Skip to main content
Erschienen in: international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 3/2011

01.11.2011 | original article

Relationship of mandibular canal to root apices of mandibular molars

Accuracy of intraoral periapical radiographs

verfasst von: Darpan Bhargava, M.D.S, MOMS RCPS (Glas), P.D.C.R., P.G.D.H.M., Ashwini Deshpande, M.D.S, PGDHSc, K. Sreekumar, M.D.S., M.F.D.S RCPS, Amrita Deshpande, M.D.S

Erschienen in: international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of the study was to assess the accuracy of intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPAR) in determining the relationship of the mandibular canal to root apices of mandibular molars.

Methods

Dry mandibles (n = 4) with intact second molars were chosen randomly and were cut into half in the midline. All eight hemimandibles were subjected to radiological evaluation using IOPARs and computed tomography scans to determine the relationship of the mandibular canal to root apices of mandibular second molar. The hemimandibles were then cut coronally in the second molar region to examine the actual relationship of the mandibular canal to the root apices. All the measurements were recorded by two maxillofacial radiologists. The variance between the three groups was estimated using analysis of variance between groups (ANOVA).

Results

The average difference of values between direct measurements and values measured on IOPARs was 0.88 ± 0.49 mm (variance = 0.24 mm) while the average difference of values between direct measurements and values measured with computed tomography scan was 0.35 ± 0.31 mm (variance = 0.096 mm).

Conclusion

Measurements on both IOPARs and computed tomography images underestimated the distance between the root apex and mandibular canal when compared to actual measured distances, although it was considerably less on the latter. Computed tomography measurements showed significantly less variance. Computed tomography is therefore a superior investigative modality although IOPARs remains more convenient.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Carmichael FA, McGowan DA. Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: a West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group Study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;30:78–82.PubMedCrossRef Carmichael FA, McGowan DA. Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: a West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group Study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;30:78–82.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:377–83.PubMedCrossRef Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:377–83.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Whaites E. Essentials of dental radiography and radiology 4th ed. Alternative and specialized imaging modalities. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone; 2007; pp. 223–44. Whaites E. Essentials of dental radiography and radiology 4th ed. Alternative and specialized imaging modalities. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone; 2007; pp. 223–44.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. Radiographic equipment and techniques used in general dental practice: a survey of general dental practitioners in England and Wales. J Dent. 2003;31:197–203.PubMedCrossRef Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. Radiographic equipment and techniques used in general dental practice: a survey of general dental practitioners in England and Wales. J Dent. 2003;31:197–203.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dula K, Mini R, Van Der Stelt PF, Buser D. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(1):80–9.PubMed Dula K, Mini R, Van Der Stelt PF, Buser D. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(1):80–9.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: a review. J Dent. 2000;28(4):219–26.PubMedCrossRef Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: a review. J Dent. 2000;28(4):219–26.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson TB. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1678–85.PubMedCrossRef Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson TB. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1678–85.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J. 2003;19:67–75.PubMed Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J. 2003;19:67–75.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Saralaya V, Narayana K. Intraosseous course of the inferior alveolar (dental) nerve and its relative position in the mandible. J Anat Soc India. 2004;53:31 (Abstr. 5). Saralaya V, Narayana K. Intraosseous course of the inferior alveolar (dental) nerve and its relative position in the mandible. J Anat Soc India. 2004;53:31 (Abstr. 5).
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28:20–5.PubMedCrossRef Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28:20–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Juodzbalys G, Hom-Lay Wang HL, Sabalys G. Anatomy of mandibular vital structures. Part I: mandibular canal and inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle in relation with dental implantology. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010;1:e-2. Juodzbalys G, Hom-Lay Wang HL, Sabalys G. Anatomy of mandibular vital structures. Part I: mandibular canal and inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle in relation with dental implantology. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010;1:e-2.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kositbowornchai S, Densiri-aksorn W, Piumthanaroj P. Ability of two radiographic methods to identify the closeness between the mandibular third molar root and the inferior alveolar canal: a pilot study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:79–84.PubMedCrossRef Kositbowornchai S, Densiri-aksorn W, Piumthanaroj P. Ability of two radiographic methods to identify the closeness between the mandibular third molar root and the inferior alveolar canal: a pilot study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:79–84.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Miloro M, DaBell J. Radiographic proximity of the mandibular third molar to the inferior alveolar canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:545–9.PubMedCrossRef Miloro M, DaBell J. Radiographic proximity of the mandibular third molar to the inferior alveolar canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:545–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Velvart P, Hecker H, Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:682–8.PubMedCrossRef Velvart P, Hecker H, Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:682–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pawelzik J, Cobnen M, Willers R, Becker J. A comparison of conventional panoramic radiographs with volumetric computed tomography images in the preoperative assessment of impacted third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:979–84.PubMedCrossRef Pawelzik J, Cobnen M, Willers R, Becker J. A comparison of conventional panoramic radiographs with volumetric computed tomography images in the preoperative assessment of impacted third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:979–84.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Denio D, Torabinejad M, Bakland LK. Anatomical relationship of the mandibular canal to its surrounding structures in mature mandibles. J Endod. 1992;18:161–5.PubMedCrossRef Denio D, Torabinejad M, Bakland LK. Anatomical relationship of the mandibular canal to its surrounding structures in mature mandibles. J Endod. 1992;18:161–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirkman TW. Statistics to use. 1996. http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/. Accessed 4 Feb. 2011. Kirkman TW. Statistics to use. 1996. http://​www.​physics.​csbsju.​edu/​stats/​.​ Accessed 4 Feb. 2011.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakagawa Y, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Kobayashi K, Ishibashi K. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1303–8.PubMedCrossRef Nakagawa Y, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Kobayashi K, Ishibashi K. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1303–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:253–9.PubMedCrossRef Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:253–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Relationship of mandibular canal to root apices of mandibular molars
Accuracy of intraoral periapical radiographs
verfasst von
Darpan Bhargava, M.D.S, MOMS RCPS (Glas), P.D.C.R., P.G.D.H.M.
Ashwini Deshpande, M.D.S, PGDHSc
K. Sreekumar, M.D.S., M.F.D.S RCPS
Amrita Deshpande, M.D.S
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2011
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1867-2221
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-223X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-011-0017-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.