Introduction
The gut microbiome—a community of mostly commensal organisms residing within the human gastrointestinal tract—has rapidly garnered traction in oncology [
1]. Preclinical studies first unraveled the unforeseen link between the gut microbiome and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in several malignancies, such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma [
2‐
4]. Pioneering experiments described that ICI activity was abrogated in germ-free mice or after antibiotic administration in specific-pathogen-free mice, pointing to the critical role of the gut microbiome in modulating the antitumor immune response to ICI [
2‐
4]. Antitumor immunity was then restored after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from responder patients or after oral supplementation with specific commensal bacteria associated with response to ICI [
2,
4‐
6]. In parallel, shotgun metagenomics sequencing of patients with NSCLC, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma demonstrated enrichment of beneficial commensal bacteria in responder patients compared to enrichment of deleterious bacteria in non-responder patients, mirroring observations in preclinical models [
2,
7]. Most recently, large and robust meta-analyses in 46,000 patients confirmed the deleterious relationship between pre-treatment antibiotic exposure on survival to ICI [
8]. These findings have driven the development of clinical trials aimed at modifying the gut microbiome through various methods, including FMT [
9‐
11]. These early clinical trials have shown that microbiome interventions can circumvent secondary resistance to ICI and potentially to prevent the development of primary resistance to ICI.
Indeed, with more than 50% of cancer patients treated with ICI at some point in their cancer care trajectory, and the majority developing resistance to these therapies, there is an unmet medical need to improve the efficacy of these agents [
12,
13]. Moreover, currently available biomarkers to predict response and toxicity to these therapies are neither sensitive nor specific [
14]. Given the rapidly evolving field of onco-microbiome research, the tremendous promise of gut microbiome biomarkers, and interventions to enhance immunotherapy efficacy, there have been significant efforts to deeply characterize the gut microbiome of patients undergoing cancer ICI to (1) predict response to these drugs, (2) select patients for appropriate microbiome interventions, and (3) identify key bacterial consortia for development of the next generation of microbiome therapeutics. While shotgun metagenomics sequencing has allowed for deep profiling and characterization of these bacterial communities, sequencing techniques are limited by requirement for advanced bioinformatics support. In addition, shotgun metagenomics sequencing cannot evaluate for organism viability [
15]. Lastly, a significant proportion of bacterial hits detected from shotgun metagenomics sequencing are represented by as-of-yet uncharacterised species or strains [
15]. Therefore, complementary techniques to counter these limitations are of great interest to propel the field of the gut microbiome forward to improve patient selection, stratification, and outcomes for microbiome interventions.
Culturomics has emerged as a complement to shotgun metagenomics sequencing due to simple workflow, ability to detect live bacteria, to characterize previously unknown species and strains, and to detect taxa at low abundance [
16‐
19]. Despite these advantages, the literature on culturomics in patients treated with ICI remains limited. Specifically, parallel metagenomics sequencing and culturomics describing the overlapping and distinct bacteria detected in patients with cancer has not been reported. To address this, we deeply characterized the gut microbiome using culturomics of 22 patients with advanced melanoma and NSCLC treated with ICI and compared their composition with 7 healthy individuals.
Materials and methods
Patients and samples
Human samples were collected from 3 different biobanks, including the CRCHUM NSCLC ethical number CE17.035, CRCHUM healthy volunteers’ biobank ethical number CE20.300 and from the PRIMM study ethical number NCT03643289. Samples were collected by the patients in their homes according to International Human Microbiota Standard (IHMS), and stored in the fridge for 1 day, then brought to the research centre, and immediately at − 80 °C. Responder status was defined by either a partial or complete response to ICI as assessed by the investigator. Patients were considered non-responders if they had stable or progressive disease as assessed by the investigator.
Bacterial isolation by culturomics
Microbial culturomics was used to explore the bacterial diversity of stool samples and identification was facilitated using the MALDI-TOF MS. For the culture, we used two steps: Firstly, a direct inoculation of the stool sample was performed with 0.3 g of stool resuspended in 1 mL of 1 × PBS. Ten serial dilutions of this suspension were performed, and 50 µL of each dilution was spread on 5% Columbia agar (COS) (Nepean, Ontario, Canada) enriched with sheep blood (ThermoFisher, Montreal Canada), plates were incubated under aerobic and anaerobic conditions using Zip bag (Becton Dickson Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) containing an anaerobic generator, GasPak (Becton Dickson Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) atmospheres at 37 °C for 48 h. Secondly, enrichments were made by adding 200 µL of each sample in liquid broths BACTEC™ vials (Becton Dickson Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) supplemented with 5% of defibrinated sheep blood and 5% of 0.22 µm filtered rumen fluid under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. For anaerobic conditions, serial dilutions were prepared from the anaerobic BACTEC™ vials and then spread on COS agar at different time points (24 h, day 3, day 7, day 10, day 15, day 21 and day 30) over a period of one month, at 37 °C, using Zip and GasPak generators. For aerobic conditions, serial dilutions were also prepared from aerobic BACTEC™ vials and inoculated on COS agar at the same time points, but under an aerobic atmosphere. The colonies obtained were subcultured after incubation for 48 h at 37 °C, and the purified colonies were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. For each colony, a double deposit was made on a 96 MSP microplate and then coated with 2 μL of matrix solution, prepared from saturated α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid powder mixed with 50% acetonitrile and 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid. The spectra of each colony were then measured using the MicroFlex LT/SH spectrometer and automatically recorded using FlexControl v.3.4 and MALDI Biotyper Compass v4 software for assay preparation and biotyping. The spectra obtained were compared with the MBT Compass BDAL library (Bruker) and our local database. Colonies with a score > 1.9 were identified to the species level. Colonies not identified by MALDI-TOF MS (score < 1.9) were subjected to genomic sequencing for identification.
gDNA was quantified using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA Assay Kit (Life Technologies). Libraries were generated from 50 ng of gDNA using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs) as per the manufacturer’s recommendations. Adapters and PCR primers were purchased from IDT. Size selection of libraries containing the desired insert size was performed using SparQ beads (Qiagen). Libraries were quantified using the Kapa Illumina GA with Revised Primers-SYBR Fast Universal kit (Kapa Biosystems). Average size fragment was determined using a LabChip GXII (PerkinElmer) instrument. Libraries were normalized and pooled, then denatured in 0.05 N NaOH and neutralized using HT1 buffer. The pool was loaded at 225 pM on an Illumina NovaSeq S4 lane using Xp protocol as per the manufacturer’s recommendations. The run was performed for 2 × 150 cycles (paired-end mode). A phiX library was used as a control and mixed with libraries at 1% level. Base calling was performed with RTA v3.4.4. Program bcl2fastq2 v2.20 was then used to demultiplex samples and generate fastq reads. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed at a read depth of 15 Gb/sample. FASTQ files were processed using the MetaPhlAn4 pipeline as previously described [
11].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis—culturomics
The detection frequency difference of each species was calculated to compare the microbiota profile obtained by culturomics based on its presence/absence in each sample. Once the frequency of each species in each group was determined, the difference was calculated to determine which species are enriched in each group. The bilateral Chi-squared test with False Discovery Rate (FDR) using the Benjamini–Hochberg method was used to compare frequency differences. Additionally, we conducted an overlap analysis, which compared the species isolated from each group to identify those common to all groups, as well as species specific to each. To compare the differences in numbers of species between different groups, we assessed the normality of the data using the Shapiro–Wilk test using GraphPad Prism version 9 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA,
www.graphpad.com). To compare two groups, we used Student's t-test when the data followed a normal distribution. Otherwise, in the presence of non-normal data, we opted for the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. For multiple comparisons, we used ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test with normal data or the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's test with non-normal data. R software (R version 4.4.0) was used to perform principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) with Bray–Curtis dissimilarity to examine the structure and distribution of microbial communities between samples. In addition, a permutation multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was used to compare the beta diversity between groups. For multiple comparisons, pairwise PERMANOVA test FDR using the Benjamini–Hochberg test was used to evaluate the difference between groups.
To assess species more frequent across groups (Cancer vs HV and Rvs NR), the Heatmap function in the ComplexHeatmap package was used to visualize data. For data with a normal distribution, a t-test was applied; otherwise, a Wilcoxon test was used. Based on the results of these tests, a vector of p-values was generated. We then filtered the data, retaining only those species whose p-value was less than 0.05. For visualization, Heatmaps were constructed using frequency matrices and annotations for rows (groups) and columns (species), grouped based on the filtered data.
To allow comparison with the culturomics results, we performed frequency comparison within each group, which considers only the presence or absence of each species. For diversity analyses and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), we used the MicrobiomeAnalyst pipeline using the default parameters (
https://www.microbiomeanalyst.ca/), which relies on relative abundance or the number of read for each species. Alpha and beta diversity were also assessed using this last pipeline, with a p-value ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Discussion
The gut microbiome has emerged as one of the most promising biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes in patients treated with ICI [
22,
23]. Despite this, studies in patients treated with ICI combining shotgun metagenomics sequencing and culturomics are lacking. This study performed dual profiling in 22 advanced NSCLC and melanoma patients, focusing on high-throughput culturomics combined with metagenomics sequencing for the NSCLC patients. Our study supports the concept of cancer-related dysbiosis, characterized by lower bacterial counts and altered microbiome composition in patients with cancer compared to healthy individuals. In addition, we found this dysbiosis to be defined by bacteria associated with cancer development, such as
Enterocloster species and
Veillonella species [
23,
24]. Culturomics further validated the presence of
Hungatella hathewayi and
Streptococcus spp. in non-responders, while
Bacteroides spp. were prevalent in responders. Importantly, our study found a significant overlap between sequencing and culture-based techniques but also identified distinct bacteria using culturomics, highlighting its utility to detect low-abundance species that might be filtered out by thresholds required for shotgun metagenomics sequencing.
Yonekura et al. investigated in preclinical models, how cancer can cause stress-induced ileopathy through β-adrenergic receptor activation [
23]. This ‘stress ileopathy’, associated with sustained
Clostridium spp.-related dysbiosis. While numerous cohort studies have profiled the gut microbiome of cancer vs. healthy controls, these studies do not provide any causal links and reinforce the open ‘chicken or egg’ conundrum of the cancer microbiome. For example, in a large cohort study by Gao et al., which included 156 colorectal cancer patients and 104 healthy controls, the authors observed a significant reduction in microbial diversity [
25]. These cohort studies, among others [
26], emphasize the consistent patterns of microbial dysbiosis fingerprints across various cancer types compared to healthy controls, suggesting that microbial shifts could potentially serve as a diagnostic biomarker. This is corroborated by our study, which also found significantly reduced bacterial diversity in cancer patients compared to healthy controls.
Several studies have utilized culturomics to study gut microbiome differences in various health conditions, but its application in distinguishing between cancer and healthy gut microbiomes is still emerging. To the best of our knowledge, our paper is one of the first to compare cancer-associated and healthy microbiomes using both culturomics and metagenomics techniques. For example, Dubourg et al
. used culturomics to study the gut microbiota composition in healthy individuals, and identified specific bacteria not detected by metagenomics sequencing which led to the addition of 531 species to the human gut repertoire [
27]. Importantly, our comparative analysis between culturomics with the gold-standard of metagenomics sequencing found a significant overlap in species identified by the two techniques, with metagenomics identifying a higher proportion of species overall, as expected. However, 94 species were uniquely identified using culturomics. Interestingly, metagenomics was able to identify key bacteria associated with ICI efficacy such as
Feacalibaterium prausnitzii [
27] which is a fastidious bacterium typically difficult to culture. In addition, our culturomics findings re-capitulated prior findings of cancer vs. healthy microbiome imprint, such as enrichment of
Bifidobacterium genus including
B. longum, and B. adolescentis,
Bacteroides species as well as
Alistipes onderdonkii in healthy individuals [
28,
29]. The present findings have important clinical implications in distinguishing health individuals from those with disease using gut microbiome profiling and in better identifying gut microbiome differences between R and NR to ICI. Notwithstanding the increasing evidence pointing to the modulation of the response to ICI by the gut microbiome, the mechanism remains elusive. Immunosuppressive bacteria such as
Enterocloster or other
Clostridia species can modulate host immune responses by producing immunosuppressive metabolites, which may suppress T-cell activation and promote regulatory T-cell differentiation [
30]. Additionally, these bacteria influence the expression of mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1), facilitating the recruitment of regulatory T cells to the gut-associated lymphoid tissue and contributing to a tolerogenic microenvironment. This immune modulation can dampen anti-tumor immune responses and reduce the efficacy of ICI [
30].
Despite this being the first study to concurrently evaluate the microbiome of healthy individuals vs. cancer patients and to examine the gut microbiome composition of responders to ICI and non-responders, our study is limited by small sample size which reduces the statistical power to obtain significant adjusted p-values, and lack of functional validation. One limitation of our study is the use of frozen rather than fresh samples. Thawed samples exhibit reduced bacterial viability, particularly affecting anaerobes, which may have influenced our culturomics results. In addition, the healthy volunteer control group was significantly younger than the cancer group, pointing to the known impact of age on bacterial diversity [
31]. Future studies with larger sample sizes should therefore account for participant demographics such as age and sex. Despite these limitations, our study reinforces the need to complement metagenomics sequencing with culturomics in future microbiome studies.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.