The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05987-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
To summarize the recommendations from the national clinical guideline published by the Danish Health Authority regarding surgical and nonsurgical interventions in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients above the age of 65 years.
A multidisciplinary working group formulated recommendations based on the GRADE approach.
Seven of the recommendations were based on randomized controlled trials and three on professional consensus. The guideline recommends surgical decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Supervised exercise and postsurgical supervised exercise are recommended due to the general beneficial effects of training on general health, even though there was no evidence on an effect on neurogenic pain. The guideline does not recommend manual therapy, paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids, neurogenic pain medication, muscle relaxants, and decompression combined with instrumented fusion as there was no evidence of the beneficial effect.
The recommendations are based on low to very low quality of evidence or professional consensus as well as patient preferences and positive or harmful effects of the intervention. The true treatment effect may therefore be different from the estimated effects, which is why the results should be interpreted with caution. The working group recommends intensified research in relation to all aspects of management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 139 kb)586_2019_5987_MOESM1_ESM.pptx
Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Yamada H, Nagata K, Hashizume H et al (2012) Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthr Cartil 20(10):1103–1108 CrossRef
www.dst.dk/enj. Statistics Denmark
Ammendolia C, Schneider M, Williams K, Zickmund S, Hamm M, Stuber K et al (2017) The physical and psychological impact of neurogenic claudication: the patients’ perspectives. J Can Chiropr Assoc 61(1):18–31
Tomkins-Lane C, Melloh M, Lurie J, Smuck M, Battie MC, Freeman B et al (2016) ISSLS prize winner: consensus on the clinical diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: results of an international Delphi Study. Spine 41(15):1239–1246 CrossRef
Segebarth B, Kurd MF, Haug PH, Davis R (2015) Routine upright imaging for evaluating degenerative lumbar stenosis: incidence of degenerative spondylolisthesis missed on supine MRI. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(10):394–397 CrossRef
https://www.sst.dk/da/nyheder/2017/~/media/24A94AF7B4214658AF47DD8A87A420B3.ashx. National clinical guideline for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
www.sst.dk/da/nkr/metode/~/media/A11D669470D04B70B77616DBA92CF985.ashx. Metodehåndbog for udarbejdelse af Nationale Kliniske Retningslinjer for puljeprojekter 2017–2020
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):395–400 CrossRef
www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2017/~/media/BDF82BCD24EA4B0AA8D5E645C857B52A.ashx. Search terms and strategies
Comer C, Redmond AC, Bird HA, Hensor EM, Conaghan PG (2013) A home exercise programme is no more beneficial than advice and education for people with neurogenic claudication: results from a randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE 8(9):e72878 CrossRef
Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Childs JD, Wainner RS, Gill HE, Ryder MG et al (2006) A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 31(22):2541–2549 CrossRef
McGregor AH, Dore CJ, Morris TP, Morris S, Jamrozik K (2011) ISSLS prize winner: function after spinal treatment, exercise, and rehabilitation (FASTER): a factorial randomized trial to determine whether the functional outcome of spinal surgery can be improved. Spine 36(21):1711–1720 CrossRef
Aalto TJ, Leinonen V, Herno A, Alen M, Kroger H, Turunen V et al (2011) Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. Eur Spine J 20(8):1331–1340 CrossRef
Markman JD, Frazer ME, Rast SA, McDermott MP, Gewandter JS, Chowdhry AK et al (2015) Double-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of pregabalin for neurogenic claudication. Neurology 84(3):265–272 CrossRef
Yaksi A, Ozgonenel L, Ozgonenel B (2007) The efficiency of gabapentin therapy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 32(9):939–942 CrossRef
Markman JD, Gewandter JS, Frazer ME, Murray NM, Rast SA, McDermott MP et al (2015) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination for the treatment of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 40(10):684–691 CrossRef
Delitto A, Piva SR, Moore CG, Fritz JM, Wisniewski SR, Josbeno DA et al (2015) Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 162(7):465–473 CrossRef
Slatis P, Malmivaara A, Heliovaara M, Sainio P, Herno A, Kankare J et al (2011) Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 20(7):1174–1181 CrossRef
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B et al (2008) Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358(8):794–810 CrossRef
Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN et al (2016) Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 374(15):1424–1434 CrossRef
Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Gilbert TJ, Summers JT, Toton JF et al (2013) An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J 13(7):734–743 CrossRef
Bernstein IA, Malik Q, Carville S, Ward S (2017) Low back pain and sciatica: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 356:i6748 CrossRef
Stochkendahl MJ, Kjaer P, Hartvigsen J, Kongsted A, Aaboe J, Andersen M et al (2018) National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy. Eur Spine J 27(1):60–75 CrossRef
Zweig T, Enke J, Mannion AF, Sobottke R, Melloh M, Freeman BJC et al (2017) Is the duration of pre-operative conservative treatment associated with the clinical outcome following surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis? A study based on the Spine Tango Registry. Eur Spine J 26(2):488–500 CrossRef
Forsth P, Olafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgstrom F, Fritzell P et al (2016) A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 374(15):1413–1423 CrossRef
Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Alderson P, Dahm P, Falck-Ytter Y et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 66(7):719–725 CrossRef
Mannion AF, Denzler R, Dvorak J, Muntener M, Grob D (2007) A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 16(8):1101–1117 CrossRef
Chen CY, Chang CW, Lee ST, Chen YC, Tang SF, Cheng CH et al (2015) Is rehabilitation intervention during hospitalization enough for functional improvements in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery? A prospective randomized controlled study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 129(Suppl 1):S41–S46 CrossRef
- Danish national clinical guidelines for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
Rikke Krüger Jensen
Helle Algren Brøgger
Jørgen Dan Møller Degn
Mikkel Ø. Andersen
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
European Spine Journal
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II