Curative-intent pancreas resection for pancreatic metastases: surgical and oncological results

P ancreatic metastasis from other primary malignancies is a rare cause for pancreas surgery. Isolated pancreatic metastasis is known to occur in cases of renal and colorectal carcinoma, melanoma, breast and lung cancer [1]. The rate of metastasis to the pancreas is about 2% of all pancreatic malignancies [2‐4]. Autopsy records of patients with malignant diseases excluding primary pancreatic cancer revealed that 15% had pancreatic metastasis and, thus, more frequently than clinically diagnosed [5]. It can be assumed that patients with pancreatic metastases are often in an advanced stage of primary disease, and the diagnosis of pancreatic metastasis is an incidental finding as part of follow-up care. Most of these patients present no metastasis-related symptoms [6, 7]. Curative intent of surgery is only given in patients with controlled primary malignant disease, which leads to a small fraction of patients undergoing pancreas resection. The most common primary entity with isolated pancreatic metastasis is renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) showing pancreatic metastasis usually years after diagnosis of the primary tumor [1, 8‐10]. Resection of pancreatic metastasis of mRCC was associated with improved patient survival compared to metastasis resection of other primary tumors [1, 8, 11, 12]. Due to the rarity of resectable pancreatic metastases, no guideline has been established for surgical treatment of different tumor entities. Only few data of surgical and oncological treatment have been reported to date from case reports or small sample size studies. The potential advantage and also the risk of pancreatic resection for these patients still remain unclear. The objective of this study was to analyze the surgical and oncological outcome after pancreatic resection of pancreatic metastasis and, therefore, we retrospectively evaluated our own prospectively-collected institutional data of patients who underwent pancreatic resection.

Data were retrospectively obtained from the pancreatic surgery database of the University of Freiburg Medical Center, which contains prospectively-collected data for all pancreatic resections performed at our institution. Inclusion criterion was histologically-proven pancreatic metastasis. All kinds of primary tumor entities except primary pancreas carcinoma were eligible for inclusion. Patients with tumor infiltration in the pancreas due to cavitary metastasis were not included. All kinds of surgical approaches were considered. Primary outcome was overall survival of mRCC patients compared to patients with other metastatic tumor entities (nmRCC). Patients’ demographic data including sex, age, comorbidities, time between surgery of primary tumor and pancreatic metastasis, localization of metastasis and extent of tumor, imaging modalities used, kind/extent of surgery, interventions, histology, complications and clinical and oncological outcome were analyzed. Perioperative complications were graded according to the recommendations of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) criteria [13‐15] and the Clavien–Dindo classification [16, 17]. Perioperative mortality was defined as death during the initial hospitalization or within 30 days of the operative date.

Study size depended on feasibility, as pancreatic metastases are rare. Data are presented as median values and their ranges unless otherwise specified. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney-U test and categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows (version 25.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Freiburg Medical Center.

Patients with secondary metastatic pancreatic malignancy are rare, usually show widespread disease or the primary tumor has aggressive tumor biology with poor prognosis. Due to advanced disease, therapy of pancreatic metastasis appears to be limited, but recent publications show evidence of survival benefit for patients after metastasectomy. Specific symptoms of pancreatic metastasis are mostly lacking, and diagnosis is often made as part of follow-up care. The symptom rate of our patients was only 34% and only two of our patients showed tumor-related symptoms. Reddy et al. reported an unusually high symptom rate of more than 90%, but most were unspecific such as abdominal pain [18]. The rate reported by Reddy et al. might be attributable to data age, since follow-up care was not yet standardized at that time, leading to a diagnosis of metastatic lesions only in case of symptoms. Other studies indicated symptom rates of approximately 20–60% [3, 9, 10, 19, 20]. Most common symptoms are abdominal pain and weight loss, followed by more specific symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding and jaundice. Sperti et al. reported a relief of symptoms after metastasectomy until disease recurrence [1]. Surgical treatment for metastatic diseases of liver and lung is well-established, but treatment of metastatic disease of other organs such as the pancreas is still under discussion [21]. The morbidity rate of pancreas surgery is still high, as pancreatic fistula occurs in approximately 20–30% of patients [22, 23]. Severe postoperative complications are diagnosed in 20% of patients [24] and the overall morbidity rate remains up to 60% [25]. The morbidity rate of our cohort was even higher, which might be attributable to a small sample-size, patient’ selection and thorough documentation of complications. The high rate of pancreatic fistula in our cohort might be attributable to the texture of the pancreas and drain management with drains in place over 21 days. It is known that the occurrence of pancreatic fistula depends on the texture of pancreas and that soft texture, which is expected in our cohort to be different than in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, is associated with an increased POPF rate [26]. Furthermore, most of our patients received distal pancreatectomy, which is also known to be associated with a higher POPF rate [27]. These are also confirmed by our results, as we found a lower rate of POPF (B and C) rate in our patents, which underwent pancreatic resection due to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. POPF B and C Rate was here 9% in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy and 20% in patients after distal pancreatectomy. In addition, a smaller pancreatic duct diameter is associated with an increased risk of POPF [28], which is to expect in patients with pancreatic metastasis unlike pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Once surgical complications have been overcome, survival rate appears to be significantly higher in resected patients [20, 29]. Results of our analysis present the justifiable possibility of curative-intended pancreas surgery in selected patients confirming data previously published by others. Our data are not able to prove superiority of surgery over other therapies as we have no comparable data about a non-surgically-treated group. However, despite advanced tumor disease 70% of our patients were alive at the end of follow-up, which is approximately ten times higher than the 5-year survival rate of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [30]. Selection criteria for our patients who were eligible for surgery of pancreatic metastasis, were fully resectable pancreatic metastasis and an overall low-to-medium surgical risk assessed by a combination of pre-existing illnesses and the current condition. The kind and frequency of pretreatment and the previously-diagnosed tumor entity was not crucial for decision. The most frequently diagnosed tumor origin was mRCC in our cohort. mRCC is known to be the most common primary tumor for pancreatic metastasis [8, 11, 12]. Recent publications have indicated a survival benefit for patients with metastatic pancreatic malignancy from renal cell cancer compared to other primary cancers [1, 11, 31, 32]. Our results confirm this. Even if patients with mRCC had a slightly higher ASA Score and more pre-existing illnesses, the 5-year survival of these patients was higher compared to patients with mnRCC (89 vs. 67%). Interestingly, the disease-free survival was shorter in patients with mRCC compared to mnRCC patients, as was also reported by others [8, 33]. The influence of different tumor pathological types on survival is well-known. The 5-year survival rate for malignancies from melanoma, sarcoma, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer is 20%, 32%, 34%, and 42%, respectively [8, 34]. The survival rate of our mnRCC patients is nearly twice as high as the other reported rates. The observed rate of nearly 90% in mRCC patients is also impressively high, given that the expected 5-year survival for extended disease is less than 20% [35]. These observations are not only attributable to patient selection, but also to the advantage of improved follow-up care leading to a symptom-free, earlier diagnosis, as it is known that symptomatic pancreatic metastasis is associated with decreased survival [33]. In addition, new targeted therapies after surgery are able to significantly improve overall survival of patients [36]. Furthermore, the impressively high survival of advanced-stage cancer patients, the rareness and latency of pancreatic metastasis speak for an underlying exceptional tumor biology. Confirming these hypotheses, most of the patients had a more than 5-year disease-free interval between primary diagnosis and diagnosis of pancreatic lesions, which is also supported by others’ data [37, 38]. Late recurrence of RCC has been known for decades [39], but the pancreas might be a special localization for recurrent cancer disease not only of RCC. In our cohort, the time from primary diagnosis to metastasis was nearly twice as long in mRCC patients compared to nmRCC patients. Furthermore, multiple metastasis of pancreas was only found in mRCC patients, which has also been reported by others [8, 33]. Thus, the origin of metastases could not only determine prognosis but also the intraoperative extent of resection. The prognosis of patients with advanced disease might be also influenced by pancreatic metastasis: Diagnosis of pancreatic metastasis had a positive impact on survival of patients treated with molecular targeted therapies [34, 37, 38, 40]. Molecular targeted therapies such as sunitinib are associated with side-effect rates up to 50%, and early disruption of therapy might worsen the outcome of treated patients with mRCC [41, 42]. Motzer et al. reported a progression-free survival of mRCC patients with sunitinib of 11 months, which is slightly lower than the observed disease-free survival of 14 months in our patients after pancreatic surgery [43]. Another study indicated an even lower survival of less than 6 months [44]. But it must be taken into account that both studies observed all patients with mRCC, not only those with pancreatic metastases. In our cohort, the disease-free survival of 4 patients with pancreatic and extra-pancreatic metastases was only 6 months, but the impact of the result is limited and should lead to further research into whether surgical or non-surgical treatment is the more promising approach for advanced mRCC. Grassi et al. reported that local treatment of pancreatic metastasis, mostly surgery, might be more promising than targeted therapy in mRCC patients [38]. For tumor entities other than RCC, it remains also largely unclear whether surgical or non-surgical therapy is the more promising approach. Ollila et al. observed that median survival in patients undergoing curative resection due to gastrointestinal melanoma metastasis was significantly better than in those undergoing palliative procedures and nonsurgical interventions (49 vs. 5 and 6 months, respectively) [45]. Nevertheless, eligibility for pancreas resection has to be critically evaluated, as pancreas surgery has high morbidity rates and life-threatening complications [25].

Retrospective analyses are limited by lack of documentation and documentation errors. Due to the rareness of pancreatic metastasis, sample-size of our cohort study is really small making it hard to deliver valid results. We were able to obtain data of 29 patients, which is a bigger number than other monocentric analyses have provided. However, the cohort of patients is inhomogeneous due to different tumor entities and different pre-treatments, which makes it hard to compare patient data. Subgroup analysis is also not a promising approach for data comparison, as subgroups are even smaller. Research about rare entities is always limited due to small cohorts, nevertheless, our results are interesting and show tendencies on which to base further research. We were not able to provide data of molecular markers as they were not measured in most of our patients, but we will put more emphasis on these in future research. Due to the scientific advances of the last decade, further research must focus on molecular markers of patients with pancreatic metastasis to identify patients who will benefit from pancreas surgery.

Pancreas resections appear to be successful in treating patients with advanced cancer with pancreatic metastases. Survival is associated with the histology of primary tumor. Further research is necessary to compare surgical and non-surgical approaches. Focus should be placed on molecular markers to elucidate the mechanisms of pancreatic metastasis in order to choose the therapeutic approach suitable for the individual patient.