Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2021

15.06.2021 | Clinical Report

Neurofibromatosis 2: Primary Modality of Hearing Rehabilitation with Cochlear Implant

verfasst von: Dathathri Anantaramaiah Halyur, Praveen H. Rayanagoudar, Apurva Kumar, Sunil Narayan Dutt

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Auditory Brainstem Implants have been recommended as the gold standard in hearing rehabilitation of Neurofibromatosis Type 2 patients who lose hearing completely in both the ears and the cochlear nerves are not stimulable. Some patients have undergone cochlear implantation, in whom the cochlear nerve was spared during surgery or have undergone stereotactic radiotherapy preserving the function of the cochlear nerve. Here we report a case in whom we chose cochlear implantation prior to any definitive treatment for the tumour itself during the ‘wait and watch’ period. The reasons in favour of this approach have been discussed in this article. Post switch-on the implant is benefitting the patient satisfactorily and she is on regular follow up for monitoring the bilateral tumours.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans DG (2009) Neurofibromatosis 2 Bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis, central neurofibromatosis, NF2, neurofibromatosis type II. Genet Med 11:599CrossRef Evans DG (2009) Neurofibromatosis 2 Bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis, central neurofibromatosis, NF2, neurofibromatosis type II. Genet Med 11:599CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dutt SN, Kumar A (2019) The methodology and electro-physiological classification of pre-operative trans-tympanic electrically-evoked auditory brainstem response (TT-EABR). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71:1–4CrossRef Dutt SN, Kumar A (2019) The methodology and electro-physiological classification of pre-operative trans-tympanic electrically-evoked auditory brainstem response (TT-EABR). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71:1–4CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Archbold S, Lutman M, Marshall DH (1995) Categories of auditory performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 166:312–314 Archbold S, Lutman M, Marshall DH (1995) Categories of auditory performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 166:312–314
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen MC, Nikolopoulos TP, O’Donoghue GM (1998) Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 19:742–746PubMed Allen MC, Nikolopoulos TP, O’Donoghue GM (1998) Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 19:742–746PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Linthicum H, Brackmann DE (1980) Bilateral acoustic tumours. A diagnostic and surgical challenge. Arch Otolaryngol 106(12):729–733CrossRef Linthicum H, Brackmann DE (1980) Bilateral acoustic tumours. A diagnostic and surgical challenge. Arch Otolaryngol 106(12):729–733CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Abaza MM, Makariou E, Armstrong M, Lalwani AK (1996) Growth rate characteristics of acoustic neuromas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2. Laryngoscope 106:694CrossRef Abaza MM, Makariou E, Armstrong M, Lalwani AK (1996) Growth rate characteristics of acoustic neuromas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2. Laryngoscope 106:694CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Asthagiri AR et al (2012) Mechanisms of hearing loss in neurofirbomatosis type 2. PLoS ONE 7(9):e46132 Epub 2012 Sep 26CrossRef Asthagiri AR et al (2012) Mechanisms of hearing loss in neurofirbomatosis type 2. PLoS ONE 7(9):e46132 Epub 2012 Sep 26CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman RA, Kohan D, Cohen NL (1992) Cochlear implants in the management of bilateral acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 13:525–528PubMed Hoffman RA, Kohan D, Cohen NL (1992) Cochlear implants in the management of bilateral acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 13:525–528PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dewan R, Pemov A, Kim HJ et al (2015) Evidence of polyclonality in neurofibromatosis type 2-associated multilobulated vestibular schwannomas. Neuro Oncol 17:566CrossRef Dewan R, Pemov A, Kim HJ et al (2015) Evidence of polyclonality in neurofibromatosis type 2-associated multilobulated vestibular schwannomas. Neuro Oncol 17:566CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Masuda A, Fisher LM, Oppenheimer ML et al (2004) Hearing changes after diagnosis in neurofibromatosis type 2. Otol Neurotol 25:150CrossRef Masuda A, Fisher LM, Oppenheimer ML et al (2004) Hearing changes after diagnosis in neurofibromatosis type 2. Otol Neurotol 25:150CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlson ML, Breen JT, Driscoll CL, Link MJ, Neff BA, Gifford RH et al (2012) Cochlear implantation in patients with Neurofibromatosis type 2: variables affecting auditory performance. Otol Neurotol 33:853–862CrossRef Carlson ML, Breen JT, Driscoll CL, Link MJ, Neff BA, Gifford RH et al (2012) Cochlear implantation in patients with Neurofibromatosis type 2: variables affecting auditory performance. Otol Neurotol 33:853–862CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert PR, Ruth RA, Thomas JF (1992) Promontory electrical stimulation in postoperative acoustic tumour patients. Laryngoscope 102(7):814–819CrossRef Lambert PR, Ruth RA, Thomas JF (1992) Promontory electrical stimulation in postoperative acoustic tumour patients. Laryngoscope 102(7):814–819CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cueva RA, Thedinger BA, Harris JP, Glasscock ME (1992) Electrical promontory stimulation in patients with intact cochlear nerve and anacusis following acoustic neuroma surgery. Laryngoscope 102(11):1220–1224CrossRef Cueva RA, Thedinger BA, Harris JP, Glasscock ME (1992) Electrical promontory stimulation in patients with intact cochlear nerve and anacusis following acoustic neuroma surgery. Laryngoscope 102(11):1220–1224CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Neff BA, Wiet RM, Lasak JM et al (2007) Cochlear implantation in the neurofibromatosis type 2 patient: long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope 117(6):1069–1072CrossRef Neff BA, Wiet RM, Lasak JM et al (2007) Cochlear implantation in the neurofibromatosis type 2 patient: long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope 117(6):1069–1072CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, Di Trapani G, Sanna M (2008) Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation. Audiol Neurotol 13(4):273–280CrossRef Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, Di Trapani G, Sanna M (2008) Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation. Audiol Neurotol 13(4):273–280CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kida Y, Kobayashi T, Tanaka T, Mori Y (2000) Radiosurgery for bilateral neurinomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2. Surg Neurol 53:383CrossRef Kida Y, Kobayashi T, Tanaka T, Mori Y (2000) Radiosurgery for bilateral neurinomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2. Surg Neurol 53:383CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathieu D, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC et al (2007) Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: an analysis of tumor control, complications, and hearing preservation rates. Neurosurgery 60:460CrossRef Mathieu D, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC et al (2007) Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: an analysis of tumor control, complications, and hearing preservation rates. Neurosurgery 60:460CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Samii M, Matthies C, Tatagiba M (1997) Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): auditory and facial nerve function after resection of 120 vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 2. Neurosurgery 40:696–706CrossRef Samii M, Matthies C, Tatagiba M (1997) Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): auditory and facial nerve function after resection of 120 vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 2. Neurosurgery 40:696–706CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Balasubramaniam A, Shannon P, Hodaie M et al (2007) Glioblastoma multiforme after stereotactic radiotherapy for acoustic neuroma: case report and review of the literature. Neuro Oncol 9:447CrossRef Balasubramaniam A, Shannon P, Hodaie M et al (2007) Glioblastoma multiforme after stereotactic radiotherapy for acoustic neuroma: case report and review of the literature. Neuro Oncol 9:447CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wackym PA, Runge-Samuelson CL, Nash JJ et al (2010) Gamma knife surgery of vestibular schwannomas: volumetric dosimetry correlations to hearing loss suggest stria vascularis devascularization as the mechanism of early hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 31(9):1480–1487CrossRef Wackym PA, Runge-Samuelson CL, Nash JJ et al (2010) Gamma knife surgery of vestibular schwannomas: volumetric dosimetry correlations to hearing loss suggest stria vascularis devascularization as the mechanism of early hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 31(9):1480–1487CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Crane BT, Gottschalk B, Kraut M, Aygun N, Niparko JK (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1215–1220CrossRef Crane BT, Gottschalk B, Kraut M, Aygun N, Niparko JK (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1215–1220CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gubbels SP, McMenomey SO (2006) Safety study of the cochlear nucleus #24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Laryngoscope 116(6):865–871CrossRef Gubbels SP, McMenomey SO (2006) Safety study of the cochlear nucleus #24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Laryngoscope 116(6):865–871CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann R, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Goldring JE et al (1999) The influence of ionizing radiation on the CLARION 1.2 cochlear implant during radiation therapy. Am J Otol 20(1):50–52PubMed Baumann R, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Goldring JE et al (1999) The influence of ionizing radiation on the CLARION 1.2 cochlear implant during radiation therapy. Am J Otol 20(1):50–52PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ralston A, Stevens G, Mahomudally E, Ibrahim I, Leckie E (1999) Cochlear implants: response to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(1):227–231CrossRef Ralston A, Stevens G, Mahomudally E, Ibrahim I, Leckie E (1999) Cochlear implants: response to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(1):227–231CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Klenzner T, Knapp F, Rohner F et al (2005) Influence of ionizing radiation on nucleus 24 cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 26(4):661–667CrossRef Klenzner T, Knapp F, Rohner F et al (2005) Influence of ionizing radiation on nucleus 24 cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 26(4):661–667CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Neurofibromatosis 2: Primary Modality of Hearing Rehabilitation with Cochlear Implant
verfasst von
Dathathri Anantaramaiah Halyur
Praveen H. Rayanagoudar
Apurva Kumar
Sunil Narayan Dutt
Publikationsdatum
15.06.2021
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02321-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.