Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Diabetologia 5/2021

Open Access 16.02.2021 | COVID-19 | Research Letter

The disproportionate excess mortality risk of COVID-19 in younger people with diabetes warrants vaccination prioritisation

verfasst von: Andrew P. McGovern, Nick J. Thomas, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Andrew T. Hattersley, Bilal A. Mateen, John M. Dennis

Erschienen in: Diabetologia | Ausgabe 5/2021

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Begleitmaterial
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00125-021-05404-8) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
COVID-19
Coronavirus disease-2019
To the Editor: Diabetes has consistently been shown to independently increase the risk of poor coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outcomes [13]. Rather than a simple additive effect of diabetes and age-related risk, recent large studies suggest a more complex relationship, with a disproportionately higher excess relative mortality risk in younger people with diabetes compared with older people with diabetes [1, 3, 4]. Better understanding of the interaction between age and diabetes in the context of COVID-19 will further inform the complex prioritisation decisions around COVID-19 vaccination [5].
To explore this relationship, we triangulated the evidence on heterogeneity of diabetes effect by age on COVID-19 mortality from large population-based and critical care-based studies. Two UK population-based studies (OpenSAFELY [n = 17,278,392; 8.8% with diabetes] and QCOVID [n = 6,083,102; 7.0% with diabetes]) have previously reported adjusted age-specific hazard ratios for COVID-19-related mortality risk associated with diabetes [1, 4]. OpenSAFELY reported these stratified by recent HbA1c measurements as recorded in primary care (</≥58 mmol/mol [</≥7.5%] or not available), but not by diabetes type. QCOVID reported age-specific hazard ratios for type 2 diabetes by sex, but did not report age-specific values for type 1 diabetes (see electronic supplementary material [ESM] Methods). The overall 90-day COVID-19-related mortality rate was 0.06% in OpenSAFELY (study period: 1 February 2020–6 May 2020) and the 97-day COVID-19-related mortality rate was 0.07% in QCOVID (derivation cohort study period: 24 January 2020–30 April 2020).
Building on our previous analysis in the critical care setting [3], we also examined adjusted age-specific hazard ratios associated with type 2 diabetes in people with severe COVID-19 using the COVID-19 Hospitalisation in England Surveillance System (CHESS) cohort (n = 19,256 individuals admitted to critical care in England; 18.3% with type 2 diabetes; see ESM Methods). In this cohort, the 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 26.4% (see ESM Table 1 for age-stratified mortality rates).
To aid interpretability of our findings, based on the work of Spiegelhalter [6, 7], we translated hazard ratio estimates into ‘COVID-age’, which represents the additional years of COVID-19 mortality risk added to an individual’s chronological age if diabetes is present. Full details of our approach are provided in the ESM Methods. The study was reviewed and approved by the Warwick BSREC (BSREC 119/19-20).
The additional COVID-19 mortality risk associated with diabetes is, in terms of COVID-age, markedly higher in younger than older people (Fig. 1). This reflects the higher relative risk of COVID-19-related mortality associated with diabetes in younger age groups (hazard ratios for diabetes >5 in adults under 50 years of age in population-based studies). Population-based and critical care-based estimates are similar, despite differences in setting, time period and adjustments for confounders between studies. For a person aged 40 years with diabetes, additional mortality risk is equivalent to around 20 years of chronological age, meaning that mortality risk is similar to that of a 60-year-old person without diabetes. For a person aged 70 years with diabetes, the additional mortality risk from diabetes is equivalent to an additional 8 years of age, so their COVID-age is 78 years (based on QCOVID data).
Clearly, considering only age and diabetes status when assessing COVID-19-associated risks (both mortality and in general) is an oversimplification. Multiple additional factors, including BMI, diabetes duration, glycaemic control, diabetes type and existing complications are known to further modify individual COVID-19 risk [8, 9]. Whilst patient-level risk incorporating these multiple factors can be calculated [10] (and is preferable for informing individuals of their COVID-19 risk), this is not practical for population-level vaccine rollout. The time-critical nature of population COVID-19 vaccination necessitates pragmatic group-level prioritisation, which is the approach initiated by governments thus far [11, 12].
Whilst the absolute risk of COVID-19-related mortality in younger people with diabetes is still not as high as that of the elderly, vaccine prioritisation approaches should not simply consider absolute mortality risk. Younger people are disproportionately impacted in terms of life years lost and are of working age, which puts them at potentially higher risk of exposure. These factors should be considered, alongside the excess relative COVID-19 mortality risk in younger people with diabetes, to ensure that they are appropriately prioritised for vaccination.

Acknowledgements

JMD is supported by an Independent Fellowship funded by Research England’s Expanding Excellence in England (E3) fund. SJV and BAM are supported by The Alan Turing Institute (EPSRC grant EP/N510129/). SJV is supported by the University of Warwick IAA funding. ATH is an NIHR Senior Investigator and a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator (098395/Z/12/Z). JMD, NJT, ATH and APM are supported by the NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility. We thank Public Health England for providing access to CHESS data to the Warwick Research Group and M. Keeling (University of Warwick, Warwick, UK) for his support and establishing data access. Sponsorship for the study was provided by the University of Warwick (SOC.28/19-20).

Authors’ relationships and activities

APM declares previous research funding from Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer and AstraZeneca. SJV declares funding from IQVIA. All other authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

e.Med Allgemeinmedizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Allgemeinmedizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der allgemeinmedizinischen Zeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Allgemeinmedizin-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

Anhänge

Supplementary information

Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dennis JM, Mateen BA, Sonabend R et al (2020) Type 2 diabetes and COVID-19-related mortality in the critical care setting: a national cohort study in England, March–July 2020. Diabetes Care 44(1):50–57. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1444 Dennis JM, Mateen BA, Sonabend R et al (2020) Type 2 diabetes and COVID-19-related mortality in the critical care setting: a national cohort study in England, March–July 2020. Diabetes Care 44(1):50–57. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2337/​dc20-1444
Metadaten
Titel
The disproportionate excess mortality risk of COVID-19 in younger people with diabetes warrants vaccination prioritisation
verfasst von
Andrew P. McGovern
Nick J. Thomas
Sebastian J. Vollmer
Andrew T. Hattersley
Bilal A. Mateen
John M. Dennis
Publikationsdatum
16.02.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Diabetologia / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05404-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Diabetologia 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Praxisempfehlungen der Deutschen Diabetes Gesellschaft

Kurz, prägnant und aktuell: Die Praxisempfehlungen der Deutschen Diabetes Gesellschaft. 

Passend zum Thema

ANZEIGE

IPD-Fallzahlen & Pneumokokken-Impfung bei Kindern in Deutschland

Das Niveau der postpandemischen Fallzahlen für invasive Pneumokokken-Erkrankungen (IPD) ist aus Sicht des Referenz-Zentrums für Streptokokken in Aachen alarmierend [1]. Wie sich die monatlichen IPD-Fallzahlen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen von Juli 2015 bis März 2023 entwickelt haben, lesen Sie hier.

ANZEIGE

HPV-Impfung: Auch für junge Erwachsene sinnvoll und wichtig

Auch nach dem 18. Lebensjahr kann eine HPV-Impfung sinnvoll und wichtig sein. Viele gesetzliche Krankenkassen übernehmen die Kosten auch zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch.

ANZEIGE

Impfstoffe – Krankheiten vorbeugen, bevor sie entstehen

Seit mehr als 130 Jahren entwickelt und produziert MSD Impfstoffe für alle Altersgruppen. Hier finden Sie nützliche Informationen und Praxismaterialien rund um das Thema Impfen.

MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH