Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2023

27.08.2022 | Original Article

Observational Study to Determine the Involvement of Level III Lymph Nodes in Case of Clinically Positive Level II Nodes in Carcinoma Breast

verfasst von: Surjeet Dwivedi, R. Shankaran, Naresh Saidha, Rohit Sharma, Debashish Mukherjee, Sabita Dwivedi, Varun Agarwal, Amiy Arnav, Abhimanyu Chaudhary, Raj Hans

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Management of breast cancer has gradually shifted from era of radical surgery to present days of multimodality management and conservatism. Management of carcinoma breast is primarily multimodality of which surgery is one of the important roles to play. Our study is a prospective observational study to determine the involvement of level III axillary lymph nodes in clinically involved axilla with grossly involved lower-level axillary nodes. Underestimation of a number of involved nodes at level III shall result in inaccuracy of subset risk stratification leading to substandard prognostication. The enigma of not addressing presumably involved nodes thereby altering the staging vs acquired morbidity has always been a contentious issue. Mean lymph node harvest at the lower level (I and II) was 17.9 ± 6.3 (range: 6–32) while positive lower-level axillary lymph node involvement was 6.5 ± 6.5 (range: 1–27). The mean ± SD for level III positive lymph node involvement was 1.46 ± 1.69 (range: 0–8). Our prospective observational study though limited by the number and years of follow-up has demonstrated that the presence of more than three positive LN at a lower level increases the risk for higher nodal involvement substantially. It is also evident in our study that PNI, ECE, and LVI increased the probability of stage up-gradation. LVI was found to be a significant prognostic factor for apical LN involvement in multivariate analysis. On multivariate logistic regression > 3 pathological positive lymph nodes at the level I and II and LVI involvement elevated the risk of involvement at level III by 11 and 46 times, respectively. It is recommended that patients who have a positive pathological surrogate marker of aggressiveness should be evaluated perioperatively for level III involvement, especially in the setting of visible grossly involved nodes. The patient should be counseled and informed decision to perform complete axillary lymph node dissection with the added risk of morbidity should be contemplated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424CrossRefPubMed Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal G, Pradeep PV, Aggarwal V, Yip CH, Cheung PS (2007) Spectrum of breast cancer in Asian women. World J Surg. 31(5):1031–40CrossRefPubMed Agarwal G, Pradeep PV, Aggarwal V, Yip CH, Cheung PS (2007) Spectrum of breast cancer in Asian women. World J Surg. 31(5):1031–40CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kodama H, Nio Y, Iguchi C, Kan N (2006) Ten-year follow-up results of a randomised controlled study comparing level-I vs level-III axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 95(7):811–816CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kodama H, Nio Y, Iguchi C, Kan N (2006) Ten-year follow-up results of a randomised controlled study comparing level-I vs level-III axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 95(7):811–816CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Marschall J, Nechala P, Colquhoun P, Chibbar R (2003) Reassessing the role of axillary lymph-node dissection in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Can J Surg 46(4):285PubMedPubMedCentral Marschall J, Nechala P, Colquhoun P, Chibbar R (2003) Reassessing the role of axillary lymph-node dissection in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Can J Surg 46(4):285PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH et al (2022) Breast cancer, version 3. 2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 18(4):452–78CrossRef Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH et al (2022) Breast cancer, version 3. 2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 18(4):452–78CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua B, Ung O, Taylor R, Boyages J (2002) Is there a role for axillary dissection for patients with operable breast cancer in this era of conservatism? ANZ J Surg 72:786e92CrossRef Chua B, Ung O, Taylor R, Boyages J (2002) Is there a role for axillary dissection for patients with operable breast cancer in this era of conservatism? ANZ J Surg 72:786e92CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Toma S, Leonessa F, Romanini A, Badellino F, Bonassi S, Nicolo G et al (1991) Predictive value of some clinical and pathological parameters on upper level axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 11:1439e43 Toma S, Leonessa F, Romanini A, Badellino F, Bonassi S, Nicolo G et al (1991) Predictive value of some clinical and pathological parameters on upper level axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 11:1439e43
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yildirim E, Berberoglu U (2007) Lymph node ratio is more valuable than level III involvement for prediction of outcome in node-positive breast carcinoma patients. World J Surg 31:276e89CrossRef Yildirim E, Berberoglu U (2007) Lymph node ratio is more valuable than level III involvement for prediction of outcome in node-positive breast carcinoma patients. World J Surg 31:276e89CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kodama H, Nio Y, Iguchi C, Kan N (2006) Ten year follow up results of a randomized controlled study comparing level-I vs. level-III axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 95:811e6CrossRef Kodama H, Nio Y, Iguchi C, Kan N (2006) Ten year follow up results of a randomized controlled study comparing level-I vs. level-III axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 95:811e6CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Canavese G, Catturich A, Vecchio C, Tomei D, Gipponi M, Bruzzi P et al (1998) Prognostic role of lymph node level involvement in patients undergoing axillary dissection for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 24:104e9CrossRef Canavese G, Catturich A, Vecchio C, Tomei D, Gipponi M, Bruzzi P et al (1998) Prognostic role of lymph node level involvement in patients undergoing axillary dissection for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 24:104e9CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuru B, Camlibel M, Dinc S, Gulcelik MA, Alagol H (2003) Prognostic significance of axillary node and infraclavicular lymph node status after mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:839–44CrossRefPubMed Kuru B, Camlibel M, Dinc S, Gulcelik MA, Alagol H (2003) Prognostic significance of axillary node and infraclavicular lymph node status after mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:839–44CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tominaga T, Takashima S, Danno M (2004) Randomized clinical trial comparing level II and level III axillary node dissection in addition to mastectomy for breast cancer. Br J Surg 91(1):38–43CrossRefPubMed Tominaga T, Takashima S, Danno M (2004) Randomized clinical trial comparing level II and level III axillary node dissection in addition to mastectomy for breast cancer. Br J Surg 91(1):38–43CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Orang E, Marzony ET, Afsharfard A (2013) Predictive role of tumor size in breast cancer with axillary lymph node involvement-can size of primary tumor be used to omit an unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(2):717–722CrossRefPubMed Orang E, Marzony ET, Afsharfard A (2013) Predictive role of tumor size in breast cancer with axillary lymph node involvement-can size of primary tumor be used to omit an unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(2):717–722CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Montague E, Redmond C et al (1977) Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Cancer. 39(6 Suppl):2827–2839CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Montague E, Redmond C et al (1977) Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Cancer. 39(6 Suppl):2827–2839CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cools-Lartigue J, Sinclair A, Trabulsi N, Meguerditchian A, Mesurolle B, Fuhrer R, Meterissian S (2013) Preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer: predictors of accuracy and future implications. Ann Surg Oncol 20(3):819–827CrossRefPubMed Cools-Lartigue J, Sinclair A, Trabulsi N, Meguerditchian A, Mesurolle B, Fuhrer R, Meterissian S (2013) Preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer: predictors of accuracy and future implications. Ann Surg Oncol 20(3):819–827CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Joshi S, Noronha J, Hawaldar R, Kundgulwar G, Vanmali V, Parmar V, Nair N, Shet T, Badwe R (2019) Merits of level III axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer: a prospective, single-institution study from India. J Glob Oncol 5:1–8PubMed Joshi S, Noronha J, Hawaldar R, Kundgulwar G, Vanmali V, Parmar V, Nair N, Shet T, Badwe R (2019) Merits of level III axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer: a prospective, single-institution study from India. J Glob Oncol 5:1–8PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gismalla MD, Elhassan MM, Abass MO (2019) Clinical and pathological factors predicting axillary nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients of central Sudan: a single institution experience. Saudi J Health Sci 8(3):146CrossRef Gismalla MD, Elhassan MM, Abass MO (2019) Clinical and pathological factors predicting axillary nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients of central Sudan: a single institution experience. Saudi J Health Sci 8(3):146CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JM, Kim JY, Jung EJ, Kwag SJ, Park JH, Park T, Jeong SH, Jeong CY, Ju YT, Lee YJ, Hong SC (2018) The prognosis factors among breast cancer patients with extensive axillary lymph node metastasis. Korean J Clin Oncol 14(1):43–47CrossRef Kim JM, Kim JY, Jung EJ, Kwag SJ, Park JH, Park T, Jeong SH, Jeong CY, Ju YT, Lee YJ, Hong SC (2018) The prognosis factors among breast cancer patients with extensive axillary lymph node metastasis. Korean J Clin Oncol 14(1):43–47CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chisthi MM, Kuttanchettiyar KG (2016) Clinico-pathological profile of axillary lymph node status in early breast carcinoma-a tertiary care centre experience. Int Surg J 3(2):776–780CrossRef Chisthi MM, Kuttanchettiyar KG (2016) Clinico-pathological profile of axillary lymph node status in early breast carcinoma-a tertiary care centre experience. Int Surg J 3(2):776–780CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Joshi S, Noronha J, Hawaldar R, Kundgulwar G, Vanmali V, Parmar V, Nair N, Shet T, Badwe R (2019) Merits of level III axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer: a prospective, single-institution study from India. J Glob Oncol 5:1PubMed Joshi S, Noronha J, Hawaldar R, Kundgulwar G, Vanmali V, Parmar V, Nair N, Shet T, Badwe R (2019) Merits of level III axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer: a prospective, single-institution study from India. J Glob Oncol 5:1PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang B, Cao WF, Zhao HM, et al. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Clinical impact of extracapsular extension of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. 31(10):790–794. Zhang B, Cao WF, Zhao HM, et al. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Clinical impact of extracapsular extension of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. 31(10):790–794.
Metadaten
Titel
Observational Study to Determine the Involvement of Level III Lymph Nodes in Case of Clinically Positive Level II Nodes in Carcinoma Breast
verfasst von
Surjeet Dwivedi
R. Shankaran
Naresh Saidha
Rohit Sharma
Debashish Mukherjee
Sabita Dwivedi
Varun Agarwal
Amiy Arnav
Abhimanyu Chaudhary
Raj Hans
Publikationsdatum
27.08.2022
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Elektronische ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01618-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.