Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 11/2022

10.05.2022 | Breast

Does the patient-assisted compression mode affect the mammography quality? A within-woman randomized controlled trial

verfasst von: Daniela Perez-Leon, Margarita Posso, Javier Louro, Belén Ejarque, Mónica Arranz, Natalia Arenas, Jose Maiques, Juan Martínez, Francesc Maciá, Marta Román, Ana Rodríguez-Arana, Xavier Castells, Rodrigo Alcántara

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 11/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Evaluate the image quality of a mammography screening device using the patient-assisted compression (PAC) compared with the standard compression (SC) mode.

Methods

This prospective within-woman, randomized controlled trial was conducted between September 2017 and December 2019. Participants were asymptomatic women aged 50 to 69 years attending their second or subsequent screening mammography round. By random assignment, one breast underwent the SC and the other breast, the PAC. Image quality was evaluated as perfect, good, moderate, or inadequate (PGMI) on 10 criteria for the craniocaudal (CC) view and 8 criteria for the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view. Pearson’s chi-square test, with Yates’ correction if pertinent, was performed to compare image quality between compression modes.

Results

A total of 444 participants were included (mean [± standard deviation] age, 60 [± 4.9] years). There were no differences in the percentages of PGMI between the PAC and SC modes for the CC view (perfect, 37% [162/444] vs 37% [163/444]; good, 1% [5/444] vs 2% [9/444]; moderate, 62% [277/444] vs 61% [271/444]; inadequate, 0% vs 0.2% [1/444]; p = .88) or for the MLO view (perfect, 53% [237/444] vs 56% [247/444]; good, 22% [99/444] vs 22% [97/444]; moderate, 23% [102/444] vs 22% [98/444]; inadequate, 1% [6/444] vs 0.5% [2/444]; p = .72). No differences were found when we stratified by laterality or when analyzed by PGMI criteria.

Conclusion

PAC does not seem to impair mammographic image quality. Future research should focus in a daily practice setting.

Key Points

  • No differences were found in the distribution of the PGMI classification, a tool for quality assessment, between patient-assisted compression and standard compression.
  • Similar results were found on stratification of image quality by mammographic view and breast laterality for both types of compression.
  • None of the PGMI criteria had significantly more errors in patient-assisted compression than in standard compression.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I (2018) Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I (2018) Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424CrossRef
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (2008) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition - Summary document. Ann Oncol 19(4):614–622CrossRef Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (2008) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition - Summary document. Ann Oncol 19(4):614–622CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Canelo-Aybar C, Ferreira DS, Ballesteros M et al (2021) Benefits and harms of breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC). J Med Screen. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141321993866 Canelo-Aybar C, Ferreira DS, Ballesteros M et al (2021) Benefits and harms of breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC). J Med Screen. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0969141321993866​
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Moshina N, Sagstad S, Sebuødegård S et al (2020) Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening. Radiography (Lond) 26(2):133–139 Moshina N, Sagstad S, Sebuødegård S et al (2020) Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening. Radiography (Lond) 26(2):133–139
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelehan P, Evans A, Wells M, MacGillivray S (2013) The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer screening: a systematic review. Breast 22(4):389–394CrossRef Whelehan P, Evans A, Wells M, MacGillivray S (2013) The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer screening: a systematic review. Breast 22(4):389–394CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chida K, Komatsu Y, Sai M et al (2009) Reduced compression mammography to reduce breast pain. Clin Imaging 33(1):7–10 Chida K, Komatsu Y, Sai M et al (2009) Reduced compression mammography to reduce breast pain. Clin Imaging 33(1):7–10
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Feder K, Grunert JH (2017) Is individualizing breast compression during mammography useful? - Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast. Breast 189(1):39–48 Feder K, Grunert JH (2017) Is individualizing breast compression during mammography useful? - Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast. Breast 189(1):39–48
9.
Zurück zum Zitat De Groot JE, Broeders MJM, Branderhorst W, Den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA (2013) A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force. Med Phys 40(8):081901CrossRef De Groot JE, Broeders MJM, Branderhorst W, Den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA (2013) A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force. Med Phys 40(8):081901CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat De Groot JE, Broeders MJM, Grimbergen CA, Den Heeten GJ (2015) Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle. BMC Womens Health 15(1):1–9CrossRef De Groot JE, Broeders MJM, Grimbergen CA, Den Heeten GJ (2015) Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle. BMC Womens Health 15(1):1–9CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot JE, Hopman IGM, van Lier MGJTB, Branderhorst W, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten G (2017) Pressure-standardised mammography does not affect visibility, contrast and sharpness of stable lesions. Eur J Radiol 86:289–295 de Groot JE, Hopman IGM, van Lier MGJTB, Branderhorst W, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten G (2017) Pressure-standardised mammography does not affect visibility, contrast and sharpness of stable lesions. Eur J Radiol 86:289–295
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Y, Poulos A, McLean D, Rickard M (2010) A review of methods of clinical image quality evaluation in mammography. Eur J Radiol 74(3):e122–e131CrossRef Li Y, Poulos A, McLean D, Rickard M (2010) A review of methods of clinical image quality evaluation in mammography. Eur J Radiol 74(3):e122–e131CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreira C, Svoboda K, Poulos A, Taylor R, Page A, Rickard M (2005) Comparison of the validity and reliability of two image classification systems for the assessment of mammogram quality. J Med Screen 12(1):38–42CrossRef Moreira C, Svoboda K, Poulos A, Taylor R, Page A, Rickard M (2005) Comparison of the validity and reliability of two image classification systems for the assessment of mammogram quality. J Med Screen 12(1):38–42CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat National Quality Assurance Coordinating Group for Radiography (2006) Quality assurance guidelines for mammography including radiographic quality control. NHSBSP 63:1–64 National Quality Assurance Coordinating Group for Radiography (2006) Quality assurance guidelines for mammography including radiographic quality control. NHSBSP 63:1–64
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyce M, Gullien R, Parashar D, Taylor K (2015) Comparing the use and interpretation of PGMI scoring to assess the technical quality of screening mammograms in the UK and Norway. Radiography (Lond) 21(4):342–347 Boyce M, Gullien R, Parashar D, Taylor K (2015) Comparing the use and interpretation of PGMI scoring to assess the technical quality of screening mammograms in the UK and Norway. Radiography (Lond) 21(4):342–347
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kornguth PJ, Rimer BK, Conaway MR et al (1993) Impact of patient-controlled compression on the mammography experience. Radiology 186(1):99–102 Kornguth PJ, Rimer BK, Conaway MR et al (1993) Impact of patient-controlled compression on the mammography experience. Radiology 186(1):99–102
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Balleyguier C, Cousin M, Dunant A, Attard M, Delaloge S, Arfi-rouche J (2018) Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography. Eur J Cancer 103:137–142CrossRef Balleyguier C, Cousin M, Dunant A, Attard M, Delaloge S, Arfi-rouche J (2018) Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography. Eur J Cancer 103:137–142CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Henrot P, Boisserie-Lacroix M, Boute V et al (2019) Self-compression technique vs standard compression in mammography. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 179(3):407–414 Henrot P, Boisserie-Lacroix M, Boute V et al (2019) Self-compression technique vs standard compression in mammography. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 179(3):407–414
Metadaten
Titel
Does the patient-assisted compression mode affect the mammography quality? A within-woman randomized controlled trial
verfasst von
Daniela Perez-Leon
Margarita Posso
Javier Louro
Belén Ejarque
Mónica Arranz
Natalia Arenas
Jose Maiques
Juan Martínez
Francesc Maciá
Marta Román
Ana Rodríguez-Arana
Xavier Castells
Rodrigo Alcántara
Publikationsdatum
10.05.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08834-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2022

European Radiology 11/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.