Background
In December 2019, a novel human coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was reported in the city of Wuhan, China. It has spread throughout the world and caused a pandemic coronavirus disease (COVID-19). As of 22th July 2020, the disease had affected more than 15 million people causing more than 620,000 deaths, with the United States becoming the latest epicenter with near 3,960,000 cases and the highest number of deaths—over 140,000 people [
1].
SARS-CoV-2 infection begins with inoculation of the respiratory tract mucosa using angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as the functional receptor for cell entry. The inhaled virus likely binds to epithelial cells in the nasal cavity and starts replicating. There is local propagation of the virus, with a limited initial innate immune response. At this stage the virus can be detected via nasal swabs, and although viral burden may be low, these individuals are contagious. The virus propagates and migrates down the respiratory tract along the conducting airways, and a more robust innate immune response is triggered. For about 80% of infected patients, the disease will be mild and mostly restricted to the upper and conducting airways. However, the remaining 20% of infected patients will progress and have severe pulmonary infiltrates, while some of these will develop very severe disease and eventually die [
2].
A wealth of scientific data has been published over the past few months on epidemiology, clinical manifestations, molecular biology, imaging features, laboratory diagnosis and treatments, but evidence has not been robust in most literature. Although COVID-19 pneumonia may sometimes meet the ARDS Berlin definition criteria, some authors argue that it is a specific disease with peculiar phenotypes, due to the frequent dissociation between the severity of hypoxemia and the maintenance of relatively good respiratory mechanics [
3].
Imaging plays a crucial role in the initial detection and evaluation of progression of COVID-19 pneumonia.
To the best of our knowledge, there is currently little scientific data regarding lung perfusion disturbances occurring in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia [
4]. Our goal is to assess lung perfusion changes seen in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, and to correlate perfusion abnormalities with clinical outcomes.
Materials and methods
Patient cohort
This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board at the Hospital Naval Almirante Nef and written informed consent was waived. A prospective cohort study was undertaken to assess the prognostic ability of lung perfusion using subtraction CT angiography (sCTA). Patients (> 18 years old) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) that required hospitalization were consecutively enrolled at three hospitals between April and May 2020. These centers included the Hospital Naval Almirante Nef (Viña del Mar, Chile), Hospital San Martín de Quillota (Quillota, Chile), and Hospital IESS Los Ceibos (Guayaquil, Ecuador). These facilities are tertiary-care hospitals able to provide on-site CTA scans and intensive care management of severe COVID-19 cases when needed.
Forty-five patients were included in this study. However, due to uninterpretable iodine map results, four of these participants had to be excluded from analyses. This left 41 patients (22 males and 19 females) in the study. In all cases, a basic clinical and demographic profile was obtained that included information regarding sex, age, duration of clinical symptoms, and laboratory studies including D-dimer, alveolar oxygenation to inspired oxygen (Pa/Fi) ratio at baseline and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. Baseline lung CT characteristics were recorded as well such as the predominant imaging pattern (ground-glass opacities, consolidation or mixed pattern), the extension of involved lung, presence of pleural effusion, evidence of right-ventricular overload and pulmonary embolism. These data were recorded along with sCTA features (see below) in an anonymized registry.
All participants were followed-up until hospital discharge searching for the development of any of the study endpoints. These endpoints included intensive-care unit (ICU) admission, initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and death. The decision to intubate or admit to an ICU facility was left to the attending physician's discretion.
CT scan protocol and image acquisition
All CT scans were performed within 24 h of admission to the hospital, in supine position. Imaging data were acquired with multidetector-CT (Canon Aquilion Prime 160 and 80, and Canon Aquilion RXL 16).
CT scan protocol
After positioning, an unenhanced scan was obtained, followed by IV injection of 100 mL iodinated contrast medium at a rate of 5 mL/seg (Visipaque 320, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis and Optiray 320, Mallinckrodt Medical, St Louis, Mo). After bolus triggering at the level of the pulmonary artery with a relative threshold of 150 HU, an early pulmonary arterial angiographic phase was obtained, followed eight seconds later by a delayed pulmonary arterial phase. All the exams were performed with the same acquisition parameters: kV (100 kV), automatic exposure control (Standard), similar range and field-of-view (FOV: L or LL), collimation (1.0 × 16 for Canon Aquilion RXL 16; 0.5 × 80 for Canon Aquilion Prime 80 and 160), pitch factor (1.4), and same rotation speed (0.5 s for Canon Aquilion RXL 16 and 0.35 s for Canon Aquilion Prime 80 and 160). The acquired images had the same reconstruction parameters: slice thickness (1.0 mm), reconstruction interval (0.8 mm) and convolution filter (mediastinum). Average dose DLP (mGy/cm) was 1093 (range: 847–1932). Breathing instructions were the same for all examinations.
sCTA is a technique that uses software-based motion correction between an unenhanced and an enhanced CT scan to obtain an iodine distribution map of the lung parenchyma. Iodine distribution maps of the early and delayed arterial phases were obtained using SureSubtraction software (version 7.0; Canon Medical Systems, Japan). Iodine maps were generated with gray-scale and identical color window tables, ranging from blue (low iodine enhancement) to yellow (high iodine enhancement).
Image analysis
Areas of injured parenchyma in both lungs were assessed for a predominant pattern. These were characterized as ground glass opacities, consolidation and mixed pattern. Airspace compromise was assessed for each of the 5 lobes considering the extent of anatomic involvement, as follows: 0 points for no involvement; 1 point for < 30% involvement; 2 points for 31–60% involvement; and 3 points for > 61% involvement. The resulting CT severity score was the sum of each individual lobar score (0–15). Areas of airspace disease were also assessed for the presence of increased perfusion or hypoperfusion. Peripheral vascular dilatation and vascular tortuosity were also assessed in each lobe.
Areas of apparently healthy lung parenchyma were assessed for preservation of anteroposterior and apicobasal perfusion gradient or hypoperfusion. Hypoperfusion in apparently normal lung parenchyma was characterized according to its distribution (focal or diffuse), and extension. The latter was graded using a scoring system: first, both lungs were divided into five lobes (upper right and left lobes, middle lobe, and lower right and left lobes). Then, the extension of hypoperfusion in apparently healthy lung parenchyma in each lobe was categorized as normal perfusion (0 points), less than 50% of the lobe affected (1 point), and 50% of the lobe or more affected (2 points). This resulted in an overall score that ranged from 0 to 10 points, with higher scores indicating more severe hypoperfusion. Using this score, patients were divided in three groups. Patients with 3 points or less were considered to have mild perfusion abnormalities, those with 4–6 points had moderate abnormalities and those with 7 or more points had severe abnormalities.
A single radiologist with over 15-years experience (MS) in reading CT analyzed the images of included patients in all hospitals. The attending physicians did not have information regarding sCTA perfusion results. However, data regarding overall CT characteristics of included participants was made available to clinicians as per current protocols at study centers.
Statistical analyses
Descriptive statistics including medians, means, standard deviations, interquartile ranges (IQR) and absolute and relative frequencies were used first to describe the study sample. Bivariate comparisons between groups were performed using Fisher's Exact test for categorical variables and Student's t test or Mann–Whitney's test for continuous variables after reviewing data distribution and variances. Association between quantitative variables were sought using Pearson's or Kendall's correlation coefficients. Discrete quantitative variables (such as computed tomography scores) were evaluated using Kendall's tau coefficient. The development of any of the aforementioned study endpoints was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves which were then compared using the logrank statistic. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were calculated whenever appropriate. Analyses were undertaken by an independent statistician who had no participation in the decision to admit or intubate any of the included patients, using STATA 15.0 SE® (College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC). A two-sided p value of < 5% was considered to be statistically significant.
Discussion
With the advent of SARS-Cov-2, nearly 20% of the infected patients will progress and develop severe disease, consistent in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, and eventually die [
2]. In our prospective cohort, we evaluated and quantified lung perfusion disturbances in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia as a severity predictor, through iodine distribution maps obtained with sCTA. Our findings showed that with increasing severity of hypoperfusion abnormalities in areas of apparently healthy lung parenchyma in conventional chest CT images, patients had a statistically significant increase in their chance to require admission to ICU (
p = 0.002), and to require IMV (
p = 0.016). Vascular tortuosity in CT angiography images was also independently associated with requirement of IMV (
p = 0.003). We also found that average lower Pa/Fi ratio (
p = 0.035), higher D-dimer levels (
p < 0.01), and number of affected lung lobules (
p = 0.02), were associated with perfusion abnormalities.
Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia showed abnormally decreased iodine distribution in areas of apparently normal lung parenchyma, findings that as a whole probably account for a severe V/Q mismatch. Some authors have suggested microthrombi to be a key component of clinical deterioration. Activation of the coagulation cascade in early stages of disease appears to be due to a thromboinflammatory response and direct viral effects on pulmonary tissue, which is counter-balanced by fibrinolytic activity and manifests as an increase in fibrin degradation products. In later stages of disease, this balance is lost and a pro-coagulant state ensues [
5‐
8].
ACE2 dysfunction could be a possible explanation for the establishment of a systemic endotheliopathy that may lead to an abnormal pro-coagulant state and sepsis [
9]. We believe that the main pathophysiologic mechanism behind COVID-19 pneumonia involves accumulation of angiotensin II due to decreased activity of ACE2, which is secondary to ACE2 endocytosis after viral binding [
10]. This leads to vasoconstriction, establishing a progressive V/Q mismatch, with extensive areas of apparently healthy but hypoperfused lung that function as alveolar dead space.
This is supported by studies showing evidence that non-hypertense patients with COVID-19 appeared to have elevated levels of plasma angiotensin II, which were correlated with the degree of lung injury and total viral load [
11,
12].
Decreased activity of ACE2 leads to heightened and relatively unopposed vasoconstriction, pro-coagulation, pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidant angiotensin II effects [
13,
14].
In a scenario of extensive vasoconstriction in well-ventilated areas, possible treatment strategies could be aimed at improving perfusion. Luni Chen et al. treated patients with severe SARS in 2003 with inhaled nitric oxide, with significant improvement in arterial oxygenation [
15].
Areas of injured lung parenchyma characterized by ground-glass opacities, consolidation and septal thickening, also have particular anomalies in COVID-19 pneumonia. Subsegmental vessel enlargement in the vicinity of areas of injured parenchyma has been described in up to 89% of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia [
2]. Although in situ microthrombosis is a possible underlying mechanism, it could also be explained by vasoplegia induced by SARS-CoV-2. Overactivation of a regional vasodilatation cascade in areas of injured non-aerated lung parenchyma, due to a local dysfunctional inflammatory response, could explain the loss of the normal, physiological hypoxic arterial vasoconstriction that would normally be expected in areas of hypoventilated lung, contributing to the abnormal hyperperfusion that we have found in areas of lung opacities.
Gattinoni et al. [
3] hypothesized that there are two distinct types of lung damage in ARDS. Type-L or 1 is characterized by low elastance and high compliance, which is rarely seen in ARDS, while type-H or 2 shows high elastance and low compliance that is typical of ARDS. They explain the primary cause of hypoxemia in type-L is perfusion defects presumably caused by vasoconstriction and high shunt fraction. In contrast, the high elastance in type-H is thought to be induced by lung edema.
In type-L pattern, areas of injured lung parenchyma show hyperperfusion, probably due to loss of compensatory hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (vasoplegia), resulting in high perfusion to areas of hypoventilated lung and an abnormally low V/Q ratio; while areas of apparently normal lung parenchyma show hypoperfusion that results in an abnormally high V/Q ratio. Changes in vascular resistance lead to a net shunt or steal of vascular flow towards areas of non-aerated lung, which is supported by the good clinical response to prone position that has been described in patients with COVID-19 [
16].
This study has several limitations. First, the small sample size, mainly explained by the epidemiologic situation of the cities where the participant hospitals are located at the moment of the study, which were in early stages of the pandemic outbreak. Our relatively small sample size restricted the use of multivariable techniques to further refine the association with perfusion CT findings and prognosis. Although the bivariate contrasts were both clinically and statistically significant, it is not possible to exclude bias due to confounding, especially considering the correlation shown in Fig.
6. However, it should also be kept in mind that the overall strength of the correlation was only moderate. This reduces the possibility that our findings are explained solely by confounding. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to fully assess this association.
Second, the analysis of the images was performed by a single radiologist, resulting in a lack of inter-observer variability assessment. Third, perfusion imaging involves more radiation than conventional CT techniques. Fourth, dual-energy CT (DECT) is commonly used in clinical practice for assessing pulmonary perfusion and uses material decomposition of iodine from other materials to visualize the regional distribution of intravenous contrast in the pulmonary vessels, including the capillaries [
17,
18]. Although sCTA is a new postprocessing technique and thus, has not been as extensively validated as DECT, it is a promising approach that digitally subtracts a precontrast CT scan from a contrast material–enhanced CT scan after motion correction. Since it is software-based, it is significantly less expensive and potentially more available than costly DECT equipment. Nevertheless, being a novel approach, concerns regarding potential bias resulting from subtraction of non-contrast images from contrast-enhanced images need to be addressed, and greater experience and better knowledge of typical pitfalls is needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy [
19‐
21]. Fifth, some of the iodine maps were uninterpretable. Finally, it is unclear whether these perfusion abnormalities are unique to COVID-19 or if they can also be found in other multifocal pneumonias and other causes of ARDS.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.