Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2021

30.04.2021 | Original Article

Evaluation of anteroposterior and vertical stability 25 years after Angle class II division 1 treatment with cervical headgear

verfasst von: Sara Ramos Braga Santos, Telma Martins de Araújo, Carlos Jorge Vogel, Márcio Bastos de Oliveira, Marcos Alan Vieira Bittencourt, Emanuel Braga

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The goal was to investigate long-term (minimum 20 years) skeletal and dental changes in Angle class II division 1 patients treated with full-fixed orthodontic appliances and cervical pull headgear.

Methods

A longitudinal retrospective study was performed with 20 orthodontic patients, who were treated exclusively by one experienced clinician and whose treatment had been completed a minimum of 20 years ago. Former patients who had been treated from the mid-1970s to the early 1990s were actively sought. After the recall, 20 patients agreed to participate in the study. Lateral cephalometric radiographs at pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and long-term follow-up (T3) were digitized and measurements were performed. Angular variables used were SNA, SNB, ANB, OcclPl-FH, PalPl-FH, GoMe-FH, 1‑NA, and Y axis. Linear measures were A‑NPerp, Pg-NPerp, 1‑NAmm, Wits, and LAFH.

Results

From T1 to T2, a significant reduction (p < 0.01) in ANB angle from 4.70 to 2.48° and in Wits value from 3.42 to 0.98 mm were observed. It was also noticed a significant increase (p < 0.01) in LAFH from 62.02 to 67.39 mm, probably due to normal facial growth. From T2 to T3, these variables remained stable. No significant changes were observed for any other measure in any of the periods studied.

Conclusions

In the assessed sample, Angle class II division 1 patients treated with cervical pull headgear presented cephalometric outcome stability of treatment, even after a long-term follow-up of a mean of 25 years postretention.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams CD, Meikle MC, Norwick KW, Turpin DL (1972) Dentofacial remodeling produced by intermaxillary forces in macaca mulatta. Arch Oral Biol 17:1519–1535PubMedCrossRef Adams CD, Meikle MC, Norwick KW, Turpin DL (1972) Dentofacial remodeling produced by intermaxillary forces in macaca mulatta. Arch Oral Biol 17:1519–1535PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Almuzian M, Alharbi F, McIntyre G (2016) Extra-oral appliances in orthodontic treatment. Dent Update 43:74–76PubMedCrossRef Almuzian M, Alharbi F, McIntyre G (2016) Extra-oral appliances in orthodontic treatment. Dent Update 43:74–76PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S (2015) Treating class II malocclusion in children: vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention. Orthod Craniofac Res 18:86–95PubMedCrossRef Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S (2015) Treating class II malocclusion in children: vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention. Orthod Craniofac Res 18:86–95PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumrind S, Korn EL, Molthen R, West EE (1981) Changes in facial dimensions associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla. Am J Orthod 80:17–30PubMedCrossRef Baumrind S, Korn EL, Molthen R, West EE (1981) Changes in facial dimensions associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla. Am J Orthod 80:17–30PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhateja NK, Fida M, Shaikh A (2015) Overjet as a predictor of vertical facial morphology in orthodontic patients with class II division 1 malocclusion. J Orthod Res 3:175–180 Bhateja NK, Fida M, Shaikh A (2015) Overjet as a predictor of vertical facial morphology in orthodontic patients with class II division 1 malocclusion. J Orthod Res 3:175–180
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke M, Jacobson A (1992) Vertical changes in high-angle class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear. Am J Orthod 102:501–508CrossRef Burke M, Jacobson A (1992) Vertical changes in high-angle class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear. Am J Orthod 102:501–508CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabrera MC, Cabrera CAG, Freitas KMS, Freitas MR, Janson G, Cabrera LC (2012) Cephalometric effects of the use of 10-hour force theory for class II treatment. Dental Press J Orthod 17:31–40CrossRef Cabrera MC, Cabrera CAG, Freitas KMS, Freitas MR, Janson G, Cabrera LC (2012) Cephalometric effects of the use of 10-hour force theory for class II treatment. Dental Press J Orthod 17:31–40CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cangialosi TJ, Melstrell ME Jr, Leung MA, Ko JY (1988) A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93:315–324PubMedCrossRef Cangialosi TJ, Melstrell ME Jr, Leung MA, Ko JY (1988) A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93:315–324PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassidy SE, Jackson SR, Turpin DL, Ramsay DS, Spiekerman C, Huang GJ (2014) Classification and treatment of class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:443–451PubMedCrossRef Cassidy SE, Jackson SR, Turpin DL, Ramsay DS, Spiekerman C, Huang GJ (2014) Classification and treatment of class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:443–451PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciger S, Aksu M, Germeç D (2005) Evaluation of posttreatment changes in class II division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127:219–223PubMedCrossRef Ciger S, Aksu M, Germeç D (2005) Evaluation of posttreatment changes in class II division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127:219–223PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hills Dale, NJ Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hills Dale, NJ
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Egolf RJ, BeGole EA (1990) Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97:336–348PubMedCrossRef Egolf RJ, BeGole EA (1990) Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97:336–348PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Elder JR, Tuenge RH (1974) Cephalometric and histologic changes produced by extraoral high-pull traction to the maxilla in macaca mulatta. Am J Orthod 66:599–617CrossRef Elder JR, Tuenge RH (1974) Cephalometric and histologic changes produced by extraoral high-pull traction to the maxilla in macaca mulatta. Am J Orthod 66:599–617CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Elms TN, Buschang PH, Alexander RG (1996) Long-term stability of class II, division 1, nonextraction cervical face-bow therapy: I, model analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:271–276PubMedCrossRef Elms TN, Buschang PH, Alexander RG (1996) Long-term stability of class II, division 1, nonextraction cervical face-bow therapy: I, model analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:271–276PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fidler BC, Årtun J, Joondeph DR, Little RM (1995) Long-term stability of angle class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:276–285PubMedCrossRef Fidler BC, Årtun J, Joondeph DR, Little RM (1995) Long-term stability of angle class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:276–285PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Firouz M, Zernik J, Nanda R (1992) Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102:197–205PubMedCrossRef Firouz M, Zernik J, Nanda R (1992) Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102:197–205PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S (1985) Posttreatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of maxillary growth. Am J Orthod 88:288–296PubMedCrossRef Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S (1985) Posttreatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of maxillary growth. Am J Orthod 88:288–296PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Freitas MR, Lima DV, Freitas KMS, Janson G, Henriques JFC (2008) Cephalometric evaluation of class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod 30:477–482PubMedCrossRef Freitas MR, Lima DV, Freitas KMS, Janson G, Henriques JFC (2008) Cephalometric evaluation of class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod 30:477–482PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL (1998) Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:51–61PubMedCrossRef Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL (1998) Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:51–61PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellman M (1940) Orthodontic results many years after treatment. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 26:843–853CrossRef Hellman M (1940) Orthodontic results many years after treatment. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 26:843–853CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Henriques FP, Janson G, Henriques JFC, Pupulim DC (2015) Effects of cervical headgear appliance a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod 20:76–81PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Henriques FP, Janson G, Henriques JFC, Pupulim DC (2015) Effects of cervical headgear appliance a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod 20:76–81PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jakobsson SO (1967) Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 53:446–457PubMedCrossRef Jakobsson SO (1967) Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 53:446–457PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S et al (1998) Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:40–50PubMedCrossRef Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S et al (1998) Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:40–50PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirjavainen M, Hurmerinta K, Kirjavainen T (2007) Facial profile changes in early class II correction with cervical headgear. Angle Orthod 77:960–967PubMedCrossRef Kirjavainen M, Hurmerinta K, Kirjavainen T (2007) Facial profile changes in early class II correction with cervical headgear. Angle Orthod 77:960–967PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T, Hurmerinta K, Haavikko K (2000) Orthopedic cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in class II correction. Angle Orthod 70:317–325PubMed Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T, Hurmerinta K, Haavikko K (2000) Orthopedic cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in class II correction. Angle Orthod 70:317–325PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kloehn SJ (1947) Guiding alveolar growth and eruption of teeth to reduce treatment time and produce a more balanced denture and face. Angle Orthod 17:10–33 Kloehn SJ (1947) Guiding alveolar growth and eruption of teeth to reduce treatment time and produce a more balanced denture and face. Angle Orthod 17:10–33
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lima Filho RMA, Lima AL, de Oliveira Ruellas AC (2003) Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear. Angle Orthod 73:187–193PubMed Lima Filho RMA, Lima AL, de Oliveira Ruellas AC (2003) Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear. Angle Orthod 73:187–193PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lione R, Franchi L, Laganà G, Cozza P (2015) Effects of cervical headgear and pendulum appliance on vertical dimension in growing subjects: a retrospective controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 37:338–344PubMedCrossRef Lione R, Franchi L, Laganà G, Cozza P (2015) Effects of cervical headgear and pendulum appliance on vertical dimension in growing subjects: a retrospective controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 37:338–344PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mäntysaari R, Kantomaa T, Pirttiniemi P, Pykäläinen A (2004) The effects of early headgear treatment on dental arches and craniofacial morphology: a report of a 2 year randomized study. Eur J Orthod 26:59–64PubMedCrossRef Mäntysaari R, Kantomaa T, Pirttiniemi P, Pykäläinen A (2004) The effects of early headgear treatment on dental arches and craniofacial morphology: a report of a 2 year randomized study. Eur J Orthod 26:59–64PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Mills CM, Holman RG, Graber TM (1978) Heavy intermittent cervical traction in class II treatment: a longitudinal cephalometric assessment. Am J Orthod 74:361–379PubMedCrossRef Mills CM, Holman RG, Graber TM (1978) Heavy intermittent cervical traction in class II treatment: a longitudinal cephalometric assessment. Am J Orthod 74:361–379PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Papadopoulos K, Perović T (2015) Class II division 1 malocclusion therapy with the help of extraoral headgear appliance with cervical pull: case report. Med Biol 17:73–78 Papadopoulos K, Perović T (2015) Class II division 1 malocclusion therapy with the help of extraoral headgear appliance with cervical pull: case report. Med Biol 17:73–78
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Papageorgiou SN, Kutschera E, Memmert S, Gölz L, Jäger A, Bourauel C et al (2017) Effectiveness of early orthopaedic treatment with headgear: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 39:176–187PubMedCrossRef Papageorgiou SN, Kutschera E, Memmert S, Gölz L, Jäger A, Bourauel C et al (2017) Effectiveness of early orthopaedic treatment with headgear: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 39:176–187PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Phan XL, Schneider BJ, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA (2004) Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in angle class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 74:174–183PubMed Phan XL, Schneider BJ, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA (2004) Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in angle class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 74:174–183PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos DS, de Lima EM (2005) A longitudinal evaluation of the skeletal profile of treated and untreated skeletal class II individuals. Angle Orthod 75:47–53PubMed Ramos DS, de Lima EM (2005) A longitudinal evaluation of the skeletal profile of treated and untreated skeletal class II individuals. Angle Orthod 75:47–53PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh A, Kishore MSV, Shetty KS (2012) Treatment changes of chin position in class-II division 1 patients: a cephalometric study. J Pierre Fauchard Acad 26:117–125CrossRef Singh A, Kishore MSV, Shetty KS (2012) Treatment changes of chin position in class-II division 1 patients: a cephalometric study. J Pierre Fauchard Acad 26:117–125CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Tortop T, Yüksel S (2007) Treatment and posttreatment changes with combined headgear therapy. Angle Orthod 77:857–863PubMedCrossRef Tortop T, Yüksel S (2007) Treatment and posttreatment changes with combined headgear therapy. Angle Orthod 77:857–863PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Tüfekçi E, Allen SB, Best AM, Lindauer SJ (2016) Current trends in headgear use for the treatment of class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod 86:584–589PubMedCrossRef Tüfekçi E, Allen SB, Best AM, Lindauer SJ (2016) Current trends in headgear use for the treatment of class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod 86:584–589PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR (1997) The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:391–400PubMedCrossRef Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR (1997) The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:391–400PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Tweed CH (1954) The Frankfort-Mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24:121–169 Tweed CH (1954) The Frankfort-Mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24:121–169
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Waldron R (1942) Reviewing the problem of retention. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 28:770–791CrossRef Waldron R (1942) Reviewing the problem of retention. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 28:770–791CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Wieslander L (1963) The effect of orthodontic treatment on the concurrent development of the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod 49:15–27CrossRef Wieslander L (1963) The effect of orthodontic treatment on the concurrent development of the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod 49:15–27CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Wieslander L (1975) Early or late cervical traction therapy of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 67:432–439PubMedCrossRef Wieslander L (1975) Early or late cervical traction therapy of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 67:432–439PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Taylor MG, King GJ (2002) Effectiveness of early treatment of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:9–17PubMedCrossRef Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Taylor MG, King GJ (2002) Effectiveness of early treatment of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:9–17PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of anteroposterior and vertical stability 25 years after Angle class II division 1 treatment with cervical headgear
verfasst von
Sara Ramos Braga Santos
Telma Martins de Araújo
Carlos Jorge Vogel
Márcio Bastos de Oliveira
Marcos Alan Vieira Bittencourt
Emanuel Braga
Publikationsdatum
30.04.2021
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00277-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.