Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 8/2021

22.06.2021 | COVID-19 | Original Zur Zeit gratis

Implementation of new ECMO centers during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience and results from the Middle East and India

verfasst von: Ahmed A. Rabie, Mohamed H. Azzam, Abdulrahman A. Al-Fares, Akram Abdelbary, Hani N. Mufti, Ibrahim F. Hassan, Arpan Chakraborty, Pranay Oza, Alyaa Elhazmi, Huda Alfoudri, Suneel Kumar Pooboni, Abdulrahman Alharthy, Daniel Brodie, Bishoy Zakhary, Kiran Shekar, Marta Velia Antonini, Nicholas A. Barrett, Giles Peek, Alain Combes, Yaseen M. Arabi

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 8/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients has increased during the course of the pandemic. As uncertainty existed regarding patient’s outcomes, early guidelines recommended against establishing new ECMO centers. We aimed to explore the epidemiology and outcomes of ECMO for COVID-19 related cardiopulmonary failure in five countries in the Middle East and India and to evaluate the results of ECMO in 5 new centers.

Methods

This is a retrospective, multicenter international, observational study conducted in 19 ECMO centers in five countries in the Middle East and India from March 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. We included patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO for refractory hypoxemia and severe respiratory acidosis with or without circulatory failure. Data collection included demographic data, ECMO-related specific data, pre-ECMO patient condition, 24 h post-ECMO initiation data, and outcome. The primary outcome was survival to home discharge. Secondary outcomes included mortality during ECMO, survival to decannulation, and outcomes stratified by center type.

Results

Three hundred and seven COVID-19 patients received ECMO support during the study period, of whom 78 (25%) were treated in the new ECMO centers. The median age was 45 years (interquartile range IQR 37–52), and 81% were men. New center patients were younger, were less frequently male, had received higher PEEP, more frequently inotropes and prone positioning before ECMO and were less frequently retrieved from a peripheral center on ECMO. Survival to home discharge was 45%. In patients treated in new and established centers, survival was 55 and 41% (p = 0.03), respectively. Multivariable analysis retained only a SOFA score < 12 at ECMO initiation as associated with survival (odds ratio, OR 1.93 (95% CI 1.05–3.58), p = 0.034), but not treatment in a new center (OR 1.65 (95% CI 0.75–3.67)).

Conclusions

During pandemics, ECMO may provide favorable outcomes in highly selected patients as resources allow. Newly formed ECMO centers with appropriate supervision of regional experts may have satisfactory results.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, Hibbert CL, Truesdale A, Clemens F, Cooper N, Firmin RK, Elbourne D (2009) Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9698):1351–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61069-2CrossRefPubMed Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, Hibbert CL, Truesdale A, Clemens F, Cooper N, Firmin RK, Elbourne D (2009) Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9698):1351–1363. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s0140-6736(09)61069-2CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoué S, Guervilly C, Da Silva D, Zafrani L, Tirot P, Veber B, Maury E, Levy B, Cohen Y, Richard C, Kalfon P, Bouadma L, Mehdaoui H, Beduneau G, Lebreton G, Brochard L, Ferguson ND, Fan E, Slutsky AS, Brodie D, Mercat A, EOLIA Trial Group, REVA, ECMONet (2018) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 378(21):1965–1975. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800385CrossRefPubMed Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoué S, Guervilly C, Da Silva D, Zafrani L, Tirot P, Veber B, Maury E, Levy B, Cohen Y, Richard C, Kalfon P, Bouadma L, Mehdaoui H, Beduneau G, Lebreton G, Brochard L, Ferguson ND, Fan E, Slutsky AS, Brodie D, Mercat A, EOLIA Trial Group, REVA, ECMONet (2018) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 378(21):1965–1975. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1800385CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zakhary B, Shekar K, Diaz R, Badulak J, Johnston L et al (2020) Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) ECMOed Taskforce. Position Paper on Global Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Education and Educational Agenda for the Future: a statement from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization ECMOed Taskforce. Crit Care Med 48(3):406–414. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004158CrossRefPubMed Zakhary B, Shekar K, Diaz R, Badulak J, Johnston L et al (2020) Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) ECMOed Taskforce. Position Paper on Global Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Education and Educational Agenda for the Future: a statement from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization ECMOed Taskforce. Crit Care Med 48(3):406–414. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​CCM.​0000000000004158​CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al, On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22(7):707–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709751CrossRefPubMed Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al, On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22(7):707–710. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​BF01709751CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt M, Bailey M, Sheldrake J, Hodgson C, Aubron C, Rycus PT, Scheinkestel C, Cooper DJ, Brodie D, Pellegrino V, Combes A, Pilcher D (2014) Predicting survival after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189(11):1374–1382. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201311-2023OCCrossRefPubMed Schmidt M, Bailey M, Sheldrake J, Hodgson C, Aubron C, Rycus PT, Scheinkestel C, Cooper DJ, Brodie D, Pellegrino V, Combes A, Pilcher D (2014) Predicting survival after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189(11):1374–1382. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1164/​rccm.​201311-2023OCCrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbaro RP, MacLaren G, Boonstra PS, Iwashyna TJ, Slutsky AS, Fan E, Bartlett RH, Tonna JE, Hyslop R, Fanning JJ, Rycus PT, Hyer SJ, Anders MM, Agerstrand CL, Hryniewicz K, Diaz R, Lorusso R, Combes A, Brodie D, Organization ELS (2020) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32008-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barbaro RP, MacLaren G, Boonstra PS, Iwashyna TJ, Slutsky AS, Fan E, Bartlett RH, Tonna JE, Hyslop R, Fanning JJ, Rycus PT, Hyer SJ, Anders MM, Agerstrand CL, Hryniewicz K, Diaz R, Lorusso R, Combes A, Brodie D, Organization ELS (2020) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Lancet. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(20)32008-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Shekar K, Slutsky AS, Brodie D (2020) ECMO for severe ARDS associated with COVID-19: now we know we can, but should we? Lancet Respir Med 8:1066–1068CrossRef Shekar K, Slutsky AS, Brodie D (2020) ECMO for severe ARDS associated with COVID-19: now we know we can, but should we? Lancet Respir Med 8:1066–1068CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Guervilly C, Prud’homme E, Pauly V, Bourenne J, Hraiech S, Daviet F, Adda M, Coiffard B, Forel JM, Roch A, Persico N, Papazian L (2019) Prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: time for a randomized trial? Intensive Care Med 45(7):1040–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05570-9CrossRefPubMed Guervilly C, Prud’homme E, Pauly V, Bourenne J, Hraiech S, Daviet F, Adda M, Coiffard B, Forel JM, Roch A, Persico N, Papazian L (2019) Prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: time for a randomized trial? Intensive Care Med 45(7):1040–1042. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00134-019-05570-9CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Implementation of new ECMO centers during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience and results from the Middle East and India
verfasst von
Ahmed A. Rabie
Mohamed H. Azzam
Abdulrahman A. Al-Fares
Akram Abdelbary
Hani N. Mufti
Ibrahim F. Hassan
Arpan Chakraborty
Pranay Oza
Alyaa Elhazmi
Huda Alfoudri
Suneel Kumar Pooboni
Abdulrahman Alharthy
Daniel Brodie
Bishoy Zakhary
Kiran Shekar
Marta Velia Antonini
Nicholas A. Barrett
Giles Peek
Alain Combes
Yaseen M. Arabi
Publikationsdatum
22.06.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Schlagwort
COVID-19
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06451-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2021

Intensive Care Medicine 8/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.