Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2020

25.07.2020 | COVID-19 | Review Zur Zeit gratis

A system for risk stratification and prioritization of breast cancer surgeries delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic: preparing for re-entry

verfasst von: Barbara L. Smith, Anvy Nguyen, Jenna E. Korotkin, Bridget N. Kelly, Michelle C. Specht, Laura M. Spring, Beverly Moy, Steven J. Isakoff, Michele A. Gadd

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

During the COVID-19 pandemic, most breast surgery for benign and malignant conditions has been postponed, creating a backlog of patients who will need surgery. A fair and transparent system for assessing the risk of further delaying surgery for individual patients to prioritize surgical scheduling is needed.

Methods

Factors related to risk of delaying surgery for breast patients were identified. Scores were assigned to each factor, with higher scores indicating a greater risk from delaying surgery. REDCap and Microsoft Excel tools were designed to track and score delayed patients.

Results

Published data and multidisciplinary clinical judgement were used to assign risk scores based on patient and tumor factors, length of delay, and tumor response to preoperative therapy. Patients completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assigned the highest scores as their options for delaying surgery are most limited. Among patients receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy or no medical therapy, higher scores were assigned for low-estrogen receptor or high-genomic risk scores, higher grade, larger tumors, younger age and longer delay. High priority scores were assigned for progression during preoperative therapy. Low scores were assigned for re-excisions, atypical lesions and other benign indications. There was good agreement of the tool’s ranking of sample patients with rankings by experienced clinicians. The tool generates risk-stratified patient lists by surgeon or institution to facilitate assignment of surgery dates.

Conclusions

This tool generates a clinically consistent, risk-stratified priority list of breast surgical procedures delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic approach may facilitate surgical scheduling as conditions normalize.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, Kaehner FL, Walker MG, Watson D, Park T, Hiller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Bryan J, Wolmark N (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa041588CrossRefPubMed Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, Kaehner FL, Walker MG, Watson D, Park T, Hiller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Bryan J, Wolmark N (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa041588CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999–2009CrossRefPubMed van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999–2009CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRefPubMed Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Eiermann W, Paepke S, Llombart-Cussac A, Eremin J, Vinholes J, Mauriac L, Ellis M, Lassus M, Chaudri-Ross HA, Dugan M, Borgs M, Semiglazov V; Letrozole Neo-Adjuvant Breast Cancer Study Group (2001) Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 12:1527–1532. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013128213451CrossRef Eiermann W, Paepke S, Llombart-Cussac A, Eremin J, Vinholes J, Mauriac L, Ellis M, Lassus M, Chaudri-Ross HA, Dugan M, Borgs M, Semiglazov V; Letrozole Neo-Adjuvant Breast Cancer Study Group (2001) Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 12:1527–1532. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1023/​a:​1013128213451CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cataliotti L, Buzdar AU, Noguchi S, Bines J, Takatsuka Y, Petrakova K, Dube P, de Oliveira CT (2006) Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the pre-operative “Arimidex” compared to tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer 106(10):2095–2103. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21872CrossRefPubMed Cataliotti L, Buzdar AU, Noguchi S, Bines J, Takatsuka Y, Petrakova K, Dube P, de Oliveira CT (2006) Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the pre-operative “Arimidex” compared to tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer 106(10):2095–2103. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​21872CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J et al (2011) Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype–ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol 29(17):2342–2349. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6950CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J et al (2011) Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype–ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol 29(17):2342–2349. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2010.​31.​6950CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwata H, Masuda N, Yamamoto Y, Fujisawa T, Toyama T, Kashiwaba M, Ohtani S, Taira N, Sakai T, Hasegawa Y, Nakamura R, Akabane H, Shibahara Y, Sasano H, Yamaguchi T, Sakamaki K, Bailey H, Cherbavas DB, Jakubowski DM, Sugiyama N, Chao C, Ohashi Y (2019) Validation of the 21-gene test as a predictor of clinical response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for ER+, HER2-negative breast cancer: the TransNEOS study. J Breast Cancer Res Treat 173:123–133.CrossRef Iwata H, Masuda N, Yamamoto Y, Fujisawa T, Toyama T, Kashiwaba M, Ohtani S, Taira N, Sakai T, Hasegawa Y, Nakamura R, Akabane H, Shibahara Y, Sasano H, Yamaguchi T, Sakamaki K, Bailey H, Cherbavas DB, Jakubowski DM, Sugiyama N, Chao C, Ohashi Y (2019) Validation of the 21-gene test as a predictor of clinical response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for ER+, HER2-negative breast cancer: the TransNEOS study. J Breast Cancer Res Treat 173:123–133.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith IE, Dowsett M, Ebbs SR, Dixon JM, Skene A, Blohmer JU, Ashley SE, Francis S, Boeddinghaus I, Walsh G, Group IT (2005) Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5108–5116. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.005CrossRef Smith IE, Dowsett M, Ebbs SR, Dixon JM, Skene A, Blohmer JU, Ashley SE, Francis S, Boeddinghaus I, Walsh G, Group IT (2005) Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5108–5116. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​04.​005CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Allevi G, Strina C, Andreis D, Zanoni V, Bazzola L, Bonardi S, Foroni C, Milani M, Cappelleti MR, Gussago F, Aguggini S, Giardini R, Martinotti M, Fox SB, Harris AL, Bottini A, Berruti A, Generali D (2013) Increased pathological complete response rate after long-term neoadjuvant letrozole treatment in postmenopausal oestrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer. Br J Cancer 108:1587–1592. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Allevi G, Strina C, Andreis D, Zanoni V, Bazzola L, Bonardi S, Foroni C, Milani M, Cappelleti MR, Gussago F, Aguggini S, Giardini R, Martinotti M, Fox SB, Harris AL, Bottini A, Berruti A, Generali D (2013) Increased pathological complete response rate after long-term neoadjuvant letrozole treatment in postmenopausal oestrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer. Br J Cancer 108:1587–1592. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​bjc.​2013.​151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Toi M, Saji S, Masuda N, Kuroi K, Sato N, Takei H, Yamamoto Y, Ohno S, Yamashita H, Hisamatsu K, Aogi K, Iwata H, Takada M, Ueno T, Saji S, Chanplakorn N, Suzuki T, Sasano H (2011) Ki67 index changes, pathological response and clinical benefits in primary breast cancer patients treated with 24 weeks of aromatase inhibition. Cancer Sci 102(4):858–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01867.xCrossRefPubMed Toi M, Saji S, Masuda N, Kuroi K, Sato N, Takei H, Yamamoto Y, Ohno S, Yamashita H, Hisamatsu K, Aogi K, Iwata H, Takada M, Ueno T, Saji S, Chanplakorn N, Suzuki T, Sasano H (2011) Ki67 index changes, pathological response and clinical benefits in primary breast cancer patients treated with 24 weeks of aromatase inhibition. Cancer Sci 102(4):858–865. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​j.​1349-7006.​2011.​01867.​xCrossRefPubMed
18.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno T, Masuda N, Yamanaka T, Saji S, Kuroi K, Sato N, Takei H, Yamamoto Y, Ohno S, Yamashita H, Hisamatsu K, Aogi K, Iwata H, Sasano H, Toi M (2014) Evaluating the 21-gene assay recurrence score as a predictor of clinical response to 24 weeks of neoadjuvant exemestane in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 19(4):607–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-013-0614-xCrossRefPubMed Ueno T, Masuda N, Yamanaka T, Saji S, Kuroi K, Sato N, Takei H, Yamamoto Y, Ohno S, Yamashita H, Hisamatsu K, Aogi K, Iwata H, Sasano H, Toi M (2014) Evaluating the 21-gene assay recurrence score as a predictor of clinical response to 24 weeks of neoadjuvant exemestane in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 19(4):607–613. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10147-013-0614-xCrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Krainick-Strobel UE, Lichtenegger W, Wallwiener D, Tulusan AH, Janicke F, Bastert G, Kiesel L, Wackwitz B, Paepke S (2008) Neoadjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer: a phase IIb/III trial to investigate optimal duration of preoperative endocrine therapy. BMC Cancer 8:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krainick-Strobel UE, Lichtenegger W, Wallwiener D, Tulusan AH, Janicke F, Bastert G, Kiesel L, Wackwitz B, Paepke S (2008) Neoadjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer: a phase IIb/III trial to investigate optimal duration of preoperative endocrine therapy. BMC Cancer 8:62. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1471-2407-8-62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Habel LA, Shak S, Jacobs MK, Capra A, Alexander C, Pho M, Baker J, Walker M, Watson D, Hackett J, Blick NT, Greenberg D, Fehrenbacher L, Langholz B, Quesenberry CP (2006) A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients. Breast Cancer Res 8(3):R25. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Habel LA, Shak S, Jacobs MK, Capra A, Alexander C, Pho M, Baker J, Walker M, Watson D, Hackett J, Blick NT, Greenberg D, Fehrenbacher L, Langholz B, Quesenberry CP (2006) A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients. Breast Cancer Res 8(3):R25. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​bcr1412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, Forbes J, Mallon EA, Salter J, Quinn E, Dunbier A, Baum M, Buzdar A, Howell A, BugariniR BFL, Shak S (2010) Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1829–1834. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4798CrossRefPubMed Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, Forbes J, Mallon EA, Salter J, Quinn E, Dunbier A, Baum M, Buzdar A, Howell A, BugariniR BFL, Shak S (2010) Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1829–1834. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2009.​24.​4798CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer CE Jr, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson JA Jr, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge GW Jr (2018) Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1510764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer CE Jr, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson JA Jr, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge GW Jr (2018) Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1510764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, Hortobagyi GN, Livingston RB, Yeh IT, Ravdin P, Bugarini R, Baehner FL, Davidson NE, Sledge GW, Winer EP, Hudis C, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Pritchard KI, Shepherd L, Gralow JR, Yoshizawa C, Allred DC, Osborne CK, Hayes DF, Breast Cancer Intergroup of North A (2010) Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 11(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70314-6CrossRefPubMed Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, Hortobagyi GN, Livingston RB, Yeh IT, Ravdin P, Bugarini R, Baehner FL, Davidson NE, Sledge GW, Winer EP, Hudis C, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Pritchard KI, Shepherd L, Gralow JR, Yoshizawa C, Allred DC, Osborne CK, Hayes DF, Breast Cancer Intergroup of North A (2010) Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 11(1):55–65. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(09)70314-6CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Masuda N, Sagara Y, Kinoshita T, Iwata H, Nakamura S, Yanagita Y, Nishimura R, Iwase H, Kamigaki S, Takei H, Noguchi S (2012) Neoadjuvant anastrozole versus tamoxifen in patients receiving goserelin for premenopausal breast cancer (STAGE): a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(4):345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70373-4CrossRefPubMed Masuda N, Sagara Y, Kinoshita T, Iwata H, Nakamura S, Yanagita Y, Nishimura R, Iwase H, Kamigaki S, Takei H, Noguchi S (2012) Neoadjuvant anastrozole versus tamoxifen in patients receiving goserelin for premenopausal breast cancer (STAGE): a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(4):345–352. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(11)70373-4CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2008) Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9- Versus 11-Gauge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:229–234.CrossRef Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2008) Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9- Versus 11-Gauge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:229–234.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamb LR, Bahl M, Hughes KS, Lehman CD (2018) Pathologic upgrade rate of high-risk breast lesions on digital two-dimentional vs tomosynthesis mammography. J Am Coll Surg 226:858–867CrossRefPubMed Lamb LR, Bahl M, Hughes KS, Lehman CD (2018) Pathologic upgrade rate of high-risk breast lesions on digital two-dimentional vs tomosynthesis mammography. J Am Coll Surg 226:858–867CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A system for risk stratification and prioritization of breast cancer surgeries delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic: preparing for re-entry
verfasst von
Barbara L. Smith
Anvy Nguyen
Jenna E. Korotkin
Bridget N. Kelly
Michelle C. Specht
Laura M. Spring
Beverly Moy
Steven J. Isakoff
Michele A. Gadd
Publikationsdatum
25.07.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Schlagwort
COVID-19
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05792-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.