (2000) Extended genioplasty: long-term cephalometric, morphometric and sensory results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:167–175PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Haers PE, Oechslin C, Sailer HF (1999) Is wire osteosynthesis obsolete for fixation of LeFort I osteotomies? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:391–394PubMedCrossRef Haers PE, Oechslin C, Sailer HF (1999) Is wire osteosynthesis obsolete for fixation of LeFort I osteotomies? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:391–394PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Sickels JE, Richardson DA (1996) Stability of orthognathic surgery: a review of rigid fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:279–285PubMedCrossRef Van Sickels JE, Richardson DA (1996) Stability of orthognathic surgery: a review of rigid fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:279–285PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Polido WD, Regis LC, Bell WH (1991) Bone resorption, stability, and soft-tissue changes following large chin advancements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:251–256PubMedCrossRef Polido WD, Regis LC, Bell WH (1991) Bone resorption, stability, and soft-tissue changes following large chin advancements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:251–256PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Precious DS (1992) Discussion—a retrospective study of advancement genioplasty using a special bone plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:347–348CrossRef Precious DS (1992) Discussion—a retrospective study of advancement genioplasty using a special bone plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:347–348CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaughnessy S, Mobarak KA, Hogevold HE, Espeland L (2006) Long-term skeletal and soft-tissue responses after advancement genioplasty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:8–17PubMedCrossRef Shaughnessy S, Mobarak KA, Hogevold HE, Espeland L (2006) Long-term skeletal and soft-tissue responses after advancement genioplasty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:8–17PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cost comparison of genioplasty: when indicated, wire osteosynthesis is more cost effective than plate and screw fixation
verfasst von
David S. Precious
Alvaro B. Cardoso
Mônica Christine A. C. Cardoso
Jean-Charles Doucet
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0437-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.