Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgery 6/2021

18.01.2021 | Original Article

Decisional Conflict in Surgical Patients

verfasst von: Chemuru Munisekhar Reddy, Nishanth Lakshmikantha, Lakshman K

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We are now living in the era of shared decision making and informed consent where the decision to undergo surgery is no longer decided by the operating surgeon alone. This involves a degree of decisiveness on the part of the patient. Decisional conflict is defined as a state of uncertainty about the course of action to be taken by the patients. Decisional conflict scale is a 16-item validated psychometric scale that measures decisional conflict objectively. In this study, we aim to introduce the concept of a decisional conflict and document its prevalence in patients undergoing surgery in a tertiary care center. This was a prospective observational study carried out in a tertiary care center between September 2019 and March 2020. The decisional conflict scale data was collected from the patients in the ward before shifting them to the operating theater. The maximum score possible was 80 and the minimum was 16. The higher the score is, the lesser the conflict. We chose an arbitrary cut-off value of 75% which equated to a score of 60 on the scale. The modified Kuppuswamy scale was used to calculate the socioeconomic status of patients. We had a total of 227 patients enrolled in the study. In our study, it was noted that 169 (74.45%) patients did not have a decisional conflict while 58 (25.55%) had a decisional conflict. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of education, occupation, income, and socioeconomic status. On subgroup analysis, it was noted that patients had a maximum conflict in 2 questions: (1) information about the available choices and (2) the risks and complications of the surgery. Measuring decisional conflict in surgical patients is feasible. Decisional conflict cuts across groups irrespective of patient gender, education, occupation, income, and socioeconomic status.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ (2013) Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med 368(1):6–8CrossRef Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ (2013) Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med 368(1):6–8CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Barr PJ, Elwyn G (2016) Measurement challenges in shared decision making: putting the ‘patient’ in patient-reported measures. Health Expect 19(5):993–1001CrossRef Barr PJ, Elwyn G (2016) Measurement challenges in shared decision making: putting the ‘patient’ in patient-reported measures. Health Expect 19(5):993–1001CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 15(1):25–30CrossRef O'Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 15(1):25–30CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Saleem SM (2020) Modified Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale updated for the year 2020. Indian Journal of Forensic and Community Medicine 7(1):1–3 Saleem SM (2020) Modified Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale updated for the year 2020. Indian Journal of Forensic and Community Medicine 7(1):1–3
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam WW, Kwok M, Chan M, Hung WK, Ying M, Or A, Kwong A, Suen D, Yoon S, Fielding R (2014) Does the use of shared decision-making consultation behaviors increase treatment decision-making satisfaction among Chinese women facing a decision for breast cancer surgery? Patient Educ Couns 94(2):243CrossRef Lam WW, Kwok M, Chan M, Hung WK, Ying M, Or A, Kwong A, Suen D, Yoon S, Fielding R (2014) Does the use of shared decision-making consultation behaviors increase treatment decision-making satisfaction among Chinese women facing a decision for breast cancer surgery? Patient Educ Couns 94(2):243CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Manne SL, Topham N, D’Agostino TA, Myers Virtue S, Kirstein L, Brill K, Manning C, Grana G, Schwartz MD, Ohman-Strickland P (2016) Acceptability and pilot efficacy trial of a web-based breast reconstruction decision support aid for women considering mastectomy. Psycho-oncology. 25(12):1424–1433CrossRef Manne SL, Topham N, D’Agostino TA, Myers Virtue S, Kirstein L, Brill K, Manning C, Grana G, Schwartz MD, Ohman-Strickland P (2016) Acceptability and pilot efficacy trial of a web-based breast reconstruction decision support aid for women considering mastectomy. Psycho-oncology. 25(12):1424–1433CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jha S, Duckett J (2019) Utility of patient decision aids (PDA) in stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 30(9):1483–1486CrossRef Jha S, Duckett J (2019) Utility of patient decision aids (PDA) in stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 30(9):1483–1486CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam WW, Chan M, Or A, Kwong A, Suen D, Fielding R (2013) Reducing treatment decision conflict difficulties in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 31(23):2879–2885CrossRef Lam WW, Chan M, Or A, Kwong A, Suen D, Fielding R (2013) Reducing treatment decision conflict difficulties in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 31(23):2879–2885CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Boss EF, Mehta N, Nagarajan N, Links A, Benke JR, Berger Z, Espinel A, Meier J, Lipstein EA (2016) Shared decision making and choice for elective surgical care: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154(3):405–420CrossRef Boss EF, Mehta N, Nagarajan N, Links A, Benke JR, Berger Z, Espinel A, Meier J, Lipstein EA (2016) Shared decision making and choice for elective surgical care: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154(3):405–420CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin PJ, Fang SY, Kuo YL (2019) Development and usability testing of a decision support app for women considering breast reconstruction surgery. J Cancer Educ:1–8 Lin PJ, Fang SY, Kuo YL (2019) Development and usability testing of a decision support app for women considering breast reconstruction surgery. J Cancer Educ:1–8
Metadaten
Titel
Decisional Conflict in Surgical Patients
verfasst von
Chemuru Munisekhar Reddy
Nishanth Lakshmikantha
Lakshman K
Publikationsdatum
18.01.2021
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02722-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Indian Journal of Surgery 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.