Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 4/2020

30.05.2020 | Compressive Neuropathies in the Upper Extremity (E Shin, Section Editor)

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Current Concepts

verfasst von: Michael N. Nakashian, Danielle Ireland, Patrick M. Kane

Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Compressive neuropathy of the ulnar nerve across the elbow is a common diagnosis encountered frequently within a hand and upper extremity clinical practice. Appropriate and timely evaluation, diagnosis, objective testing, and evidence-based decisions regarding treatment options are paramount in the optimal care of the patient with this pathology. An understanding of current literature is critical in determining and understanding best practices.

Recent Findings

A thorough review of the recent literature regarding physical examination, diagnostic testing, and nonoperative versus operative results was performed. Regarding physical examination, the glenohumeral internal rotation test and scratch collapse test are more effective and sensitive than traditional maneuvers such as Tinel’s testing and the elbow flexion test. Electrodiagnostic testing, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound evaluation have all been shown to be effective in diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome. However, no single test has proven itself to be superior. Nonoperative treatment can be successful for mild cases of cubital tunnel syndrome. Surgical release techniques comparing open with endoscopic release are equivocal, and in situ release versus transposition techniques show that transposition should not be performed routinely.

Summary

The diagnosis and treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome do not have a well-defined algorithm based on current literature. The treating physician must therefore utilize the available information to determine a diagnostic and treatment plan individualized to the patient. More rigorous scientific studies are needed to determine the most effective surgical approaches for cubital tunnel syndrome.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:CD006839. Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:CD006839.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Staples JR, Calfee R. Cubital tunnel syndrome: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25:e215–e24.CrossRefPubMed Staples JR, Calfee R. Cubital tunnel syndrome: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25:e215–e24.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ochi K, Horiuchi Y, Tanabe A, Waseda M, Kaneko Y, Koyanagi T. Shoulder internal rotation elbow flexion test for diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21:777–81.CrossRef Ochi K, Horiuchi Y, Tanabe A, Waseda M, Kaneko Y, Koyanagi T. Shoulder internal rotation elbow flexion test for diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21:777–81.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng CJ, Mackinnon-Patterson B, Beck JL, Mackinnon SE. Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:1518–24.CrossRefPubMed Cheng CJ, Mackinnon-Patterson B, Beck JL, Mackinnon SE. Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:1518–24.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat • Dy CJ, Mackinnon SE. Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9:178–84 This paper reviews the evaluation of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome and discusses physician examination and diagnostic techniques. It also reviews surgical treatment decision processes. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral • Dy CJ, Mackinnon SE. Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9:178–84 This paper reviews the evaluation of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome and discusses physician examination and diagnostic techniques. It also reviews surgical treatment decision processes. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung T, Prasad K, Lloyd TE. Peripheral neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological considerations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014;24:49–65.CrossRefPubMed Chung T, Prasad K, Lloyd TE. Peripheral neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological considerations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014;24:49–65.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat American Association of Electrodiagnostic M, Campbell WW. Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve Suppl. 1999;8:S171–205. American Association of Electrodiagnostic M, Campbell WW. Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve Suppl. 1999;8:S171–205.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon JS, Walker FO, Cartwright MS. Ulnar neuropathy with normal electrodiagnosis and abnormal nerve ultrasound. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:318–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yoon JS, Walker FO, Cartwright MS. Ulnar neuropathy with normal electrodiagnosis and abnormal nerve ultrasound. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:318–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Landau ME, Campbell WW. Clinical features and electrodiagnosis of ulnar neuropathies. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013;24:49–66.CrossRefPubMed Landau ME, Campbell WW. Clinical features and electrodiagnosis of ulnar neuropathies. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013;24:49–66.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Walker FO. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the cubital tunnel. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31:1088–93.CrossRefPubMed Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Walker FO. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the cubital tunnel. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31:1088–93.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Volpe A, Rossato G, Bottanelli M, Marchetta A, Caramaschi P, Bambara LM, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: correlation with electrophysiological studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:1098–101.CrossRef Volpe A, Rossato G, Bottanelli M, Marchetta A, Caramaschi P, Bambara LM, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: correlation with electrophysiological studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:1098–101.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vucic S, Cordato DJ, Yiannikas C, Schwartz RS, Shnier RC. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:590–5.CrossRefPubMed Vucic S, Cordato DJ, Yiannikas C, Schwartz RS, Shnier RC. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:590–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumer P, Dombert T, Staub F, et al. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: MR neurography--nerve T2 signal increase and caliber. Radiology. 2011;260:199–206.CrossRefPubMed Baumer P, Dombert T, Staub F, et al. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: MR neurography--nerve T2 signal increase and caliber. Radiology. 2011;260:199–206.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat • Osei DA, Groves AP, Bommarito K, Ray WZ. Cubital tunnel syndrome: incidence and demographics in a national administrative database. Neurosurgery. 2017;80:417–20 This large, database-driven study examined patients over a 6-year period, identifying the incidence of cubital tunnel syndrome across the US population and any demographic associations. CrossRefPubMed • Osei DA, Groves AP, Bommarito K, Ray WZ. Cubital tunnel syndrome: incidence and demographics in a national administrative database. Neurosurgery. 2017;80:417–20 This large, database-driven study examined patients over a 6-year period, identifying the incidence of cubital tunnel syndrome across the US population and any demographic associations. CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Padua L, Aprile I, Caliandro P, Foschini M, Mazza S, Tonali P. Natural history of ulnar entrapment at elbow. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:1980–4.CrossRefPubMed Padua L, Aprile I, Caliandro P, Foschini M, Mazza S, Tonali P. Natural history of ulnar entrapment at elbow. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:1980–4.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah CM, Calfee RP, Gelberman RH, Goldfarb CA. Outcomes of rigid night splinting and activity modification in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:1125–30 e1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shah CM, Calfee RP, Gelberman RH, Goldfarb CA. Outcomes of rigid night splinting and activity modification in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:1125–30 e1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Toirac A, Giugale JM, Fowler JR. Open versus endoscopic cubital tunnel in situ decompression: a systematic review of outcomes and complications. Hand (N Y). 2017;12:229–35 This study is a systematic review evaluating outcomes and complications of open versus endoscopic cubital tunnel release, suggesting the superiority of endoscopic techniques when complication rates and patient satisfaction were taken into account. CrossRef •• Toirac A, Giugale JM, Fowler JR. Open versus endoscopic cubital tunnel in situ decompression: a systematic review of outcomes and complications. Hand (N Y). 2017;12:229–35 This study is a systematic review evaluating outcomes and complications of open versus endoscopic cubital tunnel release, suggesting the superiority of endoscopic techniques when complication rates and patient satisfaction were taken into account. CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Byvaltsev VA, Stepanov IA, Kerimbayev TT. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing open versus endoscopic in situ decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Acta Neurol Belg 2019. This review systematically compared open versus endoscopic cubital tunnel surgeries and found that patients who underwent an endoscopic approach demonstrated greater improvement in scar tenderness but equivalent clinical postoperative recovery and no difference in adverse events. •• Byvaltsev VA, Stepanov IA, Kerimbayev TT. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing open versus endoscopic in situ decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Acta Neurol Belg 2019. This review systematically compared open versus endoscopic cubital tunnel surgeries and found that patients who underwent an endoscopic approach demonstrated greater improvement in scar tenderness but equivalent clinical postoperative recovery and no difference in adverse events.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Kelm J, Reith W, Schwerdtfeger K, Steudel WI. Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30:521–4.CrossRefPubMed Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Kelm J, Reith W, Schwerdtfeger K, Steudel WI. Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30:521–4.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Said J, Van Nest D, Foltz C, Ilyas AM. Ulnar nerve in situ decompression versus transposition for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome: an updated meta-analysis. J Hand Microsurg. 2019;11:18–27 By performing a meta-analysis of in situ decompression versus ulnar nerve transposition, the authors found no statistically significant differences in outcomes or revision rates. There were significantly more complications with ulnar nerve transposition. CrossRefPubMed •• Said J, Van Nest D, Foltz C, Ilyas AM. Ulnar nerve in situ decompression versus transposition for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome: an updated meta-analysis. J Hand Microsurg. 2019;11:18–27 By performing a meta-analysis of in situ decompression versus ulnar nerve transposition, the authors found no statistically significant differences in outcomes or revision rates. There were significantly more complications with ulnar nerve transposition. CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Hutchinson DT, Sullivan R, Sinclair MK. Long-term reoperation rate for cubital tunnel syndrome: subcutaneous transposition versus in situ decompression. Hand (N Y) 2019:1558944719873153. The authors found a statistically higher reoperation rate for in situ decompression compared to subcutaneous transposition with a minimum five-year follow-up period. •• Hutchinson DT, Sullivan R, Sinclair MK. Long-term reoperation rate for cubital tunnel syndrome: subcutaneous transposition versus in situ decompression. Hand (N Y) 2019:1558944719873153. The authors found a statistically higher reoperation rate for in situ decompression compared to subcutaneous transposition with a minimum five-year follow-up period.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Gaspar MP, Kane PM, Putthiwara D, Jacoby SM, Osterman AL. Predicting revision following in situ ulnar nerve decompression for patients with idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41:427–35 From a retrospective review of 216 cases, this study found that the risk of revision surgery following in situ release was 3.2%. The only significant risk factor was age younger than 50. CrossRefPubMed •• Gaspar MP, Kane PM, Putthiwara D, Jacoby SM, Osterman AL. Predicting revision following in situ ulnar nerve decompression for patients with idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41:427–35 From a retrospective review of 216 cases, this study found that the risk of revision surgery following in situ release was 3.2%. The only significant risk factor was age younger than 50. CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu CH, Chen CX, Xu J, Wang HL, Ke XB, Zhuang ZY, et al. Anterior subcutaneous versus submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130843.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu CH, Chen CX, Xu J, Wang HL, Ke XB, Zhuang ZY, et al. Anterior subcutaneous versus submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130843.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Roh YH, Kim S, Gong HS, Baek GH. Clinical features affecting the patient-based outcome after minimal medial epicondylectomy for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71:1446–52.CrossRefPubMed Roh YH, Kim S, Gong HS, Baek GH. Clinical features affecting the patient-based outcome after minimal medial epicondylectomy for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71:1446–52.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat • O'Grady EE, Vanat Q, Power DM, Tan S. A systematic review of medial epicondylectomy as a surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017;42:941–5 This study evaluated 21 case series reporting on 886 medial epicondylectomies. The results were equivocal in supporting the use of medial epicondylectomy as a standard surgical approach. The study authors concluded that the existing literature is of limited methodological quality and does not allow for firm conclusions to be drawn regarding the efficacy of medial epicondylectomy compared with other techniques. CrossRef • O'Grady EE, Vanat Q, Power DM, Tan S. A systematic review of medial epicondylectomy as a surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017;42:941–5 This study evaluated 21 case series reporting on 886 medial epicondylectomies. The results were equivocal in supporting the use of medial epicondylectomy as a standard surgical approach. The study authors concluded that the existing literature is of limited methodological quality and does not allow for firm conclusions to be drawn regarding the efficacy of medial epicondylectomy compared with other techniques. CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Current Concepts
verfasst von
Michael N. Nakashian
Danielle Ireland
Patrick M. Kane
Publikationsdatum
30.05.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09650-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Management of Ankle Instability (M Hogan, Section Editor)

Lateral Ligament Instability: Review of Pathology and Diagnosis

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (C Chambers and E Craig, Section Editors)

Hemiarthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Conversion to Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.