Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2016

11.11.2015

Covered stents in cervical anastomoses following esophagectomy

verfasst von: Emily Speer, Christy M. Dunst, Amber Shada, Kevin M. Reavis, Lee L. Swanström

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy are relatively frequent. The off-label use of self-expanding covered metal stents has been shown to be an effective initial treatment for leaks, but there is a paucity of literature regarding their use in cervical esophagogastric anastomoses. We reviewed our outcomes with anastomotic stenting after esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric reconstruction.

Methods

All stents placed across cervical anastomoses following esophagectomy from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for surgery and stent placement were collected. For patients with serial stents, each stent event was evaluated separately and as part of its series. Success was defined as resolution of indicated anastomotic problem for at least 90 days. Complications were defined as development of stent-related problems.

Results

Twenty-three patients had a total of 63 stents placed (16 % prophylactic, 38 % leak, 46 % stricture). Sixty percent of patients had successful resolution of their initial anastomotic problem; 67 % required more than one stent. Strictures and leaks healed in 27 and 70 % of patients, respectively, at a median of 55.5 days. Stent-related complications occurred in 78 % of patients. Complications (per stent event) included 62 % migration, 11 % clinically significant tissue overgrowth, 8 % minor erosion (ulcers), and 8 % major erosion. Stents placed for stricture were more likely to result in complications, especially migration (76.7 vs. 48.5 %, p = 0.02). Preoperative chemoradiation was a significant risk factor for erosion (22.5 vs. 4.3 %, p = 0.05), but not for overall complications. Patients with major erosions had longer stent duration compared to those without (92 vs. 36 days, p = 0.14).

Discussion

Although stents are effective at controlling post-esophagectomy anastomotic leaks, they are not effective for treating strictures. Stents have high complication rates, but most are minor. Chemoradiation is a risk factor for stent erosion. Caution should be used when stent duration exceeds 2–3 months due to the risk of erosion.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeppner J et al (2014) Covered self-expanding stent treatment for anastomotic leakage: outcomes in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses. Surg Endosc 28:1703–1711CrossRefPubMed Hoeppner J et al (2014) Covered self-expanding stent treatment for anastomotic leakage: outcomes in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses. Surg Endosc 28:1703–1711CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Honkoop P et al (1996) Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 6:1141–1148CrossRef Honkoop P et al (1996) Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 6:1141–1148CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Turkyilmaz A, Eroglu A, Aydin Y, Tekinbas C, Muharrem Erol M, Karaoglanoglu N (2009) The management of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus 22(2):119–126CrossRefPubMed Turkyilmaz A, Eroglu A, Aydin Y, Tekinbas C, Muharrem Erol M, Karaoglanoglu N (2009) The management of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus 22(2):119–126CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajan P et al (2014) Role of endoscopic stents and selective minimal access drainage in oesophageal leaks: feasibility and outcome. Surg Endosc 28:2368–2373CrossRefPubMed Rajan P et al (2014) Role of endoscopic stents and selective minimal access drainage in oesophageal leaks: feasibility and outcome. Surg Endosc 28:2368–2373CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Yimcharoen P et al (2010) Endoscopic stent management of leaks and anastomotic strictures after foregut surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:628–636CrossRef Yimcharoen P et al (2010) Endoscopic stent management of leaks and anastomotic strictures after foregut surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:628–636CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen N et al (2011) Management of gastrointestinal leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: conventional treatments versus endoscopic stenting. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1952–1960CrossRefPubMed Nguyen N et al (2011) Management of gastrointestinal leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: conventional treatments versus endoscopic stenting. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1952–1960CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Puig C et al (2014) The role of endoscopic stents in the management of chronic anastomotic and staple line leaks and chronic strictures after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:613–619CrossRefPubMed Puig C et al (2014) The role of endoscopic stents in the management of chronic anastomotic and staple line leaks and chronic strictures after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:613–619CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schweigert M, et al. (2014) One decade of experience with endoscopic stenting for intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: brilliant breakthrough or flash in the pan?. In: Presented at the annual scientific meeting and postgraduate course program, Southeastern Surgical Congress, Savannah, GA, February 22–25 Schweigert M, et al. (2014) One decade of experience with endoscopic stenting for intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: brilliant breakthrough or flash in the pan?. In: Presented at the annual scientific meeting and postgraduate course program, Southeastern Surgical Congress, Savannah, GA, February 22–25
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Schweigert M, Solymosi N, Dubecz A, Stadlhuber RJ, Mus-chweck H, Ofner D, Stein HJ (2013) Endoscopic stent insertion for anastomotic leakage following oesophagectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:43–47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schweigert M, Solymosi N, Dubecz A, Stadlhuber RJ, Mus-chweck H, Ofner D, Stein HJ (2013) Endoscopic stent insertion for anastomotic leakage following oesophagectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:43–47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rieder E, Dunst CM, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, Swanstrom LL (2012) Endoscopic suture fixation of gastrointestinal stents: proof of biomechanical principles and early clinical experience. Endoscopy 44(12):1121–1126CrossRefPubMed Rieder E, Dunst CM, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, Swanstrom LL (2012) Endoscopic suture fixation of gastrointestinal stents: proof of biomechanical principles and early clinical experience. Endoscopy 44(12):1121–1126CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Covered stents in cervical anastomoses following esophagectomy
verfasst von
Emily Speer
Christy M. Dunst
Amber Shada
Kevin M. Reavis
Lee L. Swanström
Publikationsdatum
11.11.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4661-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.