Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy 8/2021

09.07.2021 | Original Research

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cemiplimab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression Levels of at Least 50%

verfasst von: Liting Wang, Ye Peng, Xiaohui Zeng, Liubao Peng, Sini Li, Shuxia Qin, Xiaomin Wan, Chongqing Tan

Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy | Ausgabe 8/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Cemiplimab may significantly increase overall survival in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a PD-L1 level of at least 50%. Therefore, there is a need to consider the cost-effectiveness of using this therapy for this indication.

Methods

This Markov model was built to estimate the cost and effectiveness of cemiplimab vs. chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC based on the data from the EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial. Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) and lifetime costs were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty. Additional subgroup analyses were performed.

Results

Treatment of advanced NSCLC with cemiplimab added 0.546 QALYs (1.492 LYs) and resulted in an incremental cost of $22,069.804 compared with chemotherapy, which was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $40,390.412 per QALY gained. The results of one-way sensitivity analysis found that the cost of cemiplimab was the most sensitive factor in our study. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of cemiplimab being cost-effective was 100%. The subgroup analysis demonstrated that high PD-L1 expression (≥ 90%, > 60 to < 90% and ≥ 50 to ≤ 60%) also kept the incremental cost-effectiveness stable at $63,415.2450 per QALY, $61,896.446 per QALY and $–71,921.259 per QALY.

Conclusion

From the perspective of US payers, cemiplimab is cost-effective in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209.CrossRef Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363–85.CrossRef Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363–85.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbst RS, Giaccone G, de Marinis F, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1328–39.CrossRef Herbst RS, Giaccone G, de Marinis F, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1328–39.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyer M, Sendur MAN, Rodriguez-Abreu D, et al. (2021) Pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab or placebo for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50%: randomized, double-blind phase III KEYNOTE-598 study. J Clin Oncol 2021:JCO2003579 Boyer M, Sendur MAN, Rodriguez-Abreu D, et al. (2021) Pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab or placebo for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50%: randomized, double-blind phase III KEYNOTE-598 study. J Clin Oncol 2021:JCO2003579
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellmann MD, Paz-Ares L, Bernabe Caro R, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):2020–31.CrossRef Hellmann MD, Paz-Ares L, Bernabe Caro R, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):2020–31.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Burova E, Hermann A, Waite J, et al. Characterization of the Anti-PD-1 antibody REGN2810 and its antitumor activity in human PD-1 knock-in mice. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16(5):861–70.CrossRef Burova E, Hermann A, Waite J, et al. Characterization of the Anti-PD-1 antibody REGN2810 and its antitumor activity in human PD-1 knock-in mice. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16(5):861–70.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy AJ, Macdonald LE, Stevens S, et al. Mice with megabase humanization of their immunoglobulin genes generate antibodies as efficiently as normal mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(14):5153–8.CrossRef Murphy AJ, Macdonald LE, Stevens S, et al. Mice with megabase humanization of their immunoglobulin genes generate antibodies as efficiently as normal mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(14):5153–8.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Study of REGN2810 in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02760498. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02760498, Accessed 18 Sep 2017 Study of REGN2810 in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02760498. https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT02760498, Accessed 18 Sep 2017
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Study of REGN2810 (anti-PD-1) in patients with advanced malignancies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02383212. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02383212, Accessed 18 Sep 2017 Study of REGN2810 (anti-PD-1) in patients with advanced malignancies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02383212. https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT02383212, Accessed 18 Sep 2017
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Migden MR, Rischin D, Schmults CD, et al. PD-1 blockade with cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):341–51.CrossRef Migden MR, Rischin D, Schmults CD, et al. PD-1 blockade with cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):341–51.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickering CR, Zhou JH, Lee JJ, et al. Mutational landscape of aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(24):6582–92.CrossRef Pickering CR, Zhou JH, Lee JJ, et al. Mutational landscape of aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(24):6582–92.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sezer A, Kilickap S, Gumus M, et al. Cemiplimab monotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%: a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10274):592–604.CrossRef Sezer A, Kilickap S, Gumus M, et al. Cemiplimab monotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%: a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10274):592–604.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein DA, Chen Q, Ayer T, et al. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1112–8.CrossRef Goldstein DA, Chen Q, Ayer T, et al. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1112–8.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyot P, Ades AE, Ouwens MJ, Welton NJ. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:9.CrossRef Guyot P, Ades AE, Ouwens MJ, Welton NJ. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoyle MW, Henley W. Improved curve fits to summary survival data: application to economic evaluation of health technologies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:139.CrossRef Hoyle MW, Henley W. Improved curve fits to summary survival data: application to economic evaluation of health technologies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:139.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiang CL, Chan SK, Lee SF, Wong IO, Choi HC. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as a second-line therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):2033761.CrossRef Chiang CL, Chan SK, Lee SF, Wong IO, Choi HC. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as a second-line therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):2033761.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10183):1819–30.CrossRef Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10183):1819–30.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wan X, Luo X, Tan C, Zeng X, Zhang Y, Peng L. First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Cancer. 2019;125(20):3526–34.CrossRef Wan X, Luo X, Tan C, Zeng X, Zhang Y, Peng L. First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Cancer. 2019;125(20):3526–34.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu H, She L, Liao M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1649.CrossRef Hu H, She L, Liao M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1649.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Engel-Nitz NM, Johnson MP, Bunner SH, Ryan KJ. Real-world costs of adverse events in first-line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020;26(6):729–40.PubMed Engel-Nitz NM, Johnson MP, Bunner SH, Ryan KJ. Real-world costs of adverse events in first-line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020;26(6):729–40.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Federico A, De Giglio A, Parisi C, Gelsomino F, Ardizzoni A. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy as upfront treatment for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%: selecting the best strategy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;160:103302.CrossRef Di Federico A, De Giglio A, Parisi C, Gelsomino F, Ardizzoni A. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy as upfront treatment for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%: selecting the best strategy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;160:103302.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1823–33.CrossRef Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1823–33.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chouaid C, Bensimon L, Clay E, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France. Lung Cancer. 2019;127:44–52.CrossRef Chouaid C, Bensimon L, Clay E, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France. Lung Cancer. 2019;127:44–52.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbier MC, Pardo E, Panje CM, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer and high PD-L1 expression in Switzerland. Eur J Health Econ. 2021;22(5):669–77.CrossRef Barbier MC, Pardo E, Panje CM, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer and high PD-L1 expression in Switzerland. Eur J Health Econ. 2021;22(5):669–77.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Markham A, Duggan S. Cemiplimab: first global approval. Drugs. 2018;78(17):1841–6.CrossRef Markham A, Duggan S. Cemiplimab: first global approval. Drugs. 2018;78(17):1841–6.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Konidaris G, Paul E, Kuznik A, et al. Assessing the value of cemiplimab for adults with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Value Health. 2021;24(3):377–87.CrossRef Konidaris G, Paul E, Kuznik A, et al. Assessing the value of cemiplimab for adults with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Value Health. 2021;24(3):377–87.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghetti G, D’Avella MC, Pradelli L. Preliminary cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in Italy. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;13:121–33.CrossRef Ghetti G, D’Avella MC, Pradelli L. Preliminary cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in Italy. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;13:121–33.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno V, Garrido P, Papadopoulos KP, et al. Tolerability and antitumor activity of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, as monotherapy in patients with pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): data from the Phase 1 NSCLC expansion cohort. Lung Cancer. 2021;155:151–5.CrossRef Moreno V, Garrido P, Papadopoulos KP, et al. Tolerability and antitumor activity of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, as monotherapy in patients with pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): data from the Phase 1 NSCLC expansion cohort. Lung Cancer. 2021;155:151–5.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat She L, Hu H, Liao M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score 1% or greater. Lung Cancer. 2019;138:88–94.CrossRef She L, Hu H, Liao M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score 1% or greater. Lung Cancer. 2019;138:88–94.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cemiplimab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression Levels of at Least 50%
verfasst von
Liting Wang
Ye Peng
Xiaohui Zeng
Liubao Peng
Sini Li
Shuxia Qin
Xiaomin Wan
Chongqing Tan
Publikationsdatum
09.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Advances in Therapy / Ausgabe 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01828-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2021

Advances in Therapy 8/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.