Many studies have been performed on the clinical features of COVID-19 patients [1‐3]. There are no reports covering the pulmonary ventilation function of COVID-19 patients, especially severe ones whose lung function may be badly affected. In this study, we described the severe COVID-19 patients’ lung ventilation function.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University in Heilongjiang Province of China has been designated a treatment center for severe COVID-19 patients in late February. The severe COVID-19 patient in our study refers to the person who has been hospitalized because of COVID-19 with PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mmHg.
Anzeige
We collected the pulmonary ventilation function variables of survivors from severe COVID-19 who could complete the lung function test near discharge and in quarantine period (2 weeks after discharge); the variables include vital capacity (VC)/predicted value, forced vital capacity (FVC)/predicted value, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/predicted value, forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), and maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF)/predicted value. Before performing a lung function test, we used ultrasonography to exclude the patients who exhibited pleural effusion or pulmonary consolidation.
The SAS v9.1.3 software was used for statistical analysis. The normally distributed quantitative data were described by the mean ± standard deviation (x̅ ± s). A paired t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for comparison of lung function variable values, and the paired chi-square test (McNemar’s test) was used for comparison of lung function type.
We studied 18 patients, including three with a history of smoking and one with a history of tuberculosis. The second test was obtained a mean of 12 days after the first one. The first lung ventilation function tests (the tests near discharge) showed that 8 patients were normal including 2 smokers; 4 patients had restriction ventilation dysfunction including the patient with secondary pulmonary tuberculosis; 2 patients had restriction ventilation dysfunction with small airway dysfunction; 1 patient who also had the smoking history had obstructive ventilation dysfunction; 3 patients had small airway dysfunction. There was no statistical difference in lung function type between the first and the second pulmonary function test (P = 0.99) (Table 1).
Table 1
Lung ventilation function type and variable values for the 18 severe COVID-19 patients
First | Second | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 8 | 8 | > 0.05 |
Obstructive ventilation dysfunction | 1 | 1 | |
Restriction ventilation dysfunction | 4 | 3 | |
Small airway dysfunction | 3 | 4 | |
Restriction ventilation dysfunction with small airway dysfunction | 2 | 2 | |
VC/predicted value, % | 82.8 ± 15.9 | 88.8 ± 16.5 | < 0.01 |
FVC predicted value, % | 84.1 ± 15.4 | 91.5 ± 17.3 | < 0.01 |
FEV1/predicted value, % | 84.5 ± 16.3 | 89.4 ± 15.7 | < 0.01 |
FEV1/FVC, % | 85.2 ± 6.1 | 80.5 ± 7.0 | < 0.05 |
MMEF/predicted value, % | 77.9 ± 27.9 | 73.6 ± 29.8 | > 0.05 |
Compared with the first test, VC/predicted value, FVC/predicted value, and FEV1/predicted value in the second test were significantly higher (P < 0.05), while FEV1/FVC was significantly lower; no significant difference was found in MMEF/predicted value (Table 1).
Anzeige
This report gives a picture of the lung ventilation function of severe COVID-19 patients. The abnormal rate of lung ventilation function was high near discharge, with restriction ventilation dysfunction and small airway dysfunction accounting for 50% of all patients. The result of autopsy obtained from three patients showed interstitial lung inflammation, alveolar inflammatory cell infiltration, mild fibrous hyperplasia, partial alveolar hyaline membrane formation, and alveolar structure destruction [4]; it is suggested that these pathological changes may result in the decrease in lung compliance, which may exhibit restriction ventilation dysfunction in a lung function test. With virus particles observed in distal airway mucosal epithelial through electron microscopy [4], bronchiolitis may exist and result in dysfunction of the small airway. The significant differences of all variable values but MMEF/predicted value suggest that the lung ventilation function is improving except for small airway function, which may require longer-term follow-up.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, code number kyk2020003.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.