Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2022

29.01.2022 | Original Article

Impact of the severity of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage on urinary continence following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

verfasst von: Yoichiro Tohi, Kana Kohashiguchi, Takayoshi Miura, Yasuyuki Miyauchi, Yuki Matsuoka, Takuma Kato, Rikiya Taoka, Hiroyuki Tsunemori, Nobufumi Ueda, Mikio Sugimoto

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We assessed whether the severity of anastomotic urinary leakage detected during routine cystourethrography after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) affects urinary continence recovery. Around 302 patients who underwent RALP between August 2013 and May 2019 were included retrospectively. According to routine cystourethrographic findings obtained on the sixth or eighth postoperative day, which indicated leakage severity, patients were divided into three groups: no-leakage, grade 1 (linear shaped leakage, but not spreading), and grade 2 (spreading strip-shaped leakage). The preoperative factors and intraoperative factors were compared between no-leakage and leakage group (grade 1 and grade 2). Continence recovery was compared between the three groups. Continence recovery was defined as no pad used or one security pad used in a day. Cystourethrography revealed anastomotic urinary leakage in 44 patients (14.5%), of which 20 patients (6.6%) had grade 1 leakage and 24 patients (7.9%) had grade 2 leakage. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only significant predictor for urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage on cystourethrography following RALP was intraoperative anastomotic leakage (OR 5.306; 95% CI 1.530–18.398, p = 0.009). Continence recovery rates for no-leakage, grade 1 leakage, and grade 2 leakage groups were 11%, 20%, and 25% after 1 month (P = 0.131); 25%, 25%, and 45.8% after 3 months (P = 0.474); 44.6%, 55%, and 60.8% after 6 months (P = 0.184); and 63.1%, 87.5%, and 78.2% after 12 months (P = 0.095), respectively. In conclusion, urinary leakage in urethrovesical anastomosis, even at its severity, had no negative effects on continence recovery after RALP.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Patil N, Krane L, Javed K, Williams T, Bhandari M, Menon M (2009) Evaluating and grading cytographic leakage correlation with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. BJU Int 103:1108–1110CrossRef Patil N, Krane L, Javed K, Williams T, Bhandari M, Menon M (2009) Evaluating and grading cytographic leakage correlation with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. BJU Int 103:1108–1110CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams TR, Longoria OJ, Asselmeier S, Menon M (2008) Incidence and imaging appearance of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leaks following da Vinci robotic prostatectomy. Abdom Imaging 33:367–370CrossRef Williams TR, Longoria OJ, Asselmeier S, Menon M (2008) Incidence and imaging appearance of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leaks following da Vinci robotic prostatectomy. Abdom Imaging 33:367–370CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:405–417CrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:405–417CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H, Nakamura I, Hara S, Okada H et al (2003) Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 169:2045–2048CrossRef Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H, Nakamura I, Hara S, Okada H et al (2003) Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 169:2045–2048CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Varkarakis J, Wirtenberger W, Pinggera GM, Berger A, Harabayashi T, Bartsch G et al (2004) Evaluation of urinary extravasation and results after continence-preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 94:991–995CrossRef Varkarakis J, Wirtenberger W, Pinggera GM, Berger A, Harabayashi T, Bartsch G et al (2004) Evaluation of urinary extravasation and results after continence-preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 94:991–995CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel R, Lepor H (2003) Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61:156–160CrossRef Patel R, Lepor H (2003) Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61:156–160CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsden AR, Chodak GW (2004) Can leakage at the vesico-urethral anastomosis be predicted after radical retropubic prostatectomy? BJU Int 93:503–506CrossRef Ramsden AR, Chodak GW (2004) Can leakage at the vesico-urethral anastomosis be predicted after radical retropubic prostatectomy? BJU Int 93:503–506CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobsen A, Berg KD, Iversen P, Brasso K, Røder MA (2016) Anastomotic complications after robot-assised laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol 50:274–279CrossRef Jacobsen A, Berg KD, Iversen P, Brasso K, Røder MA (2016) Anastomotic complications after robot-assised laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol 50:274–279CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lepor H, Nieder AM, Fraiman MC (2001) Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable. Urology 58:425–429CrossRef Lepor H, Nieder AM, Fraiman MC (2001) Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable. Urology 58:425–429CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Capello SA, Boczko J, Patel HR, Joseph JV (2007) Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 21:1199–1202CrossRef Capello SA, Boczko J, Patel HR, Joseph JV (2007) Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 21:1199–1202CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Akand M, Erdogru T, Avci E, Ates M (2015) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Int J Urol 22:916–921CrossRef Akand M, Erdogru T, Avci E, Ates M (2015) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Int J Urol 22:916–921CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cormio L, Di Fino G, Scavone C, Maroscia D, Mancini V, Ruocco N, et al. Prognostic factors for anastomotic urinary leakage following retropubic radical prostatectomy and correlation with voiding outcomes. Medicine(Baltimore). 2016; 95:e3475. Cormio L, Di Fino G, Scavone C, Maroscia D, Mancini V, Ruocco N, et al. Prognostic factors for anastomotic urinary leakage following retropubic radical prostatectomy and correlation with voiding outcomes. Medicine(Baltimore). 2016; 95:e3475.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Guru KA, Seereiter PJ, Sfakianos JP, Hutson AD, Mohler JL (2007) Is a cystogram necessary after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? Urol Oncol 25:465–467CrossRef Guru KA, Seereiter PJ, Sfakianos JP, Hutson AD, Mohler JL (2007) Is a cystogram necessary after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? Urol Oncol 25:465–467CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Coogan C, Little S, Birhle R, Foster RS (1997) Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomy. Urology 49:400–403CrossRef Coogan C, Little S, Birhle R, Foster RS (1997) Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomy. Urology 49:400–403CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Little J, Birhle R, Fosters R. Early urethral catheter removal following radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. Urology. 199; 46:429–431. Little J, Birhle R, Fosters R. Early urethral catheter removal following radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. Urology. 199; 46:429–431.
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of the severity of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage on urinary continence following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
verfasst von
Yoichiro Tohi
Kana Kohashiguchi
Takayoshi Miura
Yasuyuki Miyauchi
Yuki Matsuoka
Takuma Kato
Rikiya Taoka
Hiroyuki Tsunemori
Nobufumi Ueda
Mikio Sugimoto
Publikationsdatum
29.01.2022
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01357-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.