Background
As declared by the World Health Organization, the global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has posed an unprecedented health crisis and caused more than 1.5 million deaths(
https://covid19.who.int/). As the pandemic continues, mounting evidence implicates thrombosis and coagulopathy in a fatal outcome in COVID-19 patients [
1,
2]. The latest data reported that thrombotic complications occur in up to 49% of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) [
3]. Autopsies further provide direct evidence of pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 [
4,
5]. Of note, immunothrombosis, the direct interaction of activated leukocytes with platelets and plasma coagulation factors in the innate immune response [
6], has been demonstrated to contribute to the thrombotic events of coagulopathy [
7]. Besides, the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are composed of extracellular DNA decorated with granule proteins released by activated neutrophils, was identified as a leading cause and core component of immunothrombosis [
8‐
10]. Hence, it is crucial to reveal the mechanisms causing NET formation in exploring more efficient therapeutic approaches to combat COVID-19.
Complement is a major component of the innate immune system involved in defending against foreign pathogens through complement fragments [
11]. During the complement activation, the central component C3 is cleaved into C3a and C3b. C3b binds to C3 convertase to form C5 convertase, which proteolytically cleaves C5 into C5a and C5b [
12,
13]. The anaphylatoxin C3a and C5a function as potent activators for neutrophil migration, cytokine production, platelet-leukocyte aggregation, and NET release, by binding to receptors C3aR and C5aR on the surface of neutrophils [
12,
14‐
16]. Multiple studies have illustrated that complement-induced over-activation of neutrophils is involved in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and fatal viral infections [
17‐
19]. More importantly, complement C5a- and C3a-mediated NET formation has recently been demonstrated to be the key driver in COVID-19 immunothrombosis [
20]. Thus, complements are important soluble mediators that bridge inflammation and thrombosis in COVID-19 and other infectious diseases.
Of note, C3a and C5a have carboxyl-terminus containing arginine residues that are critical for optimal activity [
21]. Carboxypeptidases are capable of controlling the activity of anaphylatoxins by cleaving off a C-terminal arginine residue to yield arginine derivatives (C3a
des-Arg and C5a
des-Arg) [
12]. The resulting C5a
des-Arg retains 1–10% of the inflammatory activity of C5a, and C3a
des-Arg is devoid of any pro-inflammatory activity [
22]. Recently, Carboxypeptidase B2 (CPB2, encoded by human
CPB2 gene) was demonstrated to be an important regulator in reducing inflammatory response and organ damage by degrading plasma anaphylatoxins [
23‐
25].
In this study, we found that the plasma levels of complements and NETs were associated with disease severity in COVID-19. More importantly, we demonstrated that recombinant CPB could reduce the NET formation by degrading anaphylatoxin C3a and C5a. These findings may shed new light on a potential therapeutic strategy for COVID-19 by targeting the anaphylatoxin-NET axis.
Methods
Patient and sample collection
The prospective study included 135 patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 who admitted to Beijing Ditan Hospital from January 20
th, 2020 to April 27
th, 2020. The following patients were excluded from the present study: 1. Age < 18; 2. Gestation; 3. Patients with any immunodeficiency such as neutrophilia, neutropenia, malignant tumor, using of immunosuppressants for more than 1 week; 4. The time from onset to admission is more than 2 weeks; 5. Dropout patients; 6. Patients or their guardians do not want to be included in the study. According to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 148 patients were enrolled in the study cohort, and 13 of them quitted before the study was completed. According to the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (trial version 7) [
26] released by National Health Commission & National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, the classification of COVID-19 are as follows: Mild: Clinical symptoms from mild fever, respiratory tract to pneumonia manifestation. Severe: Meeting any one of the following should be treated as severe cases, including respiratory distress, respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths/min; oxygen saturation ≤ 93% at rest; and PaO
2/FiO
2 ≤ 300. In severe group, 31 patients were admitted to ICU, 15 cases received mechanical ventilation and 1 of them deceased. In severe group, 11 of 41 patients (26.8%) were first diagnosed as mild/moderate and then crossed over to severe COVID-19. In treating with coagulation disorders, 22 severe patients received enoxaparin sodium, 1 severe patient received low-molecular-weight heparin sodium and 1 severe patient received dabigatran treatment. The other 17 severe patients and all the mild patients did not receive anticoagulant therapy. Twenty-five healthy donors matched to the age and sex of mild COVID-19 patients were enrolled. Three volunteers donated their peripheral neutrophils for in vitro experiments.
The first sample of each patient was collected within 24 h after admission. Then, the blood was taken once a week until discharge from hospital. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes. Plasma was separated from blood by centrifugation at 450 × g (break off) for 10 min at room temperature. Plasma samples were divided into small aliquots and stored at − 80 °C until the time of testing. The study was approved by Committee of Ethics at Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. The approval number is JDLKZ(2020)D(036)-01.
Quantification of MPO-DNA and cfDNA
Cell-free DNA in plasma was quantified using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. MPO-DNA complexes were quantified similarly to what has been previously described [
27]. In brief, a capture antibody against MPO was coated on a 96-well flat-bottom plate at 1:200 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and the amount of MPO-bound DNA was quantified using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA assay as described above.
Quantification of C5 and C3
Plasma levels of C5 (including the sum of C5 and C5a) and C3 (including the sum of C3, C3a and C3b) were detected using Human Complement C5 ELISA Kit and Human Complement C3 ELISA Kit (Abcam) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Immunofluorescence Staining
NETs were detected by immunofluorescence staining as previously reported [
28]. Neutrophils were fixed, permeabilized and blocked after 3-h in vitro culture or stimulation. Cells were incubated with antibody against histone H3 citrulline R2 + R8 + R17 (H3Cit; Abcam) at 1:400 for 1 h at 37℃, followed by secondary antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor Dyes (Invitrogen) at 1:1000 for 1 h at room temperature. DNA was stained using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Cell Signaling Technology, London, UK) at 1:2000 for 8 min at room temperature. Images were obtained with a confocal fluorescence microscope (Zeiss LSM 510 META; Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NJ, USA). NETs were identified as structures positive for both histone H3Cit and DAPI staining.
Neutrophil isolation, in vitro culture and stimulation
Blood samples from healthy donors were collected into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes as described above for plasma separation. The anticoagulated blood was then fractionated by density-gradient centrifugation using Percoll (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada). Neutrophils were further purified by dextran sedimentation of the red blood cell layer before lysing residual red blood cells with sodium chloride. Neutrophil preparations were at least 95% pure as confirmed by nuclear morphology.
Purified neutrophils were resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with heat-inactivated 5% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM L-glutamine. Neutrophils were seeded into 96-well plate (5 × 10
4/well) for supernatant detection and 24-well plate (2 × 10
5/well) with polylysine-coated coverslips for NET immunofluorescence staining. Cells were rested for 1 h at 37 °C and 5% CO
2 followed by replacement with plasma from HCs or COVID-19 patients at a final concentration of 5% in RPMI-1640 medium for 3 h according to previous report [
20]. Recombinant CPB (YaxinBio, Shanghai, China) was used at 100 μg/ml to digest C3a and C5a in the plasma at 37 °C for 30 min prior to neutrophil stimulation. One hour prior to neutrophil stimulation, 100 μg/ml anti-human C3a (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) or 10 μg/ml anti-human C5a antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were added into the culture system for neutralizing C3a or C5a in the plasma. Three hours later, the supernatant was collected to quantify MPO-DNA content. The results were calculated by deducting the background levels of MPO-DNA in the plasma.
Preparation of NET-conditioned medium and cell viability assay
Neutrophils from healthy donors were cultured with RPMI-1640 medium supplied with 5% plasma from patients with COVID-19 as described above. The peptidylarginine deiminase inhibitor Cl-amidine was added at 200 μM for blocking NET formation. Three hours later, the supernatant was collected carefully and used as NET-conditioned medium. HUVEC cells (3 × 103/well) were seeded into 96-well plate and cultured for 24 h. Cells culture media were replaced with 100 μl NET-conditioned media or new cell culture media as control for 24 h. Cell viability assay was performed using a cell counting kit 8 (CCK‐8) (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) as per the manufacturer's protocol. Absorbance was detected at 590 nm using a microplate reader. The experiments were performed in sextuplicate.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 25.0 statistical package (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation for data that were normally distributed or median and interquartile range for data that were not normally distributed for continuous variables and number (%) for categorical variables. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to inspect the normality and homogeneity of variance of all the data. For two-group comparison, P values were derived from the one-way Student t test to determine differences between groups with normally distributed data and Mann–Whitney nonparametric test with other data. For multi-group comparison, P values were derived from one-way ANOVA (continuous variables) or Chi-square test (categorical variables). For all comparisons, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Discussion
As one of the major causes of mortality in severe COVID-19, thrombosis has drawn much attention [
30]; however, the formation mechanisms remain to be clarified. Recently, NETs were found in to be a key, which provides new clues to the pathogenesis [
20,
31‐
33]. In this study, we investigated the longitudinal dynamics of complement C3, C5 and NETs in the plasma of mild and severe patients with COVID-19. Considering that the average hospitalization periods of mild and severe patients were 25.5 (17.3, 35.7) and 36 (22, 43), respectively (Table
1), an observation of up to 60 days in the present study would cover the dynamics of NETs and complements during the disease progression from onset to convalescence. First, we found that the elevated levels of NETs and complement C3 were closely related to immune status, coagulation disorders, and multiple organ dysfunction. Second, the NET formation was at least partially regulated by complement anaphylatoxin C3a and C5a. Third, we made a novel finding that recombinant CPB could effectively improve the detrimental effect of NETs on vascular endothelial cells by degrading C3a and C5a.
The roles and mechanisms of complement C5a in neutrophil migration and activation have been well described in several inflammatory disorders such as sepsis, inflammatory arthritis and gout [
34‐
38]. In the global pandemic COVID-19, over-activation of complement had also attracted the attention of scientists. Consistent with our study, other reports also revealed that activation of complement C3 and C5 was involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 [
39,
40]. The findings from our study and these reports collectively suggested that complement activation may contribute to the development of tissue injury and organ dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. Given this, complement-blocking drugs may be a beneficial addition to the therapeutic armamentarium against COVID-19. Thus, several clinical trials were launched just recently in order to prevent ARDS and mortality of COVID-19 by C5a inhibitor (Zilucoplan, NCT04382755) or anti-C5a antibody (Eculizumab, NCT04288713). Considering that in addition to C5a, a significant elevation of C3a was also observed in the patients with COVID-19, we highly recommend recombinant CPB as a potential choice for simultaneously degrading both C3a and C5a[
12]. It is worthy of expectation for preclinical studies on recombinant CPB to suppress the unrestrained inflammation and reduce the clinical severity of COVID-19. Notably, the endogenous CPB2 was also known as thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) to inhibit fibrinolysis and thereby reduce the binding of plasminogen to the fibrin clot [
24]. An excessive supplement of recombinant CPB may upset the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis. Therefore, an appropriate dosage should be carefully considered in further studies.
We noticed that the NET production induced by plasma from severe COVID-19 patients could not be completely inhibited by either neutralizing antibodies or recombinant CPB (Fig.
3a), which implied that in addition to anaphylatoxins, there were other inducers of NETs in the plasma of severe patients. Many studies have reported an increase in IL-6, IL-1β, and CXCL-8 in severe patients with COVID-19 [
41‐
43], which are also important factors that induce granulocyte activation and NET release. These pro-inflammatory cytokines may also contribute to the over-production of NETs in severe COVID-19 patients. Anaphylatoxins are leading mediators for rapidly inducing the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines [
44,
45]. Thus, complement activation may be a pivotal link in amplifying inflammatory response in early infection. Consistently, we found that compared with HDs, complement C3 and C5 increased remarkably in patients with mild symptoms. Although the complement component anaphylatoxins may contribute to increased disease severity following SARS-CoV-2 infection, complement activation is necessary for the development of a protective humoral response. In this respect, early intervention in anaphylatoxins without affecting complement cascade activation in COVID-19 patients might help prevent thrombosis and disease progression.
In addition, C3 and C5 concentrations might be influenced by a variety of factors including confounding co-morbidities. By analyzing the relationship between complement levels and complications, we found that the patients with high levels of C-reactive protein (> 5) had higher concentrations of C3 and C5 in both mild and severe patients (Additional file
4: Figure S4). Meanwhile, the immune status (peripheral neutrophil counts) was correlated with C3 concentrations in COVID-19 patients (Table
2). These data indicated that complement activation was tightly associated with inflammation and immune status in COVID-19.
Our results demonstrated that the increased complement component plays an important role in promoting the formation of NETs in patients with COVID-19. It is different from our previous findings in the infection of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV). The patients with SFTS had significantly higher levels of NETs but comparable levels of C3 and C5 to the healthy controls [
27]. The difference in complement activation between COVID-19 and SFTS might be related to differences in clinical manifestations. Pulmonary thrombosis appears to be frequent in COVID-19 pneumonia, while the patients with SFTS have a marked propensity for bleeding with a rare thrombus. Thus, the mechanism and function of NETs may be different in these two viral infections associated with coagulation abnormalities.
We acknowledged that our study has several limitations. First, the CPB2 levels in the plasma of COVID-19 patients were not available because it is unstable in physiological condition with a half-life of 10 min at 37℃. Second, for the same reason, we used recombinant pancreatic enzyme CPB instead in in vitro study, which is a stable homolog of CPB2. Third, compared with MPO-DNA, a specific marker of NETs, cfDNA could also be released from other leukocytes and damaged endothelial cells following cellular death. We were not able to accurately determine the cellular origins of peripheral cfDNA in the present study. As there were higher degrees of correlation of cfDNA with clinical parameters than MPO-DNA (Table
2), it may be directly related to leukopenia and tissue damage in patients with COVID-19.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank all the patients and healthy donors included in this study. We appreciate the works from Professor Zhihai Chen, Dr. Yangzi Song and Dr. Rui Song from Center of Infectious Disease, Beijing Ditan Hospital; Dr. Ju Zhang, Ms. Yonghong Yan, Dr. Junyan Han and Ms. Chuan Song from Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital in recruiting patients and extracting clinical information. We also thank Professor Chen Chen from Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital and Mr. Xuejia Wang for helping with data analysis.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.