In Australia, those who migrate as children or adolescents (1.5 generation migrants) may have entered a new cultural environment at a crucial time in their psychosexual development. These migrants may have to contend with constructions of sexual and reproductive health from at least two cultures which may be at conflict on the matter. This study was designed to investigate the role of culture in constructions of sexual and reproductive health and health care seeking behaviour from the perspective of 1.5 generation migrants.
Forty-two adults from various ethno-cultural backgrounds took part in this Q methodological study. Online, participants rank-ordered forty-two statements about constructions of sexual and reproductive health and health seeking behaviours based on the level to which they agreed or disagreed with them. Participants then answered a series of questions about the extent to which their ethnic/cultural affiliations influenced their identity. A by-person factor analysis was then conducted, with factors extracted using the centroid technique and a varimax rotation.
A seven-factor solution provided the best conceptual fit for constructions of sexual and reproductive health and help-seeking. Factor A compared progressive and traditional sexual and reproductive health values. Factor B highlighted migrants’ experiences through two cultural lenses. Factor C explored migrant understandings of sexual and reproductive health in the context of culture. Factor D explained the role of culture in migrants’ intimate relationships, beliefs about migrant sexual and reproductive health and engagement of health care services. Factor E described the impact of culture on sexual and reproductive health related behaviour. Factor F presented the messages migrant youth are given about sexual and reproductive health. Lastly, Factor G compared constructions of sexual and reproductive health across cultures.
This study has demonstrated that when the cultural norms of migrants’ country of origin are maintained it has a significant influence on how 1.5 generation migrants construct, experience and understand various aspects of sexual and reproductive health. Policy makers, health care professionals and resettlement service providers are advised to engage with migrant parents and youth in exploring, discussing, reframing and reconstructing SRH in an Australian context.
OECD-UNDESA. World Migration in Figures. In: OECD-UNDESA. 2013.
Department of Social Services. The people of Australia-Australia’s multicultural policy. 2013.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. In: Government A, editor. WHERE DO MIGRANTS LIVE? 4102.0 - Australian Social Trends. Canberra: ACT; 2014.
The Syrian and Iraqi humanitarian crisis [ http://www.formerministers.dss.gov.au/15738/the-syrian-and-iraqi-humanitarian-crisis/]
Poulsen M, Johnston R. The ghetto model and ethnic concentration in Australian cities. Urban Geography. 2000;21(1):26–44. CrossRef
Thomas M. Vietnamese in Australia. In: Encyclopedia of Diasporas. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 1141–9. CrossRef
Dawson MT, Gifford S, Amezquita R. Donde hay doctor?: folk and cosmopolitan medicine for sexual health among Chilean women living in Australia. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2000;2(1):51–68. CrossRef
Dawson MT, Gifford SM. Social change, migration and sexual health: Chilean women in Chile and Australia. Women & health. 2004;38(4):39–56. CrossRef
Ussher JM, Rhyder-Obid M, Perz J, Rae M, Wong TWK, Newman P. Purity, Privacy and Procreation: Constructions and Experiences of Sexual and Reproductive Health in Assyrian and Karen Women Living in Australia. Sexuality & Culture. 2012;16(4):467–85. CrossRef
Dune T, Mapedzahama V, Hawkes G, Minichiello V, Pitts M. African Migrant Women’s Understanding and Construction of Sexuality in Australia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. 2015;2:38–50.
Mengesha ZB, Dune T, Perz J. Culturally and linguistically diverse women’s views and experiences of accessing sexual and reproductive health care in Australia: a systematic review. Sexual health. 2016;13(4):299–310.
Sexual & reproductive health [ http://www.unfpa.org/sexual-reproductive-health]
Pham VH. Cultural Crossroads: The Formation of Vietnamese American Consciousness for the 1.5 Generation. In: The Online Archive of California. he Regents of The University of California. 1994.
Park K. “I Really Do Feel I’m 1.5!”: The Construction of Self and Community by Young Korean Americans. Amerasia Journal. 1999;25(1):139–63. CrossRef
Nakash O, Nagar M, Shoshani A, Zubida H, Harper RA. The effect of acculturation and discrimination on mental health symptoms and risk behaviors among adolescent migrants in Israel. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol. 2012;18(3):228. CrossRef
Fresnoza-Flot A. The Bumpy Landscape of Family Reunification: Experiences of First-and 1.5-generation Filipinos in France. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2015;41(7):1152–71. CrossRef
Waite L, Cook J. Belonging among diasporic African communities in the UK: Plurilocal homes and simultaneity of place attachments. Emotion, Space and Society. 2011;4(4):238–48. CrossRef
Wang B, Collins FL. Becoming cosmopolitan? Hybridity and intercultural encounters amongst 1.5 generation Chinese migrants in New Zealand. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2016;1–19.
Dune T, Mapedzahama V. Culture Clash: Shona (Zimbabwean) migrant women’s experiences with communicating about sexual health and wellbeing across cultures and generations. African Journal of Reproductive Health in press.
Agocha VB, Asencio M, Decena CU. Sexuality and culture. 2014. CrossRef
Raffaelli M, Kang H, Guarini T. Exploring the immigrant paradox in adolescent sexuality: An ecological perspective. 2012.
Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation. London: Sage Publications; 2012.
Coogan J, Herrington N. Q methodology: an overview. RESEARCH IN SECONDARY TEACHER EDUCATION. 2011;1(2):24–8.
Rogers SR. Q Methodology. In: Smith JA, Harre R, Van Langenhove L, editors. Rethinking methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.
The Epimetrics Group. Q-Assessor. 2016.
Brown SR. Political Subjectivity, Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1980.
Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol. 2005;2(1):67–91. CrossRef
Hwang W-C. Acculturative family distancing: Theory, research, and clinical practice. Psychother Theory Res Pract Train. 2006;43(4):397. CrossRef
Chavura S. The Secularization Thesis and the Secular State: Reflections with Special Attention to Debates in Australia. Religion and the State: A Comparative Sociology. 2011;65:92.
Levitt P. Migrant Philanthropy in Latin America: Move Over United Way. ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America. 2002.
Life in Australia [ https://www.border.gov.au/LifeinAustralia/Documents/lia_english_full.pdf]
Australian Youth Forum. National strategy for young australians. In. Edited by Government A. Canberra: Australian Government; 2010.
- Culture Clash? Investigating constructions of sexual and reproductive health from the perspective of 1.5 generation migrants in Australia using Q methodology
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
Mail Icon II