Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

01.08.2007 | Leitthema

Offene, laparoskopische und roboterassistierte radikale Prostatektomie im Vergleich

verfasst von: Dr. J. Walz, M. Graefen, H. Huland

Erschienen in: Die Onkologie | Ausgabe 8/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Aufgrund der heutigen Datenlage weist weder die offene noch die laparoskopische oder die roboterassistierte radikale Prostatektomie einen Vorteil gegenüber den anderen Operationstechniken auf. Der Nachbeobachtungszeitraum für die minimal-invasiven Techniken ist jedoch zu kurz, um endgültige Schlüsse bezüglich der onkologischen Ergebnisse ziehen zu können. Die funktionellen Ergebnisse wie postoperative Kontinenz und Potenz scheinen untereinander vergleichbar zu sein. Der Vergleich zwischen den Studien wird jedoch durch die fehlenden einheitlichen Definitionen der Endpunkte erschwert. Die heutige Datenlage lässt vermuten, dass vielmehr die Erfahrung und die Expertise des Operateurs und der Zentren für vorteilhafte Ergebnisse verantwortlich ist, da die meisten spezialisierten Zentren gute bis sehr gute Ergebnisse berichten. Dies unterstützt die Forderung nach der Bildung von Prostatakarzinomzentren, um Nebenwirkungen und Kosten der Behandlung gering und die Lebensqualität der Patienten nach der Operation hoch zu halten.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards RA et al. (2004) Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins. Urology 64: 1224–1228PubMedCrossRef Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards RA et al. (2004) Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins. Urology 64: 1224–1228PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R et al. (2003) Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 62: 292–297PubMedCrossRef Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R et al. (2003) Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 62: 292–297PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Artibani W, Grosso G, Novara G et al. (2003) Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur Urol 44: 401–406PubMedCrossRef Artibani W, Grosso G, Novara G et al. (2003) Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur Urol 44: 401–406PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK et al. (2006) Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 49: 866–871; discussion 871–862PubMedCrossRef Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK et al. (2006) Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 49: 866–871; discussion 871–862PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M et al. (2006) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other? Urology 68: 1077–1081PubMedCrossRef Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M et al. (2006) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other? Urology 68: 1077–1081PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Augustin H, Pummer K, Daghofer F et al. (2002) Patient self-reporting questionnaire on urological morbidity and bother after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 42: 112–117PubMedCrossRef Augustin H, Pummer K, Daghofer F et al. (2002) Patient self-reporting questionnaire on urological morbidity and bother after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 42: 112–117PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M et al. (2005) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 48: 546–551PubMedCrossRef Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M et al. (2005) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 48: 546–551PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bates TS, Wright MP, Gillatt DA (1998) Prevalence and impact of incontinence and impotence following total prostatectomy assessed anonymously by the ICS-male questionnaire. Eur Urol 33: 165–169PubMedCrossRef Bates TS, Wright MP, Gillatt DA (1998) Prevalence and impact of incontinence and impotence following total prostatectomy assessed anonymously by the ICS-male questionnaire. Eur Urol 33: 165–169PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87: 408–410PubMedCrossRef Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87: 408–410PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T et al. (2001) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 40: 65–69PubMedCrossRef Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T et al. (2001) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 40: 65–69PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cambio AJ, Evans CP (2006) Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol 50: 903–913; discussion 913PubMedCrossRef Cambio AJ, Evans CP (2006) Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol 50: 903–913; discussion 913PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS (1999) Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162: 433–438PubMedCrossRef Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS (1999) Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162: 433–438PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalona WJ, Smith DS (1998) Cancer recurrence and survival rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: intermediate-term results. J Urol 160: 2428–2434PubMedCrossRef Catalona WJ, Smith DS (1998) Cancer recurrence and survival rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: intermediate-term results. J Urol 160: 2428–2434PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun FK, Graefen M, Zacharias M et al. (2006) Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 24: 273–280PubMedCrossRef Chun FK, Graefen M, Zacharias M et al. (2006) Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 24: 273–280PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidson PJ, van den Ouden D, Schroeder FH (1996) Radical prostatectomy: prospective assessment of mortality and morbidity. Eur Urol 29: 168–173PubMed Davidson PJ, van den Ouden D, Schroeder FH (1996) Radical prostatectomy: prospective assessment of mortality and morbidity. Eur Urol 29: 168–173PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai A, Wu H, Sun L et al. (2002) Complete embedding and close step-sectioning of radical prostatectomy specimens both increase detection of extra-prostatic extension, and correlate with increased disease-free survival by stage of prostate cancer patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5: 212–218PubMedCrossRef Desai A, Wu H, Sun L et al. (2002) Complete embedding and close step-sectioning of radical prostatectomy specimens both increase detection of extra-prostatic extension, and correlate with increased disease-free survival by stage of prostate cancer patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5: 212–218PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E et al. (1996) Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 156: 1707–1713PubMedCrossRef Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E et al. (1996) Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 156: 1707–1713PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Eden CG, Cahill D, Vass JA et al. (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series. BJU Int 90: 876–882PubMedCrossRef Eden CG, Cahill D, Vass JA et al. (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series. BJU Int 90: 876–882PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Esposito M, Ahmed M, Dakwar G (2006) Pure Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Robotic Prostatectomy (EPLRP): a large series experience. AUA -abstract (1148) Esposito M, Ahmed M, Dakwar G (2006) Pure Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Robotic Prostatectomy (EPLRP): a large series experience. AUA -abstract (1148)
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Feneley MR, Gillatt DA, Hehir M, Kirby RS (1996) A review of radical prostatectomy from three centres in the UK: clinical presentation and outcome. Br J Urol 78: 911–918; discussion 919–920PubMed Feneley MR, Gillatt DA, Hehir M, Kirby RS (1996) A review of radical prostatectomy from three centres in the UK: clinical presentation and outcome. Br J Urol 78: 911–918; discussion 919–920PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Galli S, Simonato A, Bozzola A et al. (2006) Oncologic outcome and continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 3 years‘ follow-up in a „second generation center“. Eur Urol 49: 859–865PubMedCrossRef Galli S, Simonato A, Bozzola A et al. (2006) Oncologic outcome and continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 3 years‘ follow-up in a „second generation center“. Eur Urol 49: 859–865PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Geary ES, Dendinger TE, Freiha FS, Stamey TA (1995) Incontinence and vesical neck strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 45: 1000–1006PubMedCrossRef Geary ES, Dendinger TE, Freiha FS, Stamey TA (1995) Incontinence and vesical neck strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 45: 1000–1006PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Goeman L, Salomon L, La De Taille A et al. (2006) Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients. World J Urol 24: 281–288PubMedCrossRef Goeman L, Salomon L, La De Taille A et al. (2006) Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients. World J Urol 24: 281–288PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Graefen M, Walz J, Huland H (2006) Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49: 38–48PubMedCrossRef Graefen M, Walz J, Huland H (2006) Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49: 38–48PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E et al. (1999) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations. Eur Urol 36: 14–20PubMedCrossRef Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E et al. (1999) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations. Eur Urol 36: 14–20PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD et al. (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 43: 123–133PubMedCrossRef Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD et al. (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 43: 123–133PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H et al. (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169: 1261–1266PubMedCrossRef Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H et al. (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169: 1261–1266PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163: 1643–1649PubMedCrossRef Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163: 1643–1649PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR et al. (2001) Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 28: 555–565PubMedCrossRef Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR et al. (2001) Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 28: 555–565PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris MJ (2003) Radical perineal prostatectomy: cost efficient, outcome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management. Eur Urol 44: 303–308; discussion 308PubMedCrossRef Harris MJ (2003) Radical perineal prostatectomy: cost efficient, outcome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management. Eur Urol 44: 303–308; discussion 308PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinzer H, Heuer R, O VN et al. (2005) Fast-track surgery in radical retropubic prostatectomy. First experiences with a comprehensive program to enhance postoperative convalescence. Urologe A 44: 1287–1293PubMedCrossRef Heinzer H, Heuer R, O VN et al. (2005) Fast-track surgery in radical retropubic prostatectomy. First experiences with a comprehensive program to enhance postoperative convalescence. Urologe A 44: 1287–1293PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrmann TR, Rabenalt R, Stolzenburg JU et al. (2007) Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? World J Urol (in press) Herrmann TR, Rabenalt R, Stolzenburg JU et al. (2007) Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? World J Urol (in press)
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoznek A, Salomon L, Olsson LE et al. (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The Creteil experience. Eur Urol 40: 38–45PubMedCrossRef Hoznek A, Salomon L, Olsson LE et al. (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The Creteil experience. Eur Urol 40: 38–45PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Huland H (2001) Radical prostatectomy: options and issues. Eur Urol 39 [Suppl 1]: 3–9 Huland H (2001) Radical prostatectomy: options and issues. Eur Urol 39 [Suppl 1]: 3–9
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F et al. (2002) Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 167: 528–534PubMedCrossRef Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F et al. (2002) Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 167: 528–534PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacob F, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al. (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Eur Urol 37: 615–620PubMedCrossRef Jacob F, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al. (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Eur Urol 37: 615–620PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R et al. (2006) Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 175: 945–950; discussion 951PubMedCrossRef Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R et al. (2006) Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 175: 945–950; discussion 951PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kao TC, Cruess DF, Garner D et al. (2000) Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 163: 858–864PubMedCrossRef Kao TC, Cruess DF, Garner D et al. (2000) Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 163: 858–864PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleinhans B, Gerharz E, Melekos M et al. (1999) Changes of urodynamic findings after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 35: 217–221; discussion 221–212PubMedCrossRef Kleinhans B, Gerharz E, Melekos M et al. (1999) Changes of urodynamic findings after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 35: 217–221; discussion 221–212PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Leandri P, Rossignol G, Gautier JR, Ramon J (1992) Radical retropubic prostatectomy: morbidity and quality of life. Experience with 620 consecutive cases. J Urol 147: 883–887PubMed Leandri P, Rossignol G, Gautier JR, Ramon J (1992) Radical retropubic prostatectomy: morbidity and quality of life. Experience with 620 consecutive cases. J Urol 147: 883–887PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Lein M, Stibane I, Mansour R et al. (2006) Complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies-experience at the Charite Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte. Eur Urol 50: 1278–1282; discussion 1283–1274PubMedCrossRef Lein M, Stibane I, Mansour R et al. (2006) Complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies-experience at the Charite Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte. Eur Urol 50: 1278–1282; discussion 1283–1274PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT (2004) The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol 172: 1431–1435PubMedCrossRef Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT (2004) The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol 172: 1431–1435PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S et al. (2007) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51: 648–657; discussion 657–648PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S et al. (2007) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51: 648–657; discussion 657–648PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A et al. (2002) Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168: 945–949PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A et al. (2002) Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168: 945–949PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al. (2004) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 31: 701–717PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al. (2004) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 31: 701–717PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Michl UH, Friedrich MG, Graefen M et al. (2006) Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 176: 227–231PubMedCrossRef Michl UH, Friedrich MG, Graefen M et al. (2006) Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 176: 227–231PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Montorsi F, Salonia A, Suardi N et al. (2005) Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48: 938–945PubMedCrossRef Montorsi F, Salonia A, Suardi N et al. (2005) Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48: 938–945PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B et al. (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol 40: 70–74PubMedCrossRef Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B et al. (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol 40: 70–74PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174: 269–272PubMedCrossRef Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174: 269–272PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Ponholzer A, Temml C, Mock K et al. (2005) Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in 2869 men using a validated questionnaire. Eur Urol 47: 80–85; discussion 85–86PubMedCrossRef Ponholzer A, Temml C, Mock K et al. (2005) Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in 2869 men using a validated questionnaire. Eur Urol 47: 80–85; discussion 85–86PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter CR, Kodama K, Gibbons RP et al. (2006) 25-year prostate cancer control and survival outcomes: a 40-year radical prostatectomy single institution series. J Urol 176: 569–574PubMedCrossRef Porter CR, Kodama K, Gibbons RP et al. (2006) 25-year prostate cancer control and survival outcomes: a 40-year radical prostatectomy single institution series. J Urol 176: 569–574PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P (1997) Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 50: 849–853PubMedCrossRef Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P (1997) Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 50: 849–853PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D et al. (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients. J Urol 173: 761–764PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D et al. (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients. J Urol 173: 761–764PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D et al. (2004) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 14: 75–82PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D et al. (2004) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 14: 75–82PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M et al. (2003) Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169: 1689–1693PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M et al. (2003) Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169: 1689–1693PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O et al. (2001) Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 40: 54–64PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O et al. (2001) Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 40: 54–64PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T et al. (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group. Eur Urol 49: 113–119PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T et al. (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group. Eur Urol 49: 113–119PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson D, Anders K, Cardozo L, Bidmead J (2007) Outcome measures in urogynaecology: the clinicians‘ perspective. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18: 273–279PubMedCrossRef Robinson D, Anders K, Cardozo L, Bidmead J (2007) Outcome measures in urogynaecology: the clinicians‘ perspective. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18: 273–279PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG et al. (2004) Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol 172: 910–914PubMedCrossRef Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG et al. (2004) Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol 172: 910–914PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G et al. (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49: 822–830PubMedCrossRef Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G et al. (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49: 822–830PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M et al. (2003) Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World J Urol 20: 360–366PubMed Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M et al. (2003) Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World J Urol 20: 360–366PubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Rozet F, Harmon J, Cathelineau X et al. (2006) Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 24: 171–179PubMedCrossRef Rozet F, Harmon J, Cathelineau X et al. (2006) Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 24: 171–179PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F et al. (2006) Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 97: 1234–1241PubMedCrossRef Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F et al. (2006) Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 97: 1234–1241PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Salomon L, Levrel O, de la Taille A et al. (2002) Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center. Eur Urol 42: 104–110; discussion 110–101PubMedCrossRef Salomon L, Levrel O, de la Taille A et al. (2002) Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center. Eur Urol 42: 104–110; discussion 110–101PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Salonia A, Zanni G, Gallina A et al. (2006) Baseline potency in candidates for bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 50: 360–365PubMedCrossRef Salonia A, Zanni G, Gallina A et al. (2006) Baseline potency in candidates for bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 50: 360–365PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Samadi D, Levinson A, Hakimi A et al. (2007) From proficiency to expert, when does the learning curve for robotic-assisted prostatectomies plateau? The Columbia University experience. World J Urol 25: 105–110PubMedCrossRef Samadi D, Levinson A, Hakimi A et al. (2007) From proficiency to expert, when does the learning curve for robotic-assisted prostatectomies plateau? The Columbia University experience. World J Urol 25: 105–110PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Scardino PT (2005) Continuing refinements in radical prostatectomy: more evidence that technique matters. J Urol 173: 338–339PubMedCrossRef Scardino PT (2005) Continuing refinements in radical prostatectomy: more evidence that technique matters. J Urol 173: 338–339PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR (1997) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 50: 854–857PubMedCrossRef Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR (1997) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 50: 854–857PubMedCrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Slawin K, Guariguata L (2006) The influence of increasing experience and surgical technique on surgical margin status in patients undergoing open and robotic prostatectomy by a single surgeon. AUA-abstract 1164 Slawin K, Guariguata L (2006) The influence of increasing experience and surgical technique on surgical margin status in patients undergoing open and robotic prostatectomy by a single surgeon. AUA-abstract 1164
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS et al. (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. Jama 283: 354–360PubMedCrossRef Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS et al. (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. Jama 283: 354–360PubMedCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R et al. (2003) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 169: 2066–2071PubMedCrossRef Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R et al. (2003) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 169: 2066–2071PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M et al. (2005) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. J Urol 174: 1271–1275; discussion 1275PubMedCrossRef Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M et al. (2005) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. J Urol 174: 1271–1275; discussion 1275PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M et al. (2007) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases. World J Urol 25: 45–51PubMedCrossRef Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M et al. (2007) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases. World J Urol 25: 45–51PubMedCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Do M et al. (2003) Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)--technical improvements and development of a nerve-sparing, potency-preserving approach. World J Urol 21: 147–152PubMedCrossRef Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Do M et al. (2003) Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)--technical improvements and development of a nerve-sparing, potency-preserving approach. World J Urol 21: 147–152PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Su LM, Link RE, Bhayani SB et al. (2004) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique. Urology 64: 123–127PubMedCrossRef Su LM, Link RE, Bhayani SB et al. (2004) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique. Urology 64: 123–127PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan LD, Weir MJ, Kinahan JF, Taylor DL (2000) A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 85: 95–100PubMedCrossRef Sullivan LD, Weir MJ, Kinahan JF, Taylor DL (2000) A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 85: 95–100PubMedCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Talcott JA, Rieker P, Propert KJ et al. (1997) Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 1117–1123PubMedCrossRef Talcott JA, Rieker P, Propert KJ et al. (1997) Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 1117–1123PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92: 205–210PubMedCrossRef Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92: 205–210PubMedCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Touijer K, Kuroiwa K, Vickers A et al. (2006) Impact of a multidisciplinary continuous quality improvement program on the positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49: 853–858PubMedCrossRef Touijer K, Kuroiwa K, Vickers A et al. (2006) Impact of a multidisciplinary continuous quality improvement program on the positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49: 853–858PubMedCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Turk I, Deger S, Winkelmann B et al. (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases. Eur Urol 40: 46–52; discussion 53PubMedCrossRef Turk I, Deger S, Winkelmann B et al. (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases. Eur Urol 40: 46–52; discussion 53PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner A, Link R, Pavlovich C et al. (2006) Use of a validated quality of life questionnaire to assess sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 18: 69–76PubMedCrossRef Wagner A, Link R, Pavlovich C et al. (2006) Use of a validated quality of life questionnaire to assess sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 18: 69–76PubMedCrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh PC (2000) Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol 163: 1802–1807PubMedCrossRef Walsh PC (2000) Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol 163: 1802–1807PubMedCrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh PC, Donker PJ (1982) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128: 492–497PubMed Walsh PC, Donker PJ (1982) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128: 492–497PubMed
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL (2000) Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55: 58–61PubMedCrossRef Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL (2000) Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55: 58–61PubMedCrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh PC, Retik A, Vaughan E, Wein AE (2002) Anatomic radical prostatectomy. Campell’s Urology, 8th edn. pp 3107–3129 Walsh PC, Retik A, Vaughan E, Wein AE (2002) Anatomic radical prostatectomy. Campell’s Urology, 8th edn. pp 3107–3129
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei JT, Montie JE (2000) Comparison of patients‘ and physicians‘ rating of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 18: 76–80PubMed Wei JT, Montie JE (2000) Comparison of patients‘ and physicians‘ rating of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 18: 76–80PubMed
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Engl T et al. (2003) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Frankfurt technique. World J Urol 21: 128–132PubMedCrossRef Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Engl T et al. (2003) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Frankfurt technique. World J Urol 21: 128–132PubMedCrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA et al. (2007) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 51: 755–762; discussion 763PubMedCrossRef Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA et al. (2007) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 51: 755–762; discussion 763PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Offene, laparoskopische und roboterassistierte radikale Prostatektomie im Vergleich
verfasst von
Dr. J. Walz
M. Graefen
H. Huland
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Die Onkologie / Ausgabe 8/2007
Print ISSN: 2731-7226
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7234
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-007-1226-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2007

Der Onkologe 8/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Einführung zum Thema

Prostatakarzinom

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Muskeln trainieren gegen Nervenschäden durch Chemotherapie

17.07.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Chemotherapien können die Nerven schädigen und damit die Lebensqualität von Betroffenen zusätzlich einschränken. Wer aber auf die richtige Art trainiert, kann das absolute Risiko für Neuropathien um bis zu 40% senken.

Die beste Jahreszeit für eine Krebsimmuntherapie

16.07.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Schon länger ist bekannt, dass die Aktivität des Immunsystems mit den Jahreszeiten variiert. Auch die Wirksamkeit von Checkpointhemmern scheint klinisch relevanten saisonalen Schwankungen zu unterliegen, wie eine Studie bei fortgeschrittenem nichtkleinzelligem Lungenkarzinom zeigt.

Partielle Nephrektomie: Videoanalysen zur Verbesserung der chirurgischen Qualität

16.07.2024 Nephrektomie Nachrichten

Je versierter Operateurinnen und Operateure sind, desto geringer ist das Risiko für Komplikationen. Eine kleine US-Studie spricht dafür, dass das auch bei Roboter-assistierten Nephrektomien gilt – und dass sich Op.-Videos für die Beurteilung eignen.        

S3-Leitlinie Endometriumkarzinom aktualisiert

15.07.2024 Endometriumkarzinom Nachrichten

Die angepasste Version der S3-Leitlinie Endometriumkarzinom enthält unter anderem Empfehlungen zu Risikofaktoren, wie der Hormonersatztherapie, sowie darüber, wann eine vaginale Brachytherapie und wann eine Perkutanbestrahlung angebracht ist.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.