Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2023

02.09.2022 | Original Article

Histopathological Predictors of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer—a Tertiary Care Center Experience

verfasst von: Singh Aminder, Jindal Saveena, Soni Ankita, Kaur Harpreet, Jain Kunal, Narang Vikram, Grover Sumit, Garg Bhavna, Kaur Ramneek

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) has a therapeutic and prognostic implication in colorectal carcinomas (CRCs). It can be detected either by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or molecular studies. In developing countries, a significant proportion of the patients experience financial constraints limiting the utilization of healthcare facilities. We aimed to identify the possible clinicopathological variables which can be used as predictors of microsatellite instability in such patients. CRC cases received for MSI detection by IHC (for 1 and 1/2 years) were included. A panel of four IHC markers (anti-MLH1, anti-PMS2, anti-MSH2, and anti-MSH6) was used. Confirmation by the molecular study was recommended in all the IHC-proven MSI cases. Various clinicopathological parameters were evaluated as predictors of MSI. Microsatellite instability was detected in 40.6% (30/74) cases with MLH1 and PMS2 dual loss in 27% cases, MSH2 and MSH6 dual loss in 6.8%, loss of all four MMR proteins in 2.7%, and isolated PMS2 loss in 4.1%. MSI-H expression was shown by 36.5% cases with only 4.1% cases showing MSI-L expression. The age cut-off value to differentiate both the study groups (MSI vs MSS) was 63 years with a sensitivity of 47.7% and specificity of 86.7%. ROC curve showed an area under the curve of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.515–0.776; p-value = 0.03). On univariate analysis, age < 63 years, colon site, and absence of nodal metastasis were significantly higher in the MSI group. However, on multivariate analysis, only the age < 63 years was found to be significantly higher in the MSI group. Confirmation was molecular study could only be obtained in 12 cases and was completely concordant with MSI detection by IHC. MSI detection can be performed either by IHC or by molecular study. In this study, no histological parameter appeared to be the independent predictor of MSI status. The age < 63 years might predict the microsatellite instability, yet larger studies are needed for its validation. Thus, we recommend that IHC testing should be performed in all CRC cases.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA: Cancer J Clin 55(2):74–108CrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA: Cancer J Clin 55(2):74–108CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA: Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90CrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA: Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, Sidransky D, Eshleman JR, Burt RW, Meltzer SJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Fodde R, Ranzani GN, Srivastava S (1998) A national cancer institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 58(22):5248–5257PubMed Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, Sidransky D, Eshleman JR, Burt RW, Meltzer SJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Fodde R, Ranzani GN, Srivastava S (1998) A national cancer institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 58(22):5248–5257PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cicek MS, Lindor NM, Gallinger S, Bapat B, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA, Young J, Buchanan D, Walsh MD, Le Marchand L, Burnett T, Newcomb PA, Grady WM, Haile RW, Casey G, Plummer SJ, Krumroy LA, Baron JA, Thibodeau SN (2011) Quality assessment and correlation of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical markers among population- and clinic-based colorectal tumors results from the colon cancer family registry. J Mol Diagn 13(3):271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.12.004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cicek MS, Lindor NM, Gallinger S, Bapat B, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA, Young J, Buchanan D, Walsh MD, Le Marchand L, Burnett T, Newcomb PA, Grady WM, Haile RW, Casey G, Plummer SJ, Krumroy LA, Baron JA, Thibodeau SN (2011) Quality assessment and correlation of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical markers among population- and clinic-based colorectal tumors results from the colon cancer family registry. J Mol Diagn 13(3):271–281. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jmoldx.​2010.​12.​004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YH, Min BH, Kim SJ, Choi HK, Kim KM, Chun HK, Lee H, Kim JY, Chang DK, Son HJ, Rhee PL, Rhee JC, Kim JJ (2010) Difference between proximal and distal microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal cancers: analysis of clinicopathological and molecular features and prognoses. Ann Surg Oncol 17(5):1435–1441. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0888-4CrossRefPubMed Kim YH, Min BH, Kim SJ, Choi HK, Kim KM, Chun HK, Lee H, Kim JY, Chang DK, Son HJ, Rhee PL, Rhee JC, Kim JJ (2010) Difference between proximal and distal microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal cancers: analysis of clinicopathological and molecular features and prognoses. Ann Surg Oncol 17(5):1435–1441. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-009-0888-4CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP, Syngal S, de la Chapelle A, Rüschoff J, Fishel R, Lindor NM, Burgart LJ, Hamelin R, Hamilton SR, Hiatt RA, Jass J, Lindblom A, Lynch HT, Peltomaki P, Ramsey SD, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Vasen HF, Hawk ET, Barrett JC, Freedman AN, Srivastava S (2004) Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(4):261–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh034CrossRefPubMed Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP, Syngal S, de la Chapelle A, Rüschoff J, Fishel R, Lindor NM, Burgart LJ, Hamelin R, Hamilton SR, Hiatt RA, Jass J, Lindblom A, Lynch HT, Peltomaki P, Ramsey SD, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Vasen HF, Hawk ET, Barrett JC, Freedman AN, Srivastava S (2004) Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(4):261–268. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​jnci/​djh034CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh P, Sharma K, Tewari R, Misra V, Dwivedi M, Misra SP (2015) Clinico – histopathological features of colonic adenocarcinoma in young (<50 years) patients with special reference to microsatellite instability status. Indian J Med Res Pharm Sci 2:9–18 Singh P, Sharma K, Tewari R, Misra V, Dwivedi M, Misra SP (2015) Clinico – histopathological features of colonic adenocarcinoma in young (<50 years) patients with special reference to microsatellite instability status. Indian J Med Res Pharm Sci 2:9–18
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McConechy MK, Talhouk A, Li-Chang HH, Leung S, Huntsman DG, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN (2015) Detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies by immunohistochemistry can effectively diagnose the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 137(2):306–310CrossRefPubMed McConechy MK, Talhouk A, Li-Chang HH, Leung S, Huntsman DG, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN (2015) Detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies by immunohistochemistry can effectively diagnose the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 137(2):306–310CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindor NM, Burgart LJ, Leontovich O, Goldberg RM, Cunningham JM, Sargent DJ, Walsh-Vockley C, Petersen GM, Walsh MD, Leggett BA, Young JP, Barker MA, Jass JR, Hopper J, Gallinger S, Bapat B, Redston M, Thibodeau SN (2002) Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing in phenotyping colorectal tumors. J Clin Oncol 20(4):1043–1048. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.4.1043CrossRefPubMed Lindor NM, Burgart LJ, Leontovich O, Goldberg RM, Cunningham JM, Sargent DJ, Walsh-Vockley C, Petersen GM, Walsh MD, Leggett BA, Young JP, Barker MA, Jass JR, Hopper J, Gallinger S, Bapat B, Redston M, Thibodeau SN (2002) Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing in phenotyping colorectal tumors. J Clin Oncol 20(4):1043–1048. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2002.​20.​4.​1043CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Long Q, Peng Y, Tang Z, Wu C (2014) Role of endometrial cancer abnormal MMR protein in screening lynch-syndrome families. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7(10):7297–7303PubMedPubMedCentral Long Q, Peng Y, Tang Z, Wu C (2014) Role of endometrial cancer abnormal MMR protein in screening lynch-syndrome families. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7(10):7297–7303PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Luchini C, Bibeau F, Ligtenberg MJL, Singh N, Nottegar A, Bosse T, Miller R, Riaz N, Douillard JY, Andre F, Scarpa A (2019) ESMO recommendations on microsatellite instability testing for immunotherapy in cancer, and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden: a systematic review-based approach. Ann Oncol 30(8):1232–1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz116CrossRefPubMed Luchini C, Bibeau F, Ligtenberg MJL, Singh N, Nottegar A, Bosse T, Miller R, Riaz N, Douillard JY, Andre F, Scarpa A (2019) ESMO recommendations on microsatellite instability testing for immunotherapy in cancer, and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden: a systematic review-based approach. Ann Oncol 30(8):1232–1243. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdz116CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Histopathological Predictors of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer—a Tertiary Care Center Experience
verfasst von
Singh Aminder
Jindal Saveena
Soni Ankita
Kaur Harpreet
Jain Kunal
Narang Vikram
Grover Sumit
Garg Bhavna
Kaur Ramneek
Publikationsdatum
02.09.2022
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Elektronische ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01633-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.