nach oben

Netherlands journal of psychology

Erschienen in:

01.12.2009 | Article

On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool

verfasst von: David De Cremer, Marius van Dijke

Erschienen in: Netherlands journal of psychology | Ausgabe 4/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This paper introduces the idea of justice as a social regulation tool to explain why justice information has such a significant impact in our social lives. Our approach holds that justice shapes people’s social self, motivations and behaviour and therefore has to be considered fundamentally social in nature. Given our unique position as social animals, it is concluded that justice as an important social concern classifies as an important regulation tool in our social lives. (Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 114-117).

Andersen, S. M., Chen, S., & Miranda, R. (2002). Significant others and the self. Self and Identity, 1, 159-168.

Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.

Carver, C. S. (2001). Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 345-356.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.

Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Yee, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium. A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.

De Cremer, D. (2003). Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair: The importance of social self-esteem concerns. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 535-550.

De Cremer, D., Brebels, L., & Sedikides, C. (2008). Being uncertain about what? Procedural fairness effects as a function of general uncertainty and belongingness uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1520-1525.

De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 151-218). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. New York / London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hoelter, J. W. (1984). Relative effects of significant others on self-evaluation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 255-262.

Johnson, R. E., Selenta, C. & Lord, G. (2006). When Organizational Justice and the Self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 199, 175-201.

Krebs, D. (1998). The evolution of moral behaviors. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 337-368). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Langendijk, G., van Dijke, M. H., & De Cremer, D. (2009). How power and trust explain procedural fairness effects on self-esteem. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 118-126.

Leary, M. (2001). The self as a source of relational difficulties. Self and Identity, 1, 137-142.

Leary, M. R. (2006). To what extent is self-esteem influenced by interpersonal as compared with intrapersonal processes? What are these processes? In: M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives. (pp. 195-200). New York: Psychology Press.

Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 32, pp.1-62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.

Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Freiberg, S. J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 167-203.

Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553.

Oreg, S., & van Dam, K. (2009). Organizational justice in the context of organizational change. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 127-135.

Pervin, L. A. (1982). The stasis and flow of behavior: Toward a theory of goals. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1-53.

Rankin, R. E., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Justice and cooperation. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 146-154.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. (2003). Portraits of the self. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology. London: Sage Publications.

Sedikides, C., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. (2008). The self in procedural fairness. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2. 2107-2124.

Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. M. (2005). What is the role of control in organizational justice? In: J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 155-178). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.

van den Bos, K., Ham, J., Lind, E. A., Sinionis, M., van Essen, W. J., Rijpkema, M. (2008). Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 201-219.

van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M.P. Zanna. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M. C., & van Beest, I. (2009). If it walks like fairness, and quacks like fairness, it sometimes is fairness: Instrumental and true fairness in bargaining. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 155-162.

Verboon, P., & Goslinga, S. (2009). The role of fairness in tax compliance. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 136-145.

Titel: On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool
verfasst von: David De Cremer
Marius van Dijke
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2009
Verlag: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Erschienen in: Netherlands journal of psychology / Ausgabe 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0028-2235
Elektronische ISSN: 0028-2235
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080133

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool

Abstract

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2009

Justice and cooperation

Organisational justice in the context of organisational change

The role of fairness in tax compliance

How power and trust explain procedural fairness effects on self-esteem

If it walks like fairness, and quacks like fairness, it sometimes is fairness: instrumental and true fairness in bargaining