Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2021 | COVID-19 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2021 Open Access

BMC Geriatrics 1/2021

Behavioral changes and hygiene practices of older adults in Japan during the first wave of COVID-19 emergency

Zeitschrift:
BMC Geriatrics > Ausgabe 1/2021
Autoren:
Yasumichi Arai, Yuko Oguma, Yukiko Abe, Midori Takayama, Azusa Hara, Hisashi Urushihara, Toru Takebayashi
Wichtige Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12877-021-02085-1.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abbreviations
COVID-19
Coronavirus disease 2019
KAWP
The Kawasaki Aging and Wellbeing Project
OR
Odds ratio
CI
Confidence interval
SARS-CoV-2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
ADL
Activities of daily living
IADL
Instrumental activities of daily living
IQR
Interquartile range
MMSE
Mini-mental state examination
GDS-15
Geriatric depression scale-15

Background

Since the first case of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, the outbreak of COVID-19 has emerged as a global health emergency [ 1]. Older adults, particularly those with preexisting comorbidities, are at greater risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes, including hospital admission and death than others. Given the high mortality rate among those aged 80 years or older [ 2] and lack of evidence-based treatment, social distancing is of prime importance for preventing the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among the older population. However, social distancing can lead to both physical inactivity and social isolation. These create concerns about the increasing risks of sarcopenia, depression, and other chronic diseases of aging [ 3].
High case fatality rate and uncertainties about the convergence of COVID-19 outbreaks necessitate an urgent need to establish a practical method to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission and maintain the health and wellbeing of the older adults. On April 7, 2020, Japan declared a state of emergency in seven prefectures, including the Greater Tokyo Area [ 4]. It aimed to reduce social contact among people by 80% and continued it until May 25, 2020. With some countries experiencing the third wave of COVID-19 cases starting from November 2020, Japan declared the second state of emergency for Tokyo and its neighboring prefectures on 7 January 2021 [ 5]. Social distancing and stay-at-home order for extended periods is a serious public health concern as it can increase the risk of adverse mental and sedentary health outcomes, particularly in a vulnerable population, such as very old people and those who are not technology-driven [ 6]. Therefore, the aims of the present study were 1) to examine self-reported impacts of the COVID-19 emergency on basic lifestyle, physical activity, and personal hygiene practices, and 2) to identify subgroups of older adults who might be more susceptible to the negative impact of COVID-19 emergency using an on-going longitudinal cohort of older adults independently living in an affected community.

Methods

Study population

The Kawasaki Aging and Wellbeing Project (KAWP) is a longitudinal cohort study of older adults aged between 85 and 89 with no physical disability at baseline. The prime aim of the KAWP is to explore trajectories of functional decline, frailty, and cognitive impairment, and to identify genetic, biological, behavioral, and socioenvironmental factors that delay or modify this deteriorating process at an advanced age. The inclusion criteria of KAWP are: 1) being a resident of Kawasaki city, a city with a population of 1.5 million, located in the Greater Tokyo Area and aged between 85 and 89; 2) having no limitations in the basic activities of daily living (ADL); and 3) being able to visit the study site, the Kawasaki Municipal Hospitals independently.
Using the basic registration of residents and the long-term care insurance database, a total of 12,906 were screened as potential participants. Among them, we mailed an invitation letter for this study to 9978 individuals, and 1464 eligible residents responded to express their willingness to participate in the study. Between March 2017 and December 2018, a total of 1026 independent seniors were enrolled in the KAWP and a comprehensive baseline assessment, including assessment of physical, mental, and cognitive function as well as social participation was conducted (Fig.  1). Thereafter, the participants were scheduled for telephonic surveys every 6 months to monitor their vital status, any incidental disabilities, falls and fractures, and hospitalizations until December 2024 or until they dropped out.
In this study, we selected 546 people who were scheduled for follow-up telephonic surveys between May 25, 2020, the day the state of emergency was lifted, and the end of August 2020. Written informed consent to participate in the KAWP was obtained from all participants. The KAWP was approved by the ethics committee of the Keio University School of Medicine (ID: 20160297) and was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry as an observational study (ID: UMIN000026053).

Measurements

COVID-19 questionnaire

The COVID-19-related telephonic interviews were conducted by two trained interviewers between May 25 and August 31, 2020 using a structured questionnaire (Additional file  1) in addition to the usual 6-month follow-up telephonic survey. The questionnaire consisted of 11 closed-ended questions and one open-ended question regarding perceived changes in basic lifestyle, physical activity, conversation time, and precautious behaviors during the state of emergency. Each interview was completed in approximately 10–20 min.

Baseline characteristics

Sociodemographic and health data were obtained from the KAWP baseline survey conducted between March 2017 and December 2018 (on average 2.2 years before the telephonic survey). All participants were invited to visit one of three Kawasaki Municipal Hospitals (Kawasaki, Ida, or Tama) and were interviewed and examined using a study protocol that was harmonized with the Tokyo Oldest Old Survey on Total Health and Japan Semi-supercentenarian Study, both of which are managed by the Center for Supercentenarian Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine [ 7, 8]. Participants were asked to fill out a pre-mailed questionnaire including education (high school and higher education or not), living situation, marital status, current alcohol use, smoking status, and self-rated health. They were checked for consistency by interviewers at the time of the baseline survey.
The medical interview was conducted by trained physicians, and the number of chronic conditions was counted based on past and present medical history of 18 diseases: cerebrovascular disease, cardiac disease, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, respiratory disease, gastrointestinal disease, renal disease, prostate disease, thyroid disease, Parkinson’s disease, connective tissue disease, eye disease, osteoporosis, arthritis, hyperuricemia, malignancy, and dementia. Body weight and height were measured while wearing light clothes and standing upright. Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were assessed using the Lawton scale (0–5 points) [ 9], cognitive functions were evaluated according to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; 0–30 point) [ 10] and depression was assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) [ 11]. Self-rated health is scored by a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). Physical activity in the past 1 year was assessed using the modified Zutphen Physical Activity Questionnaire [ 12]. The questionnaire determined the frequency and duration of walking, cycling, and other leisure-time physical activities. Physical Activity Index (PAI) was then calculated by multiplying the activity intensity (compendium-coded, metabolic equivalents, METs) with duration (hours) and frequency (times per week). The questionnaire was validated with a tri-axial accelerometer and physical functions in the very old adults [ 12]. Upper tertile of PAI was regarded as engagement in physical activity. Hearing and visual acuity were rated according to self-reported categories. Those who responded “need a loud voice or speak in his/her ears” or “cannot hear at all” were judged as having a hearing impairment. Those who rated “poor” and “very poor” for eyesight were regarded as visually impaired. Self-reported community interaction was evaluated according to the following question: “How often do you meet or talk to people in the community you associate with (including phone and email exchanges)?” Here, a community is defined as an area that is about a 10-min walk away.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR); categorical variables are shown as numbers and proportions. Correlation between numerical variables assessed at baseline survey was calculated with Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Crude odds ratio (OR) and 95% confident interval (CI) were calculated for behavioral factors such as decreased physical activity and conversation time and washing hands more. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the independent association between behavioral factors and baseline characteristics, in which all variables were mutually adjusted in the models. All analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics ver. 24.0 software (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.), and results were considered statistically significant at a P -value of < 0.05, and two-sided tests were applied.

Results

Of the 546 participants eligible for the telephonic survey during the study period, 25 were not contactable, 34 declined (7 were institutionalized, 11 had hearing problems, 7 had poor health, 3 did not consent, 5 had family reasons, and 1 had unknown reasons); thus, 487 respondents completed the telephonic questionnaire (Fig.  1, response rate: 89.2%). The median age of the respondents was 89.3 (IQR: 88.3–90.6) years. More than half of the respondents were women (50.5%), and 45.0% of the respondents were widowed, and 47.4% had high school or higher education (Table  1). The median MMSE score was 26 (IQR: 24–28), and 15.8% had MMSE scores≤23. Only 12.7% of the respondents had a 1 ≥ IADL disability, whereas the majority were IADL independent. There were no significant differences in basic characteristics between participants and non-participants in the telephone survey (Supplemenaty Table 1).
Table 1
Characteristics of the respondents
Age at telephone survey, (IQR)
89.3
(88.3–90.6)
Time since basic survey, years. (IQR)
2.2
(1.7–3.0)
Female, n. (%)
246
(50.5)
Living alone a, n. (%)
130
(26.7)
Marital status a, n. (%)
 Married
246
(50.5)
 Widowed
219
(45.0)
 Divorce
11
(2.3)
 Never married
8
(1.6)
 Missing
3
(0.6)
High education a, n. (%)
231
(47.4)
 Missing
2
(0.4)
Smoking status a, n (%)
 Current smoker
21
(4.3)
 Former smoker
182
(37.4)
 Never smoker
281
(57.7)
 Missing
3
(0.6)
Current alcohol intake a, n (%)
 No
292
(60.0)
 Yes
194
(39.8)
 Missing
1
(0.2)
BMI category a, n (%)
 Underweight
28
(5.7)
 Normal weight
331
(68.0)
 Overweight
116
(23.8)
 Obesity
12
(2.5)
Self-rated health a, n. (%)
 Very/good
202
(41.5)
 Fair
216
(44.4)
 Poor/very poor
66
(13.6)
 Don’t know
3
(0.6)
MMSE a, (IQR)
26
(24–28)
MMSE a (≤23)
77
(15.8)
 Missing
3
(0.6)
GDS a, (IQR)
3
(1–4)
GDS a (≥5)
119
(24.4)
 Missing
3
(0.6)
IADL a, (IQR)
5
(5)
IADL a (≤4)
62
(12.7)
Hearing impairment a, n. (%)
36
(7.4)
 Missing
5
(1.0)
Visual impairment a, n. (%)
119
(24.4)
 Missing
6
(1.2)
Number of chronic conditions a, n (%)
 0–1
25
(5.2)
 2–4
219
(45.0)
 5≤
234
(48.0)
 Missing
9
(1.8)
Physical Activity Index a (IQR), METs h/w
16.3
(9.7–27.8)
 Missing
1
(0.2)
Frequency of community interaction a, n. (%)
 None
82
(16.8)
 Several times/year
21
(4.3)
 Several times/month
106
(21.8)
 Several times/week
190
(39.0)
 Everyday
63
(12.9)
 Not sure
22
(4.5)
 Missing
3
(0.6)
Abbreviations: IQR Interquartile range, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, GDS Geriatric Depression Scale, IADL Instrumental activities of daily living, METs h/w Metabolic equivalents hour per week
a assessed at baseline survey
At baseline, amount of physical activity was associated with self-rated health and IADL (Table  2, Spearman’s rho = 0.126, P < 0.001; rho = 0.176, P < 0.001, respectively), while negatively associated with GDS and number of chronic conditions (rho = − 0.216, P < 0.001; rho = − 0.106, P < 0.05, respectively). Self-rated health was negatively associated with GDS and the number of chronic conditions (rho = − 0.166, P < 0.001; rho = − 0.179, P < 0.05, respectively).
Table 2
Spearman's rho correlation coeficients  for numerical measures
 
Physical Activity Index
Self-rated health
MMSE
GDS
IADL
Self-rated health
.126***
       
MMSE
.013
.014
     
GDS
−.216***
−.166***
−.194***
   
IADL
.176***
.096*
.123**
−.186***
 
Number of chronic conditions
−.106*
−.179***
.081
.121**
−.075
Abbreviations: MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, GDS Geriatric Depression Scale, IADL Instrumental activities of daily living. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001
Figure 2 shows the responses to the survey questions regarding behavioral changes and personal hygiene practices during the COVID-19 emergency. Among the responders, 424 (87.1%) were interviewed directly, whereas 63 (12.9%) responded by proxy. Overall, most respondents (94.5%) reported no basic lifestyle changes, such as eating, sleeping, smoking, and drinking, whereas 28.1% reported a decrease in the amount of physical activity, and more than half (54.6%) reported reduced frequencies of going out. Similar percentages of respondents reported a decrease in the number of people to converse with and a decreased amount of time to converse (35.7 and 32.6%, respectively). For personal hygiene practice, 93.8% reported wearing a mask when they went out, whereas only 50.3% reported washing hands more often, and a few (4.5%) monitored their body temperature.
Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that engagement in physical activity at baseline (OR = 1.95; 95% CI = 1.23–3.08), smartphone ownership (OR = 2.15; 95%CI = 1.33–3.47), and visual impairment (OR = 1.79; 95%CI = 1.10–2.91) were independently associated with a decreased amount of physical activity during COVID-19 emergency (Table 3). Engagement in physical activity at baseline was associated with decreased conversation time with neighbors (OR = 2.24; 95%CI = 1.43–3.50), while frequent community interaction was negatively associated with decreased conversation time (OR = 0.23; 95%CI = 0.10–0.55) as well as decreased number of conversation partners (Supplementary Table  2). Being women and smartphone ownership were significantly associated with more frequent hands-washing (Table 3). None of the baseline characteristics were independently associated with decreased clinic/hospital/dentists visit (Supplementary Table  2).
Table 3
Factors associated with decreased physical activity and conversation time, and enhanced handwashing
 
Decreased physical activity
Decreased conversation time
Washing hands more
Crude
Adjusted d
Crude
Adjusted d
Crude
Adjusted d
Characteristics
OR
95%CI
OR
95%CI
OR
95%CI
OR
95%CI
OR
95%CI
OR
95%CI
Age
0.97
(0.84–1.12)
0.95
(0.80–1.13)
0.86
(0.75–1.00) e
0.85
(0.72–1.00)
0.99
(0.87–1.13)
1.02
(0.88–1.19)
Sex (female)
1.23
(0.83–1.83)
1.18
(0.69–2.02)
1.09
(0.74–1.59)
1.07
(0.64–1.80)
1.72
(1.20–2.47) e
1.90
(1.17–3.08) e
High education
0.77
(0.52–1.15)
0.69
(0.43–1.10)
1.01
(0.69–1.48)
0.97
(0.62–1.51)
1.26
(0.88–1.80)
1.44
(0.95–2.18)
Living alone
1.03
(0.66–1.61)
0.96
(0.56–1.65)
0.92
(0.60–1.42)
0.86
(0.51–1.44)
1.40
(0.93–2.10)
1.24
(0.76–2.03)
Widowed
1.15
(0.77–1.71)
1.09
(0.65–1.85)
1.10
(0.75–1.61)
1.25
(0.75–2.07)
1.30
(0.91–1.87)
1.08
(0.67–1.73)
Current alcohol use
1.15
(0.77–1.72)
1.35
(0.86–2.13)
0.95
(0.65–1.41)
1.02
(0.65–1.59)
0.93
(0.65–1.34)
0.97
(0.64–1.48)
Current smoker
0.59
(0.19–1.78)
0.67
(0.17–2.57)
0.78
(0.30–2.06)
0.69
(0.20–2.36)
0.46
(0.18–1.17)
0.76
(0.26–2.18)
Overweight
0.99
(0.63–1.55)
1.19
(0.73–1.94)
0.89
(0.58–1.37)
1.12
(0.70–1.82)
1.26
(0.84–1.89)
1.19
(0.76–1.86)
Self-rated health a
0.97
(0.65–1.45)
0.91
(0.58–1.44)
0.71
(0.48–1.05)
0.73
(0.47–1.13)
1.30
(0.90–1.87)
1.09
(0.73–1.64)
MMSE (≤23)
0.58
(0.31–1.05)
0.56
(0.29–1.08)
0.57
(0.32–1.01)
0.53
(0.28–1.01)
0.98
(0.60–1.61)
1.02
(0.59–1.77)
GDS (≥5)
0.78
(0.49–1.26)
0.79
(0.46–1.36)
1.16
(0.75–1.80)
1.12
(0.68–1.85)
0.71
(0.47–1.07)
0.93
(0.58–1.48)
IADL (≤4)
1.36
(0.77–2.39)
1.64
(0.85–3.19)
1.09
(0.61–1.92)
1.14
(0.59–2.23)
0.89
(0.52–1.52)
0.79
(0.43–1.46)
Chronic conditions ≥5
0.91
(0.61–1.35)
0.84
(0.54–1.30)
0.93
(0.63–1.37)
0.95
(0.62–1.45)
1.13
(0.79–1.62)
1.05
(0.71–1.57)
Hearing impairment
1.28
(0.62–2.63)
0.97
(0.42–2.26)
0.98
(0.48–2.01)
0.87
(0.38–1.98)
1.09
(0.55–2.16)
1.08
(0.50–2.30)
Visual impairment
1.74
(1.12–2.71) e
1.79
(1.10–2.91) e
1.28
(0.83–1.98)
1.18
(0.73–1.91)
1.05
(0.69–1.60)
1.28
(0.81–2.02)
Engagement in physical activity b
1.77
(1.17–2.67) e
1.95
(1.23–3.08) e
1.86
(1.25–2.76) e
2.24
(1.43–3.50) e
1.09
(0.75–1.60)
1.04
(0.68–1.58)
Frequent community interaction c
0.69
(0.37–1.29)
0.69
(0.34–1.40)
0.30
(0.15–0.63) e
0.23
(0.10–0.55) e
1.65
(0.96–2.84)
1.91
(1.03–3.55) e
Smartphone ownership
2.02
(1.32–3.10) e
2.15
(1.33–3.47) e
0.96
(0.62–1.48)
0.87
(0.54–1.41)
1.58
(1.05–2.37) e
1.81
(1.15–2.85) e
Abbreviations: OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, GDS Geriatric Depression Scale, IADL Instrumental activities of daily living
a Those who reported very good/good versus others (reference)
b Those who reported upper tertile of physical Activity Index versus others (reference)
c Those who reported every day versus others (reference)
d Mutually adjusted for all variables in the model
e P < 0.05

Discussion

In this study of the very elderly people (aged around 90), we explored self-perceived behavioral changes and hygiene practices during the first wave of COVID-19 emergency in Japan. We examined the associations between these behavioral changes and demographic, psychosocial, and functional characteristics assessed before the COVID-19 outbreak. The majority of the older individuals went out less frequently during the declared state of emergency, likely because they adhered to the stay-at-home advice applicable to other age groups [ 4]. Previous studies reported a decline in physical activity during COVID-19 lockdown in various populations and countries. An online survey of 1491 Australian adults (mean age 50.5 ± 14.9 years) demonstrated that 48.9% of respondents report decreased physical activity associated with higher depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms [ 13]. In the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, which enrolled 1119 elderly (mean age 74 ± 7 years) to a self-administered questionnaire survey, Visser et al. demonstrated that about half of the respondents reported a decrease in physical activity. Older adults were less likely to report a negative impact on their physical activity or exercise levels than younger people [ 14]. They also reported that functional limitation was strongly associated with a negative impact on physical activity. The difference in the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on physical activity behavior might be partly accounted for by the characteristics of respondents (e.g., age, functional status). In this present study of the very old adults independently living in the community, 28.1% of respondents reported decreased physical activity, which is independent of limitation in IADL or depressive symptoms (high GDS score). In contrast, physical activity engagement at baseline and smartphone ownership were independently associated with reduced physical activity during the COVID-19 emergency. These two measures were also associated with more frequent hand washing, suggesting that reductions in physical activity in our older participants may be part of preventive behaviors to reduce social contact.
Individuals with health literacy but lost resources (e.g., day center, gym, group activities) can maintain their previous physical activity levels if alternative resources, such as smartphone apps and home-exercise programs, are provided. In this study, visual impairment is another factor associated with decreased physical activity during COVID-19 emergency, suggesting that visual impairment could be a barrier to (in)formal support and resources to exercise or maintain physical activity. Therefore, alternative tools should be considered with adaptations for people with visual impairment, who are more likely to be vulnerable to the negative impacts of CODID-19 emergency.
Our results did not show any association of IADL disability or cognitive impairment with decreased physical activity during the COVID-19 emergency. This might be partly because our cohort includes relatively small percentages of those with dementia (2.1%) and disability in IADL (12.7%) due to our inclusion criteria. Alternatively, since frail older adults may already have been physically inactive, this questionnaire may have minimal effect, and hence, long-term effects on physical and mental health should be cautiously monitored by future follow-ups.
To prevent the spread of COVID-19 infection, social distancing is the most visible public health measures, but its implications for mental health and wellbeing should be addressed in research, policy, and clinical approaches to the COVID-19 pandemic [ 15]. In this context, it is noteworthy that our results show that the elderly who had established active social relations in the community before COVID-19 and interacted with each other frequently are likely to maintain their social networks even during COVID-19 emergency. In recent years, a good social environment (e.g., social support, social networks, and social inclusion), as well as the physical environment, have been shown to affect the well-being and health of the elderly [ 16]. Our results suggest that having a good social environment in the community daily may prevent the decline and deterioration of the well-being and mental health of the elderly even in emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This notion will be addressed in future follow-up studies with a direct assessment of psychosocial health and wellbeing concerning the social network in our cohort.
Compared to the high compliance with wearing a mask while going out (93.8%), hand wash hygiene was relatively neglected (50.3%) by our older respondents. In an internet survey aimed at 3301 adults in the United States of America aged ≥18 in the 2015–2016 influenza season, washing hands often (83.2%) was the most commonly reported preventive behavior [ 17]. As recommended by the World Health Organization, hand hygiene is one of the most effective ways to reduce the spread of pathogens and prevent infections [ 18]. Given the relatively low smartphone ownership (26.9%) among older adults, both online technology and real-life physical communication (e.g., phone calls, local newspapers, and radio) should focus on increasing public health outreach.
The present study has several strengths. First, it reached out to a unique population of the very old adults in the community using on-going longitudinal cohort resources. It might be difficult to enroll those elderly people into an online survey because of the relatively low use of smartphones and PCs in this age group. Second, a range of functional, mental, and behavioral factors was assessed before the COVID-19 outbreak using standardized and validated measures. There are important limitations to the present study. First, according to our study aims and eligibility criteria, we recruited community-dwelling, physically independent older adults for the KAWP. Thus, our respondents do not represent the general population with corresponding ages. Second, a selection bias might have occurred in the present survey conducted on 487 participants as a part of the KAWP study. In a questionnaire survey, it is important to achieve a high response rate within a pre-defined target population to ensure the validity of the results. Therefore, we made a substantial effort to achieve a high response rate of 89.2% in the present survey, and we believe this is a good indicator for valid results representing the study population. Moreover, characteristics of the present survey were similar to baseline characteristics of non-respondents of the KAWP cohort (Supplementary Table 1). Third, the present telephonic survey was conducted for a median of 2.2-years after the baseline examination; thus, the functional and psychosocial assessment may not reflect the respondents’ state at the time of the survey. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution. Forth, behavioral response to COVID-19 emergency may have been affected by the speed and scale of the spread of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. During the emergency period for the first wave, the maximum number of new COVID-19 patients per day was 18 (1.18 per 100,000 on April 11, 2020) [ 19]. When comparing our results to the findings of other studies, these limitations should also be taken into account.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our data suggest that the very old adults in an urban community decreased their physical activities during the COVID-19 emergency, as a possible preventive behavior. Moreover, those having visual impairment were more likely to experience negative impacts of COVID-19 emergency in terms of physical activities. Additionally, in contrast to the high rate of face mask use, handwashing compliance was low, suggesting a need for public health awareness drives on the importance of handwashing via various platforms sources. The findings provide valuable data for designing preventive strategies to maintain the health and wellbeing of older adults who are at greater risk of both severe COVID-19 and the consequences of physical inactivity.

Acknowledgements

We thank the study participants of the KAWP, the Kawasaki Municipality and Ms. Izumi Tamaki and Ms. Kyoko Furuta for their assistance in the recruitment of participants.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We have complied with all relevant regulations and guidelines for work with human subjects. The KAWP was approved by the ethics committee of the Keio University School of Medicine (ID: 20160297) and was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry as an observational study (ID: UMIN000026053). Written informed consent to participate in the KAWP was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Zusatzmaterial
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

BMC Geriatrics 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Coronavirus Corona-Update

Die aktuelle Entwicklung im Überblick: Nachrichten, Webinare, Übersichtsarbeiten.

Passend zum Thema

COVID-Impfmanagement

Schluss mit dem telefonischen Terminansturm: So organisieren Sie Covid-Impfungen in Ihrer Hausarztpraxis digital

Die gesetzlichen Änderungen zur Aufhebung der Impfpriorisierung gehen einher mit einem hohen Ansturm an telefonischen Terminanfragen, welchem Sie nun entgegenstehen. Mit Doctolib können Sie einfach und schnell Impftermine auch außerhalb Ihrer Öffnungszeiten online buchen lassen. Entlasten Sie so Ihr Praxisteam bei der Menge an Impfanfragen.   

Bildnachweise