Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Neurology 8/2021

Open Access 07.10.2020 | COVID-19 | Original Communication

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in COVID-19-related encephalopathy

verfasst von: Lorenzo Muccioli, Umberto Pensato, Giorgia Bernabè, Lorenzo Ferri, Maria Tappatà, Lilia Volpi, Ilaria Cani, Olivia J. Henry, Francesca Ceccaroni, Sabina Cevoli, Gloria Stofella, Elena Pasini, Giacomo Fornaro, Caterina Tonon, Simone Vidale, Rocco Liguori, Paolo Tinuper, Roberto Michelucci, Pietro Cortelli, Francesca Bisulli

Erschienen in: Journal of Neurology | Ausgabe 8/2021

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Objective

To report on efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy in a case series of patients with COVID-19-related encephalopathy.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data on all patients with COVID-19 hospitalized at two Italian hospitals who developed encephalopathy during disease course and were treated with IVIg.

Results

Five patients (two females, mean age 66.8 years) developed encephalopathy after a mean of 12.6 days, since the onset of respiratory/constitutional symptoms related to COVID-19. Four patients suffered severe respiratory distress, three of which required invasive mechanical ventilation. Neurological manifestations included impaired consciousness, agitation, delirium, pyramidal and extrapyramidal signs. EEG demonstrated diffuse slowing in all patients. Brain MRI showed non-specific findings. CSF analysis revealed normal cell count and protein levels. In all subjects, RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in CSF tested negative. IVIg at 0.4 g/kg/die was commenced 29.8 days (mean, range: 19–55 days) after encephalopathy onset, leading to complete electroclinical recovery in all patients, with an initial improvement of neuropsychiatric symptoms observed in 3.4 days (mean, range: 1–10 days). No adverse events related to IVIg were observed.

Conclusions

Our preliminary findings suggest that IVIg may represent a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19-associated encephalopathy. Clinical efficacy may be driven by the anti-inflammatory action of IVIg, associated with its anti-cytokine qualities.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00415-020-10248-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Lorenzo Muccioli and Umberto Pensato have contributed equally to this work.

Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). While many individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or develop only mild respiratory and constitutional symptoms, a subgroup of patients present with complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome [1, 2].
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a systemic hyperinflammatory condition presenting secondary to monocyte, macrophage and dendritic cell activation in severe COVID-19 infection and has been implicated in disease pathophysiology [3].
Neuropsychiatric manifestations are increasingly being reported in association with COVID-19, including encephalopathy [4]. The pathophysiology underlying this presentation remains unclear; however, a role of cytokine-mediated neuroinflammation has been suggested [5−10]. COVID-19-associated encephalopathy has been described responsive to high-dose steroids and plasmapheresis, consistent with an immune-mediated pathogenesis [5, 11, 12].
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy has shown efficacy in treating systemic COVID-[13, 19] yet its role in the management of associated CNS manifestations remains to be determined.
We report five patients with COVID-19-related encephalopathy successfully treated with IVIg.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data on all patients with COVID-19 hospitalized at Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, and Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy, from March 13, 2020, to May 27, 2020, who developed encephalopathy during disease course and were treated with IVIg. COVID-19 diagnosis was made on the basis of at least one positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and consistent clinical and/or radiological findings. IVIg therapy was prescribed by the treating neurologist based on the patient’s clinical profile and suspected immune-mediated/inflammatory encephalopathy, in accordance with institutional and international guidelines.

Results

Five patients (two females) with a mean age of 66.8 years (range: 54–75 years) were included in this retrospective study. Demographics, comorbidities, disease course, timing of IVIg and other immunotherapies are summarized in Table 1. Clinical, neuroradiological, EEG and CSF findings are summarized in Table 2. The illustrative case of the first patient is shown in Fig. 1.
Table 1
Demographics, comorbidities and disease course
Pt
Age (y),
Sex
Comorbidities
COVID-19 onset (day)a,b
Worst P/F (day)a
IVIg treatment
(0.4 g/kg/d)
(start, end)a
Clinical Response (initial, complete)a
Other immunotherapies
(start, end)a
Last f.up (day)a
1
54, F
None
− 5
130 (+ 3)
+ 18, + 21
+ 19, + 21
Tocilizumab 400 mg (+ 0)
Low-dose steroids (+ 3, + 17)
+ 90
2
75, M
Type 2 DM, hypertension, ischemic heart disease,
previous stroke
0
114 (+ 12)
+ 26, + 30
+ 28, + 34
Tocilizumab 400 mg (+ 33)
Low-dose steroids (+ 21, + 36)
+ 115
3
69, F
Bipolar disorder, MCI, iatrogenic parkinsonism, type 2 DM
− 15
345 (+ 14)
+ 28, + 32
+ 30, + 38
MP 1 g/die (+ 13, + 17)
+ 86
4
69, M
Hypertensive cardiopathy
− 23
81
(− 14)
+ 22, + 27
+ 24, + 28
 
+ 70
5
67, M
Type 2 DM,
hypertension
− 20
79
(− 8)
+ 55, + 60
+ 65, + 75
Tocilizumab 400 mg (− 8)
+ 105
DM diabetes mellitus, MCI mild cognitive impairment, MP methylprednysolone
aWe referred to encephalopathy onset as day “0”, and to all events occurred previously or subsequently as minus or plus “day”, respectively
bOnset of constitutional or respiratory symptoms such as fever, cough, dyspnea
Table 2
Neurological clinical and investigative findings
Pt
Neurological manifestations
EEG (D)
MRI (D)
CSF (D)
1
Irritability, quadriparesis with pyramidal signs, akinetic mutism, agitated delirium, frontal release reflexes
Diffuse slowing at 6–7 Hz
(+ 15)
Fronto-parietal white matter hyperintensity
(+ 16)
Cells: 0/μL
Proteins: 26 mg/dL
Qalb: 4
(+ 17)
2
Confusion, disorientation, global memory deficits
Diffuse slowing at 4–5 Hz
(+ 21)
Previous right fronto-parietal stroke
(+ 22)
Cells: 1 WBC/μL
Proteins: 60 mg/dL
Qalb: 17.8
(+ 25)
3
Apraxia, mixed delirium, pyramidal signs, frontal release reflexes, extrapyramidal signs (rigidity and bradykinesia)a
Diffuse slowing at 6–7 Hz, frontal sharp waves
(+ 13)
Parietal white matter hyperintensity, cerebral atrophy
(+ 13)
Cells: 1 WBC/μL
Proteins: 32 mg/dL
Qalb: 3.8
(+ 9)
4
Decreased level of consciousness, agitation, tonic muscle spasms
Diffuse slowing at 5–6 Hz, FIRDA
(+ 0)
Cerebral small vessel disease (chronic)
(+ 2)
Cells: 6 WBC/μL
Proteins 35 mg/dL
(+ 1)
5
Decreased level of consciousness, agitation, hemiparesis with pyramidal signs, extrapyramidal signs (rigidity and tremor), frontal release reflexes
Diffuse slowing at 5–6 Hz
(+ 2)
Cerebral small vessel disease (chronic)
(+ 45)
Cells: 1 WBC/μL
Proteins: 29 mg/dL
(+ 2)
D number of days after encephalopathy onset, FIRDA frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity, Qalb CSF/serum albumin quotient, WBC white blood cell
aExtrapyramidal signs were already present before COVID-19 due to drug-induced parkinsonism
Three patients (1, 4, 5) were placed on invasive mechanical ventilation due to respiratory distress, while patient 2 was treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Patient 3 had prior hospitalization in another facility for mild respiratory distress, where she was treated with low-flow oxygen therapy. She was subsequently re-admitted to our facility due to the subacute onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms. All patients developed encephalopathy, with a mean onset of 12.6 days (range 0–23 days) after the presentation of respiratory/constitutional symptoms related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In patients 4 and 5, encephalopathy presented following sedation weaning as persisting impaired consciousness, whereas CNS symptoms developed in the other patients independently. Neurological manifestations were heterogeneous, including confusion, agitation, delirium, akinetic mutism, apraxia, pyramidal, extrapyramidal and frontal release signs. EEG demonstrated diffuse slowing in all patients, with frontal predominance in two cases. Brain MRI showed non-specific diffuse white-matter hyperintensities in two patients, while the others displayed chronic cerebrovascular findings. CSF analysis revealed ≤ 6 WBC and normal protein levels in each patient. In all subjects, RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 and for common neurotropic viruses in CSF, as well as a panel of CSF and serologic antibodies against neuronal intracellular and cell surface antigens, tested negative. Blood tests revealed elevated inflammatory markers, including IL-6 (Supplementary Appendix). Patient 3 developed hypernatremia (up to 164 mEq/L) and prerenal acute kidney injury during hospitalization, but their correction did not result in mental status improvement. With this exception, common causes of encephalopathy such as renal or hepatic failure, electrolyte imbalances, and hypoxemia were excluded in all cases. IVIg at 0.4 g/kg/die was commenced 29.8 days (mean, range 19–55 days) after encephalopathy onset, leading to complete electroclinical recovery in all patients, with an initial improvement of neuropsychiatric symptoms observed in 3.4 days (mean, range 1–10 days). No further neurological symptoms were observed at the last follow-up visit, which was performed after a mean of 54.8 days (range 30–81) since clinical recovery. In patient 1, a marked reduction of serum IL-6 levels was evident on the fourth IVIg infusion day (from 218 to 28 pg/mL), coinciding with clinical response. No adverse events related to IVIg were observed.

Discussion

Encephalopathy is emerging as a recurrent complication of COVID-19, yet the best approach to management and treatment remains unknown. We described five patients with COVID-19-related encephalopathy, all of whom recovered following IVIg.
IVIg is an efficient anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory treatment for a growing number of neurological disorders; however, its mode of action is complex and not yet fully understood [15]. The pathophysiology underlying the diseases which respond to IVIg is highly heterogeneous, thus it is likely that IVIg acts on various disease-specific pathways.
In patients with COVID-19 and severe pulmonary involvement, treatment with IVIg led to a significant clinical improvement and concomitant reduction of serum inflammatory markers, observed as early as the first infusion day [13]. Correspondingly, our patients showed a prompt and dramatic improvement of neurological manifestations following IVIg. Similar results have been achieved in six other patients with COVID-19-related encephalopathy treated with high-dose corticosteroids [5, 11]. In our third case, steroid pulse therapy was ineffective, where subsequent IVIg was concomitant with clinical recovery. In support of our preliminary findings, IVIg led to improved neuropsychiatric symptoms in four COVID-19 patients with mixed central and peripheral neurological manifestations and to clinico-radiological recovery in a further patient with frontal status epilepticus and encephalopathy [16, 17].
Clinical course and investigative findings observed in the present case series, including negative RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in CSF, absence of significant elevation of CSF cells and protein levels, non-specific MRI findings, and the dramatic response to immunotherapy, suggest an inflammatory/immune-mediated pathogenesis rather than CNS viral invasion. An autoantibody-mediated mechanism is unlikely to explain CNS involvement, based on the brief temporal interval between CNS and infection-related symptom onset, negative testing for anti-neuronal antibodies, and the prompt and sustained response to IVIg [15]. Cytokine-mediated neuroinflammation has been implicated in the underlying pathogenic mechanism of COVID-19-associated encephalopathy, and may have contributed to disease course in our patients [510]. Except the third case, all patients suffered acute respiratory distress secondary to CRS induced by SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, case 3 is the only patient with previous cognitive impairment, a condition that possibly made her more susceptible to develop encephalopathy despite mild systemic inflammation, as in other reported geriatric patients [10]. In patient 1 and 4, we observed a delay between the rise of inflammatory markers in serum and the onset/peak of neurological manifestations, possibly due to a delayed rise of CSF cytokines with respect to serum levels. Unfortunately, we were not able to measure CSF cytokines.
IVIg has anti-cytokine qualities, which appear important for its anti-inflammatory action. This may be related to the presence of anti-cytokine autoantibodies found in natural human immunoglobulin, including anti-TNF-α, anti-IL-1 and anti IL-8 [18]. Additionally, the natural IgG fraction inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines in a dose-dependent manner via the Fc portion [18]. Accordingly, IVIg therapy has been shown to significantly reduce circulating proinflammatory cytokines within 3 days [19], as observed in patient 1.
Cytokines may drive neuroinflammation even without severe CRS, possibly as a consequence of local CNS production [5, 6, 20]. The IVIg anti-cytokine effects documented peripherally may independently and directly act on the CNS. IVIg can cross an intact blood–brain-barrier and is bioavailable in sufficient concentrations to interact with the therapeutic targets, with the maximum concentration reached in the CNS 24 h after administration in a murine model [1, 2].
None of our patients experienced adverse events related to IVIg. Adverse reactions to IVIg therapy are usually minor and occur in less than 10% of patients [15]. However, as both COVID-19 and IVIg may predispose to thromboembolic events such as stroke and pulmonary embolism [2, 15], prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered. In patients with evidence of coagulopathy, an alternate immunotherapy such as high-dose corticosteroids should be preferred. However, since the likelihood of thromboembolic disease in COVID-19 might be secondary to CRS, the global thromboembolic risk may be partially compensated by the anti-inflammatory action of IVIg [1, 16].

Conclusions

IVIg was a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19-related encephalopathy in our case series. Clinical efficacy may be driven by the anti-inflammatory action of IVIg, associated with its anti-cytokine qualities. Our preliminary observation needs to be confirmed with larger clinical studies. However, considering the emerging evidence supporting an inflammatory-mediated pathogenesis in a subgroup of patients with COVID-19-related encephalopathy, we believe that immunotherapy with IVIg or other agents might be considered to hasten clinical recovery and prevent potential long-term neurological sequelae.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the colleagues working at the COVID-19 units of Bellaria and Infermi hospitals, especially L. Guerra, S. Zaccaroni, L.L. Gramegna, P. Riguzzi, C. Calabrò, E. Fileccia, G. Fornaro, F. Volpato, L. Bussini. We also thank Prof. R. Lodi, Prof. P. Affanni, Prof. M.C. Re, G. Bordin, I. Bon, G. Rossini.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Nothing to report.

Ethical approval

All investigations were carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Neuer Inhalt

e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Anhänge

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Guan WJ, Νi ZY, Hu Y et al (2020) Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 382(18):1708–1720CrossRef Guan WJ, Νi ZY, Hu Y et al (2020) Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 382(18):1708–1720CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ani F, Chehade S, Lazo-Langner A (2020) Thrombosis risk associated with COVID-19 infection. A scoping review. Thromb Res 192:152–160CrossRef Al-Ani F, Chehade S, Lazo-Langner A (2020) Thrombosis risk associated with COVID-19 infection. A scoping review. Thromb Res 192:152–160CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore JB, June CH (2020) Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science 368(6490):473–474CrossRef Moore JB, June CH (2020) Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science 368(6490):473–474CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Koralnik IJ, Tyler KL (2020) COVID-19: a global threat to the nervous system. Ann Neurol 88(1):1–11CrossRef Koralnik IJ, Tyler KL (2020) COVID-19: a global threat to the nervous system. Ann Neurol 88(1):1–11CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Beach SR, Praschan NC, Hogan C et al (2020) Delirium in COVID-19: a case series and exploration of potential mechanisms for central nervous system involvement. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 65:47–53CrossRef Beach SR, Praschan NC, Hogan C et al (2020) Delirium in COVID-19: a case series and exploration of potential mechanisms for central nervous system involvement. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 65:47–53CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dogan L, Kaya D, Sarikaya T et al (2020) Plasmapheresis treatment in COVID-19-related autoimmune meningoencephalitis: case series. Brain Behav Immun 87:155–158CrossRef Dogan L, Kaya D, Sarikaya T et al (2020) Plasmapheresis treatment in COVID-19-related autoimmune meningoencephalitis: case series. Brain Behav Immun 87:155–158CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cao W, Liu X, Bai T et al (2020) High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin as a therapeutic option for deteriorating patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Open Forum Infect Dis 7(3):102CrossRef Cao W, Liu X, Bai T et al (2020) High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin as a therapeutic option for deteriorating patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Open Forum Infect Dis 7(3):102CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lünemann JD, Nimmerjahn F, Dalakas MC (2015) Intravenous immunoglobulin in neurology–mode of action and clinical efficacy. Nat Rev Neurol 11(2):80–89CrossRef Lünemann JD, Nimmerjahn F, Dalakas MC (2015) Intravenous immunoglobulin in neurology–mode of action and clinical efficacy. Nat Rev Neurol 11(2):80–89CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Abe Y, Horiuchi A, Miyake M, Kimura S (1994) Anti-cytokine nature of natural human immunoglobulin: one possible mechanism of the clinical effect of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Immunol Rev 139:5–19CrossRef Abe Y, Horiuchi A, Miyake M, Kimura S (1994) Anti-cytokine nature of natural human immunoglobulin: one possible mechanism of the clinical effect of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Immunol Rev 139:5–19CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharief MK, Ingram DA, Swash M, Thompson EJ (1999) I.v. Immunoglobulin reduces circulating proinflammatory cytokines in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology 52(9):1833–1838CrossRef Sharief MK, Ingram DA, Swash M, Thompson EJ (1999) I.v. Immunoglobulin reduces circulating proinflammatory cytokines in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology 52(9):1833–1838CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Santomasso BD, Park JH, Salloum D et al (2018) Clinical and biological correlates of neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov 8(8):958–971CrossRef Santomasso BD, Park JH, Salloum D et al (2018) Clinical and biological correlates of neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov 8(8):958–971CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat St-Amour I, Pare I, Alata W et al (2013) Brain bioavailability of human intravenous immunoglobulin and its transport through the murine blood-brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 33(12):1983–1992CrossRef St-Amour I, Pare I, Alata W et al (2013) Brain bioavailability of human intravenous immunoglobulin and its transport through the murine blood-brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 33(12):1983–1992CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in COVID-19-related encephalopathy
verfasst von
Lorenzo Muccioli
Umberto Pensato
Giorgia Bernabè
Lorenzo Ferri
Maria Tappatà
Lilia Volpi
Ilaria Cani
Olivia J. Henry
Francesca Ceccaroni
Sabina Cevoli
Gloria Stofella
Elena Pasini
Giacomo Fornaro
Caterina Tonon
Simone Vidale
Rocco Liguori
Paolo Tinuper
Roberto Michelucci
Pietro Cortelli
Francesca Bisulli
Publikationsdatum
07.10.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Neurology / Ausgabe 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10248-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2021

Journal of Neurology 8/2021 Zur Ausgabe