Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Critical Care 1/2020

Open Access 01.12.2020 | COVID-19 | Research Letter

Incidence rate and clinical impacts of arrhythmia following COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17,435 patients

verfasst von: Shu-Chen Liao, Shih-Chieh Shao, Chi-Wen Cheng, Yung-Chang Chen, Ming-Jui Hung

Erschienen in: Critical Care | Ausgabe 1/2020

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
Shu-Chen Liao and Shih-Chieh Shao have contributed equally to this work
A comment to this article is available online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13054-021-03655-w.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Arrhythmia is a potential cardiovascular complication of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) [1]. In one case series of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 16.7% developed unspecified arrhythmia [2], while another case series indicated sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation among 5.9% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 [3]. However, incidence rates of arrhythmia and mortality rates after incident arrhythmia in COVID-19 patients have not been systematically established.
We searched for relevant studies cited in PubMed or Embase up to September 15, 2020, using the terms “COVID-19”, “arrhythmia”, “incidence”, “mortality,” and “prognosis” with suitable MeSH terms. All studies were selected and reviewed by two reviewers (SCL and SCS). The final list of included studies and data extractions were derived through extensive discussion with agreement from both authors. Statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc (Windows) version 15.0 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). Outcomes were reported as proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI), based on the random effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was detected by the Cochran Q test with p value and the I2 statistic.
Of 645 potential studies screened, we excluded 143 duplicate studies, 66 irrelevant studies, 12 conference abstracts, 241 other types of publications (e.g., pre-prints, protocols, opinions, recommendations, editorials, commentaries, retractions and reviews), 114 studies without incidence or mortality data, and 13 non-English studies. We included 56 studies from 11 countries comprising 17,435 patients with COVID-19. Study characteristics for included articles are listed in Table 1. Notably, most studies only included hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (96.4%). The overall incidence of arrhythmia in COVID-19 patients was 16.8% (95% CI: 12.8–21.2%; I2: 98.0%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1a). The incidence of different types of arrhythmia in patients with COVID-19 was as follows: 12.0% (22 studies, 95% CI: 8.6–15.9%) for non-classified arrhythmia, 8.2% (14 studies, 95% CI: 5.5–11.3%) for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia, 10.8% (26 studies, 95% CI: 6.6–15.9%) for conduction disorders, 8.6% (5 studies, 95% CI: 4.5–13.9%) for premature contraction and 3.3% (16 studies, 95% CI: 1.9–4.9%) for ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia. We found the mortality was 20.3% (95% CI: 12.9–29.0%; I2: 72.8%, p < 0.001) in COVID-19 patients who developed arrhythmia (Fig. 1b).
Table 1
Study characteristics
Author/Year
Country
Study design
Setting
Male
Age
HF
CAD
Medication
Du Y/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (2 centers)
Inpatient
72.9
65.8a
NA
11.8
Anti-influenza drugs: 77.6; Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 12.9
Wang D/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
54.3
56.0
NA
NA
Anti-influenza drugs: 89.9; Azithromycin: 18.1
Guo T/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
48.7
58.5 a
NA
11.2
Anti-influenza drugs: 88.8
Rosenberg ES/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (multicenter)
Inpatient
59.7
63.0
6.7
12.0
Hydroxychloroquine: 18.8; Azithromycin: 14.7; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 51.1
Lei S/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (3 centers)
Inpatient
41.2
55.0
NA
NA
Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 100
Saleh M/2020
New York/USA
Prospective (3 centers)
Inpatient
57.2
58.5 a
7.5
11.4
Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine: 40.8; (Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine) + Azithromycin: 59.2
Chang D/2020
New York/USA
Prospective (1 center)
Inpatient
59.5
60.2 a
0.9
5.1
Hydroxychloroquine: 56.4; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 43.6
Bhatla A/2020
Philadelphia/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
45.0
50.0 a
13.0
11.0
Hydroxychloroquine: 24.6; Remdesivir: 8.1
Chorin E/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (2 centers)
Inpatient
75.0
64.0 a
3.0
12.0
Hydroxychloroquine: 100.0; Azithromycin: 100.0
Sabatino J/2020
Catanzaro/Italy
Cross-sectional (multicenter)
Inpatient
52.6
34.7 a
NA
NA
NA
Mani VR/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
60.3
64.7 a
NA
20.1
Hydroxychloroquine: 21.7; Azithromycin: 12.5; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 48.9
Si D/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient (died)
63.6
64.0
NA
17.4
Azithromycin: 0.8; Anti-influenza drugs: 71.9; Lopinavir- Ritonavir: 7.4; Remdesivir: 0.0
   
Inpatient (alive)
32.7
61.5
NA
8.4
Azithromycin: 2.6; Anti-influenza drugs: 83.7; Lopinavir- Ritonavir: 14.3; Remdesivir: 2.0
Angeli F/2020
Varese/Italy
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
72.0
64 a.0
6.0
10.0
Hydroxychloroquine: 82.0; Macrolides: 56.0; Lopinavir- Ritonavir: 54.0
Samuel S/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
57.5
12.6 a
NA
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 44.0; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 25.0; Remdesivir: 5.6; Tocilizumab: 5.6
Ramireddy A/2020
Los Angeles/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
61.0
62.3 a
20.0
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 10.2; Azithromycin: 27.6; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 62.2
Sala S/2020
Milan/Italy
Cross-sectional (multicenter)
Inpatient
66.0
65.0
NA
7.0
Hydroxychloroquine: 100.0; Azithromycin: 100.0
Cao B/2020
Beijing/China
Randomized controlled trial (1 center)
Inpatient
60.3
58.0
NA
NA
Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 49.7
Goyal P/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (2 centers)
Inpatient
60.6
62.2
NA
13.7
NA
Cao J/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
52.0
54.0
NA
NA
Antiviral drugs: 98.0
Zhang G/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
48.9
55.0
NA
NA
Antiviral drugs: 88.7
Jun Wu/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
54.5
62.0
NA
NA
Antiviral drugs: 97.0
Fernández-Ruiz M/2020
Madrid/Spain
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient/outpatient
77.8
71.0
NA
22.2
Lopinavir-Ritonavir + Hydroxychloroquine: 44.4; Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 5.6; Hydroxychloroquine: 27.8
McCullough SA/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
63.2
64.0
7.3
14.4
NA
Lim JH/2020
Daegu/Korea
Retrospective (2 centers)
Inpatient
66.7
75.0
6.7
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 83.3; Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 96.7
Maraj I/2020
Connecticut/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
56.0
62.7 a
NA
14.0
Hydroxychloroquine: 100.0; Azithromycin: 100.0
Shao F/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
66.2
69.0 a
NA
11.0
NA
Lagier JC/2020
Marseille/France
Retrospective (multicenter)
Inpatient/outpatient
45.6
45.0 a
NA
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 2.7; Azithromycin: 3.7; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 89.3
Jung HY/2020
Daegu/Korea
Retrospective (multicenter)
Inpatient
42.9
63.5 a
NA
NA
Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 100.0; Hydroxychloroquine: 50.0
Dubernet A/2020
Réunion Island/France
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
69.4
66.0
NA
NA
Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 63.9; Lopinavir- Ritonavir: 5.6
Voisin O/2020
Paris/France
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
55.2
68.0
NA
NA
Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 100.0
Mazzanti A/ 2020
Pavia/Italy
Prospective (multicenter)
Inpatient
63.0
69.0
NA
NA
Hydroxychloroquin:100.0; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 26.0; Hydroxychloroquin + Lopinavir- Ritonavir: 35.0; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin + Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 6.0
Gupta MD/2020
New Delhi/India
Case series (1 center)
Inpatient
57.1
56.0
14.3
28.6
NA
Chinitz JS/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
42.9
64.0 a
NA
NA
NA
Ferguson J/2020
California/USA
Retrospective (2 centers)
Inpatient
52.8
60.4
6.9
9.7
Hydroxychloroquine: 22.2; Azithromycin: 45.8; Remdesivir: 44.4; Tocilizumab: 5.6
Argenziano MG/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
60.1
63.0
10.7
13.5
Hydroxychloroquine: 63.9; Azithromycin: 47.6; Remdesivir: 2.1; Tocilizumab: 6.0
Khamis F/2020
Muscat/Oman
Prospective (2 centers)
Inpatient
85.0
48.0 a
NA
NA
Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine: 97.0; Azithromycin: 71.0; Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 59.0; Tocilizumab: 3.2
Russo V /2020
Naples/Italy
Retrospective (multicenter)
Inpatient
61.1
66.9 a
11.1
15.9
NA
Xu H/2020
Sichuan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
49.0
NA
NA
NA
Antiviral drugs: 100.0
Chen L/2020
Guangdong/China
Retrospective (3 centers)
Inpatient
67.0
59.5 a
NA
NA
Antiviral drugs: 96.0
Kelly M/2020
Dublin/Ireland
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
61.9
NA
NA
NA
Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 61.2
Rivinius R/2020
Heidelberg/Germany
Retrospective (multicenter)
Inpatient
81.0
58.6 a
100.0
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 14.3; Azithromycin: 19.0
Aversa M/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
50.0
65.0
NA
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 84.0; Azithromycin: 75.0; Remdesivir: 9.0; Tocilizumab: 19.0
Wang ZH/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
64.4
67.4 a
NA
NA
Antiviral drugs: 88.1; Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 10.2
Li J/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
47.0
58.0
NA
6.0
Antiviral drugs: 78.4
Rey JR/2020
Madrid/Spain
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
54.8
62.3 a
4.9
6.5
Hydroxychloroquine: 77.4; Azithromycin: 45.6; Lopinavir- Ritonavir: 10.4; Tocilizumab: 7.4
Riker RR/2020
Portland/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
100.0
70.0
0.0
33.3
Hydroxychloroquine: 66.6; Azithromycin: 100.0; Remdesivir: 33.3; Tocilizumab: 33.3
Beyls C/2020
Amiens Cedex/France
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
68.3
NA
NA
NA
Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 100
Sheth V/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
71.0
69.0
NA
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 84.0; Azithromycin: 90.0; Remdesivir: 3.2
Ferrando C/2020
Barcelona/Spain
Prospective (multicenter)
Inpatient
66.8
64.0
1.4
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 90.1; Azithromycin: 74.8; Lopinavir- Ritonavir: 65.2; Remdesivir: 2.9; Tocilizumab: 42.5
Farré N/2020
Barcelona/Spain
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
57.1
NA
5.3
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 2.6; Azithromycin: 1.6; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 93.3; Tocilizumab: 16.9
Sridhar AR/2020
Washington/ USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
60.0
62.0 a
16.0
13.0
Hydroxychloroquine: 100.0
Sekhavati E/2020
Tehran/Iran
Randomized controlled trial (1 center)
Inpatient
50.0
54.3 a
NA
NA
Azithromycin: 100.0; Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 100.0
Satlin MJ/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (2 centers)
Inpatient
63.0
62.0
9.0
18.0
Hydroxychloroquine: 100.0; Azithromycin: 18.0; Remdesivir: 7.2
Chen L/2020
Wuhan/China
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
76.2
53.0
NA
6.3
Antiviral drugs: 90.5
Oates CP/2020
New York/USA
Retrospective (1 center)
Inpatient
55.0
69.0
NA
19.0
Hydroxychloroquine: 87.0; Azithromycin: 60.0; Remdesivir: 4.0; Tocilizumab: 4.0
Enzmann MO/2020
Dakota/USA
Retrospective (3 centers)
Inpatient
56.7
56.0
10.7
NA
Hydroxychloroquine: 6.0; Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin: 44.0; Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 2.0; Tocilizumab: 8.0
CAD coronary artery disease, HF heart failure, NA not reported
aIn studies not reporting the median, results are represented by the mean
Compared to the incident arrhythmia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (4.7%, 95% CI: 2.4–8.9) [4], the present study indicates higher incidence of arrhythmia in COVID-19 patients (16.8%) with 2 out of 10 patients dying after developing arrhythmia. The possible mechanisms of arrhythmia may involve cardiac damage from metabolic disarray, hypoxia, neuro-hormonal or inflammatory stress and infection-related myocarditis in the setting of COVID-19 [5]. Notably, higher incidence rates of conduction disorders and premature contraction were found in COVID-19 patients, compared to other types of arrhythmia, in the present study. Our findings increase clinical awareness of arrhythmia in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 for the benefit of first-line healthcare providers.
The major limitation of our study was the inclusion of studies largely from observational data with the potential risk of selection bias. For example, nearly all included studies analyzed data from inpatient settings rather than from the community, likely resulting in overestimation of the true incidence and mortality of arrhythmia among COVID-19 infections. In addition, heterogeneity within and between countries may have caused differences in the estimated incidence and clinical impacts of arrhythmia. Finally, due to the involvement of multiple factors, mortality in COVID-19 patients who developed arrhythmia cannot be entirely attributed to arrhythmia alone. However, the strength of the present study is to summarize the current evidence regarding arrhythmia and COVID-19 infection from various populations worldwide. Since COVID-19 infection probably poses increased risk of arrhythmia, significantly affecting mortality, physicians should consider arrhythmia monitoring with early management in addition to supportive care and respiratory support when treating COVID-19 patients.
Not applicable.
This research letter has not been published and is not under consideration by any other journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang Y, Chen T, Mui D, et al. Cardiovascular manifestations and treatment considerations in covid-19. Heart. 2020;106(15):1132–41.CrossRef Kang Y, Chen T, Mui D, et al. Cardiovascular manifestations and treatment considerations in covid-19. Heart. 2020;106(15):1132–41.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061–9.CrossRef Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061–9.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):1–8.CrossRef Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):1–8.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Corrales-Medina VF, Suh KN, Rose G, et al. Cardiac complications in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(6):e1001048.CrossRef Corrales-Medina VF, Suh KN, Rose G, et al. Cardiac complications in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(6):e1001048.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Driggin E, Madhavan MV, Bikdeli B, et al. Cardiovascular considerations for patients, health care workers, and health systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(18):2352–71.CrossRef Driggin E, Madhavan MV, Bikdeli B, et al. Cardiovascular considerations for patients, health care workers, and health systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(18):2352–71.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Incidence rate and clinical impacts of arrhythmia following COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17,435 patients
verfasst von
Shu-Chen Liao
Shih-Chieh Shao
Chi-Wen Cheng
Yung-Chang Chen
Ming-Jui Hung
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
BioMed Central
Schlagwort
COVID-19
Erschienen in
Critical Care / Ausgabe 1/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03368-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Critical Care 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.