Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 1/2020

05.03.2020 | Original Article

Current state of robotic use in inguinal hernia repair: a survey of minimally invasive hernia surgeons

verfasst von: Priscila Rodrigues Armijo, Bhavani Pokala, Laura Flores, Salim Hosein, Dmitry Oleynikov

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Little is known about how robot technology is employed by surgeons in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). We evaluated the needs of established robotic surgeons and of those who are new to this technology. A survey was designed and sent electronically to MIS surgeons. Questions included fellowship training, area of expertise, experience with robotic simulation and in clinical use, mentorship, likelihood of switching to a different approach, and expectations for the robot. Descriptive analysis was conducted using STATA/MP 15.1. 189 interviewees self-identified as hernia surgeons. 73.8% had additional fellowship, with majority practicing for 3–6 years (54%). Nearly 40% were MIS surgeons (N = 73), followed by general surgery (34.4%), and bariatrics (13.8%). 146 interviewees (77.7%) have used the daVinci® in clinical scenarios. Among robotic surgeons, majority were performing less than ten robotic cases per month. Inguinal hernia repairs were the leading procedures (49%), followed by foregut-related (19.5%), and colorectal-related surgeries (17.5%). Nearly 40% of surgeons stated inguinal hernia repairs to be the most often performed procedure using the robot. Nearly 40% of open and laparoscopic hernia surgeons are willing to adopt robotic-assisted procedures for their inguinal hernia repairs. Level 1 evidence (47.9%) and cost (24.1%) were the most pressing needs for robotic research. Majority of interviewees have used the daVinci® in clinical settings. Hernia repair remains the primary application of the robot in general surgery, among specialized surgeons. Over 40% of hernia surgeons are interested in switching to robotic technology over its open or laparoscopic counterparts.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E, Tanner T, Oleynikov D (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32(4):2106–2113CrossRef Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E, Tanner T, Oleynikov D (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32(4):2106–2113CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley WE Jr (1990s) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS 12(4):351–357PubMedPubMedCentral Kelley WE Jr (1990s) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS 12(4):351–357PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2253–2257CrossRef Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2253–2257CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kevric J, Papa N, Toshniwal S, Perera M (2018) Fifteen-year groin hernia trends in australia: the era of minimally invasive surgeons. ANZ J Surg 88(4):E298–E302CrossRef Kevric J, Papa N, Toshniwal S, Perera M (2018) Fifteen-year groin hernia trends in australia: the era of minimally invasive surgeons. ANZ J Surg 88(4):E298–E302CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Jones T et al (2012) Trends in the utilization of inguinal hernia repair techniques: a population-based study. Am J Surg 203(3):313–317 (discussion 317) CrossRef Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Jones T et al (2012) Trends in the utilization of inguinal hernia repair techniques: a population-based study. Am J Surg 203(3):313–317 (discussion 317) CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller DC, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Hollenbeck BK (2006) Trends in the diffusion of laparoscopic nephrectomy. JAMA 295(21):2480–2482CrossRef Miller DC, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Hollenbeck BK (2006) Trends in the diffusion of laparoscopic nephrectomy. JAMA 295(21):2480–2482CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK Jr (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188(4A Suppl):2S–15SCrossRef Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK Jr (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188(4A Suppl):2S–15SCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Casarin J, Multinu F, Ubl DS et al (2018) Adoption of minimally invasive surgery and decrease in surgical morbidity for endometrial cancer treatment in the united states. Obstet Gynecol 131(2):304–311CrossRef Casarin J, Multinu F, Ubl DS et al (2018) Adoption of minimally invasive surgery and decrease in surgical morbidity for endometrial cancer treatment in the united states. Obstet Gynecol 131(2):304–311CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Benmessaoud C, Kharrazi H, MacDorman KF (2011) Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16395CrossRef Benmessaoud C, Kharrazi H, MacDorman KF (2011) Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16395CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32(4):1636–1655CrossRef Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32(4):1636–1655CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gamagami R, Dickens E, Gonzalez A et al (2018) Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes. Hernia 22(5):827–836CrossRef Gamagami R, Dickens E, Gonzalez A et al (2018) Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes. Hernia 22(5):827–836CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24(2):377–382CrossRef Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24(2):377–382CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman RM, Umer A, Bozzuto BJ, Dilungo JL, Ellner S (2016) Surgical value of elective minimally invasive gallbladder removal: a cost analysis of traditional 4-port vs single-incision and robotically assisted cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):303–308CrossRef Newman RM, Umer A, Bozzuto BJ, Dilungo JL, Ellner S (2016) Surgical value of elective minimally invasive gallbladder removal: a cost analysis of traditional 4-port vs single-incision and robotically assisted cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):303–308CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31(1):185–192CrossRef Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31(1):185–192CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, SAGES Robotic Task Force, Siu KC, Oleynikov D (2019) A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc 34:361–367CrossRef Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, SAGES Robotic Task Force, Siu KC, Oleynikov D (2019) A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc 34:361–367CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayloo S, Roh Y, Choudhury N (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy: training of residents in use of the robotic platform. Int J Med Robot 10(1):88–92CrossRef Ayloo S, Roh Y, Choudhury N (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy: training of residents in use of the robotic platform. Int J Med Robot 10(1):88–92CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson EC, Gottlieb AH, Muller HG, Smith W, Ali MR, Vidovszky TJ (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy and resident education: the UC davis experience. Int J Med Robot 10(2):218–222CrossRef Nelson EC, Gottlieb AH, Muller HG, Smith W, Ali MR, Vidovszky TJ (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy and resident education: the UC davis experience. Int J Med Robot 10(2):218–222CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Current state of robotic use in inguinal hernia repair: a survey of minimally invasive hernia surgeons
verfasst von
Priscila Rodrigues Armijo
Bhavani Pokala
Laura Flores
Salim Hosein
Dmitry Oleynikov
Publikationsdatum
05.03.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00709-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Updates in Surgery 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.