Cost-effectiveness of 3 versus 6 years of zoledronic acid treatment before bisphosphonate holiday for women with osteoporosis
- 13.09.2021
- Original Article
Erschienen in:
- Verfasst von
- S. Nayak
- S. L. Greenspan
- Erschienen in
- Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 1/2022
Abstract
Summary
We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of recurrent periods of 3 versus 6 years of zoledronic acid treatment prior to 3-year bisphosphonate holidays for US postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and femoral neck BMD T-scores between − 2.5 and − 3.5. We found that cycles of 3 years of treatment followed by holidays is likely to be the more cost-effective option.
Introduction
We compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cycles of 3 years versus 6 years of zoledronic acid treatment prior to 3-year bisphosphonate holidays for US postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Methods
We developed an individual-level state-transition microsimulation cost-effectiveness model to compare treatment strategies over the lifetime of recurrent periods of 3 years of zoledronic acid followed by 3-year holidays (zoledronic acid 3/3), recurrent periods of 6 years of zoledronic acid followed by 3-year holidays (zoledronic acid 6/3), and no zoledronic acid treatment for women with osteoporosis and femoral neck BMD T-scores between − 2.5 and − 3.5.
Results
Base-case analysis and all key parameter sensitivity analysis findings for every treatment initiation age evaluated (50, 60, 70, and 80) revealed that zoledronic acid 3/3 was consistently the most cost-effective strategy, assuming a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). In general, the zoledronic acid 3/3 and 6/3 strategies were relatively close in effectiveness (QALYs) over the lifetime; however, lifetime direct health care costs were on average approximately $2000 lower for the 3/3 strategy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results revealed that the zoledronic acid 3/3 strategy was favored in greater than 70% of the iterations for a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY for all treatment initiation ages evaluated.
Conclusions
After 3 years of zoledronic acid treatment for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and femoral neck BMD T-scores between − 2.5 and − 3.5, taking 3-year holidays before restarting another treatment cycle is likely to be more cost-effective over the lifetime than cycles of 6 years of treatment prior to 3-year holidays.
Anzeige
- Titel
- Cost-effectiveness of 3 versus 6 years of zoledronic acid treatment before bisphosphonate holiday for women with osteoporosis
- Verfasst von
-
S. Nayak
S. L. Greenspan
- Publikationsdatum
- 13.09.2021
- Verlag
- Springer London
- Erschienen in
-
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965 - DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-06010-5
Dieser Inhalt ist nur sichtbar, wenn du eingeloggt bist und die entsprechende Berechtigung hast.
Dieser Inhalt ist nur sichtbar, wenn du eingeloggt bist und die entsprechende Berechtigung hast.
