Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2015

01.07.2015

Current status of endoscopic simulation in gastroenterology fellowship training programs

verfasst von: Pichamol Jirapinyo, Christopher C. Thompson

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aims

Recent guidelines have encouraged gastroenterology and surgical training programs to integrate simulation into their core endoscopic curricula. However, the role that simulation currently has within training programs is unknown. This study aims to assess the current status of simulation among gastroenterology fellowship programs.

Methods

Design: This questionnaire study consisted of 38 fields divided into two sections. The first section queried program directors’ experience on simulation and assessed the current status of simulation at their institution. The second portion surveyed their opinion on the potential role of simulation on the training curriculum. Setting: The study was conducted at the 2013 American Gastroenterological Association Training Directors’ Workshop in Phoenix, Arizona. Participants: The participants were program directors from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited gastroenterology training programs, who attended the workshop.

Results

The questionnaire was returned by 69 of 97 program directors (response rate of 71 %). 42 % of programs had an endoscopic simulator. Computerized simulators (61.5 %) were the most common, followed by mechanical (30.8 %) and animal tissue (7.7 %) simulators, respectively. Eleven programs (15 %) required fellows to use simulation prior to clinical cases. Only one program has a minimum number of hours fellows have to participate in simulation training. Current simulators are deemed as easy to use (76 %) and good educational tools (65 %). Problems are cost (72 %) and accessibility (69 %). The majority of program directors believe that there is a need for endoscopic simulator training, with only 8 % disagreeing. Additionally, a majority believe there is a role for simulation prior to initiation of clinical cases with 15 % disagreeing.

Conclusion

Gastroenterology fellowship program directors widely recognize the importance of simulation. Nevertheless, simulation is used by only 42 % of programs and only 15 % of programs require that trainees use simulation prior to clinical cases. No programs currently use simulation as part of the evaluation process.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat ASGE Training Committee (2012) Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 75(2):231–235CrossRef ASGE Training Committee (2012) Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 75(2):231–235CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Carswell CM, Clarke D, Seales WB (2005) Assessing mental demand during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 12(1):80–90PubMedCrossRef Carswell CM, Clarke D, Seales WB (2005) Assessing mental demand during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 12(1):80–90PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwald D, Cohen J (2006) Evolution of endoscopy simulators and their application. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 16:389–406PubMedCrossRef Greenwald D, Cohen J (2006) Evolution of endoscopy simulators and their application. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 16:389–406PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Classen M, Ruppin H (1974) Practical training using a new gastrointestinal phantom. Endoscopy 6:127–131CrossRef Classen M, Ruppin H (1974) Practical training using a new gastrointestinal phantom. Endoscopy 6:127–131CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams CB, Baillie J, Gillies DF, Borislow D, Cotton PB (1990) Teaching gastrointestinal endoscopy by computer simulation: a prototype for colonoscopy and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 36:49–54PubMedCrossRef Williams CB, Baillie J, Gillies DF, Borislow D, Cotton PB (1990) Teaching gastrointestinal endoscopy by computer simulation: a prototype for colonoscopy and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 36:49–54PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Noar MD (1992) Robotics interactive endoscopy simulation of ERCP/sphincterotomy and EGD. Endoscopy 24(Suppl 2):539–541PubMedCrossRef Noar MD (1992) Robotics interactive endoscopy simulation of ERCP/sphincterotomy and EGD. Endoscopy 24(Suppl 2):539–541PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorthy K, Munz Y, Orchard TR, Gould S, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) An innovative method for the assessment of skills in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 18:1613–1619PubMedCrossRef Moorthy K, Munz Y, Orchard TR, Gould S, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) An innovative method for the assessment of skills in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 18:1613–1619PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahmood T, Darzi A (2003) A study to validate the colonoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 17:1583–1589PubMedCrossRef Mahmood T, Darzi A (2003) A study to validate the colonoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 17:1583–1589PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Datta Vk, Mandalia M, Mackay SD, Darzi AW (2001) Evaluation and validation of a virtual reality based flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer. Gut 48:A97–A98CrossRef Datta Vk, Mandalia M, Mackay SD, Darzi AW (2001) Evaluation and validation of a virtual reality based flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer. Gut 48:A97–A98CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Grantcharov TP, Carstensen L, Schulze S (2005) Objective assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy skills using a virtual reality simulator. JSLS 9:130–133PubMedCentralPubMed Grantcharov TP, Carstensen L, Schulze S (2005) Objective assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy skills using a virtual reality simulator. JSLS 9:130–133PubMedCentralPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlitsch A, Glauninger P, Gupper A et al (2002) Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 3:698–702CrossRef Ferlitsch A, Glauninger P, Gupper A et al (2002) Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 3:698–702CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritter EM, McClusky DA 3rd, Lederman AB, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2003) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator. J Gastrointest Surg 7:871–877; discussion 877–878 Ritter EM, McClusky DA 3rd, Lederman AB, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2003) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator. J Gastrointest Surg 7:871–877; discussion 877–878
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Felsher JJ, Olesevich M, Farres H et al (2005) Validation of a flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg 189:497–500PubMedCrossRef Felsher JJ, Olesevich M, Farres H et al (2005) Validation of a flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg 189:497–500PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorthy K, Munz Y, Jiwanji M. Bann S, Chang A, Darzi A (2004) Validity and reliability of a virtual reality upper gastrointestinal simulator and cross validation using structured assessment of individual performance with video playback. Surg Endosc 18:328–333 Moorthy K, Munz Y, Jiwanji M. Bann S, Chang A, Darzi A (2004) Validity and reliability of a virtual reality upper gastrointestinal simulator and cross validation using structured assessment of individual performance with video playback. Surg Endosc 18:328–333
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung J et al (2012) Head-to-head comparison of practice with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography computer and mechanical simulators by experienced endoscopists and trainees. Dig Endosc 24(3):175–181PubMedCrossRef Leung J et al (2012) Head-to-head comparison of practice with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography computer and mechanical simulators by experienced endoscopists and trainees. Dig Endosc 24(3):175–181PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J, Thompson CC (2013) The next generation of endoscopic simulation. Am J Gastroenterol 108(7):1036–1039PubMedCrossRef Cohen J, Thompson CC (2013) The next generation of endoscopic simulation. Am J Gastroenterol 108(7):1036–1039PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sedlack RE, Kolars JC (2004) Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 99:33–37PubMedCrossRef Sedlack RE, Kolars JC (2004) Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 99:33–37PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Guiulio E, Fregonese D, Casetti T et al (2004) Training with a computer-based simulator achieves basic manual skills required for upper endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 60:196–200CrossRef Di Guiulio E, Fregonese D, Casetti T et al (2004) Training with a computer-based simulator achieves basic manual skills required for upper endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 60:196–200CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC et al (2006) Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 64:361–368PubMedCrossRef Cohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC et al (2006) Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 64:361–368PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerson LB (2006) Evidence-based assessment of endoscopic simulators for training. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 16:489–509, vii–viii Gerson LB (2006) Evidence-based assessment of endoscopic simulators for training. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 16:489–509, vii–viii
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirai Y, Yoshida T, Shiraishi R et al (2008) Prospective randomized study on the use of a computer-based endoscopic simulator for training in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:1046–1050PubMedCrossRef Shirai Y, Yoshida T, Shiraishi R et al (2008) Prospective randomized study on the use of a computer-based endoscopic simulator for training in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:1046–1050PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Haycock AV, Youd P, Bassett P et al (2009) Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 70:835–845PubMedCrossRef Haycock AV, Youd P, Bassett P et al (2009) Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 70:835–845PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hazey JW, Marks JM, Mellinger JD et al (2014) Why fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES)? Surg Endosc 28(3):701–703PubMedCrossRef Hazey JW, Marks JM, Mellinger JD et al (2014) Why fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES)? Surg Endosc 28(3):701–703PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulose BK, Vassilliou MC, Dunkin BJ et al (2014) Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery cognitive examination: development and validity evidence. Surg Endosc 28(2):631–638PubMedCrossRef Poulose BK, Vassilliou MC, Dunkin BJ et al (2014) Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery cognitive examination: development and validity evidence. Surg Endosc 28(2):631–638PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Vassilliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Fried GM et al (2014) Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc 28(3):704–711CrossRef Vassilliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Fried GM et al (2014) Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc 28(3):704–711CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Cherry DK, Hing E, Woodwell DA et al (2008) National Ambulatory Medical Survey: 2006 summary. Natl Health Stat Rep 6(3):1–39 Cherry DK, Hing E, Woodwell DA et al (2008) National Ambulatory Medical Survey: 2006 summary. Natl Health Stat Rep 6(3):1–39
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Garud S et al (2010) The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy. Arch Intern Med 170(19):1752–1757PubMedCrossRef Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Garud S et al (2010) The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy. Arch Intern Med 170(19):1752–1757PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA et al (2003) Standards of Practice Committee. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 57(6):633–638PubMedCrossRef Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA et al (2003) Standards of Practice Committee. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 57(6):633–638PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335(13):909–918PubMedCrossRef Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335(13):909–918PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunkin BJ (2003) Flexible endoscopy simulators. Semin Laparosc Surg 10(1):29–35PubMed Dunkin BJ (2003) Flexible endoscopy simulators. Semin Laparosc Surg 10(1):29–35PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR et al (2010) Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc 71:319–324PubMedCrossRef Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR et al (2010) Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc 71:319–324PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sedlack RE (2011) Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc 74:355–366PubMedCrossRef Sedlack RE (2011) Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc 74:355–366PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Naeem N (2013) Validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS). J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 23(1):77–82PubMed Naeem N (2013) Validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS). J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 23(1):77–82PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sedlack PE (2010) The Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 72:1125–1133PubMedCrossRef Sedlack PE (2010) The Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 72:1125–1133PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Issenberg SB et al (1999) Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 282(9):861–866PubMedCrossRef Issenberg SB et al (1999) Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 282(9):861–866PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Issenberg SB et al (2005) Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 27(1):10–28PubMedCrossRef Issenberg SB et al (2005) Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 27(1):10–28PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat ASGE Training Committee (2011) Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 73(5):861–867CrossRef ASGE Training Committee (2011) Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 73(5):861–867CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson CC, Jirapinyo P, Kumar N et al (2014) Development and initial validation of endoscopic part-task training box. Endoscopy 46(9):735–744 Thompson CC, Jirapinyo P, Kumar N et al (2014) Development and initial validation of endoscopic part-task training box. Endoscopy 46(9):735–744
Metadaten
Titel
Current status of endoscopic simulation in gastroenterology fellowship training programs
verfasst von
Pichamol Jirapinyo
Christopher C. Thompson
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3884-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.