Anzeige
Erschienen in:
15.02.2022 | COVID-19 | Original Article
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-γ-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination
Erschienen in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases | Ausgabe 4/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
We compared the performance of an in-house-developed flow cytometry assay for intracellular cytokine staining (FC-ICS) and a commercially-available cytokine release assay (the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 Test [QF]) for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike (S)-reactive-IFN-γ-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination.
Patients and methods
The sample included 141 individuals (all male; median age, 42 years; 20–72) who had been fully vaccinated with the Comirnaty® COVID-19 vaccine (at a median of 114 days; 34–145). Prior to vaccination, 91 were categorized as being SARS-CoV-2-naïve and 50 as SARS-CoV-2-experienced. A whole blood-based FC-ICS using 15-mer overlapping peptides encompassing the entire SARS-CoV-2 S protein was used for enumeration of virus-specific IFN-γ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The QF test (Ag1 for CD4+ T cells and Ag2 for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in combination) was carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Results
The FC-ICS and the QF assays returned significantly discordant qualitative results in both the entire cohort (P<0.001 with QF Ag1 and QF Ag2) and in SARS-CoV-2-naïve participants alone (P=0.005 and P=0.01, respectively). Discrepant results mostly involved FC-ICS positive/QF negative specimens. Overall, no correlation was found either between SARS-CoV-2 IFN-γ- CD4+ T-cell frequencies and IFN-γ levels measured in the QF Ag1 tube (P=0.78) or between the sum of SARS-CoV-2 IFN-γ CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell frequencies and IFN-γ levels quantified in the QF Ag2 tube.
Conclusion
The data suggest a greater sensitivity for the FC-ICS assay than the QF test, and urge caution when comparing SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immune responses assessed using different analytical platforms.