Introduction
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is an infrequent malignant neoplasm of the major salivary glands [
1]. The majority of salivary gland tumors occur in the parotid glands. ACCs account for about 1% of all malignancies of the head and neck area [
1,
2]. The tumor is usually slow growing compared with other carcinomas, and the frequent sites of metastasis are lungs, bone, liver, and, rarely, the brain [
3]. Spinal metastasis from ACC of the salivary glands is an exceedingly rare situation, and only a few case reports exist in the literature [
3‐
5]. Here, we present two rare cases of spinal metastasis from ACC of the parotid gland. The clinical summary, imaging findings, and surgical procedures are discussed.
Discussion
In these two case reports, we have presented our experience with spinal surgery in the management of two patients who had spinal metastasis from ACC of the parotid gland. Spinal instrumentation surgery can improve the survival and overall quality of life (QoL) of patients with spinal metastasis, but a correct diagnosis is essential to delivering effective treatment. Multimodality adjuvant therapy will be helpful to improve the prognosis of such cases.
To the best of our knowledge, only one case of spinal metastasis that was reported as the first clinical sign of parotid ACC has been presented in the literature [
4]. Their patient (a 68-year-old female), like our two patients, was successfully managed by surgical procedure but radiation therapy was not performed [
4]. Researchers have suggested the posterior approach for spinal decompression when the spinal metastases have caused neurological symptoms, especially myelopathy and radiculopathy [
4]. They recommended radiation therapy in incomplete excision cases or residual disease [
4]. Due to microscopic involvement in the resected margins, we recommend radiation therapy after spine surgery even with grossly resected lesions.
MRI and/or CT should be applied to confirm suspected spinal metastasis. Myelography, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET) may be used in the surveillance of patients with suspected spinal metastasis [
6]. If tissue for pathologic diagnosis is necessary and there is no primary metastasis, a patient could benefit from a biopsy [
6]. In our two cases, the imaging modality, such as MRI, CT, and bone scan, was applied to establish a diagnosis of spinal metastasis, and vertebral biopsy was not used. Although there is no consensus on the management of the metastatic disease, complete illness control might be attained for early detection of spinal metastasis and more optimal treatment with new technology such as PET, PET/CT, and precision medicine. These technologies were not applied in this report; however, it is recommended to use new technologies, especially in developed countries.
Spinal bone metastases cause pathologic fractures, leading to back pain and nerve damage. These fractures represent significant pathology that reduces a patient’s quality of life, hence early diagnosis and suitable treatment are mandatory. Accessible treatments can be invasive or noninvasive such as chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. There is insufficient evidence for a treatment protocol to be suggested in patients with spinal metastases. The management of these patients needs a multidisciplinary team of experts including oncologists and spine surgeons. The Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanical, Systemic factors (NOMS) framework helps to make treatment decisions for cases with spinal metastatic tumors. The neurologic component includes the assessment of the grade of epidural spinal cord compression and neurological status of the patient, the oncologic component explains the radio-sensitivity of primary cancer, the mechanical evaluation of the spine determines the requirement for spinal column stabilization, and the systemic component considers the general systemic condition of the patient [
7]. In these cases, the NOMS algorithm was used to decide on surgery treatments and complementary treatments were considered.
Conclusions
Spinal metastasis may be suspected in patients with ACC of the parotid gland with signs and symptoms not explained by the primary site. Instrumentation surgery should be performed in cases with parotid ACC who develop spinal metastasis, based on the NOMS framework.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the staff of the Neurosurgery Unit and the Clinical Research and Development Center, Milad hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.