The double-duct sign is defined as dilation of both the common bile duct and pancreatic duct, which usually indicates pancreatic malignancy. However, benign causes have also been reported to cause a double-duct sign.
Case presentation
We present the case of a 59-year-old Caucasian female patient admitted to the Gastroenterology Department with intermittent right epigastric abdominal pain and an intact gallbladder. A double-duct sign was seen on endoscopic ultrasound. The suspicion of pancreatic malignancy was excluded through follow-up investigations. Biliary type II sphincter of Oddi dysfunction was diagnosed with an association of the double-duct sign. Sphincterotomy was performed to reduce pain, and there was no recurrence of symptoms during follow-up.
Conclusions
This is the third reported case in the literature of the double-duct sign associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. This case emphasizes that the double-duct sign is not always caused by a local malignancy. The literature review of the reported cases has been summarized to help in the diagnosis of future similar cases.
Hinweise
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
SOD
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
CBD
Common bile duct
PD
Pancreatic duct
ERCP
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
The double-duct sign presents as dilation of the pancreatic duct and common bile duct on imaging studies. This sign is considered menacing since the two most common causes are malignancies of either the pancreas or the ampulla of Vater [1]. However, benign causes have also been reported to cause a double-duct sign, including chronic pancreatitis and ampullary stenosis [1]. Only two cases in the literature have described a double-duct sign due to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) as the underlying etiology [2, 3]. We report the case of a 59-year-old female who presented with abdominal pain and was diagnosed with an unusual cause of the double-duct sign. Also, we performed a literature search on the reported cases of double-duct sign.
Case presentation
A 59-year-old Caucasian female presented to the Gastroenterology Department for moderate and intermittent upper right quadrant pain of 3-month duration. The pain was not associated with food intake or radiating to other regions. She did not have nausea, vomiting, weight loss, loss of appetite, or a change in bowel habits. The stool and urine colors were also normal.
Anzeige
The patient’s history consisted of osteoporosis, tension headache, chronic recurrent urinary infection, and hypertension. The patient does not smoke or drink alcohol. Her drug history consisted of valsartan and acetaminophen.
On physical examination, vital signs were within the normal range. There was no presence of jaundice, pallor, or edema. Murphy’s sign was negative. (To check for Murphy's sign, the patient is asked to inspire deeply while the examiner palpates the right subcostal region. If pain is elicited and the patient suddenly ceases his/her inspiratory effort, a positive Murphy’s sign has been induced.) Laboratory tests revealed no abnormal results (Table 1).
Table 1
Laboratory blood tests
Test
Result
Normal value
Red blood cells
4.63 × 109/l
3.80–5.20 × 109/l
C-reactive protein
3 mg/l
Up to 6 mg/l
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
10 mm/1 hour
Up to 20 mm/1 hour
Leucocytes
5.7 × 109/l
4–10.5 × 109/l
Conjugated bilirubin
0.8 ml/dl
0.2–1.2 mg/dl
Alkaline phosphatase
88 U/l
26–117 U/l
Gamma-glutamyl transferase
9 U/l
Up to 38 U/l
Alanine aminotransferase
11 U/l
Up to 41 U/l
Aspartate aminotransferase
17 U/l
Up to 40 U/l
Glucose
80 mg/dl
100 mg/dl
Creatinine
0.69 mg/dl
0.9–1.2 mg/dl
Calcium
Amylase
8.6 mg/dl
59 U/l
8–10 mg/dl
< 100 U/l
CA-19.9
29.93 U/ml
0–37 U/ml
Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan excluded any obstructive lesion that might have caused the double-duct sign. The abdominal ultrasound showed normal gallbladder.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed dilation of the common bile duct (CBD) (13.4 mm) (Fig. 1) and pancreatic duct (PD) (6.9 mm) (Fig. 2) near the head of the pancreas with no stones in the CBD or suspicious mass lesions in the pancreas or the ampulla of Vater.
Fig. 1.
Endoscopic ultrasound showing a dilated common bile duct
Fig. 2.
Endoscopic ultrasound showing a dilated pancreatic duct
×
×
Anzeige
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) confirmed the dilatation of the CBD and PD starting at the level of the ampulla of Vater. The patient’s history and results of applied investigations together with the Milwaukee Classification system established a diagnosis of biliary type II SOD.
During ERCP, a 6-mm endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed with a 7-French plastic stent placement of 5 cm length in the PD followed by a 10-French plastic stent of 9 cm length in the CBD. The pain diminished after sphincterotomy, and the stents were removed after 3 months.
Biopsy of the ampulla of Vater (Fig. 3) was performed during the ERCP and revealed a mild, chronic, and non-specific inflammation with no atypical cells. After 6 months of follow-up, the patient had a good status with no abnormalities.
Fig. 3.
Biopsy of the ampulla of Vater
×
Discussion
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a clinical syndrome characterized by an outflow reduction of bile and pancreatic secretions due to dyskinesia or anatomical stenosis. It has multiple clinical features that may or may not be simultaneous: episodic pain in the epigastrium or the right upper quadrant, nausea, vomiting, and recurrent bouts of pancreatitis [4].
In our case, depending on the patient's history and performed investigations, biliary type II SOD—according to the Milwaukee classification system—was diagnosed [5]. This is defined as a biliary type pain plus a dilated common bile duct > 12 mm on ultrasonography or liver enzyme dysfunction. However, there was no evidence of pancreatic-type pain or pancreatitis features to be classified into the pancreatic type SOD. However, pancreatic duct dilation was present along with common bile duct dilation appearing as a double-duct sign on imaging studies.
SOD is common in women after cholecystectomy [6] and is considered a distinct clinical entity when associated with opium abuse [7].
Our patient had not undergone cholecystectomy, had no exposure to opiate use, and did not have evidence of gallstone disease. SOD was of uncertain origin in this case. To our knowledge, no previous cases in the literature have reported the double-duct sign as a result of biliary type II SOD with a pancreatic duct dilation without the presence of pancreatitis. Two cases of double-duct sign were due to opiate-associated sphincter of Oddi dysfunction [2, 3]. The double-duct sign usually indicates pancreatic malignancy with a lower prevalence in patients who do not have obstructive jaundice [8]. In academic literature, other rare cases of the double-duct sign have been reported. We performed a PubMed search in July 2020 with 'double-duct sign' as search term. There were 77 publications, 8 of which were excluded because the articles were not in English; 53 included original data, and 16 reports are summarized according to the main cause that led to the double-duct sign in Table 2.
Since pancreatic cancer grows and develops in a stealthy fashion, early detection and diagnosis with possible therapeutic resection are challenging [1]. Hence, it is important to exclude malignancies when a double-duct sign is seen. After exclusion, we should seek for other possible causes, including the rare ones.
Anzeige
Conclusion
In our patient, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction was the underlying cause for the double-duct sign. To our knowledge, this is the third description of a double-duct sign due to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Our case emphasizes that a double-duct sign is not always caused by a local malignancy. Nevertheless, a cancer of the pancreas or ampulla of Vater should be ruled out as early as possible.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted in accordance with the fundamental principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication of this case and any accompanying images was obtained from the patient. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Anzeige
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mit e.Med Allgemeinmedizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der allgemeinmedizinischen Zeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Allgemeinmedizin-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
