Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 5/2015

01.10.2015 | Original Article

Current practices of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis

verfasst von: M. Trevisonno, P. Kaneva, Y. Watanabe, G. M. Fried, L. S. Feldman, A. Andalib, M. C. Vassiliou

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The selection of a laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernias varies among surgeons. It is unclear what is being done in actual practice. The purpose of this study was to report practice patterns for treatment of inguinal hernias among Quebec surgeons, and to identify factors that may be associated with the choice of operative approach.

Methods

We studied a population-based cohort of patients who underwent an inguinal hernia repair between 2007 and 2011 in Quebec, Canada. A generalized linear model was used to identify predictors associated with the selection of a laparoscopic approach.

Results

49,657 inguinal hernias were repaired by 478 surgeons. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) was used in 8 % of all cases. LIHR was used to repair 28 % of bilateral hernias, 10 % of recurrent hernias, 6 % of unilateral hernias, and 4 % of incarcerated hernias. 268 (56 %) surgeons did not perform any laparoscopic repairs, and 11 (2 %) surgeons performed more than 100 repairs. These 11 surgeons performed 61 % of all laparoscopic cases. Patient factors significantly associated with having LIHR included younger age, fewer comorbidities, bilateral hernias, and recurrent hernias.

Conclusion

An open approach is favored for all clinical scenarios, even for situations where published guidelines recommend a laparoscopic approach. Surgeons remain divided on the best technique for inguinal hernia repair: while more than half never perform LIHR, the small proportion who perform many use the technique for a large proportion of their cases. There appears to be a gap between the best practices put forth in guidelines and what surgeons are doing in actual practice. Identification of barriers to the broader uptake of LIHR may help inform the design of educational programs to train those who have the desire to offer this technique for certain cases, and have the volume to overcome the learning curve.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203CrossRefPubMed McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahon D, Decadt B, Rhodes M (2003) Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:1386–1390CrossRefPubMed Mahon D, Decadt B, Rhodes M (2003) Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:1386–1390CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Wara P, Asmussen T, Juul P, Strand L, Anderson FH, Bay-Neilsen M (2011) Danish Hernia Database recommendations for the management of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults. Danish Med Bull 58:C4243PubMed Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Wara P, Asmussen T, Juul P, Strand L, Anderson FH, Bay-Neilsen M (2011) Danish Hernia Database recommendations for the management of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults. Danish Med Bull 58:C4243PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards CC 2nd, Bailey RW (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repair: the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:149–153PubMed Edwards CC 2nd, Bailey RW (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repair: the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:149–153PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Blais R (1993) Variations in surgical rates in Quebec: does access to teaching hospitals make a difference? CMAJ 148:1729–1736PubMedCentralPubMed Blais R (1993) Variations in surgical rates in Quebec: does access to teaching hospitals make a difference? CMAJ 148:1729–1736PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg J, Bay-Nielsen M (2008) Current status of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Denmark. Hernia 12:583–587CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg J, Bay-Nielsen M (2008) Current status of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Denmark. Hernia 12:583–587CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Smink DS, Paquette IM, Finlayson SR (2009) Utilization of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:745–748CrossRefPubMed Smink DS, Paquette IM, Finlayson SR (2009) Utilization of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:745–748CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Jones T, Kuchena A, Martinez J, Ali SM, Lohse CM, Farley DR (2012) Trends in the utilization of inguinal hernia repair techniques: a population-based study. Am J Surg 203:313–317PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Jones T, Kuchena A, Martinez J, Ali SM, Lohse CM, Farley DR (2012) Trends in the utilization of inguinal hernia repair techniques: a population-based study. Am J Surg 203:313–317PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Trevisonno M, Kaneva P, Watanabe Y, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Lebedeva K, Vassiliou M (2014) A survey of general surgeons regarding laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: practice patterns, barriers and educational needs. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-014-1287-8 Trevisonno M, Kaneva P, Watanabe Y, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Lebedeva K, Vassiliou M (2014) A survey of general surgeons regarding laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: practice patterns, barriers and educational needs. Hernia. doi:10.​1007/​s10029-014-1287-8
20.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wara P, Bay-Nielsen M, Juul P, Bendix J, Kehlet H (2005) Prospective nationwide analysis of laparoscopic versus Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1277–1281CrossRefPubMed Wara P, Bay-Nielsen M, Juul P, Bendix J, Kehlet H (2005) Prospective nationwide analysis of laparoscopic versus Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1277–1281CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827CrossRefPubMed Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkhoury F, Martin JT, Contessa J, Zucherman R, Nadzam G (2010) The impact of laparoscopy on the volume of open cases in general surgery training. J Surg Educ 67:316–319CrossRefPubMed Alkhoury F, Martin JT, Contessa J, Zucherman R, Nadzam G (2010) The impact of laparoscopy on the volume of open cases in general surgery training. J Surg Educ 67:316–319CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Qureshi A, Vergis A, Jimenez C, Green J, Pryor A, Schlachta CM, Okrainec A (2011) MIS training in Canada: a national survey of general surgery residents. Surg Endosc 25:3057–3065CrossRefPubMed Qureshi A, Vergis A, Jimenez C, Green J, Pryor A, Schlachta CM, Okrainec A (2011) MIS training in Canada: a national survey of general surgery residents. Surg Endosc 25:3057–3065CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilchesky M, Tamblyn RM, Huang A (2004) Validation of diagnostic codes within medical services claims. J Clin Epidemiol 57:131–141CrossRefPubMed Wilchesky M, Tamblyn RM, Huang A (2004) Validation of diagnostic codes within medical services claims. J Clin Epidemiol 57:131–141CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Current practices of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis
verfasst von
M. Trevisonno
P. Kaneva
Y. Watanabe
G. M. Fried
L. S. Feldman
A. Andalib
M. C. Vassiliou
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1358-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Hernia 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.