Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2022

30.04.2021 | Original Article

Influence of facial components in class III malocclusion esthetic perception of orthodontists, patients, and laypersons

verfasst von: Rosamaria Fastuca, DDS, MS, Tommaso Beccarini, DDS, MS, Ornella Rossi, DDS, Piero Antonio Zecca, DDS, MS, Alberto Caprioglio, DDS, MS

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of different facial components (face length, lip volume, nose size, and cheekbone contour) on the perception of facial attractiveness of patients with Angle class III malocclusion in different categories of responders (orthodontists, laypersons, patients) with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) simulations.

Methods

An ideal standard 3D face was manipulated to create a class III facial malocclusion. Four facial components were modified (face length, lip volume, nose size and cheekbone contour) and the resulting simulations were used to obtain 2D figures and 3D videos, which were evaluated in a survey by orthodontists, patients, and laypersons.

Results

No significant differences were detected between the 2D figures and 3D video simulations. Good correspondence was shown between the three categories of responders for the most and the least attractive faces. Smaller lips and bigger nose, regardless to the vertical dimension (short or long face), were found to be the least attractive features with agreement of all respondents.

Conclusion

Regarding class III facial attractiveness perception, the sum of all facial features and not the alteration of a single component alone seems to play a key role in the perception of facial attractiveness. The 2D or 3D perspective did not play a significant role in perception and the analyzed categories of responders did not show significant differences when perceiving facial attractiveness of the utilized simulations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnett GW, Bergman RT (1993) Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning—Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:395–411CrossRef Arnett GW, Bergman RT (1993) Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning—Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:395–411CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Prahl-Andersen B, Boersma H, Van der Linden FP, Moore AW (1979) Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 98:209–212CrossRef Prahl-Andersen B, Boersma H, Van der Linden FP, Moore AW (1979) Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 98:209–212CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Elnagar MH, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S, Khedr M, Kusnoto B, Evans CA (2017) Three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue changes associated with bone-anchored maxillary protraction protocols. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 152:336–347CrossRef Elnagar MH, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S, Khedr M, Kusnoto B, Evans CA (2017) Three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue changes associated with bone-anchored maxillary protraction protocols. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 152:336–347CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hershey HG, Smith LH (1974) Soft-tissue profile change associated with surgical correction of the prognathic mandible. Am J Orthod 65:483–502CrossRef Hershey HG, Smith LH (1974) Soft-tissue profile change associated with surgical correction of the prognathic mandible. Am J Orthod 65:483–502CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowker WD, Howard VM (1959) A metric analysis of the facial profile. Angle Orthod 29:149–160 Bowker WD, Howard VM (1959) A metric analysis of the facial profile. Angle Orthod 29:149–160
6.
Zurück zum Zitat De Lir AL, de Moura WL, Oliveira Ruellas AC, Gomes Souza MM, Nojima LI (2013) Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:296–302CrossRef De Lir AL, de Moura WL, Oliveira Ruellas AC, Gomes Souza MM, Nojima LI (2013) Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:296–302CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Cornelis MA, Heymann G, de Paula LK, De Clerck H (2011) Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:790–798CrossRef Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Cornelis MA, Heymann G, de Paula LK, De Clerck H (2011) Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:790–798CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson EK, Fields HW Jr, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel SF (2017) Role of facial attractiveness in patients with slight-to-borderline treatment need according to the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as judged by eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151(2):297–310CrossRef Johnson EK, Fields HW Jr, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel SF (2017) Role of facial attractiveness in patients with slight-to-borderline treatment need according to the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as judged by eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151(2):297–310CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fastuca R, Lorusso P, Lagravère MO, Michelotti A, Portelli M, Zecca PA, D’ Antò V, Militi A, Nucera R, Caprioglio A (2017) Digital evaluation of nasal changes induced by rapid maxillary expansion with different anchorage and appliance design. BMC Oral Health 17:113CrossRef Fastuca R, Lorusso P, Lagravère MO, Michelotti A, Portelli M, Zecca PA, D’ Antò V, Militi A, Nucera R, Caprioglio A (2017) Digital evaluation of nasal changes induced by rapid maxillary expansion with different anchorage and appliance design. BMC Oral Health 17:113CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bin Ayub F, Agarwal A, Kumar RR, Yadav A, Attri S (2019) Perception of Nasal esthetics as affecting Facial esthetics. J Dent Med Sci 18:52–60 Bin Ayub F, Agarwal A, Kumar RR, Yadav A, Attri S (2019) Perception of Nasal esthetics as affecting Facial esthetics. J Dent Med Sci 18:52–60
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF (1993) Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104:180–187CrossRef Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF (1993) Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104:180–187CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sassouni V, Nanda S (1964) Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod 50:801–823CrossRef Sassouni V, Nanda S (1964) Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod 50:801–823CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Arqoub SH, Al-Khateeb SN (2001) Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions. Eur J Orthod 33:103–111CrossRef Abu Arqoub SH, Al-Khateeb SN (2001) Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions. Eur J Orthod 33:103–111CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Todd SA, Hammond P, Hutton T, Cochrane S, Cunningham S (2005) Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions. Clinical Trial Eur J Orthod 27:363–369CrossRef Todd SA, Hammond P, Hutton T, Cochrane S, Cunningham S (2005) Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions. Clinical Trial Eur J Orthod 27:363–369CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston DJ, Hunt O, Johnston C, Burden D, Stevenson M, Hepper P (2005) The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 27:349–354CrossRef Johnston DJ, Hunt O, Johnston C, Burden D, Stevenson M, Hepper P (2005) The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 27:349–354CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin L, Jiang M, Chen W, Smales RJ, Wang Q, Tangf L (2014) Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:750–756CrossRef Yin L, Jiang M, Chen W, Smales RJ, Wang Q, Tangf L (2014) Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:750–756CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fenga J, Yub H, Yinc Y, Yand Y, Wangd Z, Baie D, Hanf X (2019) Esthetic evaluation of facial cheek volume: a study using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod 89:129–137CrossRef Fenga J, Yub H, Yinc Y, Yand Y, Wangd Z, Baie D, Hanf X (2019) Esthetic evaluation of facial cheek volume: a study using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod 89:129–137CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yua X, Liub B, Peic Y, Xud T (2014) Evaluation of facial attractiveness for patients with malocclusion. A machine-learning technique employing Procrustes. Angle Orthod 84:410–416CrossRef Yua X, Liub B, Peic Y, Xud T (2014) Evaluation of facial attractiveness for patients with malocclusion. A machine-learning technique employing Procrustes. Angle Orthod 84:410–416CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat De Smit A, Dermaut L (1984) Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 86:67–73CrossRef De Smit A, Dermaut L (1984) Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 86:67–73CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink M, Hirschfelder U, Hirschinger V, Schmid M, Spitzl C, Detterbeck A, Hofmann E (2017) Assessment of facial soft-tissue profiles based on lateral photographs versus three-dimensional face scans. J Orofac Orthop 78:70–76CrossRef Fink M, Hirschfelder U, Hirschinger V, Schmid M, Spitzl C, Detterbeck A, Hofmann E (2017) Assessment of facial soft-tissue profiles based on lateral photographs versus three-dimensional face scans. J Orofac Orthop 78:70–76CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tigue CC, Pisanski K, O’Connor JJM, Fraccaro PJ, Feinberg DR (2012) Men’s judgments of women’s facial attractiveness from two- and three-dimensional images are similar. J Vis 12:1–7CrossRef Tigue CC, Pisanski K, O’Connor JJM, Fraccaro PJ, Feinberg DR (2012) Men’s judgments of women’s facial attractiveness from two- and three-dimensional images are similar. J Vis 12:1–7CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Třebický V, Fialová J, Stella D, Štěrbová Z, Kleisner K, Havlíček J (2018) 360 degrees of facial perception: congruence in perception of frontal portrait, profile, and rotation photographs. Front Psychol 7:2405CrossRef Třebický V, Fialová J, Stella D, Štěrbová Z, Kleisner K, Havlíček J (2018) 360 degrees of facial perception: congruence in perception of frontal portrait, profile, and rotation photographs. Front Psychol 7:2405CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nanda RS, Ghosh J, Bazakidou E (1996) Three-dimensional facial analysis using a video imaging system. Angle Orthod 66:181–188PubMed Nanda RS, Ghosh J, Bazakidou E (1996) Three-dimensional facial analysis using a video imaging system. Angle Orthod 66:181–188PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Modarai F, Donaldson JC, Naini FB (2013) The influence of lower lip position on the perceived attractiveness of chin prominence. Angle Orthod 83:795–800CrossRef Modarai F, Donaldson JC, Naini FB (2013) The influence of lower lip position on the perceived attractiveness of chin prominence. Angle Orthod 83:795–800CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sforza C, Lainob A, D’Alessio R, Grandi G, Tartaglia GM, Ferruccio Ferrario V (2008) Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive and normal adolescent boys and girls. Angle Orthod 78:799–807CrossRef Sforza C, Lainob A, D’Alessio R, Grandi G, Tartaglia GM, Ferruccio Ferrario V (2008) Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive and normal adolescent boys and girls. Angle Orthod 78:799–807CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosa M, Olimpo A, Fastuca R, Caprioglio A (2013) Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics in cases with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors. Prog Orthod 1:14–34 Rosa M, Olimpo A, Fastuca R, Caprioglio A (2013) Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics in cases with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors. Prog Orthod 1:14–34
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP (1999) A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14:291–295 Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP (1999) A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14:291–295
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabré M, Mossaz C, Christou P, Kiliaridis S (2009) Orthodontists’ and laypersons’ aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 31:443–448CrossRef Fabré M, Mossaz C, Christou P, Kiliaridis S (2009) Orthodontists’ and laypersons’ aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 31:443–448CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of facial components in class III malocclusion esthetic perception of orthodontists, patients, and laypersons
verfasst von
Rosamaria Fastuca, DDS, MS
Tommaso Beccarini, DDS, MS
Ornella Rossi, DDS
Piero Antonio Zecca, DDS, MS
Alberto Caprioglio, DDS, MS
Publikationsdatum
30.04.2021
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00287-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.