Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2022

29.03.2022 | Gastrointestinal

Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm predicts postsurgical recurrence in locoregional therapy–treated hepatocellular carcinoma

verfasst von: Seo Yeon Youn, Bohyun Kim, Dong Hwan Kim, Ho Joong Choi, Pil Soo Sung, Joon-Il Choi

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

In HCC, locoregional therapy (LRT) is performed as a bridging or downstaging treatment before curative surgery. The impact of the LI-RADS Treatment Response (LR-TR) algorithm on surgical outcomes remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate radiologic and clinical factors predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after curative surgery for LRT-treated HCC.

Materials and methods

Consecutive HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation or curative resection after LRT from 2010 to 2016 and had baseline and follow-up post-LRT CT/MRI up to the point of surgery were included. The LR-TR category at the time of surgery and other features were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. RFS was estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests.

Results

We evaluated 73 patients with 115 lesions. The LR-TR viable category at the time of surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04, 14.16), preoperative AFP > 200 ng/mL (HR, 3.63; 95% CI: 1.63, 8.10), LRT sessions > 3 (HR, 4.99; 95% CI: 1.73, 14.38), and resection (HR, 3.35; 95% CI: 1.39, 8.09) independently predicted recurrence. The risk score categorized the patients into poor, intermediate, and favorable-risk groups with 1-year RFS rates of 35.0%, 78.3%, and 97.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). Outside Milan at the time of surgery (HR, 5.79; 95% CI: 1.94, 17.07) and recurrence within the first postoperative year (HR, 17.66; 95% CI: 6.42, 48.56) predicted death.

Conclusion

In LRT-treated HCC, non-LR-TR viable disease achieved within fewer LRT sessions and removed by liver transplantation recurred less.

Key Points

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response (LR-TR) viable disease (hazard ratio [HR], 3.84; p = 0.043), preoperative serum AFP level > 200 ng/mL (HR, 3.63; p = 0.002), more than three locoregional treatment (LRT) sessions (HR, 4.99; p = 0.003), and resection compared to liver transplantation (HR, 3.35; p = 0.001) were the independent predictors for postsurgical recurrence in LRT-treated HCCs.
A scoring system combining LR-TR categories and key clinical factors stratifies the patients into poor, intermediate, and favorable recurrence risk groups, with 1-year RFS rates of 35.0%, 78.3%, and 97.0%, respectively (p < 0.001).
Outside Milan at the time of surgery (HR, 5.79; p = 0.001) and recurrence within the first postoperative year (HR, 17.66; p < 0.001) were associated with poor overall survival.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018) EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182–236 European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018) EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182–236
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS et al (2018) AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 67:358–380CrossRef Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS et al (2018) AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 67:358–380CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Akateh C, Black SM, Conteh L et al (2019) Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 25:3704–3721CrossRef Akateh C, Black SM, Conteh L et al (2019) Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 25:3704–3721CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Toso C, Mentha G, Kneteman NM, Majno P (2010) The place of downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 52:930–936CrossRef Toso C, Mentha G, Kneteman NM, Majno P (2010) The place of downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 52:930–936CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita S, Aoki T, Inoue Y et al (2015) Outcome of salvage hepatic resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation therapy. Surgery 157:463–472CrossRef Yamashita S, Aoki T, Inoue Y et al (2015) Outcome of salvage hepatic resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation therapy. Surgery 157:463–472CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Imai K, Beppu T, Chikamoto A et al (2014) Salvage treatment for local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after local ablation therapy. Hepatol Res 44:E335–E345CrossRef Imai K, Beppu T, Chikamoto A et al (2014) Salvage treatment for local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after local ablation therapy. Hepatol Res 44:E335–E345CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang J, Huang W, Guo Y et al (2021) Risk factors, patterns, and long-term survival of recurrence after radiofrequency ablation with or without transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol 11:638428CrossRef Huang J, Huang W, Guo Y et al (2021) Risk factors, patterns, and long-term survival of recurrence after radiofrequency ablation with or without transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol 11:638428CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Otto G, Schuchmann M, Hoppe-Lotichius M et al (2013) How to decide about liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: size and number of lesions or response to TACE? J Hepatol 59:279–284CrossRef Otto G, Schuchmann M, Hoppe-Lotichius M et al (2013) How to decide about liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: size and number of lesions or response to TACE? J Hepatol 59:279–284CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris PD, Laurence JM, Yeo D et al (2017) Can response to locoregional therapy help predict longterm survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma? A systematic review. Liver Transplantation 23:375–385CrossRef Morris PD, Laurence JM, Yeo D et al (2017) Can response to locoregional therapy help predict longterm survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma? A systematic review. Liver Transplantation 23:375–385CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30:52–60CrossRef Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30:52–60CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincenzi B, Di Maio M, Silletta M et al (2015) Prognostic relevance of objective response according to EASL Criteria and mRECIST criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with loco-regional therapies: a literature-based meta-analysis. PLoS One:10 Vincenzi B, Di Maio M, Silletta M et al (2015) Prognostic relevance of objective response according to EASL Criteria and mRECIST criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with loco-regional therapies: a literature-based meta-analysis. PLoS One:10
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim BK, Kim SU, Kim KA et al (2015) Complete response at first chemoembolization is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 62:1304–1310CrossRef Kim BK, Kim SU, Kim KA et al (2015) Complete response at first chemoembolization is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 62:1304–1310CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Edeline J, Boucher E, Rolland Y et al (2012) Comparison of tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST in patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 118:147–156CrossRef Edeline J, Boucher E, Rolland Y et al (2012) Comparison of tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST in patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 118:147–156CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Youn SY, Kim DH, Choi SH et al (2021) Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 31:4785–4793CrossRef Youn SY, Kim DH, Choi SH et al (2021) Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 31:4785–4793CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo N, Kim MS, Park M-S et al (2020) Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017. Eur Radiol 30:261–271CrossRef Seo N, Kim MS, Park M-S et al (2020) Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017. Eur Radiol 30:261–271CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaudhry M, McGinty KA, Mervak B et al (2019) The LI-RADS version 2018 MRI treatment response algorithm: evaluation of ablated hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 294:320–326CrossRef Chaudhry M, McGinty KA, Mervak B et al (2019) The LI-RADS version 2018 MRI treatment response algorithm: evaluation of ablated hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 294:320–326CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SW, Joo I, Kim HC et al (2020) LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features. Eur Radiol 30:2861–2870CrossRef Kim SW, Joo I, Kim HC et al (2020) LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features. Eur Radiol 30:2861–2870CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta P, Bansal A, Das GC et al (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System locoregional treatment response criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 31:7725–7733CrossRef Gupta P, Bansal A, Das GC et al (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System locoregional treatment response criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 31:7725–7733CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pirasteh A, Sorra EA, Marquez H et al (2021) LI-RADS treatment response algorithm after first-line DEB-TACE: reproducibility and prognostic value at initial post-treatment CT/MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:3708–3716CrossRef Pirasteh A, Sorra EA, Marquez H et al (2021) LI-RADS treatment response algorithm after first-line DEB-TACE: reproducibility and prognostic value at initial post-treatment CT/MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:3708–3716CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ormiston WEL, Yarmohammadi H, Lobaugh S et al (2021) Post-treatment CT LI-RADS categories: predictors of overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma post bland transarterial embolization. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:3738–3747CrossRef Ormiston WEL, Yarmohammadi H, Lobaugh S et al (2021) Post-treatment CT LI-RADS categories: predictors of overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma post bland transarterial embolization. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:3738–3747CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vatcheva KP, Lee M, McCormick JB, Rahbar MH (2016) Multicollinearity in regression analyses conducted in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6:227CrossRef Vatcheva KP, Lee M, McCormick JB, Rahbar MH (2016) Multicollinearity in regression analyses conducted in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6:227CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhu J, Kim JM, Choi GS, Kwon CHD, Joh JW (2018) Continuing five or more locoregional therapies before living donor salvage liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma is related to poor recurrence-free survival. Ann Surg Treat Res 95:152–160CrossRef Rhu J, Kim JM, Choi GS, Kwon CHD, Joh JW (2018) Continuing five or more locoregional therapies before living donor salvage liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma is related to poor recurrence-free survival. Ann Surg Treat Res 95:152–160CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat DiNorcia J, Florman SS, Haydel B et al (2020) Pathologic response to pretransplant locoregional therapy is predictive of patient outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis from the US Multicenter HCC Transplant Consortium. Ann Surg 271:616–624CrossRef DiNorcia J, Florman SS, Haydel B et al (2020) Pathologic response to pretransplant locoregional therapy is predictive of patient outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis from the US Multicenter HCC Transplant Consortium. Ann Surg 271:616–624CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae JS, Lee JM, Yoon JH et al (2021) Evaluation of LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates: intraindividual comparison between CT and hepatobiliary agent–enhanced MRI. Radiology 299:336–345CrossRef Bae JS, Lee JM, Yoon JH et al (2021) Evaluation of LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates: intraindividual comparison between CT and hepatobiliary agent–enhanced MRI. Radiology 299:336–345CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Shropshire EL, Chaudhry M, Miller CM et al (2019) LI-RADS treatment response algorithm: performance and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 292:226–234CrossRef Shropshire EL, Chaudhry M, Miller CM et al (2019) LI-RADS treatment response algorithm: performance and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 292:226–234CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm predicts postsurgical recurrence in locoregional therapy–treated hepatocellular carcinoma
verfasst von
Seo Yeon Youn
Bohyun Kim
Dong Hwan Kim
Ho Joong Choi
Pil Soo Sung
Joon-Il Choi
Publikationsdatum
29.03.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08720-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2022

European Radiology 9/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.