Skip to main content
Erschienen in: MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin 16/2017

26.09.2017 | Zytostatische Therapie | FORTBILDUNG . ÜBERSICHT

Kolonkarzinom-Update 2017

Darmkrebs — das Neueste in Diagnostik und Therapie

verfasst von: PD Dr. med. Christoph Holmer, Prof. Dr. med. Martin E. Kreis

Erschienen in: MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin | Ausgabe 16/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Das kolorektale Karzinom hat nicht an epidemiologischer Relevanz verloren. Nach wie vor ist es bei Männern die zweithäufigste, bei Frauen die dritthäufigste krebsbedingte Todesursache. Erfahren Sie hier, was sich in den letzten Jahren in puncto Diagnostik und Therapie getan hat.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bericht zum Krebsgeschehen in Deutschland 2016. Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten im Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg). Berlin, 2016 Bericht zum Krebsgeschehen in Deutschland 2016. Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten im Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg). Berlin, 2016
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pox C, Aretz S, Bischoff SC et al. S3-guidelinecolorectal cancer version 1.0. Z Gastroenterol. 2013; 51:753–854CrossRefPubMed Pox C, Aretz S, Bischoff SC et al. S3-guidelinecolorectal cancer version 1.0. Z Gastroenterol. 2013; 51:753–854CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Haug U, Grobbee EJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I et al. Immunochemical faecal occult blood testing to screen for colorectal cancer: can the screening interval be extended? Gut. 2016 Mar 22. pii: gutjnl-2015-310102. Haug U, Grobbee EJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I et al. Immunochemical faecal occult blood testing to screen for colorectal cancer: can the screening interval be extended? Gut. 2016 Mar 22. pii: gutjnl-2015-310102.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JK, Liles EG, Bent S et al. Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee JK, Liles EG, Bent S et al. Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH et al Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:1287–97CrossRefPubMed Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH et al Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:1287–97CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Werner S, Chen H. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:184–5CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Werner S, Chen H. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:184–5CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Church TR, Wandell M, Lofton-Day C, et al. Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectalcancer. Gut. 2014;63:317–25CrossRefPubMed Church TR, Wandell M, Lofton-Day C, et al. Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectalcancer. Gut. 2014;63:317–25CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A et al. Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1747–63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A et al. Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1747–63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Maraghi RH, Kielar AZ. CT colonography versus optical colonoscopy for screening asymptomatic patients for colorectal cancer a patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) analysis. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:564–71CrossRefPubMed El-Maraghi RH, Kielar AZ. CT colonography versus optical colonoscopy for screening asymptomatic patients for colorectal cancer a patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) analysis. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:564–71CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ragnhammar P, Hafström L, Nygren P et al. A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2001;40:282–308CrossRefPubMed Ragnhammar P, Hafström L, Nygren P et al. A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2001;40:282–308CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Andre T et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2343–51CrossRefPubMed Andre T et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2343–51CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Haller DG et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1465–71CrossRefPubMed Haller DG et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1465–71CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yothers G et al. Oxaliplatin as adjuvant therapyfor coloncancer:updatedresults of NSABP C-07 trial, including survival and subset analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3768–74CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yothers G et al. Oxaliplatin as adjuvant therapyfor coloncancer:updatedresults of NSABP C-07 trial, including survival and subset analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3768–74CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Saltz LB et al. Irinotecan fluorouracil plus leucovorin is not superior to fluorouracil plus leucovorinaloneas adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer: Results of CALGB 89803. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3456–61CrossRefPubMed Saltz LB et al. Irinotecan fluorouracil plus leucovorin is not superior to fluorouracil plus leucovorinaloneas adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer: Results of CALGB 89803. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3456–61CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: completen mesocolic excision and central ligation — technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:354–64CrossRefPubMed Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: completen mesocolic excision and central ligation — technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:354–64CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernhoff R, Martling A, Sjövall A et al. Improved survival after an educational project on colon cancer management in the county of Stockholm — A population based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:1479–84CrossRefPubMed Bernhoff R, Martling A, Sjövall A et al. Improved survival after an educational project on colon cancer management in the county of Stockholm — A population based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:1479–84CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:161–8CrossRefPubMed Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:161–8CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655–62CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655–62CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:75–82CrossRefPubMed Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:75–82CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinrich S, Lang H. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Pro primary surgery. Chirurg. 2014;85:17–23CrossRefPubMed Heinrich S, Lang H. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Pro primary surgery. Chirurg. 2014;85:17–23CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Verwaal VJ, Ruth S van, Bree E de et al. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3737–43CrossRefPubMed Verwaal VJ, Ruth S van, Bree E de et al. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3737–43CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Kolonkarzinom-Update 2017
Darmkrebs — das Neueste in Diagnostik und Therapie
verfasst von
PD Dr. med. Christoph Holmer
Prof. Dr. med. Martin E. Kreis
Publikationsdatum
26.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin / Ausgabe 16/2017
Print ISSN: 1438-3276
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-3560
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s15006-017-9592-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 16/2017

MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin 16/2017 Zur Ausgabe

AKTUELLE MEDIZIN MAGAZIN

Sex-Studie klärt Deutschland auf