Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 7/2019

01.02.2019 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

CT of acute rejection after liver transplantation: a matched case–control study

verfasst von: Jong Keon Jang, Kyoung Won Kim, Sang Hyun Choi, So Yeong Jeong, Ji Hun Kim, Eun Sil Yu, Jae Hyun Kwon, Gi Won Song, Sung Gyu Lee

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted in order to investigate computed tomography (CT) findings associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR) following liver transplantation (LT) and their relevance to clinical outcomes.

Materials and methods

We analyzed 120 patients with newly diagnosed ACR following LT for various liver diseases and 119 controls matched for age, sex, type of liver graft, and date of CT exam following LT. Two radiologists analyzed the images for morphological characteristics of the graft, morphological change in the major draining vein, graft enhancement in the portal venous phase, graft attenuation on noncontrast CT, and periportal halo. Univariate analysis was used to determine the association between radiological findings and ACR. Clinical outcomes, including treatment response and graft survival, were compared between patients with and without associated radiological findings.

Results

Morphological characteristics of the graft (i.e., globular swelling), morphological change in the major draining vein (i.e., nonanastomotic luminal narrowing), and heterogeneous enhancement were significantly associated with ACR (all p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, the severity of morphological characteristics of the grafts (mild/severe: odds ratio [OR], 19.98/32.24) and morphological change in the major draining vein (without/with prestenotic dilatation: OR, 4.17/22.5) were significantly associated with the increased possibility of an ACR diagnosis. Clinical outcomes for treatment response and graft survival were not significantly different between patients with and without associated radiological findings.

Conclusions

Globular swelling, nonanastomotic stenosis with or without prestenotic dilatation of the major draining vein, and heterogeneous enhancement of the graft on portal venous-phase CT were significantly associated with ACR.

Key Points

Globular swelling of the graft, nonanastomotic narrowing in the major vein, and heterogeneous graft enhancement on CT were significantly associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR).
• Associated CT findings were highly specific but not sensitive for differentiating ACRs from matched controls.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartlett AS, Ramadas R, Furness S, Gane E, McCall JL (2002) The natural history of acute histologic rejection without biochemical graft dysfunction in orthotopic liver transplantation: a systematic review. Liver Transpl 8:1147–1153CrossRefPubMed Bartlett AS, Ramadas R, Furness S, Gane E, McCall JL (2002) The natural history of acute histologic rejection without biochemical graft dysfunction in orthotopic liver transplantation: a systematic review. Liver Transpl 8:1147–1153CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V et al (2012) Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). J Hepatol 57:675–688CrossRefPubMed Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V et al (2012) Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). J Hepatol 57:675–688CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams DH, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Samuel D (2015) From immunosuppression to tolerance. J Hepatol 62:S170–S185CrossRefPubMed Adams DH, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Samuel D (2015) From immunosuppression to tolerance. J Hepatol 62:S170–S185CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher LR, Henley KS, Lucey MR (1995) Acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation: variability, morbidity, and mortality. Liver Transpl Surg 1:10–15CrossRefPubMed Fisher LR, Henley KS, Lucey MR (1995) Acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation: variability, morbidity, and mortality. Liver Transpl Surg 1:10–15CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiesner RH, Demetris AJ, Belle SH et al (1998) Acute hepatic allograft rejection: incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome. Hepatology 28:638–645CrossRefPubMed Wiesner RH, Demetris AJ, Belle SH et al (1998) Acute hepatic allograft rejection: incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome. Hepatology 28:638–645CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham SC, Furth EE (1995) Receiver operating characteristic analysis of serum chemical parameters as tests of liver transplant rejection and correlation with histology. Transplantation 59:740–746CrossRefPubMed Abraham SC, Furth EE (1995) Receiver operating characteristic analysis of serum chemical parameters as tests of liver transplant rejection and correlation with histology. Transplantation 59:740–746CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Henley KS, Lucey MR, Appelman HD et al (1992) Biochemical and histopathological correlation in liver transplant: the first 180 days. Hepatology 16:688–693CrossRefPubMed Henley KS, Lucey MR, Appelman HD et al (1992) Biochemical and histopathological correlation in liver transplant: the first 180 days. Hepatology 16:688–693CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu KW, Chen YS, de Villa VH et al (2005) Characterization of liver enzymes on living related liver transplantation patients with acute rejection. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1825–1827PubMed Chiu KW, Chen YS, de Villa VH et al (2005) Characterization of liver enzymes on living related liver transplantation patients with acute rejection. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1825–1827PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Demetris AJ, Bellamy C, Hübscher SG et al (2016) 2016 Comprehensive update of the Banff working group on liver allograft pathology: introduction of antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 16:2816–2835CrossRefPubMed Demetris AJ, Bellamy C, Hübscher SG et al (2016) 2016 Comprehensive update of the Banff working group on liver allograft pathology: introduction of antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 16:2816–2835CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Alten TA, Negm AA, Voigtländer T et al (2014) Safety and performance of liver biopsies in liver transplant recipients. Clin Transpl 28:585–589CrossRef Alten TA, Negm AA, Voigtländer T et al (2014) Safety and performance of liver biopsies in liver transplant recipients. Clin Transpl 28:585–589CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S et al (2007) Transjugular liver biopsy—indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications—a systematic review. J Hepatol 47:284–294CrossRefPubMed Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S et al (2007) Transjugular liver biopsy—indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications—a systematic review. J Hepatol 47:284–294CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolognesi M, Sacerdoti D, Mescoli C et al (2005) Acute liver rejection: accuracy and predictive values of doppler US measurements—initial experience. Radiology 235:651–658CrossRefPubMed Bolognesi M, Sacerdoti D, Mescoli C et al (2005) Acute liver rejection: accuracy and predictive values of doppler US measurements—initial experience. Radiology 235:651–658CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jéquier S, Jéquier JC, Hanquinet S, Le Coultre C, Belli DC (2003) Orthotopic liver transplants in children: change in hepatic venous Doppler wave pattern as an indicator of acute rejection. Radiology 226:105–112CrossRefPubMed Jéquier S, Jéquier JC, Hanquinet S, Le Coultre C, Belli DC (2003) Orthotopic liver transplants in children: change in hepatic venous Doppler wave pattern as an indicator of acute rejection. Radiology 226:105–112CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Germani G, Tsochatzis E et al (2012) Predicting severity and clinical course of acute rejection after liver transplantation using blood eosinophil count. Transpl Int 25:555–563CrossRefPubMed Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Germani G, Tsochatzis E et al (2012) Predicting severity and clinical course of acute rejection after liver transplantation using blood eosinophil count. Transpl Int 25:555–563CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zalasin S, Shapiro RS, Glajchen N, Stancato-Pasik A (1998) Liver transplant rejection: value of hepatic vein Doppler waveform analysis. Abdom Imaging 23:427–430CrossRefPubMed Zalasin S, Shapiro RS, Glajchen N, Stancato-Pasik A (1998) Liver transplant rejection: value of hepatic vein Doppler waveform analysis. Abdom Imaging 23:427–430CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh AK, Cronin CG, Verma HA et al (2011) Imaging of preoperative liver transplantation in adults: what radiologists should know. Radiographics 31:1017–1030CrossRefPubMed Singh AK, Cronin CG, Verma HA et al (2011) Imaging of preoperative liver transplantation in adults: what radiologists should know. Radiographics 31:1017–1030CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SS, Kim KW, Park SH et al (2007) Value of CT and Doppler sonography in the evaluation of hepatic vein stenosis after dual-graft living donor liver transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:101–108CrossRefPubMed Lee SS, Kim KW, Park SH et al (2007) Value of CT and Doppler sonography in the evaluation of hepatic vein stenosis after dual-graft living donor liver transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:101–108CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou H, Wang YX, Lou HY, Xu XJ, Zhang MM (2014) Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome caused by herbal medicine: CT and MRI features. Korean J Radiol 15:218–225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou H, Wang YX, Lou HY, Xu XJ, Zhang MM (2014) Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome caused by herbal medicine: CT and MRI features. Korean J Radiol 15:218–225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JS, Kwon JH, Kim KW et al (2016) CT features of primary graft nonfunction after liver transplantation. Radiology 281:465–473CrossRefPubMed Kim JS, Kwon JH, Kim KW et al (2016) CT features of primary graft nonfunction after liver transplantation. Radiology 281:465–473CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Maluf DG, Stravitz RT, Cotterell AH et al (2005) Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: a 6-year single center experience. Am J Transplant 5:149–156CrossRefPubMed Maluf DG, Stravitz RT, Cotterell AH et al (2005) Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: a 6-year single center experience. Am J Transplant 5:149–156CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Rico-Juri JM, Tsochatzis E, Burra P, De la Mata M, Lerut J (2016) Biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection as an efficacy endpoint of randomized trials in liver transplantation: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Transpl Int 29:961–973CrossRefPubMed Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Rico-Juri JM, Tsochatzis E, Burra P, De la Mata M, Lerut J (2016) Biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection as an efficacy endpoint of randomized trials in liver transplantation: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Transpl Int 29:961–973CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaked A, Ghobrial RM, Merion RM et al (2009) Incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection in recipients undergoing adult living donor or deceased donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 9:301–308CrossRefPubMed Shaked A, Ghobrial RM, Merion RM et al (2009) Incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection in recipients undergoing adult living donor or deceased donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 9:301–308CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Germani G, Rodriguez-Castro K, Russo FP et al (2015) Markers of acute rejection and graft acceptance in liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 21:1061–1068CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Germani G, Rodriguez-Castro K, Russo FP et al (2015) Markers of acute rejection and graft acceptance in liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 21:1061–1068CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang Y, Zhao J, Yu H, Wu H, Niu N (2017) Acoustic radiation force impulse and Doppler ultrasonography: comprehensive evaluation of acute rejection after liver transplantation. J Ultrasound Med 36:1137–1145CrossRefPubMed Tang Y, Zhao J, Yu H, Wu H, Niu N (2017) Acoustic radiation force impulse and Doppler ultrasonography: comprehensive evaluation of acute rejection after liver transplantation. J Ultrasound Med 36:1137–1145CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sebagh M, Azoulay D, Roche B et al (2011) Significance of isolated hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 17:798–808CrossRefPubMed Sebagh M, Azoulay D, Roche B et al (2011) Significance of isolated hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 17:798–808CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sebagh M, Debette M, Samuel D et al (1999) “Silent” presentation of veno-occlusive disease after liver transplantation as part of the process of cellular rejection with endothelial predilection. Hepatology 30:1144–1150CrossRefPubMed Sebagh M, Debette M, Samuel D et al (1999) “Silent” presentation of veno-occlusive disease after liver transplantation as part of the process of cellular rejection with endothelial predilection. Hepatology 30:1144–1150CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Seiler CA, Renner EL, Czerniak A, Didonna D, Büchler MW, Reichen J (1999) Early acute cellular rejection: no effect on late hepatic allograft function in man. Transpl Int 12:195–201CrossRefPubMed Seiler CA, Renner EL, Czerniak A, Didonna D, Büchler MW, Reichen J (1999) Early acute cellular rejection: no effect on late hepatic allograft function in man. Transpl Int 12:195–201CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinner S, Schubert TB, Said A, Mezrich JD, Reeder SB (2017) Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography for the diagnosis of post-transplant biliary complications. Eur Radiol 27:4415–4425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kinner S, Schubert TB, Said A, Mezrich JD, Reeder SB (2017) Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography for the diagnosis of post-transplant biliary complications. Eur Radiol 27:4415–4425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Demetris AJ, Ruppert K, Dvorchik I et al (2002) Real-time monitoring of acute liver-allograft rejection using the Banff schema. Transplantation 74:1290–1296CrossRefPubMed Demetris AJ, Ruppert K, Dvorchik I et al (2002) Real-time monitoring of acute liver-allograft rejection using the Banff schema. Transplantation 74:1290–1296CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
CT of acute rejection after liver transplantation: a matched case–control study
verfasst von
Jong Keon Jang
Kyoung Won Kim
Sang Hyun Choi
So Yeong Jeong
Ji Hun Kim
Eun Sil Yu
Jae Hyun Kwon
Gi Won Song
Sung Gyu Lee
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5971-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

European Radiology 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.